Viral Hepatitis
Copyright ©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2005; 11(4): 482-487
Published online Jan 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i4.482
Table 1 Characteristics of HCV patients studied.
Non-responders (n = 22)Relapsers (n = 16)Sustained responders (n = 19)
Sex (M/F)15/710/613/6
Age (Mean/range)48±1550±1037±13
Disease duration (yr)2.4±2.12.9±32.5±2.4
Source of HCV Infection
Transfusion before 1990844
Iv drug abuse336
Multiple hospitalizations300
Multiple sexual partners012
Unknown887
Genotype
1a/1b1188
2a/c220
3a447
4412
Undefined112
Viral load
>2.106 copies/mL91010
≤2.106 copies/mL1369
Histologic data (Yes/No)14/811/510/9
Minimal/mild inflammation1269
Moderate/severe inflammation251
None/mild/moderate fibrosis10510
Severe fibrosis or cirrhosis460
HBV and/or HIV co-infection000
Table 2 Prevalence (%) and mean titre of PCA and non-organ specific autoantibodies in HCV patients at three time-points.
Before treatment (n = 57)
End of treatment (n = 57)
End of follow up (n = 57)
P value
Pos (%)Mean titrePos (%)Mean titrePos (%)Mean titre
ANA54.41/18870.21/19471.91/171NS
SMA89.51/12789.51/13584.21/118NS
Undefined12.31/10819.311/76141/248NS
cytoplasmic staining1
AMA000
Anti-LKM5.31/13371/1005.31/67NS
PCA15.81/7617.51/10815.81/231NS
Anti-LC1.81/403.51/600NS
ANCA80.71/3180.71/3182.51/31NS
CANCA78.91/2877.21/3077.21/28NS
PANCA3.51/905.31/538.81/64NS
Anti-PR-3000
Anti-MPO000
Anti-dsDNA22.8129 BI24.6135 BI21.1134 BINS
Anti-CL19.3148 BI29.8138 BI17.5129 BINS
Table 3 Alterations of anti-LKM reactivity in association with the response to therapy in the four anti-HCV positive/anti-LKM-positive patients.
GenderGenotypeAnti-LKM titre
Response
1st2nd3rdEnd of treatmentEnd of follow-up
M1b1/3201/400ResponderSustained responder
F1b1/401/1601/80ResponderRelapser
F2a/c1/401/401/40Non-responderNon-responder
M401/1601/80Non-responderNon-responder
Table 4 Impact of ANA detection on sustained biochemical response of the patients.
Biochemical response at the end of follow up [n (%)]
nYesNoP
ANA entry
Pos3113 (41.9)18 (58.1)0.017
Neg2620 (76.9)6 (23.1)
ANA end of follow up
Pos4120 (48.8)21 (51.2)0.037
Neg1613 (81.3)3 (18.7)
Table 5 Impact of PCA and ANA on sustained biochemical and virological response of the patients.
Combined sustained response at the end of follow up [n (%)]
nYesNoP
PCA entry
Pos90 (0)9 (100)0.022
Neg4819 (39.6)29 (60.4)
ANA end of follow up
Pos4110 (24.4)31 (75.6)0.048
Neg169 (56.3)7 (43.7)
Table 6 Impact of PCA on sustained virological response of the patients.
Virological response at the end of follow up [n (%)]
nYesNoP
PCA entry
Pos90 (0)9 (100)0.02
Neg4820 (41.7)28 (58.3)
Table 7 Impact of ANA and SMA alterations at the three time-points of investigation on the sustained virological response of the patients.
Virological response at the end of follow up [n (%)]
nYesNoP
Alteration of ANA titres
Increase208 (40)12 (60)0.02
Decrease138 (61.5)5 (38.5)
Constant244 (16.7)20 (83.3)
Alteration of SMA titres
Increase143 (21.4)11 (78.6)0.003
Decrease1812 (66.7)6 (33.3)
Constant255 (20)20 (80)
Table 8 Impact of ANA and SMA alterations at the three time-points of investigation on the sustained combined biochemical and virological response of the patients.
Combined sustained response at the end of follow up [n (%)]
nYesNoP
Alteration of ANA titers
Increase207 (35)13 (35)0.02
Decrease138 (61.5)5 (38.5)
Constant244 (16.7)20 (83.3)
Alteration of SMA titers
Increase142 (14.3)12 (85.7)0.001
Decrease1812 (66.7)6 (33.3)
Constant255 (20)20 (80)
Table 9 Impact of SMA alterations at the tree time-points of investigation on the sustained biochemical response of the patients.
Biochemical response at the end of follow up [n (%)]
nYesNoP
Alteration of SMA titers
Increase147 (50)7 (50)0.005
Decrease1816 (88.8)2 (11.2)
Constant2510 (40)15 (60)