Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2015; 21(6): 1857-1864
Published online Feb 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1857
Table 1 Clinical and pathological features of the concurrent carcinomas detected by computed tomography
Concurrent lesionsIncomplete colonoscopy
P valueComplete colonoscopy
P value
CT+ (n = 13)CT- (n = 16)CT+ (n = 43)CT- (n = 20)
Sex (M/F)8/511/526/1716/4
Median age (yr)63696663
Mean maximum dimension (mm)38 ± 1124 ± 50.0237 ± 1325 ± 9< 0.01
Gross appearance0.200.18
Protruding972310
Ulcerated2598
Sclerotic24112
Differentiation0.170.06
Well3498
Moderate57224
Poor55128
Location0.710.41
Ascending colon54146
Transverse colon2264
Descending colon45136
Sigmoid colon2381
Rectum0223
Colonic obstruction0.46-
Yes61000
No764320
Average distance to index tumor (cm)36.77 ± 6.8619.88 ± 4.160.0436.65 ± 3.5524.00 ± 5.110.05
Located in the same bowl segments with index tumor0.030.03
Yes3111312
No105308
Table 2 Anatomical distribution of index and concurrent cancers in this cohort
Index lesionConcurrent lesions
Ascending colonTransverse colonDescending colonSigmoid colonRectum
Incomplete group
Ascending colon61311
Transverse colon02100
Descending colon21410
Sigmoid colon10121
Rectum00010
Total94952
Complete group
Ascending colon101431
Transverse colon33201
Descending colon2712
Sigmoid colon02140
Rectum22511
Total20101995
Table 3 Overall sensitivity and specificity in the two groups
CT findingsHistological findings
Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)
PositiveNegativeTotal
Incomplete group44.8 (26.5, 64.3)93.6 (90.5, 96.0)
Positive132235
Negative16323339
Complete group68.3 (55.3, 79.4)97.0 (96.0, 97.8)
Positive435194
Negative2016351655
Total9220312123