Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2016; 22(19): 4707-4715
Published online May 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i19.4707
Published online May 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i19.4707
Table 1 Parameters compared between different groups
| Groups | Subgroups | Operation time(min) | Completion time (min) | Bursting pressure (cmH2O) | Anastomotic circumference (cm) | Normal circumference (cm) |
| Stent group | 71.6 ± 20.6 | 33.1 ± 18.5 | - | - | - | |
| Week 2 | 56.6 ± 16.6 | 23.6 ± 14.8 | 108.0 ± 34.9 | - | ||
| Month 3 | 86.6 ± 10.9 | 42.6 ± 18.0 | - | 7.7 ± 0.4 | 7.7 ± 0.2 | |
| Control group | 108.3 ± 27.8 | 65.5 ± 19.9 | - | - | - | |
| Week 2 | 100.8 ± 34.1 | 57.2 ± 24.3 | 97.5 ± 60.2 | - | - | |
| Month 3 | 115.8 ± 20.8 | 73.8 ± 11.5 | - | 7.1 ± 1.1 | 8.3 ± 1.1 |
- Citation: Ma L, Cai XJ, Wang HH, Yu YL, Huang DY, Ge GJ, Hu HY, Yu SC. Laparoscopic colonic anastomosis using a degradable stent in a porcine model. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(19): 4707-4715
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i19/4707.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i19.4707