Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2015; 21(8): 2425-2432
Published online Feb 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2425
Table 1 Clinical manifestations of small-volume chylous ascites following laparoscopic radical gastrectomy
Symptomn (%)
Abnormal blood leukocyte increase54 (94.7)
Abdominal pain40 (70.1)
Fever20 (35.1)
Abdominal distension19 (33.3)
Abdominal bleeding2 (3.51)
Table 2 Comparison of the variables of patients with and without small-volume chylous ascites, according to a univariate analysis
CharacteristicSVCA (n = 57)No SVCA (n = 1309)P value
Gender0.963
Male43991
Female14318
Age (yr)63.60 ± 9.34461.18 ± 11.3460.091
Preoperative anemia0.013
Present26395
Absent31914
Preoperative hypoproteinemia0.012
Present22314
Absent35995
Tumor size (cm)0.735
≥ 526627
< 531682
Tumor location0.179
Upper12303
Middle18283
Lower20609
Diffuse7114
Histology0.911
Differentiated24599
Undifferentiated33710
Tumor depth0.690
T115319
T26147
T313388
T423455
Surgical management0.481
Distal gastrectomy28603
Total gastrectomy29706
Lymph node status0.004
N012480
N19195
N216201
N320433
Resected LNs (n)35.12 ± 13.69131.35 ± 11.4940.045
Operative time (min)201.12 ± 66.076192.24 ± 84.0620.430
Table 3 Correlation between small-volume chylous ascites and perigastric lymph nodes metastasis (n)
LADG
P valueLATG
P value
SVCANo SVCASVCANo SVCA
No. 10.9690.314
+1315138
-1858133559
No. 2///0.896
+//8153
-30544
No. 30.9480.115
+722118420
-1239120277
No. 40.6920.161
+616815201
-1344423496
No. 50.4580.093
+491179
-1552137618
No. 60.3530.837
+41906119
-1542232578
No. 70.4310.505
+1679200
-1854529497
No. 80.0140.035
+7969285
-1251629412
No. 90.0170.000
+67832240
-135346457
No. 10/0.126
+//5167
-//33530
No. 110.8980.134
+2595165
-1755333532
No. 12a0.5790.182
+1545021459
-416217238
Table 4 Multivariable analysis of the factors associated with the development of small-volume chylous ascites
FactorP valueOR95%CI
Resected LNs (n)0.0102.0691.1873.605
(≥ 32 vs < 32)
No. 8 metastasis0.0392.1021.0374.261
(positive vs negative)
No. 9 metastasis0.0004.0192.0118.030
(positive vs negative)
Preoperative anemia0.4861.2470.672.321
(present vs absent)
Preoperative hypoproteinemia0.0760.5660.3021.062
(present vs absent)
N stage0.000
N1 vs N00.0531.5190.6887.426
N2 vs N00.0005.1942.24412.021
N3 vs N00.0007.3422.77419.431
Table 5 Comparison of postoperative recovery between the small-volume chylous ascites and non-small-volume chylous ascites groups
FactorSVCA (n = 57)No SVCA (n = 1309)P value
Postoperative anal exhaust (d)3.54 ± 1.2833.54 ± 1.3430.963
Postoperative food intake (d)4.19 ± 2.3264.62 ± 1.7720.078
Postoperative hospital stay (d)25.14 ± 15.69313.11 ± 5.894< 0.001
WBC count (POD1, × 109/L)12.5 ± 3.813.1 ± 4.80.376
WBC count (POD3, × 109/L)15.2 ± 2.412.2 ± 3.60.023
WBC count (POD5, × 109/L)17.6 ± 4.711.6 ± 2.20.018
WBC count (POD7, × 109/L)16.2 ± 5.810.9 ± 3.10.013
WBC count (discharge)8.1 ± 1.57.3 ± 2.20.541