Clinical Trials Study
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2014; 20(45): 17148-17154
Published online Dec 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.17148
Table 1 Results of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation
Ref.nStudy designMean stonesize (range, mm)Mean numberof stones (range)Success in first/final session (%)Use oflithotripsy (%)
Ersoz et al[8]58Retrospective studyNANA83/1007
Minami et al[9]88Retrospective study14 (NA)2.5 (1-25)99/991
Maydeo et al[10]60Retrospective study16 (12-20)1 (median 43%)965
Heo et al[11]100Retrospective study16 (NA)2.7 (NA)83/978
Attasaranya et al[12]107Retrospective study13 (10-30)NA95/9527
Itoi et al[13]57Retrospective study15 (10-28)3.2 (1-11)96/1006
Kim et al[14]70Retrospective study13 (5-30)NA95/1002
Kurita et al[15]24Retrospective study17 (10-39)NA96/964
Kim et al[16]72Retrospective study18 (11-25)NA88/978
Stefanidis et al[17]45RCT17NA98/982
Kim et al[18]139Retrospective studyNANA76/10013
Itoi et al[19]11Retrospective study14 (7-30)5 (1-26)100/10018
Sakai et al[20]59Retrospective study15 (10-28)7.5 (1-30)83/10014
Teoh et al[21]73RCT12.5 (5-35)NA89/9729
Park et al[22]946Retrospective study14.6 (12-20)2.5 (1-15)Final 9722
Our study124Prospective study14.0 (10-25)3.9 (1-20)86/10014
Table 2 Adverse events after endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation
Ref.ComplicationsBleedingPancreatitisPerforationOthers
Ersoz et al[8]16%9%3%0%3%
Minami et al[9]6%1%1%0%4%
Maydeo et al[10]8%8%0%0%0%
Heo et al[11]8%5%4%0%0%
Attasaranya et al[12]6%2%0%1%3%
Itoi et al[13]2%0%1%0%1%
Kim et al[14]2%0%2%0%0%
Kurita et al[15]4%0%0%0%4%
Kim et al[16]10%0%2%0%7%
Stefanidis et al[17]4%2%2%0%0%
Kim et al[18]7%1%6%0%0%
Itoi et al[19]0%0%0%0%0%
Sakai et al[20]7%2%0%2%3%
Teoh et al[21]7%1%3%0%3%
Park et al[22]10%6%3%0.5%0.5%
Our study5%2%1%0%2%
Table 3 Diameter of the balloon used
Balloon sizenPercent
10-12 mm4032.3%
12-15 mm6149.2%
15-18 mm2016.1%
18-20 mm32.4%