Esophageal Cancer Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2003. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 15, 2003; 9(6): 1174-1178
Published online Jun 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i6.1174
Expression of ECRG4, a novel esophageal cancer-related gene, downregulated by CpG island hypermethylation in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Chun-Mei Yue, Mei-Xia Bi, Li-Ping Guo, Shih-Hsin Lu, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, Cancer Institute, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100021, China
Da-Jun Deng, Beijing Institute for Cancer Research, School of Oncology, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by grant from State Key Basic Program (G1998051204) and from the Ministry of Education, China
Correspondence to: Shih-Hsin Lu, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, Cancer Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100021, China. shlu@public.bta.net.cn
Telephone: +86-10-67712368 Fax: +86-10-67712368
Received: March 2, 2003
Revised: March 4, 2003
Accepted: March 29, 2003
Published online: June 15, 2003

Abstract

AIM: To study the mechanisms responsible for inactivation of a novel esophageal cancer related gene 4 (ECRG4) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS: A pair of primers was designed to amplify a 220 bp fragment, which contains 16 CpG sites in the core promoter region of the ECRG 4 gene. PCR products of bisulfite-modified CpG islands were analyzed by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC), which were confirmed by DNA sequencing. The methylation status of ECRG 4 promoter in 20 cases of esophageal cancer and the adjacent normal tissues, 5 human tumor cell lines (esophageal cancer cell line-NEC, EC109, EC9706; gastric cancer cell line- GLC; human embryo kidney cell line-Hek293) and 2 normal esophagus tissues were detected. The expression level of the ECRG 4 gene in these samples was examined by RT-PCR.

RESULTS: The expression level of ECRG 4 gene was varied. Of 20 esophageal cancer tissues, nine were unexpressed, six were lowly expressed and five were highly expressed compared with the adjacent tissues and the 2 normal esophageal epithelia. In addition, 4 out of the 5 human cell lines were also unexpressed. A high frequency of methylation was revealed in 12 (8 unexpressed and 4 lowly expressed) of the 15 (80%) downregulated cancer tissues and 3 of the 4 unexpressed cell lines. No methylation peak was observed in the two highly expressed normal esophageal epithelia and the methylation frequency was low (3/20) among the 20 cases in the highly expressed adjacent tissues. The methylation status of the samples was consistent with the result of DNA sequencing.

CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the inactivation of ECRG 4 gene by hypermethylation is a frequent molecular event in ESCC and may be involved in the carcinogenesis of this cancer.




INTRODUCTION

Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world. Previous studies have shown several genetic abnormalities including amplification of c-myc, int-2 and Hst, mutation and/or deletion of p53 and Rb in human EC and EC cell lines[1,2]. However, the genetic events leading to the development of EC are not clear yet. In recent years, many studies of EC focused on the clone and identification of novel EC-related genes, which might play an important role in the carcinogenesis and development of esophageal cancer[3-5].

Recently, we have cloned and identified a novel tumor candidate suppressor gene, ECRG 4 (Genbank Accession NO. AF 325503), from human normal esophageal epithelium[6,7]. The ECRG 4 gene located in chromosome 2q14.1-14.3 contains 4 exons, spans about 13 kb and has a full-length cDNA of 772 bp. Analysis by bioinformatics has shown that the protein coded by ECRG 4 shows a 31% homology with mouse IgG V region. The results of SAGE and RT-PCR detection have demonstrated the ECRG 4 gene is expressed in adult esophageal epithelium but is downregulated in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and tumor cell lines. These findings suggest that the ECRG 4 gene might be involved in the development of ESCC, but the mechanism inactivating it remains to be determined.

According to the result of the sequence analysis in ECRG 4 gene, we found that there were CpG islands in the promoter region, exon 1 and part of intron 1 of the gene. Many tumor suppressor genes are downregulated by promoter methylation during the development and progression of cancer, and hypermethylation of gene-promoter regions is being revealed as one of the most frequent mechanisms in loss of gene function, thus detection of CpG methylation is important to understand the gene regulation of cancer[8,9]. It has been reported that the expression of some tumor suppressor genes, such as p16INK4a, p16INK4b, FHIT and E-cadherin are commonly downregulated by CpG island hypermethylation in ESCC[10-13]. However, the reason for reducing expression of ECRG 4 in ESCC is unknown.

