Review
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2012; 18(8): 736-745
Published online Feb 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i8.736
Table 1 Gem combined chemotherapy regimens
Phase III trialCombinationNo. of patientOS (mo)P valuePFS (mo)P valueRR (%)P value
Berlin et al[36]GemFU vs Gem3226.7 vs 5.40.093.4 vs 2.20.0226.9 vs 5.6NR
Riess et al[37]GemFU vs Gem4736.2 vs 5.850.68NR0.44NRNR
Cunningham et al[43]GemCap vs Gem5337.1 vs 6 .20.085.3 vs 3.80.00419.1 vs 12.40.034
Herrmann et al[41]GemCap vs Gem3198.4 vs 7.20.2344.3 vs 3.90.10310 vs 7.8NS
Colucci et al[48]GemCIS vs Gem1077.5 vs 50.434.6 vs 1.80.04826.4 vs 9.20.02
Heinemann et al[50]GemCIS vs Gem1957.5 vs 60.155.3 vs 3.10.05310.2 vs 8.2NS
Colucci et al[49]GemCIS vs Gem4008.3 vs 7.20.383.9 vs 3.80.810.1 vs 12.90.37
Louvet et al[52]GemOX vs Gem3139.0 vs 7.10.135.8 vs 3.70.0426.8 vs 17.30.04
Poplin et al[11]GemOX vs Gem8325.7 vs 4.90.092.7 vs 2.60.16 vs 90.11
Stathopoulos et al[59]GemIRI vs Gem1456.4 vs 6.50.972.8 vs 2.90.79515 vs 100.387
O’Reilly et al[61]Gem-EXE vs Gem3496.7 vs 6.20.523.7 vs 3.80.226.3 vs 4.6NR
Oettle et al[55]Gem-PEM vs Gem5656.2 vs 6.30.853.9 vs 3.30.1114.8 vs 7.10.004
Ioka et al[35]GS vs Gem45410.1 vs 8.80.155.7 vs 4.10.000129.3 vs 13.3NR
Table 2 Gem in combination with targeted therapy
Phase III trialCombinationNo. of patientOS (mo)P valuePFSP valueORR (%)P value
Moore et al[76]Gem ± Erlotinib5696.24 vs 5.910.0383.75 vs 3.550.0048.6 vs 8.0NS
Philip et al[79]Gem ± Cetuximab7456.3 vs 5.90.233.4 vs 3.00.1812 vs 140.59
Kindler et al[83]Gem ± BEV6025.8 vs 5.90.953.8 vs 2.90.0713 vs 10NS
Van Cutsem et al[84]Gem + Erlotinib ± BEV6077.1 vs 6.00.20874.6 vs 3.60.000213.5 vs 8.60.057
Goncalves et al[87]Gem ± Sorafenib1048.5 vs 9.20.1463.8 vs 5.60.601NRNR