Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2012; 18(19): 2364-2370
Published online May 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i19.2364
Table 1 Patient characteristics
Patient group
RadiotherapyBSCResectionPvalue
Cases281125
Gender (M/F)14/144/720/5
Mean age (yr)70.1 ± 9.7 (52-86)74.0 ± 9.0 (61-90)67.0 ± 9.7 (55-78)
Reason for non-resection> 0.9999
Tumor factor219-
Patient factor72-
Performance status
012317
11568
2120
TNM stage0.4953
1a007
1b221
2a103
2b118
32486
Bismuth classification0.2332
1302
2632
37610
412211
Table 2 Details of biliary drainage and anti-cancer therapy
Patient group
RadiotherapyBSCPvalue
Cases2811
Biliary metallic stenting2410
Drainage area0.0630
Bilateral142
Unilateral108
Insertion route0.0339
Endoscopic46
Percutaneous204
PTBD only31> 0.9999
No need for drainage10> 0.9999
Anti-cancer therapy
Radiotherapy28-
Extra corporeal (50 Gy)28-
Intra bile duct (24 Gy)11-
Additional chemotherapy16-
Gemcitabine1-
S-16-
5FU-based regimen9-
Table 3 Results of metallic stenting
Patient group
RadiotherapyBSCPvalue
Cases2311
Mean stent patency (d)1604 ± 78.3235 ± 53.30.0038
Median stent patency (d)1557358
Stent obstruction (%)12 (56.5)4 (36.4)0.4646
Mean patent period329.2 ± 234.8136.8 ± 147.10.1472
Cause
Tumor ingrowth910.1133
Tumor overgrowth110.5490
Sludge220.5799