Observational Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2021; 27(29): 4913-4928
Published online Aug 7, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i29.4913
Advanced glycation end product: A potential biomarker for risk stratification of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in ELSA-Brasil study
Evelyn Nunes Goulart da Silva Pereira, Beatriz Peres de Araujo, Anissa Daliry, Laboratory of Cardiovascular Investigation, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil
Daniela Polessa Paula, National School of Statistical Sciences, Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, Rio de Janeiro 20231-050, Brazil
Maria de Jesus Mendes da Fonseca, Department of Epidemiology and Quantitative Methods in Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil
Maria de Fátima Haueisen Sander Diniz, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais 31270-901, Brazil
Rosane Harter Griep, Laboratory of Health and Environment Education, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil
ORCID number: Evelyn Nunes Goulart da Silva Pereira (0000-0001-5511-7036); Daniela Polessa Paula (0000-0002-0576-7361); Beatriz Peres de Araujo (0000-0002-3137-7228); Maria de Jesus Mendes da Fonseca (0000-0002-53195513); Maria de Fátima Haueisen Sander Diniz (0000-0001-9146-5003); Anissa Daliry (0000-0001-7303-0030); Rosane Harter Griep (0000-0002-6250-2036).
Author contributions: Pereira ENGDS and Araujo BP collected and analyzed the data, drafted the manuscript and revised the manuscript; Paula DP analyzed the data and revised the manuscript; Fonseca MJMD and Griep RH collected the data and revised the manuscript; Diniz MFHS revised the manuscript; Daliry A designed the study, collected and analyzed the data, drafted the manuscript and revised the manuscript; all authors approved the final version of the manuscript prior to submission.
Supported by Brazilian Ministry of Health (Science and Technology Department) and the Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology (Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos and CNPq National Research Council), No. 01 06 0010.00 RS, No. 01 06 0300.00 ES, No. 01 06 0212.00 BA, No. 01 06 0278.00 MG, No. 01 06 0115.00 SP, and No. 01 06 0071.00 RJ; and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and the Carlos Chagas Filho Rio de Janeiro State Research Support Foundation (FAPERJ) (to Griep RH).
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved for publication by Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation.
Informed consent statement: All study participants or their legal guardian provided informed written consent about personal and medical data collection prior to study enrolment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflict of interests to report.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement-checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement-checklist of items.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Anissa Daliry, MSc, PhD, Academic Research, Laboratory of Cardiovascular Investigation, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil. daliry@ioc.fiocruz.br
Received: January 28, 2021
Peer-review started: January 28, 2021
First decision: March 7, 2021
Revised: March 18, 2021
Accepted: April 26, 2021
Article in press: April 26, 2021
Published online: August 7, 2021

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Liver diseases are associated with the excess formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), which induce tissue inflammation and oxidative damage. However, the trend of oxidative marker levels according to the steatosis grade in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is unclear.

AIM

To compare serum AGE levels between participants with NAFLD accordingly to steatosis severity in the baseline ELSA-Brasil population.

METHODS

In 305 individuals at baseline ELSA-Brasil, NAFLD-associated steatosis was classified by ultrasound hepatic attenuation. The participants were grouped according to the severity of steatosis: mild and moderate/severe pooled. The measurement of serum fluorescent AGE concentrations was based on spectrofluorimetric detection. Serum AGE content and clinical and laboratory characteristics of the participants were compared between groups. The correlation between serum AGE levels and the grade of steatosis was analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between serum AGE levels and steatosis severity. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

According to the steatosis severity spectrum in NAFLD, from mild to moderate/severe, individuals with the most severe steatosis grade had a higher incidence of metabolic syndrome (63% vs 34%, P ≤ 0.001), diabetes mellitus (37% vs 14%, P ≤ 0.001), and high cholesterol levels (51% vs 33%, P < 0.001). Moreover, individuals with increasing severity of steatosis presented increasing waist circumference, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, insulin, triglycerides, alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, C-reactive protein, and uric acid levels and lower high-density lipoprotein. Higher serum AGE content was present in the moderate/severe group of individuals than in the mild group (P = 0.008). In addition, the serum AGE levels were correlated with the steatosis grade in the overall sample (rho = 0.146, P = 0.010). Logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for confounding variables, showed that subjects with higher serum AGE content had a 4.6-fold increased chance of having moderate or severe steatosis when compared to low levels of serum AGEs. According to the results of the receiver operator characteristic curves analyses (areas under the curve, AUC = 0.83), AGEs could be a good marker of steatosis severity in patients with NAFLD and might be a potential biomarker in predicting NAFLD progression, strengthening the involvement of AGE in NAFLD pathogenesis.

CONCLUSION

NAFLD-associated steatosis was associated with serum AGE levels; therefore, plasmatic fluorescent AGE quantification by spectroscopy could be a promising alternative method to monitor progression from mild to severe NAFLD accordingly to steatosis grade.

Key Words: Advanced glycation end products, Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, Steatosis, ELSA-Brasil study, Spectroscopy

Core Tip: We evaluated the relationship between fluorescent advanced glycation end product (AGE) levels and the severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)-associated steatosis. We evaluated 305 subjects with NAFLD from Rio de Janeiro in the baseline ELSA-Brasil population grouped according to the steatosis stratification: mild and moderate/severe pooled. Serum AGE levels were correlated with the steatosis grade in the overall sample. The severity of NAFLD-associated steatosis was associated with serum AGE levels; therefore, plasmatic fluorescent AGE quantification by spectroscopy could be a promising alternative method for classifying and grading NAFLD accordingly to hepatic steatosis.



INTRODUCTION

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterized by abnormal liver fat accumulation in the absence of significant alcohol consumption or secondary causes of fat accumulation[1,2]. NAFLD includes a large spectrum of clinical phenotypes, from non-alcoholic fatty liver to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), in which inflammation and hepatocyte injury are present. Individuals with NAFLD can develop progressive fibrosis, liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and end-stage liver disease[3]. In Western populations, NAFLD is rapidly becoming the top reason for liver transplants[4,5].

The prevalence of NAFLD worldwide is estimated to be 25%, with the highest prevalence in South America (30.45%). This condition is considered the leading cause of chronic liver disease in the United States and Europe[6,7]. Currently, there is a strong bidirectional association between NAFLD and metabolic syndrome (MetS) when components of MetS, such as insulin resistance and hypertriglyceridemia, increase an individual’s chance of developing NAFLD[8-10]. Furthermore, metabolic disorders such as diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and obesity have also been associated with NAFLD[1,11,12].

