Original Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2013; 19(41): 7089-7096
Published online Nov 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i41.7089
Table 1 Individual results
PatientTypeStainHistologyRefluxPatientTypeStainHistologyReflux
1VillousYesSIMYes16TubularNoInsufficiencyYes
2OvalNoCardiacNo17VillousYesSIMYes
3OvalNoCardiacNo18OvalNoFundicYes
4StraightNoFundicNo19TubularNoInsufficiencyNo
5StraightYesFundicNo20OvalYesFundicYes
6TubularNoCardiacNo21VillousYesSIMNo
7OvalNoCardiacNo22TubularNoInsufficiencyNo
8TubularYesCardiacNo23TubularYesCardiacYes
9TubularNoCardiacNo24VillousYesCardiacYes
10Small roundYesFundicNo25OvalNoCardiacYes
11TubularNoCardiacYes26VillousNoCardiacNo
12TubularNoCardiacNo27StraightNoCardiacNo
13TubularNoFundicNo28TubularNoCardiacNo
14TubularYesInsufficiencyNo29OvalYesCardiacYes
15TubularYesCardiacNo30OvalyesCardiacYes
Table 2 Relationship between specialized intestinal metaplasia and variables
VariablesSIM (+)SIM (-)Total
Reflux esophagitis2911
No-Reflux esophagitis11415
Total132326
Villous325
Non-villous02121
Total232326
MB stain3912
Non-MB stain01414
Total332326
Table 3 Diagnostic value of pit-pattern evaluation and metaplasia staining for detection of specialized intestinal metaplasia (n = 3)
TPTNP value
Pit-pattern321
MB stain314
Pit-patternMB stain
Sensitivity100.00%100.00%
Specificity91.30%60.90%0.03911
Accuracy92.30%65.40%0.03911
PPV60.00%25.00%0.16431
NPV100.00%100.00%