In order to determine the mechanism involved in the downregulation of ECRG 4 in ESCC, we have examined the methylation status of the 5 CpG island in promoter region of the ECRG 4 gene in 5 human cell lines, which include 3 esophageal cancer cell lines, 2 normal esophageal epithelia and 20 cases with ESCC and adjacent tissues. The methylation status of the cell lines and tissues were compared with the expression of the ECRG 4 gene in the same samples by RT-PCR respectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell lines and tissue samples

Five cell lines, including 3 esophageal cancer cell line-NEC, EC109 and EC9706; 1 gastric cancer cell line- GLC and 1 human embryo kidney cell line-Hek293 were used in this study. All cell lines were routinely cultured in 1640 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. 20 pairs of ESCC and corresponding tissues adjacent to the tumors were obtained from surgically removed specimens of individual patients who underwent an operation at the Cancer Hospital in Linxian County which has the highest age-adjusted mortality rate of this cancer. Two normal esophageal epithelia were collected from healthy individuals by biopsy. All the samples were frozen at -70 °C before RNA and DNA were extracted with standard method as described previously[14].

Bisulfite treatment of DNA

Genomic DNA was treated with sodium bisulfite as described by Herman et al[15]. Briefly, 1 g DNA was denatured by adding freshly prepared NaOH with the final concentration 0.3 M for 15 min in a 37 °C water bath. The denatured DNA was then diluted in 30 μL freshly prepared 10 mM hydroquinone (Sigma) and 520 μL freshly prepared 3 M sodium bisulfite (Sigma) at pH5.0. The DNA was incubated at 50 °C for 16 h and subsequently purified by the Wizard DNA Clean-Up System Kit (A7280; Promega).

20 μg of human placenta genomic DNA was incubated for 24 h with 20 units of SssI (New England Biolabs) as described in the instruction manual and the methylated DNA was treated by bisulfite and purified by the Wizard DNA Clean-Up System Kit (A7280; Promega) as described above.

Design of primers and SsPCR condition

Primers were designed according to the CpG island of the sense strand of the ECRG 4 gene. The strand-specific primers for the treated CpG island were used to amplify a 220 bp fragment containing 16 CpG sites and 4 cis-acting elements, and they were: 5'-AGTGGGGGAGTTAAGGAGATATT-3' (forward), and 5'-CCCCTAAACTCCAAAACCAA-3' (reverse). PCR was performed in a GeneAmp 2400 thermocycler (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT) with a 25 μL reaction mixture containing about 100 ng DNA, 1.6 μmol each primer, 400 μmol each dNTPs, 1.25 U LA Taq with 1 × LA reaction buffer (TaKaRa). Thermal cycles were: at 94 °C for 2 min, then 40 cycles at 94 °C for 30 sec, at 52 °C for 30 sec, at 72 °C for l min and 30 sec followed by extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The PCR products were detected in 1.5% agarose gels.

Analysis for methylation by DHPLC

The ssPCR products of ECRG 4 were introduced into the mobile phase at an injection volume of 5 μL by the autosampler on a WAVE DNA Fragment Analysis System (Transgenomic) identical to that described by Deng et al[16]. Non-denaturing analysis was conducted at 48 °C and partially denaturing analysis was conducted at 56 °C, which was predicted by WAVEMaker.

The ssPCR product from the SssI and bisulfite treated human placenta genomic DNA was the positive control of the experiment.

DNA cloning and sequencing

The PCR products amplified with primers specific either for the methylated or for the unmethylated DNA were purified and cloned into the pMD18-T Easy Vector (Promega) and sequenced on an ABI 377 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems) by using M13 primers.