The most common imaging techniques used to diagnose NAFLD are ultrasonography, magnetic resonance, computerized tomography, and controlled attenuation parameter[13,14]. NAFLD can be histologically distinguished from alcoholic steatohepatitis based on histological markers in liver biopsy: Lobular inflammation, hepatocyte ballooning, portal granulocytic inflammation, and Mallory-Denk bodies[15]. Clinical settings and population studies with NAFLD commonly use conventional B-mode ultrasonography because it is non-invasive, easy to use, inexpensive, and widely available[16,17]. Despite the many methods available to assess NAFLD, the pathophysiology of NAFLD is extremely complex and has only been partially elucidated. Although laboratory tests, imaging techniques, and histology play a pivotal role in NAFLD diagnosis, novel alternative methods to diagnose and monitor NAFLD progression are critically needed.

According to the multiple-hit hypothesis, several factors in parallel act synergistically, causing metabolic and molecular alterations that lead to the development and progression of NAFLD[18]. Accumulation of fat in the liver is considered one of the first hits; however, the progression of the disease requires the involvement of other secondary factors, such as insulin resistance, inflammatory mediators, gut microbiome, mitochondrial dysfunction, genetics, nutritional and environmental factors, and/or ER stress[18-20]. Among the “multiple hits”, advanced glycation end products (AGEs) have been observed by several studies to play a critical role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD[19,21,22].

AGEs are products of non-enzymatic reactions of reducing sugars or oxidized lipids with amino groups in proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids[23]. In addition to being produced in an endogenous manner, AGEs are also present in foods highly processed or dry heated at high temperatures[24]. Increased AGE levels can trigger loss of normal structure and protein dysfunction due to abnormal cross-linking between intracellular and extracellular proteins. Moreover, the activation of the receptor for AGE (RAGE) by binding AGEs can trigger an increase in inflammation and oxidative stress[25] and participate in insulin resistance, liver injury, and fibrosis[22,26]. AGEs are increased in several pathological conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease[27], cardiovascular diseases[28-30] diabetes mellitus[31-33], and liver diseases[34]. We have previously shown that activation of the AGE-RAGE axis, oxidative stress, and inflammation could have a role in microcirculatory alterations in NAFLD[35]. The increased accumulation of AGEs in the serum or liver tissue of NASH patients could induce cell damage and necrotic-type hepatocyte death[36]. AGEs can leak outside of cells and induce inflammatory or fibrotic responses in adjacent cells[36]. To date, there is a lack of clinical studies investigating the role of AGEs in the pathogenesis of NAFLD. Given this, it is of great interest to address the specific pathophysiological mechanisms underlying NAFLD-associated steatosis association with AGEs levels in a large and mixed population cohort. Therefore, in this study, we addressed whether steatosis severity was associated with serum AGE levels in the baseline data from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) study. We propose plasmatic fluorescent AGE quantification by spectroscopy as a promising alternative method to monitor progression of NAFLD accordingly to steatosis severity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study population

This is a cross-sectional study addressing the association between NAFLD and AGEs in the baseline ELSA-Brasil population; a cohort of active or retired employees of both sexes, aged between 35 and 74 years, totaling 15105 civil servants living in six cities in Brazil (Belo Horizonte, Porto Alegre, Rio de Janeiro, Salvador, São Paulo, and Vitoria) from predefined universities or research institutes[37]. In the present study, subjects from Rio de Janeiro were included (n = 305) (Figure 1). Exclusion criteria were as follows: no information on serum AGE content, no information on alcohol consumption, or excessive alcohol consumption (> 210 g/wk for men or 140 g/wk for women). In addition, subjects who had no NAFLD evaluation, poor ultrasound image quality, or normal hepatic deep-beam attenuation (complete viewing) were excluded. This study was approved by all the institutional review boards of the participating institutions, which conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsink, and all participants provided informed consent.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Flow chart of the selection of the eligible study population in the final analysis. AGE: Advanced glycation end product; NAFLD: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Data collection

Clinical and anthropometric examination data were collected on-site by questionnaires and clinical exams between August 2008 and December 2010[38]. The questionnaire included information on age at the baseline visit (years), gender, alcohol consumption (never used, ex-user or user), and smoking habit (non-smoker or smoker). Waist circumference (cm), weight (kg), and height (cm) were measured according to standard techniques[39]. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing body weight by squared height in meters (kg/m2). Blood pressure was measured using a validated Omron HEM 705CPINT oscillometer device (Omron Co, Kyoto, Japan) three times with a 1 min interval in the sitting position and the mean of the last two measurements defined the blood pressure value.

Participants' sera were collected after 12 h of fasting, centrifuged, and stored at -70 °C until analysis. Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) was measured using a kinetic colorimetric assay; aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) by enzymatic assay (ADVIA Chemistry, Siemens, Deerfield, United States); uric acid by colorimetric enzyme (uricase) method; total cholesterol, high-density cholesterol, and triglycerides by the enzymatic colorimetric method. Low-density cholesterol was calculated by the Friedewald equation if triglycerides ≤ 400 mg/dL or directly measured by enzymatic colorimetric method otherwise; glucose was measured by hexokinase method (ADVIA Chemistry, Siemens, Deerfield, United States), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by high-pressure liquid chromatography (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, United States), fasting insulin was determined by immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA); and high sensitivity C reactive protein by immunochemistry nephelometry (BN II Siemens® nephelometer). Microalbuminuria was measured via an immunochemical assay (nephelometry) (Dade Behring). Creatinine levels were measured using an enzymatic colorimetric assay (ADVIA 1200, Siemens, Deerfield, United States). Diabetes was defined by previous medical history of diabetes, antidiabetic drug use, 2 h plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL, fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL, or glycated hemoglobin ≥ 6.5%. High cholesterol was defined as the use of medication to treat dyslipidemia or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥ 130 mg/dL. The presence of MetS was defined according to the NCEP ATP III definition, which requires three or more of the following five criteria: waist circumference ≥ 88 cm for women and ≥ 102 cm for men; antihypertensive drug use or systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mmHg or diastolic ≥ 85 mmHg; triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL; high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol < 50 mg for women and < 40 mg for men; and fasting glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL with oral or insulin treatment using hypoglycemic agents.

