Brief Articles
Copyright ©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2009; 15(23): 2882-2886
Published online Jun 21, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2882
Table 1 Prevalence of patient characteristics among patient’s who were and were not truant for scheduled endoscopic procedure
FactorNumber of patients (n)
Control group1No-showTotal patients evaluated
Urgent procedureNo219198417
Yes9950149
Direct to endoscopyNo235187422
Yes8175156
Referring doctorNo referral91726
GP293235528
Specialist193352
SexFemale176152328
Male150133283
Time of procedure7:30-10:0012587212
10:00-12:30115106221
12:30-15:008692178
Type of procedureColonoscopy177129306
EGD109107216
Flex-sig404989
WeekdayMonday5361114
Tuesday5865123
Wednesday7256128
Thursday7361134
Friday7042112
Distance living from hospitalWithin 10 miles201194395
Within 60 miles10674180
Beyond 60 miles181331
Previous endoscopyNo132104236
Yes184144328
New patientNo153135288
Yes161133294
Table 2 Univariate analysis of patient characteristics and their predictive value for patient absenteeism from scheduled endoscopic procedure
ComparisonOR95% CIP-value
UrgencyNon-urgent vs urgent1.7901.211, 2.6450.0035
Direct to endoscopyNot direct vs direct0.8590.595, 1.2420.4199
Referring physicianSpecialist vs GP2.1651.200, 3.9060.0063
No referral vs GP2.3551.031, 5.379
AgeIncrements of 10 years0.9120.823, 1.0100.0757
SexFemale vs male0.9740.708, 1.3400.8714
Time of procedure7:30-10:00 vs 12:30-15:000.6510.423, 1.0010.0835
10-12:30 vs 12:30-15:000.9670.637, 1.468
Type of procedureColonoscopy vs flex-sig0.7410.439, 1.2500.2757
EGD vs flex-sig0.9640.558, 1.667
WeekdayTues vs Mon1.0000.580, 1.7230.9570
Wed vs Mon0.7540.439, 1.293
Thurs vs Mon0.8090.476, 1.373
Fri vs Mon0.4930.278, 0.873
Region< 10 mile radius vs < 60 mile radius1.5370.685, 3.4480.1110
< 60 mile radius vs > 60 mile radius1.0540.454, 2.449
Previous endoscopyYes vs no1.0390.738, 1.4640.8252
Waiting time3 mo increments0.8350.675, 1.0340.0980
New patientNo vs yes1.2930.921, 1.8150.1369
Table 3 Multivariate analysis of patient characteristics and their predictive value for patient absenteeism from scheduled endoscopic procedure
ComparisonOR95% CIP-value
UrgencyNon-urgent vs urgent1.6241.056, 2.4970.027
Direct to endoscopyNot direct vs direct2.2441.331, 3.7830.002
Referring physicianSpecialist vs GP2.7631.383, 5.5190.058
No referral vs GP1.2280.321, 4.7060.666