Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2015; 21(3): 935-943
Published online Jan 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.935
Table 1 Operative procedures for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Operative modalityNumber
Hepatic resection (n = 85)
Major resection (n = 40)
Partial hepatectomy24
Right trisectionectomy1
Left trisectionectomy4
Right hemihepatectomy1
Left hemihepatectomy8
Central bisectionectomy2
Minor resection (n = 45)
Partial hepatectomy33
Right anterior sectionectomy2
Right posterior sectionectomy3
Left lateral sectionectomy4
Bisegmentectomy3
Combined resection (n = 10)
Spleen2
Gallbladder8
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for overall survival of hepatitis B virus-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients included in this study
VariablenUnivariate analysis
Multivariateanalyses
1-yr5-yrP valueHR95%CIP value
Gender0.205NANANA
Female1966%23%
Male6658%10%
Age0.769NANANA
≤ 605964%13%
> 602650%12%
Capsule formation0.522NANANA
Yes3255%10%
No5363%14%
Cirrhosis0.0021.9811.197-3.2780.008
Yes4856%0%
No3765%27%
Child-Pugh class0.257NANANA
A7661%14%
B918%0%
AFP (ng/mL)0.342NANANA
≤ 204851%11%
> 203772%15%
CA19-9 (U/mL)0.342NANANA
≤ 375566%14%
> 373050%10%
Gross type0.402NANANA
MF6361%13%
PI + IG2256%11%
Differentiation0.119NANANA
Well or Moderate6364%16%
Poor2250%0%
Tumor number< 0.0012.6531.562-4.508< 0.001
Single6069%17%
Multiple2538%0%
Tumor size0.006NANANA
< 5 cm4370%21%
≥ 5 cm4249%5%
LN metastasis0.005NANANA
Yes1131%0%
No7464%14%
Vascular invasion0.013NANANA
Yes1124%0%
No7464%14%
TNM classification< 0.001NANANA
Stage I or II6166%17%
Stage III or IV2443%0%
Width of resection margin0.274NANANA
< 1 cm3769%17%
≥ 1 cm4853%9%
Surgical procedure0.962NANANA
Major hepatectomy4061%13%
Minor hepatectomy4559%12%
Table 3 Sites of initial recurrences in hepatitis B virus-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients after curative resection
Site of initial recurrenceNo. of patients
Liver, lymph nodes6
Liver, lung1
Liver46
Lymph nodes8
Peritoneum5
Wound site1
Bone1
Lung2
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for disease-free survival in hepatitis B virus-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients included in this study
VariablenUnivariate analysis
Multivariateanalyses
1-yr5-yrP valueHR95%CIP value
Gender0.312NANANA
Female1950%0%
Male6632%4%
Age0.853NANANA
≤ 605933%1%
> 602642%5%
Capsule formation0.970NANANA
Yes3240%7%
No5333%0%
Cirrhosis0.0031.9191.153-3.1920.012
Yes4822%0%
No3752%5%
Child-Pugh class0.237NANANA
A7650%20%
B927%0%
AFP (ng/mL)0.648NANANA
≤ 204832%3%
> 203740%2%
CA19-9 (U/mL)0.189NANANA
≤ 375539%3%
> 373029%2%
Gross type0.917NANANA
MF6337%3%
PI + IG2230%0%
Differentiation0.076NANANA
Well or Moderate6342%3%
Poor2218%0%
Tumor number< 0.001NANANA
Single6048%3%
Multiple255%0%
Tumor size0.091NANANA
< 5 cm4344%1%
≥ 5 cm4227%5%
LN metastasis< 0.001NANANA
Yes110%0%
No7440%3%
Vascular invasion3.7791.601-8.9230.020
Yes11
No74
TNM classification< 0.001NANANA
Stage I or II610%0%
Stage III or IV2451%20%
Width of resection margin< 0.001NANANA
< 1 cm3749%4%
≥ 1 cm480%0%
Surgical procedure0.391NANANA
Major hepatectomy4041%2%
Minor hepatectomy4531%3%
Table 5 Comparison of the pathological factors according to the extent of lymph node dissection
VariableLND (-)LN samplingRegional LNDP value
Cirrhosis0.439
Yes171318
No18910
Gross type0.617
MF241722
PI + IG1156
Differentiation0.478
Well or Moderate251523
Poor1075
Capsule formation0.931
Yes14810
No211418
Tumor number0.512
Single271418
Multiple8810
Tumor size0.145
< 5 cm211210
≥ 5 cm141018
Pathologica LN metastasis0.085
YesNA29
NoNA2019
Vascular invasion0.181
Yes236
No331922