Plasma AGEs

Measurement of fluorescent AGE concentrations was based on spectrofluorimetric detection[40]. Serum was diluted 200-fold with phosphate-buffered saline (KH2PO4 1.06 mmol/L, NaCl 155.10 mmol/L, and Na2HPO4·7H2O 2.97 mmol/L, pH 7.4) and homogenized using a vortex mixer for 10 s, measured at an emission wavelength of 445 nm and at an excitation wavelength of 370 nm (SpectraMax M5 ELISA Microplate Reader, Molecular Devices, Acton, MA, United States). A solution of BSA (1 mg/mL in 0.1 N NaOH) was used as a reference and its fluorescence intensity was defined as one unit of fluorescence. The amount of fluorescence of the patient serum sample was measured at a protein concentration of 1 mg/mL and expressed in arbitrary units after normalization with the native BSA preparation[41].

Hepatic imaging and NAFLD classification

Ultrasound has been recommended as the first-line method for evaluating hepatic steatosis due to its safety, low cost, and noninvasiveness[42,43]. Among the most common ultrasonography parameters for assessing NAFLD, we have chosen hepatic attenuation of the ultrasound beam because of its better diagnostic performance as previously described[44]. A standard B-mode ultrasound evaluation was performed using a visual grading system based on the degree of loss of definition of the diaphragm posterior to the right hepatic lobe. Liver ultrasound examinations were performed by previously trained operators using a high-resolution B-mode scanner (SSA-790A, Aplio XG, Toshiba Medical System, Tokyo, Japan) and a convex array transducer (model PVT-375BT), with a central frequency of–3.5 MHz and a fundamental frequency of 1.9-5.0 MHz, the same models of equipment used by the participants at enrollment. After the acquisition process, the B-mode hepatic ultrasound images were read, and the quality control protocol was verified by a senior ultrasound radiologist following a standardized protocol[44]. The presence of steatosis was classified as mild (partial, i.e., > 50% visualization of the diaphragm), moderate (partial, i.e., < 50% visualization of the diaphragm), or severe (no visualization of the diaphragm), as previously validated[44].

Serum biomarkers

Liver steatosis predictive models previously reported in the literature were used to compare the effect of NAFLD classification method on the associations based on fatty liver index (FLI) and hepatic steatosis index (HSI), an algorithm for the prediction of fatty liver in the general population. The FLI is a prevalent biomarker panel consisting of BMI, waist circumference, triglycerides, and gamma-glutamyl transferase for identifying NAFLD, with a total score varying between 0 and 100. The presence of liver steatosis was defined as an FLI ≥ 60, and the absence was defined as FLI < 30[45]. The FLI was calculated according to the following algorithm: FLI = ey/(1 + ey) × 100, where y = 0.953 × ln (triglycerides, mg/dL) + 0.139 × BMI, kg/m2 + 0.718 × ln (GGT, U/L) + 0.053 × waist circumference, cm – 15.745.

The HSI is a biomarker panel consisting of BMI, diabetes, and the ALT/AST ratio. Liver steatosis was defined as HSI ≥ 36[46]. HSI = 8 × ALT/AST ratio + BMI (+ 2, if diabetes mellitus; + 2, if female).

The atherogenic index (AI), a biomarker used to predict the susceptibility of individuals for developing cardiovascular diseases and atherosclerosis, is strongly associated with NAFLD, which can be used in the auxiliary diagnosis of NAFLD. AI consists of the logarithm of the molar ratio of triglyceride to HDL cholesterol. According to previous studies, AI was stratified into three groups: low (< 0.11), intermediate (0.11-0.21), and high (> 0.21) risk[47].

Statistical analysis

The participants were grouped according to the severity of NAFLD-associated steatosis: mild, and moderate/severe pooled. Clinical and laboratory characteristics were described by median (interquartile range) for continuous variables and by frequency (percentage) for categorical variables. The serum AGE content of the participants was compared across the steatosis stratification. Given the ordinal nature of steatosis stratification groups, we ran trend analysis using Jonckheere-Terpstra for continuous variables and Cox-Mantel-Haenszel for categorical variables. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to analyze correlations between serum AGE levels and the grade of steatosis. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between hepatic steatosis severity (moderate/severe pooled) and high levels of serum AGEs (AGEs ≥ 0.85, according to the median of AGE values in the study population). Odds ratios (ORs) were obtained from logistic regression analysis, and the results were presented as ORs with a 95% confidence interval (CI). NAFLD-associated steatosis severity was the dependent variable. In the first model, AGEs were the independent variables; in the second model, the first model plus gender; in the third model, the second model plus gamma-glutamyl transferase levels; in the fourth model, the third model plus altered fasting blood glucose (110 ≤ 125 mg/dL or ≥ 126 mg/dL); in the fifth model, the fourth model plus high cholesterol. This study achieved this model’s performance by three folder cross-validations, including sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The receiver operator characteristic curves (ROCs) were drawn, which can assess the logistic regression model’s prediction performance. Data analysis was performed using R version 3.6.2 (R Project for Statistical Computing) and run in RStudio version 1.2.5033 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

RESULTS

Of the 305 individuals from the overall sample, 56% were male, and the median age was 51 (45-55) years. The median (interquartile) serum AGE content was 0.85 (0.76-0.96). Mild steatosis was present in 182 (60%), moderate in 111 (36%), and severe in 12 (4%) individuals. The AGE levels based on NAFLD-associated steatosis stratification were 0.82 (0.75-0.92), 0.86 (0.79-0.98), and 0.98 (0.82-1.10) for mild, moderate, and severe steatosis, respectively. For the subsequent analyses, due to the low frequency of severe steatosis, the moderate and severe individuals were pooled into a single group with 123 (40%) individuals.

Table 1 displays the characteristics of the participants. According to NAFLD-associated steatosis grade, from mild to moderate/severe , individuals were older, but no difference was found between genders. No difference was observed in smoking habits or use of alcohol. According to the NCEP ATP III definition, individuals with the most severe forms of steatosis had a higher prevalence of MetS (63% vs 34%, P ≤ 0.001), diabetes mellitus (37% vs 14%, P ≤ 0.001), and high cholesterol (51% vs 33%, P ≤ 0.001). Similarly, individuals with increasing severity of steatosis presented increasing waist circumference, BMI, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, insulin, triglycerides, ALT, GGT, C-reactive protein, and uric acid levels and lower HDL. There were no significant differences in total cholesterol, AST, microalbuminuria, creatinine, sodium, and potassium levels among groups (Table 1).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics according to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-associated steatosis severity.

