Topic Highlight
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2015; 21(37): 10542-10552
Published online Oct 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10542
Table 1 Clinical presentation and preferred endoscopic management according to site of perforation[1,7,8,54]
Location of perforationClinical presentationPreferred endoscopic closure techniquesComments
EsophagusSubcutaneous emphysema, neck pain, chest pain, emesisSmall perforations (< 2 cm) can be closed with clips (TTSC or OTSC)The use of endoscopic techniques may be challenging in the proximal esophagus, due to space constraints and patient intolerance - consider conservative treatment in stable patients
Tachycardia with chills and fever suggest mediastinitis and sepsis developmentPerforations < 2 cm size with everted edges may be treated with OTSC clipsStent fixation with clip application or suturing techniques may be useful to prevent migration of the stent
Large perforations (> 2 cm) or defects associated with esophageal stenosis may be managed with fully covered and partially covered SEMS or endoscopic suturing techniquesFibrin glue application and EVAC use has been reported for closure of esophageal perforations but experiences are limited
StomachAbdominal pain, abdominal fullnessEndoscopic clipping techniques (TTSC, OTSC) are the mainstay of gastric perforation closureMost perforations of the stomach are small defects that occur during EMR, ESD procedures and can be successfully closed with TTSC.
Breathing deterioration and shock symptoms suggest development of tension pneumoperitoneumOmental patch closure technique, clipping plus endoloop or OTSC may be an option in closing large defects (> 1 cm)Closing perforations in proximal stomach may be challenging
Peritonitis and abscess formation result from leakage of gastric contentsEndoscopic suturing is an optional method especially in closing post-ESD defectsEndoscopic band ligation for gastric perforation closure has been reported but experiences are limited
Pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax are relatively rare complications of perforations in cardiac regionEndoscopic stents may be useful to treat perforations following pyloric or gastroenteric anastomosis dilation
Duodenum and biliary tractRetroperitoneal nature of the injuries may mask the severityPeri-ampullary or biliary tract perforations may be treated with biliary stent placement or TTSCThe use of transparent cap may be helpful in difficult locations
The severity of perforations varies from asymptomatic retroperitoneal air alone (which is not true perforation), to life-threatening perforations with persistent pancreatic and biliary leaks into retroperitoneal or intraperitoneal spaceLarge perforations most often require immediate surgery. However, when the defect size < 15 mm consider perforation closure with TTSC, OTSCClosure of medial duodenal wall defects with clips may be challenging due to risk of clipping the ampulla and anatomic location
Fully covered duodenal SEMS are also the therapeutic option in nonperiampullary perforationsNasoduodenal drain to divert pancreatic and biliary secretions may be beneficial
Peritonitis is a late finding associated with poor outcomeAsymptomatic patients with retroperitoneal air alone need no additional treatment
Colon, RectumAbdominal pain, abdominal fullness, subcutaneous emphysemaSmall perforations (< 2 cm) can be closed with clips (TTSC or OTSC)The success rate of endoscopic closure is higher when the perforation is recognized and closed during the same procedure, the quality of bowel preparation is good, and there is no leakage of intraluminal contents
Breathing deterioration and shock symptoms suggest development of tension pneumoperitoneumClipping plus endoloop is an option to close large colonic defectsLarge vertical perforations should be closed from top to bottom, and horizontal perforations should be clipped from left to right
Peritonitis and abscess formation are the consequence of intraluminal fecal leakageEndoscopic band ligation can also be useful to treat colonic perforations