Original Article
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2010; 16(10): 1201-1208
Published online Mar 14, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i10.1201
Table 1 Comparison of GATA-4 and GATA-5 methylation status with clinicopathological characteristics of SGC
Clinicopathological characteristicsMethylation positive rate (%)
GATA-4
GATA-5
SGCNSGCN
SGC invasion
T1&T2 (n = 20)45.0a35.0b45.045.0
T3 (n = 50)54.042.068.048.0
T4 (n = 10)70.050.060.040.0
Metastasis
Yes (n = 44)52.331.861.436.4
No (n = 36)55.652.861.138.9
H. pylori infection
Positive (n = 42)61.945.264.350.0
Negative (n = 34)41.238.255.944.1
Age (yr)
≤ 59 (n = 42)45.233.357.128.6
≥ 60 (n = 38)63.250.065.865.8c
Sex
Male (n = 62)51.641.961.351.6
Female (n = 18)61.138.961.127.6d
Total
n = 8053.841.361.346.3e
Table 2 GATA-4 and GATA-5 methylation frequency (%) in gastric dysplasia lesions in subjects from Linqu County, a high risk area for stomach cancer
Classification of gastric dysplasiaGATA-4GATA-5
Low-grade noninvasive neoplasia57.1 (16/28)69.0 (20/29)
Hp-infection
With71.4 (15/21)63.6 (14/22)
Without14.3 (1/7)a85.7 (6/7)
Indefinite for dysplasiab42.9 (30/70)46.7 (35/75)c
Total46.9 (46/98)52.9 (55/104)
Table 3 Correlation of the GATA-4 and GATA-5 methylation status with their protein expression in sporadic gastric carcinomas with IHC
Protein expression, by IHCGATA-4 methylation status
GATA-5 methylation status
MUP-valueaMUP-value
Positive (+ ~ +++)7110.012590.011
Negative (- ~ ±)113163