Mild (n = 182)
Moderate/severe (n = 123)
P value1
Age (yr)50 (44-54)52 (45-57)0.002
Gender
Male99 (54)72 (59)0.503
Female83 (46)51 (41)
Race
Black17 (9)15 (12)0.383
Brown52 (29)41 (34)
White109 (61)61 (50)
Asian2 (1)3 (2)
Indigenous0 (0)2 (2)
Use of alcohol
Never used15 (8)10 (8)0.144
Ex-user46 (25)22 (18)
User121 (67)91 (74)
Smoking habit
Non smoker102 (56)62 (50)0.261
Smoker80 (44)61 (50)
Metabolic syndrome (NCEP ATP III)
Presence62 (34)78 (63)< 0.001
Absence120 (66)45 (37)
Diabetes mellitus
Presence25 (14)45 (37)< 0.001
Absence157 (86)78 (63)
High cholesterol
Presence59 (33)62 (51)< 0.001
Absence122 (67)61 (49)
Body mass index (kg/m2)26.6 (24.6-29.6)29.2 (27.2-32.3)< 0.001
Waist circumference (cm)94.1 (87.5-100.0)101.5 (94.1-107.5)< 0.001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)117 (108-127.5)121.5 (113.5-131.2)0.001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)75.5 (69.6-81.5)79.5 (74.0-86.0)< 0.001
Laboratory
Fasting glucose (mg/dL)99.28 (93.33-105.84)104.24 (97.79-116.14)< 0.001
HbA1c (mg/dL)5.40 (5.1-5.8)5.76 (5.3-6.2)< 0.001
Insulin (mcUI/mL)9.91 (7.1-13.9)13.71 (10.5-19.32)< 0.001
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)199.6 (176.8-227.6)196.2 (175.3-222.8)0.636
Triglycerides (mg/dL)107.8 (79.0-152.4)137.15 (99.6-225.0)< 0.001
HDL (mg/dL)50.1 (42.9-60.1)47.45 (42.0-54.2)0.007
ALT (mg/dL)25 (19-33)30 (22.5-40)0.001
AST (mg/dL)24 (21-28)24 (21-29.5)0.276
GGT (mg/dL)24 (18-35)33 (23-51)< 0.001
hs-CRP (mg/dL)1.6 (0.8-3.5)2.2 (1.4-4.7)< 0.001
Uric acid (mg/dL)5.4 (4.5-6.6)6 (5.2-6.9)< 0.001
Microalbuminuria (mg/dL)0.50 (0.33-0.82)0.51 (0.31-1.05)0.265
Creatinine (mg/dL)0.87 (0.77-0.97)0.87 (0.77-0.97)0.324
Sodium (mg/dL)143 (141-144)143 (141-144)0.200
Potassium (mg/dL)4.5 (4.2-4.7)4.4 (4.2-4.7)0.820

Table 2 shows the association between the FLI, HIS, and AI with the severity of NAFLD-associated steatosis. Notably, increased degrees of steatosis resulted in increased values of the evaluated indexes (Table 2).

Table 2 Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-associated steatosis stratification accordingly to fatty liver serum biomarkers.

Mild (n = 182)
Moderate/severe (n = 123)
P value1
Fatty liver index44.65 (26.71-67.91)74.50 (54.08-88.16)< 0.001
Hepatic steatosis index36.66 (33.63-40.89)41.22 (37.75-45.47)< 0.001
Atherogenic index0.35 (0.16-0.50)0.44 (0.29-0.70)< 0.001

Higher serum AGE content was present in the moderate/severe group of individuals than in the mild steatosis group (P = 0.008) (Figure 2). In addition, the serum AGE levels were correlated with the steatosis grade in the overall sample (rho = 0.146, P = 0.010).

Figure 2
Figure 2 Boxplot showing the distribution of advanced glycation end product values in serum in the group of participants with mild steatosis and the group of participants with moderate/severe pooled steatosis. Data are shown as median ± inter-quartile range. bP< 0.001. AGE: Advanced glycation end product; RFU: Relative fluorescent units.

Logistic regression analysis was performed to verify if subjects with higher serum AGE content were more likely to have severe forms of NAFLD accordingly to steatosis levels (Table 3). The results showed that only high AGE serum levels (OR: 2.65, 95%CI: 1.05-6.92) was an independent risk factor for severe NAFLD-associated steatosis, and all four models showed a consistent relationship with the severity of steatosis in NAFLD (Table 3). The risk of moderate or severe NAFLD-associated steatosis in the highest serum AGE content was 239% (OR: 3.39; 95%CI: 1.24-9.98) after adjustment for sex. A similar association was also observed in model 2 after additional adjustment for GGT levels. Model 3 was also associated with an increased risk of severe forms of NAFLD-associated steatosis after additional adjustment for hyperglycemia (OR: 4.53, 95%CI: 1.44-16.28). In model 4, the risk was 4.6-fold higher after adjusting for hypercholesterolemia (OR: 4.67, 95%CI: 1.46-17.17).

Table 3 Effect of high advanced glycation end product levels on the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-associated steatosis severity.
Variable
SE
OR (95%CI)
Sensitivity
Specificity
Accuracy
Crude model0.472.64 (1.04-6.92)0.620.610.61
Model 10.523.38 (1.24-9.98)0.600.730.64
Model 20.553.34 (1.17-10.40)0.710.680.69
Model 30.614.52 (1.44-16.28)0.780.720.75
Model 40.624.66 (1.45-17.16)0.770.770.77

To further confirm the predictive power of high AGE levels for NAFLD-stratification accordingly to hepatic steatosis , ROC analysis for the diagnostic value for steatosis was done (Figure 3). The areas under the curve (AUC) for AGEs in model 4 of adjustment (0.83) would have the most clinical implications for predicting the severity of NAFLD-associated steatosis, with a sensitivity of 0.77, a specificity of 0.77, and an accuracy of 0.77, followed by model 3 (AUC = 0.81), model 2 (AUC = 0.79), model 1 (AUC = 0.72), and the crude model (AUC = 0.62) (Table 3, Supplementary Table 1, and Figure 3).

