Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2008; 14(2): 272-277
Published online Jan 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.272
Table 1 Indicated referrals in the main groups of patients
All n (% of referrals)Indicated n (% of that group)
Incontinence71 (43)66 (93)1
Constipation31 (19)6 19)2
3rd sphincter rupture21 (13)21 (100)
Pain9 (5)0 (0)
Re-anastomosis/enterostoma8 (5)8 (100)
Soiling5 (3)0 (0)
IBD4 (2)4 (100)
Hemorrhoids3 (2)0 (0)
Anal atresia2 (1)2 (100)
Fistulas2 (1)2 (100)
Fissure1 (1)0 (0)
Other9 (5)0 (0)
Total167 (100)109 (653)
Table 2 Reason for referral and effect of treatment on patients
2004-2006
Treatment according to the patients
Symptoms change after treatment
Reason for referralPatientsTreatment1>Diet n (%)Medication n (%)Surgery n (%)Physiotherapy n (%)Expectative n (%)VAS
Category
BeforeAfterImprovedReassuredWorse
Incontinence271100832123262255.720397
Constipation31353123471056.211171
3rd sphincter rupture2122212177.17.22151
Anal pain9811563.55.135
Surg/Stoma88626.3724
Soiling572323.44.8311
IBD44224.86.522
Hemorrhoids3613264.36.321
Anal atresia221167.52
Fistula22245.511
Fissure12115281
Pouchitis111871
Other912118115.16.7531
Average (SD)5.1b6.1b
(2.4)(2.3)
Total (%)16720917 (8)57 (27)35 (17)36 (16)64 (31)54 (35)88 (57)12 (8)
Table 3 A comparison between the proposed therapeutic advice and followed therapy. A therapy can consist of more components
All therapies (%)Diet (%)Medication (%)Physiother (%)Expectative (%)Surgery (%)
Followed130 (80)7 (100)54 (71)32 (73)31 (100)36 (90)
Not followed32 (20)022 (29)12 (27)04 (10)
Total162 (100)7 (100)76 (100)44 (100)31 (100)40 (100)