Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2015; 21(16): 5081-5089
Published online Apr 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.5081
Table 1 Characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis
Ref.YearCountryEthnicityCancer typeGenotyping methodSource of controlsTotal sample size (cases/controls)
Zhang et al[10]2014ChinaAsianCRCPCR-CTPPPB247/300
Li et al[12]2013ChinaAsianCRCPCR-RFLPHB451/631
Canbay et al[13]2011TurkeyCaucasianCRCPCR-RFLPPB79/247
Gu et al[14]2011ChinaAsianGCPCR-RFLPPB572/547
Li et al[15]2011ChinaAsianGCPCR-RFLPPB126/156
Canbay et al[16]2010TurkeyCaucasianGCPCR-RFLPPB40/247
Brevik et al[17]2010United StatesCaucasianCRCTaqManHB304/359
Jelonek et al[18]2010PolandCaucasianCRCPCR-RFLPPB153/273
Palli et al[19]2010ItalyCaucasianGCTaqManPB314/548
Ye et al[20]2010ChinaAsianCRCMassARRAYHB123/158
Kasahara et al[21]2008JapanAsianCRCPCR-RFLPHB68/121
Pardini et al[22]2008CzechCaucasianCRCTaqManHB532/532
Tse et al[23]2008United StatesCaucasianECTaqManHB312/454
Berndt et al[24]2007United StatesCaucasianCRCTaqManPB720/725
Berndt et al[24]2007United StatesMixedCRCTaqManPB47/48
Moreno et al[25]2006SpainCaucasianCRCArrayed primer extensionPB359/312
Hao et al[26]2004ChinaAsianECPCR-RFLPPB409/478
Table 2 Apurinic endonuclease 1 Asp148Glu polymorphism genotype distribution and allele frequency in cases and controls
Ref.Genotype (n)
Allele frequency (n)
MAF
Cases
Controls
Cases
Controls
TotalTTTGGGTotalTTTGGGTGTG
Zhang et al[10]247879070300121137412642303812190.47
Li et al[12]451123247816311863351104934097075550.45
Canbay et al[13]7928438247151633399593651290.37
Gu et al[14]3386918584362110183693233534033210.52
Li et al[15]1262664361565670301161361821300.54
Canbay et al[16]4014188247151633346343651290.42
Brevik et al[17]30410213765359108167843412673833350.44
Jelonek et al[18]113495952737014162157691631430.31
Palli et al[19]29810314748546208243953532436594330.41
Ye et al[20]12337860158521060160862101060.35
Kasahara et al[21]6823450121705109145191510.33
Pardini et al[22]5311402611305301572671065415215814790.49
Tse et al[23]31175162744541232281033123104744340.50
Berndt et al[24]6921753641537102043351717146707436770.48
Berndt et al[24]471123134818227454958360.48
Moreno et al[25]359951778731299147663673513452790.49
Hao et al[26]40912621172477149243954633555414330.43
Table 3 Meta-analysis results
ComparisonOR95%CIP valueHeterogeneity
Effects model
I2P value
G vs T1.181.05-1.320.004171%< 0.00001Random
Caucasian1.090.94-1.260.2472%0.0004Random
Asian1.271.07-1.510.007170%0.003Random
Colorectal cancer1.150.99-1.330.0673%< 0.0001Random
Gastric cancer1.411.09-1.830.009170%0.02Random
Esophageal cancer1.010.88-1.160.870%0.40Fixed
GG vs TT1.250.98-1.590.0773%< 0.00001Random
Caucasian1.040.77-1.410.8172%0.0003Random
Asian1.581.05-2.380.03176%0.002Random
Colorectal cancer1.120.79-1.590.5179%< 0.00001Random
Gastric cancer1.771.11-2.840.02163%0.04Random
Esophageal cancer1.020.77-1.350.900%0.34Fixed
TG vs TT1.281.08-1.520.004168%< 0.0001Random
Caucasian1.260.98-1.630.0776%<0.0001Random
Asian1.301.01-1.670.04163%0.01Random
Colorectal cancer1.230.98-1.540.0873%< 0.0001Random
Gastric cancer1.661.20-2.310.002151%< 0.0001Random
Esophageal cancer1.040.83-1.310.720%0.41Fixed
GG+TG vs TT1.321.10-1.570.002173%< 0.00001Random
Caucasian1.240.95-1.610.1180%< 0.00001Random
Asian1.381.07-1.780.01166%0.007Random
Colorectal cancer1.230.98-1.550.0875%< 0.0001Random
Gastric cancer1.771.40-2.24< 0.0001119%0.29Fixed
Esophageal cancer1.020.81-1.290.849%0.29Fixed
GG vs TT+TG1.100.90-1.340.3370%< 0.0001Random
Caucasian0.950.75-1.200.6664%0.004Random
Asian1.360.95-1.950.1077%0.002Random
Colorectal cancer1.050.77-1.430.7679%< 0.00001Random
Gastric cancer1.250.99-1.560.0633%0.21Fixed
Esophageal cancer0.960.75-1.210.710%0.38Fixed