Figure 3
Figure 3 Receiver operating characteristic curves and corresponding areas under the curve of models to predict non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-associated steatosis. ROC: Receiver operating characteristic; CI: Confidence interval.
DISCUSSION

Addressing the specific mechanisms by which NAFLD progresses could potentially open new frontiers for preventive and monitoring strategies for liver diseases. In this study, we investigated the relationship between plasmatic AGE levels and severity of NAFLD-associated steatosis in a racially/ethnically diverse cohort at baseline of the ELSA-Brasil study. Steatosis stratification based on serum biomarker indexes, that is, FLI, HSI, and AI, was associated with the ultrasonography grade of NAFLD previously described[45-47], with higher values for moderate/severe group. Serum AGE levels were positively correlated with the steatosis stage; that is, AGE content was significantly higher in subjects with moderate/severe forms of steatosis compared to the mild form. Logistic regression analysis after adjusting for confounding variables showed that subjects with higher serum AGE content had a 4.6-fold increased chance of having moderate or severe forms of steatosis when compared to that in those with low levels of serum AGEs. According to the results of the ROC analyses from the current study, AGEs could be a good marker of steatosis severity in patients with NAFLD and might be a potential biomarker in predicting NAFLD progression. Therefore, fluorescent AGEs could be a potential plasmatic biomarker for risk stratification of NAFLD accordingly to the severity of hepatic steatosis.

A proposed mechanism to explain why some patients with NAFLD progress to more severe forms of NAFLD is the multiple-hit hypothesis. In this hypothesis, the deposition of fat in the liver is the first hit, whereas the progression requires the involvement of other factors[48]. Emerging evidence highlighted that AGEs can act as a critical ‘hit’ being one factor that drives the progression from simple NAFLD to NASH and liver fibrosis[18,49]. Previously, the correlation of CML level with the clinical score of patients with liver cirrhosis showed a direct relationship with the severity of disease[50]. We and others have demonstrated increased deposition of AGEs in the liver of animals with NAFLD, MetS, and diabetes[35,41,50-57], which was associated with microcirculatory disturbances[53]. Furthermore, treatment with pyridoxamine, an AGE inhibitor, reduced the microcirculatory and metabolic alterations caused by NAFLD[53]. Using biopsies, Gaens et al[56] showed that Ne-(carboxymethyl) lysine (CML), as assessed by immunohistochemistry, was increased in the liver of obese individuals who underwent bariatric surgery, and AGE levels were associated with the grade of hepatic steatosis and inflammation, suggesting that AGEs could contribute to NAFLD progression. Furthermore, incubation of human hepatic stellate cells with AGEs increased the expression of fibrotic and cell proliferation markers, suggesting that these compounds can contribute to the development of NASH[58]. Mechanistically, AGE formation may result in loss of hepatocyte function, while intracellular accumulation of AGEs causes cell death[59]. Moreover, the interaction of extracellular AGEs with its receptor RAGE in hepatocytes[60] promotes inflammation, a characteristic feature of NAFLD progression to NASH[61]. In addition, fatty acids stimulate CML accumulation in hepatocytes and subsequently elicit inflammatory reactions via RAGE activation[56].

Although some studies have highlighted the involvement of AGEs in liver diseases, only two previous studies assessed the correlation between serum AGEs and the severity of NAFLD. The study by Hyogo et al[34] showed that AGE levels were elevated in NASH patients compared to individuals with simple steatosis. Świderska et al[62] reported that AGEs can be used as a biomarker to differentiate between patients with minimal vs moderate steatosis, but in a small cohort (early NAFLD n = 29 and advanced NAFLD n = 38). We addressed the AGE levels in subjects with mild and moderate/severe steatosis in a larger cohort. Presently, we assessed AGE levels by fluorescent spectroscopy, while the study by Hyogo et al[34] used ELISA. Fluorescence spectroscopy is an easy, rapid, and cost-effective method that has been previously proposed as a reliable tool that can be used to distinguish patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes from healthy subjects[63,64]. Recently, Heidari et al[65] showed that serum levels of AGEs increase progressively with increasing duration of diabetes, and proposed the monitoring of fluorescent AGEs as an estimation tool for diabetes chronicity.

Along with increasing NAFLD-associated steatosis severity, increased AGE is associated with a concomitant worsening of the metabolic profile, namely MetS, diabetes mellitus, cholesterol levels, BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, and lipid and glycemic profile[66-70]. In our study, the results of logistic multiple regression analysis showed that, as well as AGEs, altered fasting blood glucose and high cholesterol levels were associated with the severity of steatosis in NAFLD. The risk of severe steatosis in individuals with altered fasting blood glucose and high cholesterol was 6.730 and 3.490 times higher than that in subjects with a normal range of blood glucose and cholesterol, respectively. Although the precise pathological process has not been elucidated, it has been widely accepted that excess triglyceride accumulation in the liver is a prerequisite for NAFLD development. Triglyceride showed a great correlation with NAFLD in both epidemiologic studies[71] and pre-clinical research[72]. The progression of NAFLD results from an imbalance between lipid uptake and lipid disposal and eventually causes oxidative stress and hepatocyte injury. Excess lipid accumulation may result in impaired insulin signaling through cell autonomous mechanisms or through the induction of inflammation and the subsequent production of inflammatory cytokines by macrophages, which impair insulin action[73]. Increasing evidence suggests that subjects with hyperglycemia resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both have a particularly high risk for NASH, with varying degrees of liver fibrosis[74,75]. Insulin resistance may cause inflammation in the adipose tissue, which triggers the acceleration of lipolysis, resulting in increased free fatty acid export to the liver, leading to the accumulation of fat in the liver and consequently NAFLD[48,76]. It has already been demonstrated that AGE formation is accelerated under a hyperglycemic state, playing an important role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD and complications of diabetes[77,78]. Lipid peroxidation is also known to be involved in the generation of AGEs, and the glycation of lipids results in the formation of AGEs, which are related to triglyceride or HDL-C levels[79].

The current study has limitations that should be mentioned. First, it was not possible to distinguish people with NAFLD from healthy controls based on serum fluorescent AGE concentrations. Moreover, given the cross-sectional design of the study, no causal relations can be established. The sample size is higher than others in the field, but the sample size of the severe form of NAFLD-associated steatosis remains small, probably due to the study population being formed by healthy employees. Thus, the associations found here may be even greater in the general population. This might have limited our results to fully explore the relationship between glycation products and disease stages. As this was a single-center study, results and glycation levels should be extrapolated to other populations carefully.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this cross-sectional analysis of the ELSA-Brasil cohort baseline study showed that high serum AGE content was associated with severe forms of steatosis, with high serum AGE levels being an important risk factor for NAFLD-associated steatosis severity. In addition, serum AGE content was positively correlated with the severity of steatosis. These data suggest that AGEs might be a potential plasmatic biomarker for NAFLD stratification accordingly to hepatic steatosis. Our findings strengthen the involvement of AGE in NAFLD pathogenesis. These findings highlight the importance of including the evaluation of AGE status as a part of health examinations and may help health policy-makers prevent or delay NAFLD among the population.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Research background

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is considered the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome and it affects about 25% of the adult population, and can progress to hepatocellular carcinoma, death, and/or liver transplantation. The underlying mechanisms that account for disease progression are still not fully understood due to its complexity.

