Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2014; 20(36): 13015-13026
Published online Sep 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.13015
Table 1 Endoscopic treatment as a primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis
Treatment comparisonsNo. of trialsNumber of patientsBleeding OR (95%CI)Mortality OR (95%CI)
EVL vs NT87380.3 (0.17-0.53)0.42 (0.3-0.6)
NSBBs vs EVL1915040.66 (0.45-0.96)1.09 (0.92-1.30)
Table 2 Endoscopic treatment of acute variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis
Treatment comparisonsNumber of trialsNumber of patientsFailure to control bleeding OR (95%CI)Mortality OR (95%CI)
Vasoactive drugs vs sclerotherapy171817-0.02 (-0.06-0.02)-0.02 (-0.06-0.02)
EVL vs sclerotherapy1213090.025 (-0.004-0.046)0.013 (-0.023-0.049)
Sclerotherapy + drugs vs sclerotherapy81026-0.132 (-0.181-0.084)0.034 (-0.004-0.071)
Endoscopy + drugs vs endoscopy89391.12 (1.02-1.23)0.73 (0.45-1.18)
Sclerotherapy + drugs vs drugs4400-0.163 (-0.239-0.087)-0.055 (-0.127-0.018)
Table 3 Endoscopic treatment as a secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis
Treatment comparisonsNumber of trialsNumber of patientsRebleeding OR (95%CI)Mortality OR (95%CI)
EVL vs sclerotherapy2016340.53 (0.42-0.67)0.77 (0.59-0.99)
EVL vs NSBBs and IsMn44760.79 (0.62-1.00)0.81 (0.61-1.08)
EVL vs EVL + NSBBs99550.59 (0.41-0.85)0.71 (0.45-1.11)
EVL vs EVL + sclerotherapy85201.05 (0.67-1.64)0.99 (0.68-1.44)
TIPS vs endoscopy128830.32 (0.24-0.43)1.17 (0.85-1.61)