RT-PCR detection

Total RNA was isolated from cells and tissues using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). Reverse transcription was carried out with the SuperScript TM First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen). Approximately 3 μg total RNA was used in each reverse transcription reaction and the final volume was 20 μL. The ORF of ECRG 4 gene was amplified using the primers 5’-GGTTCTCCCTCGCAGCACCT-3’ (forward), and 5’-CAGCGTGTGGCAAGTCATGGTTAGT-3’ (reverse). PCR was performed in a GeneAmp 2400 thermocycler (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT) with a 25 μL reaction mixture containing 1 μL reverse transcription products, 200 pmol each primer, 200 μmol each dNTPs, 1.5 mM Μg2+, 2.0 U PLATINUM pfx DNA polymerase with 1 × reaction buffer (Promega). Thermal cycles were: at 95 °C for 2 min, then 30 cycles at 95 °C for 30 sec, at 62 °C for 30 sec, at 72 °C for l min followed by extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The β-actin transcripts in each sample were also amplified as internal controls to normalize the amount of ECRG 4 specific products.

RESULTS
The promoter hypermethylation in ECRG 4 gene

Based on the flanking DNA sequences of the ECRG 4-core promoter region, PCR primers were designed to amplify a 220 bp fragment containing the 16 CpG sites (Figure 1). Using the ssPCR-specific primers, a 220 bp product was successfully obtained from each bisulfite-treated sample, which was detected by 1.5% agarose gels and DHPLC size analysis, and the specific band (Figure 2) and the single chromatogram peak (Figure 3) were obtained respectively. The agarose gel detection and the size analysis on DHPLC all indicating the quality and quantity of the ssPCR products were high and the products could be used in the methylation analysis on DHPLC. Figure 4a shows the detection of methylated and unmethylated CpG islands in ssPCR products by DHPLC. Compared with the peak of positive control from the SssI treated human fetal DNA, the methylated and unmethylated samples could be easily discerned. The different proportion of methylated peak represented the different methylation levels in different samples. To confirm the reliability of the ssPCR products of the ECRG4 promoter region, either the methylated or the unmethylated DNA was cloned and sequenced (Figure 5). The cytosines in the CpG sites of methylated ssPCR products remained unchanged, but the cytosines of unmethylated products were converted to thymines. The promoter methylation of ECRG4 gene in esophageal tissues is shown in Table 1. A high frequency of methylation was observed in 12 cancer tissues, 3 tumor adjacent tissues and 3 cell lines (EC 9706, EC 109 and GLC). No methylation peak was obtained in the two normal esophageal epithelia, the other tumor and adjacent tissues and the two cell lines (NEC and Hek293).

Figure 1
Figure 1 The sequence of ECRG 4 fregment for bisulfite- DHPLC analysis. The fragment contains 4 cis-acting elements and 16 CpG sites in shadow. The 5'and 3'primers are in the frames of the two ends of the fragment respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2 The 1. 5% agarose gel detection of the ssPCR products of ECRG 4. M; pUC19 DNA/Msp I Hap II) Marker. 1, 2, 3, 4; four tissue samples.
Figure 3
Figure 3 The sizing analysis of ssPCR products of ECRG 4 on DHPLC at 48 °C. PC was the product from the Sss I treated human placenta genomic DNA. 1, 2, 3, 4; the same samples as in Figure 2.
Figure 4
Figure 4 (a) The methylation detection of ssPCR products at 56 °C on DHPLC. The methylation peak was emphasized by the arrow. PC was the product from the SssI treated human placenta genomic DNA. 1, 2, 3, 4; the same samples as Figure 2. (b) The expression level of ECRG 4 by RT-PCR using the primer set flanking the ORF of the gene in the same samples was detected on DHPLC. The β-Actin gene was amplified as internal control. M; 1 kb DNA Ladder Marker. 1, 2, 3, 4; the same samples as Figure 2.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Sequencing of ssPCR products of the ECRG4 gene promoter region. All cytosines in CpG dinuleotides in the methylated ECRG4 remain as cytosines, indicating methylation (A), while all cytosines in unmethylated ECRG4 have been converted to thymidines, indicating unmethylation (B).
Table 1 The expression and methylation of ECRG 4 in ESCC.
CasesGenderPathological stageExpression
Methylation
NormalCancerNormalCancer
N1Fa++c-
N2F++-
1MbModerate+++d-f+g
2FModerate+--+
3MModerate++++--
4MModerate++++--
5FModerate++-e-+
6FModerate++++
7MModerate++++--
8FPoor++--+
9MModerate++++--
10MPoor++--+
11FModerate++++
12FModerate++--+
13FModerate++++--
14MModerate+++-+
15MModerate++--+
16FModerate++--+
17MModerate--+-
18FModerate+++--
19MModerate+++--
20MModerate++--+