Research motivation

Liver diseases are associated with the excess formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), which induce tissue inflammation and oxidative damage. However, the trend of oxidative marker levels according to NAFLD severity is unclear.

Research objectives

We aim to understand whether NAFLD-associated steatosis severity was associated with serum AGE levels in the baseline data from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) study to address the specific pathophysiological mechanisms underlying NAFLD association with AGEs in a large and mixed population cohort.

Research methods

NAFLD-associated steatosis severity was classified by ultrasound hepatic attenuation: mild and moderate/severe pooled. The measurement of serum fluorescent AGE concentrations was based on spectrofluorimetric detection. Serum AGE content and clinical and laboratory characteristics of the participants were compared between groups. The correlation between serum AGE levels and the grade of steatosis was analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between serum AGE levels and NAFLD-associated steatosis severity. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Research results

According to hepatic steatosis grade in NAFLD, from mild to moderate/severe, individuals with the most severe forms of steatosis had a higher incidence of metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, and high cholesterol levels. Moreover, individuals with increasing severity of NAFLD-associated steatosis presented increasing waist circumference, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, insulin, triglycerides, alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, C-reactive protein, and uric acid levels and lower high-density lipoprotein. Higher serum AGE content was present in the moderate/severe group of individuals than in the mild group. In addition, the serum AGE levels were correlated with the steatosis grade in the overall sample. Logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for confounding variables, showed that subjects with higher serum AGE content had a 4.6-fold increased chance of having moderate or severe forms of NAFLD-associated steatosis when compared to low levels of serum AGEs.

Research conclusions

Steatosis severity in NAFLD patients was associated with serum AGE levels, thereafter AGEs could be a good marker of NAFLD stratification accordingly to steatosis grade, strengthening the involvement of AGE in NAFLD pathogenesis.

Research perspectives

Plasmatic fluorescent AGE quantification by spectroscopy could be a promising alternative method to monitor progression from mild to severe forms of NAFLD accordingly to the severity of hepatic steatosis.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank all the ELSA-Brasil participants for their invaluable contribution to this study.

Footnotes

Manuscript source: Unsolicited manuscript

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country/Territory of origin: Brazil

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): B, B

Grade C (Good): 0

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Geng TY, Li Z S-Editor: Gao CC L-Editor: A P-Editor: Liu JH

