Brief Article
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2010; 16(16): 2055-2060
Published online Apr 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i16.2055
Table 1 Clinical parameters of patients included in this study n (%)
CharacteristicsPatients (n = 634)
Gender
Male467 (73.6)
Female167 (26.4)
Age (yr)56.1 ± 12.1
Tumor size (cm)4.3 ± 1.7
Tumor location
Lower521 (80.8)
Middle71 (11.2)
Lower and middle42 (8.0)
Digestive tract construction
Billroth I469 (74.0)
Billroth II148 (22.3)
Roux-en-Y17 (3.7)
Pathology
Differentiated140 (22.1)
Undifferentiated494 (77.9)
Depth of invasion
pT1118 (18.6)
pT2174 (27.4)
pT3342 (54.0)
pN category
pN0195 (30.8)
pN1232 (36.6)
pN2156 (24.6)
pN351 (8.0)
rN category
rN0195 (30.8)
rN1172 (27.1)
rN2156 (24.6)
rN3111 (17.5)
Number of resected LNs23.1 ± 8.6
Table 2 Univariate analysis of variables for gastric cancer patients after curative distal gastrectomy
Parametersn5-yr survival (%)χ2P
Gender< 0.0010.991
Male46758.1
Female16756.3
Age (yr)0.6410.423
< 6037058.9
≥ 6026456.0
Tumor size (cm)4.4090.036
≤ 434361.0
> 429153.6
Tumor location5.6930.058
Lower52157.7
Middle7163.7
Lower and Middle4245.4
Digestive tract construction5.5080.064
Billroth I46960.7
Billroth II14848.5
Roux-en-Y1751.0
Pathology9.1350.003
Differentiated14068.1
Undifferentiated49454.6
Depth of invasion70.4660.000
pT111890.6
pT217464.4
pT334242.9
pN category142.2790.000
pN019583.3
pN123259.3
pN215633.9
pN35120.0
rN category217.4940.000
rN019583.3
rN117268.6
rN215640.7
rN311117.2
Table 3 Multiple stepwise regression analysis with the Cox proportional hazards model
ParametersβSEWaldPRR95% CI
rN excluded
Tumor size-0.0250.1170.0450.8320.9760.776-1.227
Pathology0.0000.1610.0000.9991.0000.730-1.370
Depth of invasion27.1440.000
pT2 vs pT10.9560.25913.590.0002.6011.565-4.325
pT3 vs pT11.2530.24725.6680.0003.5002.156-5.683
pN category20.5720.000
pN1 vs pN00.5560.1888.7540.0031.7341.206-2.519
pN2 vs pN00.8290.20316.6730.0002.2911.539-3.410
pN3 vs pN01.020.24816.9160.0002.7721.705-4.507
rN included
Tumor size-0.0330.1170.0780.7790.9680.769-1.218
Pathology0.0110.1610.0050.9451.0110.738-1.385
Depth of invasion24.3880.000
pT2 vs pT10.9080.26311.9740.0012.481.483-4.149
pT3 vs pT11.2060.25222.8270.0003.342.036-5.477
rN category17.9270.000
rN1 vs rN00.5020.1996.3490.0121.6511.118-2.440
rN2 vs rN00.8420.20516.9280.0002.3221.554-3.468
rN3 vs rN00.8670.23413.7580.0002.3801.505-3.763
Table 4 Comparison of survival rates for patients classified by rN category or by pN category
N stagenrN1
rN2
rN3
P
nOS (%)nOS (%)nOS (%)
pN123216968.65436.3922.20.000
pN2156366.79540.85820.40.007
pN351NANA757.44411.60.012
Table 5 Comparison of survival rates for patients classified by pN category or by rN category
N stagenpN1
pN2
pN3
P
nOS (%)nOS (%)nOS (%)
rN114716968.6366.7NANA0.638
rN21565436.39540.8757.40.188
rN351922.25820.44411.60.257