The expression level of ECRG 4 gene was different, and a high frequency of methylation was revealed in 12 (8 unexpressed and 4 lowly expressed) of the 15 (80%) cancer tissues and the 3 of the 4 unexpressed cell lines. No methylation peak was observed in the two highly expressed normal esophageal epithelia and the methylation frequency was low (3/20) among the 20 cases in the highly expressed adjacent tissues.

Expression of ECRG4 gene related to methylation

The expression level of the ECRG 4 gene in the tissues and cell lines was examined by RT-PCR (Figure 4b). Out of 20 esophageal cancer tissues, nine were unexpressed, six were lowly expressed and five were highly expressed compared with the adjacent tissues and the 2 normal esophageal epithelia. In addition, 4 out of the 5 human cell lines were also unexpressed. The methylation was observed in 12 (8 unexpressed and 4 lowly expressed) of the 15 (80.0%) cancer tissues and the 3 unexpressed cell lines (Table 1 and Table 2). Among the normal tissues corresponding to the 12-methylation cancer tissues, nine were highly expressed and unmethylated; three were lowly expressed or unexpressed and methylated (Table 1). No methylation peak was obtained in the highly expressed samples, including the two normal esophageal epithelia, the cell line Hek293 and the other tumor and adjacent tissues. The results demonstrated that the expression of ECRG4 was downregulated by CpG island hypermethylation in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Table 2 The expression and methylation of ECRG 4 in cell lines.
Cell linesExpressionMethylation
NEC-a-c
EC109-+d
EC9706-+
GLC-+
Hek293+b-
DISCUSSION

We used a high-throughout methylation assay, bisulfite-DHPLC assay to examine the methylation status of the ECRG 4 gene promoter in ESCC. The results demonstrated for the first time that downregulated expression of ECRG 4 in ESCC was associated with CpG island methylation in the core promoter region of the gene. These findings suggest that inactivation by the promoter hypermethylation of ECRG 4 is a common molecular event in ESCC and it may be involved in the development of this cancer, since this epigenetic change of the ECRG 4 gene was not found in the normal epithelium and immortalling cell line Hek293. Eads et al[17] reported that DNA hypermethylation was an early epigenetic alteration in the multistep progression of the esophageal adenocarcinoma, because they found that the premalignant tissue was significantly more methylated than the normal tissue. Then, we can speculate that the inactivation by hypermethylation of ECRG 4 might be an early event in the progression of ESCC carcinogenesis.

Because of the extent of methylation at various CpG sites of most genes, especially a novelly identified gene is unknown, it is hard to design good MSP primers or MethyLight probes for methylated templates, which require full methylation at all CpG sites in their mating region[15,18]. However, the ssPCR for bisulfite-modified templates are not influenced by the extent of methylation of CpGs, because no CpG site exits in the primer sequence and the primer for modified DNA can amplify both methylated and unmethylated templates. Deng et al[16] had compared the bisulfite-DHPLC with other methylation detection method, and demonstrated the bisulfite-DHPLC assay could be used to detect methylation in homoallelic and heteroallelic CpG islands in cell lines and tissues rapidly and reliably. In the present study, we also confirmed the reliability of bisulfite-DHPLC assay by DNA sequencing.

