Brief Article
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2014; 20(3): 822-828
Published online Jan 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i3.822
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the subjects in each group n (%)
Control (n = 25)SSBE (n = 16)LSBE (n = 8)
Sex (male/female)19/615/1b8/0b
Age (yr)32 ± 738.4 ± 14.438.0 ± 14.0
BMI (kg/m2)22 ± 2.822.7 ± 3.122.2 ± 3.5
No. smokers7 (28)4 (25)4 (50)bd
No. drinkers20 (80)14 (87.6)7 (87.5)
No. Helicobacter pylori antibody positive4 (18.2)2 (12.5)0 (0)bd
No. with erosive reflux esophagitis1 (4)7 (43.8)b5 (62.5)bd
Table 2 Results of the acid perfusion test in each group
Lag time (s)Intensity rateAPSS
Control group6.1 ± 2.3162 ± 1509.0 ± 8.7
Barrett’s esophagus5.8 ± 2.2162 ± 1647.7 ± 6.1
SSBE5.7 ± 2.3199 ± 1898.8 ± 6.9
LSBE6.1 ± 2.088 ± 545.4 ± 3.3
Table 3 Frequency of primary and secondary contractions in the different groups following infusion of either physiological saline or acid
No. primary contractions
No. secondary contractions
Physiological salineAcidPhysiological salineAcid
Control group1.3 ± 3.30.3 ± 0.98.0 ± 2.88.4 ± 2.4
Barrett’s esophagus0.8 ± 1.20.7 ± 1.56.3 ± 3.17.2 ± 2.8
SSBE1.1 ± 1.40.6 ± 1.07.3 ± 3.28.1 ± 2.9
LSBE0.4 ± 0.71.0 ± 2.14.1 ± 1.2bd5.3 ± 1.2bd