Basic Research
Copyright ©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2007; 13(48): 6538-6548
Published online Dec 28, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i48.6538
Table 1 Body weight of different groups of mice
Daysfollowing tumourtransplantationBody weight (g)
Normal controlEAC controlALE controlEAC + ALE
015.6 ± 0.33 15.7 ± 0.4615.5 ± 0.2815.6 ± 0.38
1016.9 ± 0.3618.4 ± 0.58a17.2 ± 0.4117.7 ± 0.29
2018.3 ± 0.2621.5 ± 0.51b18.5 ± 0.2919.8 ± 0.35c
3020.6 ± 0.3925.4 ± 0.66b21.1 ± 0.3521.7 ± 0.49d
Table 2 Final weight of liver and kidney of different groups of animals sacrificed 30 d post-EAC inoculation
Organ (s)Final weight (g)
Normal controlEAC controlALE controlEAC + ALE
Liver1.25 ± 0.041.13 ± 0.061.26 ± 0.081.23 ± 0.03
Kidney0.38 ± 0.030.33 ± 0.050.38 ± 0.050.37 ± 0.04
Table 3 Effect of ALE on tumour cell count in Ehrlich ascites carcinoma-bearing mice
Days followingtumour transplantationMean tumour cell count
Decrease(%)
EAC controlEAC + ALE
1018.2 × 106± 0.4411.3 × 106± 0.35b37.91
2052.1 × 106± 0.7624.9 × 106± 0.41b52.20
30 228.7 × 106± 0.5372.4 × 106± 0.49b   68.34
Table 4 Changes in total count (TC), Hb level and haematocrit in different groups of mice treated with or without ALE
Days following EACcell inoculationGroupTC (RBC) (106/mm3)TC (WBC) (106/mm3)Hb (g%)Haematocrit (%)
0Normal control7.3 ± 0.125.8 ± 0.2312.6 ± 0.1633.43 ± 0.16
EAC control7.2 ± 0.156.5 ± 0.5212.0 ± 0.3132.16 ± 0.27
ALE control7.3 ± 0.145.9 ± 0.2212.5 ± 0.1633.58 ± 0.25
EAC + ALE7.3 ± 0.136.2 ± 0.1512.2 ± 0.2733.11 ± 0.23
10Normal control7.4 ± 0.145.8 ± 0.6312.6 ± 0.6533.51 ± 0.32
EAC control6.6 ± 0.7610.4 ± 0.72b10.0 ± 0.78a25.74 ± 0.53c
ALE control7.6 ± 0.185.7 ± 0.5512.8 ± 0.6133.75 ± 0.35
EAC + ALE6.9 ± 0.537.7 ± 0.68e11.0 ± 0.4929.08 ± 0.69d
20Normal control7.3 ± 0.545.7 ± 0.4312.4 ± 0.7833.46 ± 0.17
EAC control5.1 ± 0.67a13.9 ± 0.56b8.2 ± 0.92f21.05 ± 0.26c
ALE control7.5 ± 0.515.7 ± 0.3812.6 ± 0.7333.71 ± 0.18
EAC + ALE6.7 ± 0.127.9 ± 0.48d11.5 ± 0.57h28.87 ± 0.35d
30Normal control7.5 ± 0.145.8 ± 0.2312.7 ± 0.8433.49 ± 0.16
EAC control4.3 ± 0.12b18.8 ± 0.54b6.4 ± 0.93b17.63 ± 0.72c
ALE control7.7 ± 0.135.7 ± 0.2412.9 ± 0.7633.65 ± 0.21
EAC + ALE7.1 ± 0.13d8.4 ± 0.71d12.1 ± 0.77d30.23 ± 0.57d
Table 5 Effect of ALE on sister-chromatid exchange (SCE) frequencies (500 plates/group) in different groups of mice killed at various time points
Weeks after tumour inoculationGroupMeanSCE/cellReduction infrequency (%)
1EAC control4.59 ± 0.57-
EAC + ALE3.62 ± 0.2921.13
2EAC control6.89 ± 1.13-
EAC + ALE3.78 ± 0.78a45.14
3EAC control7.83 ± 1.05-
EAC + ALE4.64 ± 0.54b40.74
4EAC control10.26 ± 1.67-
EAC + ALE4.83 ± 0.69c52.92
5EAC control   14.94 ± 2.14-
EAC + ALE5.12 ± 1.16d65.73
Table 6 Effect of ALE on the generation of average number of single-strand breaks (SSBs)/DNA fragment in murine liver 24 h and 5 d post-EAC transplantation
Time followingEAC inoculationGroupDS-DNA(%)No. of SSBs/DNA fragmentInhibition(%)
24 hNormal control94.750.07 ± 0.01----
EAC control79.571.28 ± 0.22b----
ALE control94.870.07 ± 0.02----
EAC + ALE88.231.14 ± 0.15----
5 dNormal control95.12 0.08 ± 0.03----
EAC control17.21    3.14 ± 0.31b----
ALE control94.93 0.07 ± 0.3----
EAC + ALE55.831.93 ± 0.23d38.53