Abnormal hypermethylation of CpG islands associated with tumor suppressor genes can lead to repression of gene expression and contribute significantly to tumorigenesis of many kinds of tumors, such as esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer and cervical cancer[19-23]. Furthermore, each tumor type has a characteristic set of genes with an increased propensity to become methylated, and an individual tumor within a single patient has a unique epigenetic fingerprint[24]. Determining tumor-type specific and patient-specific fingerprints may provide biomarkers that can be used in diagnosis, such as cancer detection, cancer chemoprediction and prognostics[25,26]. The recent study has been repleted with the examples of hypermethylation of CpG islands in the promoter region of more than 40 lung cancer related genes to analyse methylation patterns of multiple genes. They want to obtain complex DNA methylation signatures, which can provide a useful and highly specific tool for lung cancer diagnosis[27].

The promoter hypermethlation of the ESCC-related genes such as, p16INK4a, p15INK4b, hMLH1, E-cadherin, Chfr and HLA class I genes, has been shown to be a common epigenetic event in this cancer and the studies of these genes suggest that hypermethylation of key genes may be used in combination with other molecular changes, such as p53 mutation, in the development of biomarkers for predicting the risk for ESCC[28-30]. Our present study extended the findings of methylation signature in ESCC, and the methylation in more ESCC-related genes was studied, better understaning of the mechanisms underlying tumor progression in this cancer was obtained, so that improved diagnosis and therapy can be facilitated.

In summary, our study demonstrated that aberrant methylation of CpG islands in the core promoter of the ECRG 4 gene was a frequent molecular event in ESCC and proved for the first time that loss or lower expression of ECRG 4 was associated with ECRG 4 CpG island methylation. These results indicate that the inactivation of ECRG 4 gene by hypermethylation in ESCC may be involved in the carcinogenesis of the cancer.

