Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2006; 12(37): 6032-6036
Published online Oct 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i37.6032
Table 1 Characteristics of the patients
Baseline factorsn (%) )
Sex
Male32 (73)
Female12 (27)
Age (yr)
≤ 5016 (36)
51-6413 (30)
≥ 6515 (34)
Median (Range)60 (33-77)
Stage at diagnostic
I-II14 (32)
IIIA + IIIB21 (48)
IV9 (20)
Histotype
Intestinal9 (20)
Diffuse35 (80)
Grading
I3 (7)
II8 (18)
III33 (75)
Tumor location
Cardia9 (21)
Fundus9 (21)
Body10 (24)
Antrum14 (33)
Gastrectomy
R035 (80)
R18 (18)
R21 (2)
XPD 751
Lys/Lys19 (51)
Lys/Gln14 (38)
Gln/Gln4 (11)
Unknown7
Table 2 Toxicity evaluated
Toxicity grade III-IVn (%)
No28 (64)
Yes16 (36)
Toxicity type
Hematological10 (62)
Digestive3 (19)
Others3 (19)
Table 3 Relapse site
Relapsen (%)
No24 (54.5)
Yes20 (45.5)
Relapse sites
Local5 (25)
Distant10 (50)
Local + Distant5 (25)
Table 4 Results of chi-square test for disease relapse
RelapseXPD
Stage
LysLys/GlnGln/GlnI+ IIIIIA + IIIB + IV
No71131113
Yes1231317
P0.0420.050
Table 5 Unadjusted XPD genotype and relapse-free survival (RFS)
XPDRFS (median)Hazard Ratio95% CI
Lys/Lys11.791.0Reference
Lys/Gln14.330.350.11 to 1.09
Gln/Gln23.330.250.03 to 1.96
Table 6 Adjusted Cox multivariate analysis for RFS
XPDRFS (median)Hazard Ratio95% CIP
Lys/Lys11.793.071.07 to 8.780.036
Lys/Gln + Gln/Gln20.261.0Reference