Topic Highlight
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2015; 21(41): 11740-11747
Published online Nov 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i41.11740
Table 1 Relationship between neuroendocrine differentiation and clinico-pathological parameters
Clinical parameterLink to neuroendocrine differentiationRef.
AgeNo[39, 55, 63]
GenderNo[39, 55, 63]
Preoperative conditionsAssociation with lower CEA levels[63]
Tumor markers
DNA ploidyNo[50]
TP53 expressionNo[50, 67]
Similar abnormal expression as in conventional adenocarcinomas[25]
BCL-2 expressionYes[68]
Ki-67 labeling indexVery low (< 5%)[25]
No[24]
Tumor localizationNo[24, 25, 39, 45, 48-50, 53, 55, 63, 66]
Yes[38, 59]
Tumor morphology
Polypoid vs ulcerationNo[55, 63]
Tumor differentiationNo[24, 39, 45, 48-50, 52, 53, 63, 66]
Yes[38, 56, 57, 60, 69]
Tumor sizeNo[55, 63]
Tumor stageNo[24, 39, 45, 48-50, 53, 55, 66]
Yes[56]
Lymphatic and venous invasionNo[55, 63]
Perineural invasionNo[63]
Lymph node metastasesNo[55]
Yes[57, 58]
Distant metastasesYes[47, 51]
Clinical stageNo[53, 55]
Yes[36]
Therapy responseAssociated with better response to radiochemotherapy[25]
PrognosisNo[38, 44, 50, 53, 55, 62, 63]
Better prognosis[60]
Shorter survival from time of metastasis[24]
More aggressive behavior[48]
Poor prognosis[36, 39, 45, 46, 54, 56, 57, 59, 61 (stage II), 66 (stage III and IV), 70, 71]