References
1.  Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Charlton M, Cusi K, Rinella M, Harrison SA, Brunt EM, Sanyal AJ. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018;67:328-357.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3544]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4051]  [Article Influence: 675.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (7)]
2.  Muthiah MD, Sanyal AJ. Current management of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Liver Int. 2020;40 Suppl 1:89-95.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 35]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 9.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Calzadilla Bertot L, Adams LA. The Natural Course of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 339]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 397]  [Article Influence: 49.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Younossi Z, Stepanova M, Ong JP, Jacobson IM, Bugianesi E, Duseja A, Eguchi Y, Wong VW, Negro F, Yilmaz Y, Romero-Gomez M, George J, Ahmed A, Wong R, Younossi I, Ziayee M, Afendy A;  Global Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Council. Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Is the Fastest Growing Cause of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplant Candidates. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17:748-755.e3.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 388]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 478]  [Article Influence: 95.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Younossi ZM, Stepanova M, Ong J, Trimble G, AlQahtani S, Younossi I, Ahmed A, Racila A, Henry L. Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Is the Most Rapidly Increasing Indication for Liver Transplantation in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;19:580-589.e5.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 148]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 231]  [Article Influence: 77.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Younossi ZM. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - A global public health perspective. J Hepatol. 2019;70:531-544.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 943]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1128]  [Article Influence: 225.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Younossi Z, Anstee QM, Marietti M, Hardy T, Henry L, Eslam M, George J, Bugianesi E. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15:11-20.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2383]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3032]  [Article Influence: 505.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
8.  Yki-Järvinen H. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as a cause and a consequence of metabolic syndrome. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:901-910.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 764]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 809]  [Article Influence: 80.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Wainwright P, Byrne CD. Bidirectional Relationships and Disconnects between NAFLD and Features of the Metabolic Syndrome. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:367.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 73]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 88]  [Article Influence: 11.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Kanwar P, Kowdley KV. The Metabolic Syndrome and Its Influence on Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Clin Liver Dis. 2016;20:225-243.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 68]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 69]  [Article Influence: 8.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Golabi P, Otgonsuren M, de Avila L, Sayiner M, Rafiq N, Younossi ZM. Components of metabolic syndrome increase the risk of mortality in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e0214.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 107]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 126]  [Article Influence: 21.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Lonardo A, Nascimbeni F, Mantovani A, Targher G. Hypertension, diabetes, atherosclerosis and NASH: Cause or consequence? J Hepatol. 2018;68:335-352.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 361]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 432]  [Article Influence: 72.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Zhou JH, Cai JJ, She ZG, Li HL. Noninvasive evaluation of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Current evidence and practice. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:1307-1326.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 120]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 126]  [Article Influence: 25.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (3)]
14.  Castera L, Friedrich-Rust M, Loomba R. Noninvasive Assessment of Liver Disease in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:1264-1281.e4.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 619]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 782]  [Article Influence: 156.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Tannapfel A, Denk H, Dienes HP, Langner C, Schirmacher P, Trauner M, Flott-Rahmel B. Histopathological diagnosis of non-alcoholic and alcoholic fatty liver disease. Virchows Arch. 2011;458:511-523.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 81]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 91]  [Article Influence: 7.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Hernaez R, Lazo M, Bonekamp S, Kamel I, Brancati FL, Guallar E, Clark JM. Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of ultrasonography for the detection of fatty liver: a meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2011;54:1082-1090.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 864]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 971]  [Article Influence: 74.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Cesaretti M, Addeo P, Schiavo L, Anty R, Iannelli A. Assessment of Liver Graft Steatosis: Where Do We Stand? Liver Transpl. 2019;25:500-509.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Buzzetti E, Pinzani M, Tsochatzis EA. The multiple-hit pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Metabolism. 2016;65:1038-1048.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1490]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1706]  [Article Influence: 213.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
19.  Fernando DH, Forbes JM, Angus PW, Herath CB. Development and Progression of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: The Role of Advanced Glycation End Products. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 70]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 91]  [Article Influence: 18.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Fang YL, Chen H, Wang CL, Liang L. Pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescence: From "two hit theory" to "multiple hit model". World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24:2974-2983.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 191]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 202]  [Article Influence: 33.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
21.  Sayej WN, Knight Iii PR, Guo WA, Mullan B, Ohtake PJ, Davidson BA, Khan A, Baker RD, Baker SS. Advanced Glycation End Products Induce Obesity and Hepatosteatosis in CD-1 Wild-Type Mice. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:7867852.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 4.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Leung C, Herath CB, Jia Z, Goodwin M, Mak KY, Watt MJ, Forbes JM, Angus PW. Dietary glycotoxins exacerbate progression of experimental fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2014;60:832-838.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 61]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 63]  [Article Influence: 6.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Singh R, Barden A, Mori T, Beilin L. Advanced glycation end-products: a review. Diabetologia. 2001;44:129-146.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1761]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1680]  [Article Influence: 73.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Goldberg T, Cai W, Peppa M, Dardaine V, Baliga BS, Uribarri J, Vlassara H. Advanced glycoxidation end products in commonly consumed foods. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:1287-1291.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 488]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 489]  [Article Influence: 24.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Fishman SL, Sonmez H, Basman C, Singh V, Poretsky L. The role of advanced glycation end-products in the development of coronary artery disease in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: a review. Mol Med. 2018;24:59.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 144]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 164]  [Article Influence: 27.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Palma-Duran SA, Kontogianni MD, Vlassopoulos A, Zhao S, Margariti A, Georgoulis M, Papatheodoridis G, Combet E. Serum levels of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) and the decoy soluble receptor for AGEs (sRAGE) can identify non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in age-, sex- and BMI-matched normo-glycemic adults. Metabolism. 2018;83:120-127.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54]  [Article Influence: 9.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Chou PS, Wu MN, Yang CC, Shen CT, Yang YH. Effect of Advanced Glycation End Products on the Progression of Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;72:191-197.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Kanauchi M, Tsujimoto N, Hashimoto T. Advanced glycation end products in nondiabetic patients with coronary artery disease. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1620-1623.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 76]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 80]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Schalkwijk CG, Baidoshvili A, Stehouwer CD, van Hinsbergh VW, Niessen HW. Increased accumulation of the glycoxidation product Nepsilon-(carboxymethyl)lysine in hearts of diabetic patients: generation and characterisation of a monoclonal anti-CML antibody. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1636:82-89.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 78]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 84]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Kralev S, Zimmerer E, Brueckmann M, Lang S, Kälsch T, Rippert A, Lin J, Borggrefe M, Hammes HP, Süselbeck T. Elevation of the glycoxidation product N(epsilon)-(carboxymethyl)lysine in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47:446-451.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Singh VP, Bali A, Singh N, Jaggi AS. Advanced glycation end products and diabetic complications. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2014;18:1-14.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 750]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 836]  [Article Influence: 83.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Choudhuri S, Dutta D, Sen A, Chowdhury IH, Mitra B, Mondal LK, Saha A, Bhadhuri G, Bhattacharya B. Role of N-ε- carboxy methyl lysine, advanced glycation end products and reactive oxygen species for the development of nonproliferative and proliferative retinopathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mol Vis. 2013;19:100-113.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Mori H, Kuroda A, Araki M, Suzuki R, Taniguchi S, Tamaki M, Akehi Y, Matsuhisa M. Advanced glycation end-products are a risk for muscle weakness in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Investig. 2017;8:377-382.