Colorectal Cancer
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2004.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 15, 2004; 10(4): 550-554
Published online Feb 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i4.550
Table 1 Comparison between positive rate and positive unit (PU) of NDRG1 protein in all groups
GroupCasesPositive number and percentage
Positive unit mean ± SD
-++++++%
Normal colorectal mucosa3817210055.2645.34 ± 5.66
Colorectal adenomas316186180.6548.35 ± 4.79
Non-metastatic CRCs4522419095.5651.62 ± 4.63
Metastatic CRCs38014186100.0054.38±4.39
Regional lymph node metastatic sites382924394.7454.73 ± 4.56
Table 2 Comparison of positive rates of NDRG1 protein in all groups (P value)
GroupNormal colorectal mucosaColorectal adenomasNon-metastatic CRCsMetastatic CRCsRegional lymph node metastatic sites
Normal colorectal mucosa——bP < 0.01bP < 0.01bP < 0.01bP < 0.01
Colorectal adenomasbP < 0.01——cP < 0.05dP < 0.01dP < 0.01
Non-metastatic CRCsbP < 0.01cP < 0.05——eP < 0.05fP < 0.01
Metastatic CRCsbP < 0.01dP < 0.01eP < 0.05——
Regional lymph node metastatic sitesbP < 0.01dP < 0.01fP < 0.01——
Table 3 Comparison of positive units (PU) of NDRG1 protein in all groups (P value)
GroupNormal colorectal mucosaColorectal adenomasNon-metastatic CRCsMetastatic CRCsRegional lymph node metastatic sites
Normal colorectal mucosa——aP < 0.05bP < 0.01bP < 0.01bP < 0.01
Colorectal adenomasaP < 0.05——dP < 0.01dP < 0.01dP < 0.01
Non-metastatic CRCsbP < 0.01dP < 0.01——eP < 0.05fP < 0.01
Metastatic CRCsbP < 0.01dP < 0.01eP < 0.05——
Regional lymph node metastatic sitesbP < 0.01dP < 0.01fP < 0.01——
Table 4 Correlation between expression of NDRG1 and lymph node metastasis in CRCs
Expression of NDRG1LN (-)LN (+)
-20
+2414
++1918
+++06
P value< 0.01
Spearman correlation coefficient0.329
Table 5 Association of clinicopathologic variables with NDRG1 expression in CRCs
No. of cases-++++++
Sex
Male51126204
Female32112172
Age (years)
< 5541118184
≥ 5542120192
Histological differentiation
High differentiation23210110
Moderate differentiation47023204
Poor differentiation130562