Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2014; 20(43): 16037-16052
Published online Nov 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i43.16037
Table 1 Risk factors and causes of reactivation of chronic hepatitis B
Causes of HBV reactivationRisk factors
Male sex
Cancer chemotherapyGenotypes B and D
ImmunosuppressantsPre-core and core promoter mutations
Corticosteroid withdrawalElevated ALT at presentation
Interferon therapy
Hepatitis A/E virus superinfection
Hepatitis C virus superinfection
Hepatitis delta virus superinfection/co-infection
Interaction with HIV infection
Effect of immune reconstitution therapy
Table 2 Factors to differentiate severe acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B from acute hepatitis B
ParametersAVH-BHBV-R
IgM anti-HBc> 600 Paul Ehrlich units/mLYesYes
(7 s and 8 s forms)(19 s form)
> 1:1000 titerYesNo
HBV DNA> 2.25 × 104/mLNoYes
(121 000 copies/mL)
Liver biopsy: evidence of chronic hepatitis such as lymphocytic portal inflammation with interface hepatitis, spotty lobular inflammation, portal expansion, periportal fibrous strands, bridging fibrosis, and/or cirrhosisNoYes
Basal core promoter mutationNoYes
Pre-core stop codon mutationNoYes
Table 3 Independent prognostic factors for mortality (and liver transplantation) in severe acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B[22]
ParametersChan et al[40] 2002, J Viral HepatolYuen et al[19] 2003, Clin Infect DisChien et al[49] 2003, J HepatolTsubota et al[45] 2005, J Gastroenterol HepatolKumar et al[38] 2006, Dig Dis Sci
AgeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
SexN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
AlbuminN/AN/ALowN/AN/A
BilirubinHighHighHighHighHigh
Prothrombin TimeN/AProlongedProlongedProlongedProlonged
ALTN/AN/AN/AN/AHigh
Platelet countLowLowLowN/ANot studied
HBeAgN/AN/AN/AN/AHigh
HBV DNANot studiedN/AN/AN/AHigh
CreatinineN/AN/AN/ANot studiedNot studied
AFPNot studiedN/AN/AN/ANot studied
CirrhosisNot studiedPresentN/APresentNot studied
AscitesNot studiedNot studiedPresentN/ANot studied
CTPNot studiedNot studiedHighHighNot studied
Table 4 Studies that have provided long-term data on lamivudine treatment for severe acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B
CharacteristicsChan et al[40] 2002, J Viral HeaptWong et al[25] 2009, J Gastroenterol HepatolTsubota et al[45] 2005, J Gastroenterol HepatolKumar et al[38] 2006, Dig Dis Sci
LocationHong KongHong KongJapanIndia
Follow up2.52.82.91.5
(median, yr)
ALT (median, IU/L)175813258161658
Bilirubin (median, mg/dL)31.619.614.410.1
PT/INR (median)1.631.601.582.0
HBeAg +ve (%)01007083
HBV DNA (median, log copies/mL)6.768.088.695.135
SVR21/2621/2918/2121/31
Table 5 Summary of older studies that dealt with role of entecavir and entacavir vs lamivudine in patients of hepatitis B virus-related acute on chronic liver failure[52-55]
StudyPatient No.Drug used (no. of patients treated)Clinical implicationsSalient featuresConclusion
Chen et al[53]55EntecavirALT, albumin, bilirubin, PT; no significant change between groupsNo difference in mortality rates below 3 mo and after 3 mo, MELD not affected between groupsShort-term suppression of HBV replication offers no benefit on survival
Wong et al[56]124EntecavirTreatment achievedTongji prognostic predictor model is better than MELD in prognostication in HBV-ACLFEntecavir prevents disease progression and increases the
< 3 logs HBV DNA; significantly higher survival rate; prevention of liver or renal dysfunctionsurvival of patients with HBV-ACLF
Shouval et al[61]36 vs 117Entecavir (36); Lamivudine (117)Prolonged jaundice, encephalopathy, ascites in Entecavir groupMore liver-related mortality in entecavir group, faster virological responseShort-term mortality high in entecavir group, but faster reduction in viral load
Cui et al[58]33/34/37Entecavir (33); lamivudine (34); placebo (37)Liver function and MELD scores did not improve significantlyNo significant difference in 3-mo survival was observed, levels of HBV DNA and rates of recurrence of HBV-associated ACLF were lowerNucleoside analog treatment did not improve the short-term prognosis of patients with HBV-associated ACLF although it was efficacious and safe in the management of HBV DNA levels
Imamura et al[20]34Entecavir and lamivudine consecutivelyNo reduction of < 1 log IU/mL in HBV DNA after 1 or 3 mo of treatment. Initial virological response, with lamivudine and entecavir, respectively, was 83.3% and 100%Twelve months after treatment, 41.6% of 24 lamivudine group patients switched to another drug or added adefovir to their treatment due to the emergence of lamivudine-resistant mutantsEntecavir appears to be as effective as lamivudine in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B
Table 6 Important studies on antiviral therapy in hepatitis-B-related acute on chronic liver failure
Ref.CountryStudy designDrugs/doseNo of patients treatedEnd eventsFollow upRemarks
Yang et al[79]ChinaRCTEntecavir (0.5 mg)55Liver function, HBV DNA1 moUseful
Sun et al[50]ChinaRetrospective cohortLAM (100 mg)130Mortality, DNA, YMDD mutation3 moNot useful
Qiu et al[80]ChinaRCTTelbivudine (600 mg)30Liver function, HBV DNA1 moUseful
Cui et al[58]ChinaRetrospective cohortLAM (100 mg) or EVT (0.5 mg)67 (LAM) vs EVT (37)Mortality, MELD, HBV DNA, recurrence12 moSimilar
Zhang et al[72]ChinaObservational studyLAM (100 mg) plus Dexamethasone (10 mg/d, 5 d)56Liver function, MELD, Survival1 moUseful
Garg et al[62]IndiaRCTTenofovir (300 mg) vs placebo14 vs 27Mortality, MELD, HBV DNA3 moUseful
Chen et al[60]ChinaRetrospective cohortLAM (100 mg) or EVT (0.5 mg)72 (LAM) vs 34 (EVT)Mortality, recurrence, HBV DNA, YMDD mutation7 moSimilar
Chen et al[47]ChinaRCTLAM (100 mg) or EVT (0.5 mg)42(EVT) vs 30(LAM)HBV DNA, YMDD mutation, MELD Na7 moEvt more useful
Qin et al[81]ChinaRCTTelbivudine (600 mg)12Mortality, liver function, HBV DNA3 moUseful in renal dysfunction
Lai et al[54]ChinaRCTLAM (100 mg) or EVT (0.5 mg)93(EVT) vs 89(LAM)HBV DNA, MELD, HBeAg -ve3 moEvt useful
Chen et al[82]ChinaRCTEntecavir (0.5 mg) plus Dexamethasone (10 mg/d, 3 d)31Liver function, MELD, Mortality3 moUseful