Brief Articles
Copyright ©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2009; 15(37): 4709-4714
Published online Oct 7, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4709
Table 1 Distribution of 1348 TIVADs and average catheter-indwelling-days
n (%)Median (range)
Sex
Male842 (62)151 (60 337)
Female506 (38)228 (88 473)
Origin of patient
Inpatients967 (72)157 (60 358)
Outpatients381 (28)217 (93 455)
Type of malignancy
Hematogenous76 (6)148 (61 303)
Solid1272 (94)180 (70 403)
Type of catheter
Groshong830 (61)218 (81 478)
Open-ended518 (39)143 (55 280)
Total1348 (100)178 (70 399)
Table 2 Primary malignancy in 1280 patients with 1348 TIVADs for long-term intravenous chemotherapy n (%)
MalignancyPatientsTIVADs
Colorectal354 (27.7)359 (26.6)
Lung348 (27.2)367 (27.2)
Head and Neck139 (10.8)150 (11.1)
Breast103 (8.0)109 (8.1)
Gastric78 (6.1)91 (6.8)
Hematogenous70 (5.5)76 (5.6)
H-B-P69 (5.5)72 (5.4)
Esophageal41 (3.2)43 (3.2)
Urologic40 (3.1)40 (3.0)
Gynecologic12 (0.9)14 (1.0)
Others126 (2.0)27 (2.0)
Total1280 (100)1348 (100)
Table 3 Insertion site, surgical procedure and catheter type n (%)
SiteSurgical procedureOpen-ended catheterGroshong catheterTotal
Cephalic veinCutdown
Right287620907 (67.3)
Left11182193 (14.3)
Subclavian veinPuncture
Right5487141 (10.5)
Left381755 (4.1)
Internal jugular vein
Right819 (0.7)
Left011 (0.1)
External jugular vein
Right4711 (0.8)
Left022 (0.1)
Femoral vein
Right14923 (1.7)
Left246 (0.4)
Total5188301348
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for TIVAD failure
Univariate hazard ratio95% CIP valueMultivariate hazard ratio95% CIP value
Age (yr)1.0091.002-1.0150.0061.0091.003-1.0160.003
Sex
Male1.631.373-1.936< 0.0011.5661.318-1.861< 0.001
Female1
Origin of patients
Inpatient1
Outpatient0.9260.779-1.1000.385
Type of catheter
Groshong1
Open-ended1.7191.461-2.023< 0.0011.6891.435-1.989< 0.001
Insertion site
RCV0.8910.754-1.0530.179
Others11
Type of malignancy
Solid1
Hematogenous1.3360.966-1.8490.0801.4991.079-2.0830.016
Table 5 Comparisons of adverse events for open-ended vs Groshong catheter and solid vs hematogenous malignancy
Open-ended catheter (n = 518)Groshong catheter (n = 830)P value1Solid malignancy (n = 1272)Hematogenous malignancy (n = 76)P value1
Infection14 , 2.7% (0.130)26, 3.1% (0.099)0.65132, 2.5% (0.091)8, 10.5% (0.456)< 0.001
Thrombosis26, 5% (0.242)21, 2.5% (0.080)0.01546, 3.6% (0.131)1, 1.3% (0.057)0.515
Surgical complication9, 1.7% (0.083)6, 0.7% (0.022)0.08412, 0.9% (0.034)3, 3.9% (0.171)0.048