Randomized Controlled Trial
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2014; 20(42): 15845-15851
Published online Nov 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15845
Table 1 Demographic data and indication for colonoscopy n (%)
NaP tables (n = 158)PEG solution (n = 162)P value
Mean age (yr)46.5 ± 9.848.6 ± 10.30.064
Male70 (44.3)69 (42.6)0.758
BMI23.2 ± 3.123.0 ± 3.00.628
Experience of colonoscopy67 (42.4)74 (45.7)0.555
Surgical history23 (14.6)35 (21.6)0.102
Indication for colonoscopy
Screening89 (56.3)81 (50.0)0.257
Bowel habit change9 (5.7)17 (10.5)0.116
Stool caliber change8 (5.1)6 (3.7)0.552
Melena/hematochezia13 (8.2)16 (9.9)0.608
Abdominal pain22 (13.9)10 (6.2)0.021
Anemia2 (1.3)2 (1.2)1.000
Weight loss1 (0.6)3 (1.9)0.623
P/Hx of CRN13 (8.2)17 (10.5)0.487
F/Hx of CRC07 (4.3)0.015
For polypectomy1 (0.6)3 (1.9)0.623
Table 2 Bowel preparation quality and procedure-related factors n (%)
NaP tables (n = 158)PEG solution (n = 162)P value
Bowel cleansing
Adequate147 (93.0)150 (92.6)0.877
Inadequate11 (7.0)12 (7.4)
Boston scale score
Right colon2.6 ± 0.62.5 ± 0.70.262
Transverse colon2.8 ± 0.52.7 ± 0.50.022
Left colon2.8 ± 0.52.8 ± 0.50.990
Global colon8.2 ± 1.38.0 ± 1.20.221
Cecal insertion time (min)4.5 ± 2.74.2 ± 2.60.224
Withdrawal time (min)10.5 ± 4.69.5 ± 3.60.028
Total colonoscopy time (min)15.2 ± 6.413.7 ± 5.40.023
Table 3 Detection rate of colorectal polyps and adenomas n (%)
NaP tablets (n = 158)PEG solution (n = 162)P value
Polyps regardless of size
Participants91 (57.6)81 (50.0)0.173
Polyps/patient1.3 ± 1.71.2 ± 1.80.752
Polyps diameter ≤ 5 mm
Participants76 (48.1)63 (38.9)0.096
Polyps/patient0.9 ± 1.30.8 ± 1.50.770
Polyps diameter > 5 mm
Participants43 (27.2)44 (27.2)0.991
Polyps/patient0.5 ± 1.00.4 ± 0..80.508
Adenomas regardless of size
Participants55 (34.8)57 (35.2)0.944
Polyps/patient0.7 ± 1.30.6 ± 1.10.679
Adenomas diameter ≤ 5 mm
Participants40 (25.3)39 (24.1)0.797
Polyps/patient0.4 ± 0.90.4 ± 0.80.813
Adenomas diameter > 5 mm
Participants29 (18.4)33 (20.4)0.648
Polyps/patient0.3 ± 0.70.3 ± 0.60.744
Table 4 Patient compliance, acceptability and satisfaction
NaP tabletsPEG solutionP value
(n = 158)(n = 162)
Compliance (amount of intake of cleansing agent)0.228
Optimal (100%)151 (95.6)148 (91.4)
Good (75%-100%)6 (3.8)14 (8.6)
Poor (< 75%)1 (0.6)0
Acceptability (difficulty of the preparation)< 0.001
None86 (54.4)50 (30.9)
Some59 (37.3)85 (52.5)
Much13 (8.2)27 (16.7)
Taste of the preparation< 0.001
Very bad4 (2.5)14 (8.6)
Bad26 (16.5)54 (33.3)
Neutral82 (51.9)75 (46.3)
Good38 (24.1)14 (8.6)
Very good8 (5.1)5 (3.1)
Satisfaction level (VAS)7.8 ± 2.06.5 ± 2.4< 0.001
Table 5 Incidence of adverse events n (%)
Adverse eventsNaP tablets (n = 158)PEG solution (n = 162)P value
Nausea53 (33.5)53 (32.7)0.875
Vomiting17 (10.8)17 (10.5)0.939
Abdominal pain11 (7.0)14 (8.6)0.576
Abdominal distension/bloating44 (27.8)61 (37.7)0.062
Anal irritation symptom6 (3.8)8 (4.9)0.618
Sleep disturbance3 (1.9)7 (4.3)0.336
Total100 (63.3)112 (69.1)0.269