Footnotes

Edited by Zhang JZ and Wang XL

References
1.  Lu SH. Alterations of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in esophageal cancer in China. Mutat Res. 2000;462:343-353.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Lu SH, Hsieh LL, Luo FC, Weinstein IB. Amplification of the EGF receptor and c-myc genes in human esophageal cancers. Int J Cancer. 1988;42:502-505.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 97]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 110]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Yang ZQ, Imoto I, Fukuda Y, Pimkhaokham A, Shimada Y, Imamura M, Sugano S, Nakamura Y, Inazawa J. Identification of a novel gene, GASC1, within an amplicon at 9p23-24 frequently detected in esophageal cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 2000;60:4735-4739.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Daigo Y, Nishiwaki T, Kawasoe T, Tamari M, Tsuchiya E, Nakamura Y. Molecular cloning of a candidate tumor suppressor gene, DLC1, from chromosome 3p21.3. Cancer Res. 1999;59:1966-1972.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Sasaki S, Nakamura T, Arakawa H, Mori M, Watanabe T, Nagawa H, Croce CM. Isolation and characterization of a novel gene, hRFI, preferentially expressed in esophageal cancer. Oncogene. 2002;21:5024-5030.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Su T, Liu H, Lu S. [Cloning and identification of cDNA fragments related to human esophageal cancer]. Zhonghua Zhongliu Zazhi. 1998;20:254-257.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Bi MX, Han WD, Lu SX. Using Lab On-line to Clone and Identify the Esophageal Cancer Related Gene 4. Shengwu Huaxue Yu Shengwu Wui Xuebao (Shanghai). 2001;33:257-261.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Jones PA. DNA methylation and cancer. Oncogene. 2002;21:5358-5360.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 224]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 207]  [Article Influence: 9.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Esteller M. CpG island hypermethylation and tumor suppressor genes: a booming present, a brighter future. Oncogene. 2002;21:5427-5440.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 862]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 846]  [Article Influence: 38.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Xing EP, Nie Y, Song Y, Yang GY, Cai YC, Wang LD, Yang CS. Mechanisms of inactivation of p14ARF, p15INK4b, and p16INK4a genes in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5:2704-2713.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Wong DJ, Barrett MT, Stöger R, Emond MJ, Reid BJ. p16INK4a promoter is hypermethylated at a high frequency in esophageal adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res. 1997;57:2619-2622.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Si HX, Tsao SW, Lam KY, Srivastava G, Liu Y, Wong YC, Shen ZY, Cheung AL. E-cadherin expression is commonly downregulated by CpG island hypermethylation in esophageal carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2001;173:71-78.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Tanaka H, Shimada Y, Harada H, Shinoda M, Hatooka S, Imamura M, Ishizaki K. Methylation of the 5' CpG island of the FHIT gene is closely associated with transcriptional inactivation in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer Res. 1998;58:3429-3434.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Blin N, Stafford DW. A general method for isolation of high molecular weight DNA from eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1976;3:2303-2308.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1899]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2281]  [Article Influence: 47.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Herman JG, Graff JR, Myöhänen S, Nelkin BD, Baylin SB. Methylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:9821-9826.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4183]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4203]  [Article Influence: 150.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Deng D, Deng G, Smith MF, Zhou J, Xin H, Powell SM, Lu Y. Simultaneous detection of CpG methylation and single nucleotide polymorphism by denaturing high performance liquid chromatography. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:E13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Eads CA, Lord RV, Wickramasinghe K, Long TI, Kurumboor SK, Bernstein L, Peters JH, DeMeester SR, DeMeester TR, Skinner KA. Epigenetic patterns in the progression of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2001;61:3410-3418.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Eads CA, Danenberg KD, Kawakami K, Saltz LB, Blake C, Shibata D, Danenberg PV, Laird PW. MethyLight: a high-throughput assay to measure DNA methylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:E32.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1017]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1026]  [Article Influence: 42.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Tokugawa T, Sugihara H, Tani T, Hattori T. Modes of silencing of p16 in development of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2002;62:4938-4944.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Oue N, Shigeishi H, Kuniyasu H, Yokozaki H, Kuraoka K, Ito R, Yasui W. Promoter hypermethylation of MGMT is associated with protein loss in gastric carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2001;93:805-809.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 64]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 69]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Palmisano WA, Divine KK, Saccomanno G, Gilliland FD, Baylin SB, Herman JG, Belinsky SA. Predicting lung cancer by detecting aberrant promoter methylation in sputum. Cancer Res. 2000;60:5954-5958.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Widschwendter M, Jones PA. DNA methylation and breast carcinogenesis. Oncogene. 2002;21:5462-5482.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 319]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 316]  [Article Influence: 14.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Virmani AK, Muller C, Rathi A, Zoechbauer-Mueller S, Mathis M, Gazdar AF. Aberrant methylation during cervical carcinogenesis. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7:584-589.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Costello JF, Frühwald MC, Smiraglia DJ, Rush LJ, Robertson GP, Gao X, Wright FA, Feramisco JD, Peltomäki P, Lang JC. Aberrant CpG-island methylation has non-random and tumour-type-specific patterns. Nat Genet. 2000;24:132-138.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 980]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 932]  [Article Influence: 38.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Jones PA, Laird PW. Cancer epigenetics comes of age. Nat Genet. 1999;21:163-167.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1657]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1588]  [Article Influence: 63.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Beck S, Olek A, Walter J. From genomics to epigenomics: a loftier view of life. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:1144.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 59]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 65]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Tsou JA, Hagen JA, Carpenter CL, Laird-Offringa IA. DNA methylation analysis: a powerful new tool for lung cancer diagnosis. Oncogene. 2002;21:5450-5461.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 216]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 225]  [Article Influence: 10.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Nie Y, Liao J, Zhao X, Song Y, Yang GY, Wang LD, Yang CS. Detection of multiple gene hypermethylation in the development of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2002;23:1713-1720.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 60]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 91]  [Article Influence: 4.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Shibata Y, Haruki N, Kuwabara Y, Ishiguro H, Shinoda N, Sato A, Kimura M, Koyama H, Toyama T, Nishiwaki T. Chfr expression is downregulated by CpG island hypermethylation in esophageal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2002;23:1695-1699.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 66]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 76]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Nie Y, Yang G, Song Y, Zhao X, So C, Liao J, Wang LD, Yang CS. DNA hypermethylation is a mechanism for loss of expression of the HLA class I genes in human esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Carcinogenesis. 2001;22:1615-1623.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 143]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 146]  [Article Influence: 6.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]