Computed tomography colonography in 2014: An update on technique and indications

Table 1 All of the relevant data

Ref.	Year	Design	Polyp > 6 mm		Polyp > 6 mm, < 10 mm		Polyp > 10 mm		CancerSe
			Se	Sp	Se	Sp	Se	Sp
Pickhardt et al[33]	2011	Meta-analysis							96.1%
de Haan et al[4]	2011	Meta-analysis	75.9%	94.6%	68.1%	96.5%	83.3%	98.7%
Sosna et al[43]	2003	Meta-analysis			84%		88%	95%
Chaparro et al[41]	2009	Meta-analysis			63%	90%	83%	92%
Mulhall et al[44]	2005	Meta-analysis			70%	93%	85%	97%
Halligan et al[42]	2005	Meta-analysis	86%	86%			93%	97%
Rosman et al[45]	2007	Meta-analysis			63%		82%
Sosna et al[69]	2008	Meta-analysis			70.7%		82.3%	95.4%
Plumb et al[46]	2014	Meta-analysis	89.7%	74%			92%	95%	95.8%
Atkin et al[2]	2013	RCT							96.5%
Halligan et al[3]	2013	RCT							93.3%
Stoop et al[5]	2012	RCT
Johnson et al[37]	2008	Obs Multic	78%	88%			90%	86%
Regge et al[38]	2009	Obs Multic	85.3%	87.8%			90.8%	84.5%	95.1%
Neri et al[7]	2013	Obs Single	95.6%	93.9%			100%	98%
Graser et al[40]	2009	Obs Single	91.3%	93.1%			92%	97.9%
Pickhardt et al[39]	2003	Obs Single	88.7%	79.6%			93.8%	96%
Mean			86.3%	87.1%	69.8%	93.1%	88.8%	94.3%	95.4%

RCT: Randomized controlled trial.