Brief Article
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2014; 20(8): 2079-2084
Published online Feb 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i8.2079
Table 1 Clinical and laboratory characteristics of the study sample n (%)
CharacteristicsValue
Patients (n)91 (100)
Age (yr)53.75 ± 12
Cirrhosis etiology
Alcoholism48 (52.7)
Viral hepatitis24 (26.3)
Viral hepatitis + alcoholism3 (3.2)
Other16 (17.5)
Grading of varices
I21 (23)
II30 (32.9)
III22 (24.1)
Child–Pugh classification
A17 (18.6)
B37 (40.6)
C37 (40.6)
Table 2 Patient distribution according to the presence of esophageal varices
EV presentEV absentP value1
Platelets/μL117517 ± 50275175788 ± 884480.014
SD (average mm)148.16 ± 21.88130.61 ± 14.410.002
PC/SD ratio824.56 ± 412.271390 ± 905.490.018
Table 3 Results of the platelet count/diameter of the spleen ratio diagnostic test using the cutoff value of ≤ 884 to predict esophageal varices
EV presentEV absent
Cutoff ratio of ≤ 884 vs > 8847318
Sensitivity84%
Specificity70%
Positive predictive value94%
Negative predictive value40%
Positive likelihood ratio4.1
Negative likelihood ratio0.37