Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2013; 19(45): 8382-8390
Published online Dec 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i45.8382
Table 1 Clinopathologic features of the 37 patients with esophageal adenosquamous carcinoma
GenderAge (yr)LocationLength (cm)Macroscopic tumor typepTpNOperationTreatmentResultLast follow up (mo)
M40Lt7Medullary4a1RadicalS + RD4
M51Mt7Medullary32RadicalSD19
F74Mt8Polypoid4a1RadicalSA158
M47Mt5Medullary31RadicalS + RA114
M64Mt7Medullary4a0RadicalSD2
F51Mt3Medullary30RadicalSD74
M61Ut4Medullary1b0RadicalSD45
M42Ut4Sclerotic4b0PalliativeSD20
M50Mt3Medullary30RadicalSD42
M56Mt6Ulcerative30RadicalSD21
M60Mt3Sclerotic30RadicalS + RD1140
M63Lt4Medullary31RadicalSD14
M65Mt4Sclerotic30RadicalSD26
M67Mt10Intraluminal20RadicalSD1
M72Mt4Medullary31RadicalSD11
M56Mt4Medullary31RadicalSD15
M78Mt4Medullary21RadicalSD12
F66Lt2Ulcerative21RadicalS + RD28
M50Mt7Medullary4a2RadicalS + RD11
M40Mt5Medullary1b0RadicalSD30
M53Mt6Medullary31RadicalSD25
F54Mt4Medullary30RadicalSD5
M62Mt4Medullary33PalliativeS + CD5
M63Mt4Medullary30RadicalSA85
M63Ut6Medullary30RadicalSD19
M41Mt6Medullary31RadicalS + RA80
M47Mt6Medullary30RadicalSD9
M57Mt3Polypoid20RadicalSA60
M53Mt6Medullary33RadicalSD10
M65Mt3Medullary1b0RadicalSD33
M56Mt3Medullary31RadicalS + RD32
F45Mt3Medullary30RadicalS + RL16
M63Mt7Medullary31RadicalS + RA34
M63Lt2Medullary1b3RadicalSD6
M65Mt5Medullary31RadicalS + RD20
F73Mt5Medullary31RadicalSA11
M73Lt10Medullary4a2PalliativeSD2
Table 2 Univariate analysis of the prognosis of the 37 patients with esophageal adenosquamous carcinoma
Number of patientsSurvival rate
MST (mo, 95%CI)P value
1-yr3-yr5-yr
Gender0.302
Male3164.5%25.8%18.4%20.0 (13.5-26.5)
Female683.3%55.6%55.6%74.0 (0.0-149.4)
Age (yr)0.448
≤ 601973.7%34.2%28.5%25.0 (11.6-38.4)
> 601860.6%24.2%16.2%19.0 (8.6-29.4)
Location0.031
Ut3100.0%33.3%0.0%20.0 (18.4-21.6)
Mt2968.8%34.5%30.2%25.0 (12.8-37.2)
Lt540.0%0.0%0.0%6.0 (1.7-10.3)
Length0.630
≤ 4 cm1973.7%34.4%23.0%28.0 (12.0-44.0)
> 4 cm1861.1%24.4%24.4%19.0 (7.4-30.6)
Macroscopic tumor type< 0.001
Medullary2961.9%27.3%18.2%19.0 (11.7-26.3)
Intraluminal10.0%0.0%0.0%1.0
Polyploid2100.0%100.0%100.0%-
Ulcerative2100.0%0.0%0.0%21.0
Sclerotic3100.0%33.3%33.3%26.0 (16.4-35.6)
pT category0.573
pT1475.0%25.0%0.0%30.0 (3.5-56.5)
pT2450.0%25.0%25.0%12.0 (0.0-38.5)
pT32378.3%34.5%28.8%21.0 (12.4-29.6)
pT4633.3%16.7%16.7%4.0 (0.0-14.8)
pN category0.002
pN01776.5%38.2%25.5%30.0 (12.8-47.2)
pN11477.9%31.2%31.2%25.0 (9.9-40.1)
pN2333.3%0.0%0.0%11.0 (0.0-25.4)
pN330.0%0.0%0.0%6.0 (4.4-7.6)
Adjuvant radiotherapy0.066
No2762.7%23.5%15.7%19.0 (11.7-26.3)
Yes1080.0%45.7%45.7%32.0
Operation0.025
Radical3470.5%32.2%25.0%25.0 (15.4-34.6)
Palliative333.3%0.0%0.0%5.0 (0.2-9.8)
Table 3 Multivariate Cox regression analysis for the prognosis of the 37 patients with esophageal adenosquamous carcinoma
Prognostic factorHazard ratio95%CIP value
Location2.1770.797-5.9510.129
Macroscopic tumor type1.0020.633-1.5850.995
pN category1.6560.956-2.8710.072
Adjuvant radiotherapy0.3170.114-0.8850.028
Operation3.7180.782-17.6790.099
Table 4 Comparison of clinicopathological variables between patients with esophageal adenosquamous carcinoma and those with squamous cell carcinoma
VariableASCSCC
P value
Well differentiated (n = 1011)Moderately differentiated (n = 2007)Poorly differentiated (n = 421)Total (n = 3439)
Gender0.191
Male3174814733132534
Female6263534108905
Age (yr)0.056
≤ 601967213472702289
> 60183396601511150
Location0.647
Ut312428454462
Mt2974614263032475
Lt514129764502
Tumor length0.182
≤ 4 cm193977991911387
> 4 cm1861412082302052
pT category0.409
pTis01017532
pT1a018351063
pT1b4398822149
pT2420235080632
pT32356211352321929
pT4a513927868485
pT4b1418424149
pN category0.187
pN01758710492121848
pN114235530110875
pN2315132869548
pN333810030168
Adjuvant radiotherapy1.000
No2772914652922486
Yes10282542129953
Operation0.755
Radical3494518513853181
Palliative36615636258
Table 5 Comparison of prognosis between patients with adenosquamous carcinoma and those with squamous cell carcinoma
Cases1-yr OS3-yr OS5-yr OSMST (mo, 95%CI)
Well differentiated SCC101187.5%67.1%58.9%148.0
Moderately differentiated SCC200781.0%51.5%42.5%39.0 (34.7-43.3)
Poorly differentiated SCC42172.6%37.3%27.4%22.0 (18.3-25.7)
Total SCC343981.8%54.3%45.6%46.0 (40.8-51.2)
ASC3767.5%29.4%22.9%21.0 (12.6-29.4)