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44]  [Article Influence: 5.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Hyogo H, Yamagishi S, Iwamoto K, Arihiro K, Takeuchi M, Sato T, Ochi H, Nonaka M, Nabeshima Y, Inoue M, Ishitobi T, Chayama K, Tazuma S. Elevated levels of serum advanced glycation end products in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:1112-1119.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 138]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 138]  [Article Influence: 8.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Pereira ENGDS, Silvares RR, Flores EEI, Rodrigues KL, Ramos IP, da Silva IJ, Machado MP, Miranda RA, Pazos-Moura CC, Gonçalves-de-Albuquerque CF, Faria-Neto HCC, Tibiriça E, Daliry A. Hepatic microvascular dysfunction and increased advanced glycation end products are components of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0179654.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34]  [Article Influence: 4.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Sakasai-Sakai A, Takata T, Takino JI, Takeuchi M. The Relevance of Toxic AGEs (TAGE) Cytotoxicity to NASH Pathogenesis: A Mini-Review. Nutrients. 2019;11.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Schmidt MI, Duncan BB, Mill JG, Lotufo PA, Chor D, Barreto SM, Aquino EM, Passos VM, Matos SM, Molina Mdel C, Carvalho MS, Bensenor IM. Cohort Profile: Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:68-75.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 304]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 385]  [Article Influence: 38.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Bensenor IM, Griep RH, Pinto KA, Faria CP, Felisbino-Mendes M, Caetano EI, Albuquerque Lda S, Schmidt MI. [Routines of organization of clinical tests and interviews in the ELSA-Brasil investigation center]. Rev Saude Publica. 2013;47 Suppl 2:37-47.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 92]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 128]  [Article Influence: 12.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Aquino EM, Barreto SM, Bensenor IM, Carvalho MS, Chor D, Duncan BB, Lotufo PA, Mill JG, Molina Mdel C, Mota EL, Passos VM, Schmidt MI, Szklo M. Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil): objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;175:315-324.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 417]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 520]  [Article Influence: 43.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Nakayama H, Mitsuhashi T, Kuwajima S, Aoki S, Kuroda Y, Itoh T, Nakagawa S. Immunochemical detection of advanced glycation end products in lens crystallins from streptozocin-induced diabetic rat. Diabetes. 1993;42:345-350.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 67]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 69]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Rodrigues KL, Borges JP, Lopes GO, Pereira ENGDS, Mediano MFF, Farinatti P, Tibiriça E, Daliry A. Influence of Physical Exercise on Advanced Glycation End Products Levels in Patients Living With the Human Immunodeficiency Virus. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1641.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Papatheodoridi M, Cholongitas E. Diagnosis of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD): Current Concepts. Curr Pharm Des. 2018;24:4574-4586.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 88]  [Article Influence: 17.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Celle G, Savarino V, Picciotto A, Magnolia MR, Scalabrini P, Dodero M. Is hepatic ultrasonography a valid alternative tool to liver biopsy? Dig Dis Sci. 1988;33:467-471.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 51]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 55]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Goulart AC, Oliveira IR, Alencar AP, Santos MS, Santos IS, Martines BM, Meireles DP, Martines JA, Misciagna G, Benseñor IM, Lotufo PA. Diagnostic accuracy of a noninvasive hepatic ultrasound score for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). Sao Paulo Med J. 2015;133:115-124.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Bedogni G, Bellentani S, Miglioli L, Masutti F, Passalacqua M, Castiglione A, Tiribelli C. The Fatty Liver Index: a simple and accurate predictor of hepatic steatosis in the general population. BMC Gastroenterol. 2006;6:33.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1238]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1604]  [Article Influence: 89.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Lee JH, Kim D, Kim HJ, Lee CH, Yang JI, Kim W, Kim YJ, Yoon JH, Cho SH, Sung MW, Lee HS. Hepatic steatosis index: a simple screening tool reflecting nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42:503-508.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 596]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 804]  [Article Influence: 57.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  Wang Q, Zheng D, Liu J, Fang L, Li Q. Atherogenic index of plasma is a novel predictor of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in obese participants: a cross-sectional study. Lipids Health Dis. 2018;17:284.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
48.  Tilg H, Adolph TE, Moschen AR. Multiple Parallel Hits Hypothesis in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Revisited After a Decade. Hepatology. 2021;73:833-842.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 113]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 152]  [Article Influence: 50.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Raposeiras-Roubín S, Rodiño-Janeiro BK, Paradela-Dobarro B, Grigorian-Shamagian L, García-Acuña JM, Aguiar-Souto P, Jacquet-Hervet M, Reino-Maceiras MV, González-Juanatey JR, Álvarez E. Fluorescent advanced glycation end products and their soluble receptor: the birth of new plasmatic biomarkers for risk stratification of acute coronary syndrome. PLoS One. 2013;8:e74302.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Sebeková K, Kupcová V, Schinzel R, Heidland A. Markedly elevated levels of plasma advanced glycation end products in patients with liver cirrhosis - amelioration by liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2002;36:66-71.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 89]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 93]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Silvares RR, Pereira EN, Flores EE, Estato V, Reis PA, Silva IJ, Machado MP, Neto HC, Tibiriça E, Daliry A. Combined therapy with metformin and insulin attenuates systemic and hepatic alterations in a model of high-fat diet-/streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Int J Exp Pathol. 2016;97:266-277.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Rangel Silvares R, Nunes Goulart da Silva Pereira E, Eduardo Ilaquita Flores E, Lino Rodrigues K, Ribeiro Silva A, Gonçalves-de-Albuquerque CF, Daliry A. High-fat diet-induced kidney alterations in rats with metabolic syndrome: endothelial dysfunction and decreased antioxidant defense. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019;12:1773-1781.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  Pereira ENGDS, Silvares RR, Flores EEI, Rodrigues KL, Daliry A. Pyridoxamine improves metabolic and microcirculatory complications associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Microcirculation. 2020;27:e12603.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
54.  Sil R, Ray D, Chakraborti AS. Glycyrrhizin ameliorates metabolic syndrome-induced liver damage in experimental rat model. Mol Cell Biochem. 2015;409:177-189.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
55.  Gaens KH, Goossens GH, Niessen PM, van Greevenbroek MM, van der Kallen CJ, Niessen HW, Rensen SS, Buurman WA, Greve JW, Blaak EE, van Zandvoort MA, Bierhaus A, Stehouwer CD, Schalkwijk CG. Nε-(carboxymethyl)lysine-receptor for advanced glycation end product axis is a key modulator of obesity-induced dysregulation of adipokine expression and insulin resistance. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34:1199-1208.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 130]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 147]  [Article Influence: 14.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
56.  Gaens KH, Niessen PM, Rensen SS, Buurman WA, Greve JW, Driessen A, Wolfs MG, Hofker MH, Bloemen JG, Dejong CH, Stehouwer CD, Schalkwijk CG. Endogenous formation of Nε-(carboxymethyl)lysine is increased in fatty livers and induces inflammatory markers in an in vitro model of hepatic steatosis. J Hepatol. 2012;56:647-655.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 79]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 84]  [Article Influence: 7.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
57.  Sharifi N, Amani R, Hajiani E, Cheraghian B. Does vitamin D improve liver enzymes, oxidative stress, and inflammatory biomarkers in adults with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease? Endocrine. 2014;47:70-80.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 162]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 159]  [Article Influence: 15.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
58.  Iwamoto K, Kanno K, Hyogo H, Yamagishi S, Takeuchi M, Tazuma S, Chayama K. Advanced glycation end products enhance the proliferation and activation of hepatic stellate cells. J Gastroenterol. 2008;43:298-304.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 83]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 88]  [Article Influence: 5.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
59.  Sakasai-Sakai A, Takata T, Takino JI, Takeuchi M. Impact of intracellular glyceraldehyde-derived advanced glycation end-products on human hepatocyte cell death. Sci Rep. 2017;7:14282.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
60.  Yamagishi S, Matsui T. Role of receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) in liver disease. Eur J Med Res. 2015;20:15.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 45]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
61.  Takino J, Yamagishi S, Takeuchi M. Glycer-AGEs-RAGE signaling enhances the angiogenic potential of hepatocellular carcinoma by upregulating VEGF expression. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:1781-1788.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 49]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
62.  Świderska M, Maciejczyk M, Zalewska A, Pogorzelska J, Flisiak R, Chabowski A. Oxidative stress biomarkers in the serum and plasma of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Can plasma AGE be a marker of NAFLD? Free Radic Res. 2019;53:841-850.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 64]  [Article Influence: 12.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
63.  Wróbel K, Wróbel K, Garay-Sevilla ME, Nava LE, Malacara JM. Novel analytical approach to monitoring advanced glycosylation end products in human serum with on-line spectrophotometric and spectrofluorometric detection in a flow system. Clin Chem. 1997;43:1563-1569.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
64.  Kalousová M, Skrha J, Zima T. Advanced glycation end-products and advanced oxidation protein products in patients with diabetes mellitus. Physiol Res. 2002;51:597-604.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
65.  Heidari F, Rabizadeh S, Rajab A, Heidari F, Mouodi M, Mirmiranpour H, Esteghamati A, Nakhjavani M. Advanced glycation end-products and advanced oxidation protein products levels are correlates of duration of type 2 diabetes. Life Sci. 2020;260:118422.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
66.  Sayiner M, Koenig A, Henry L, Younossi ZM. Epidemiology of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in the United States and the Rest of the World. Clin Liver Dis. 2016;20:205-214.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 323]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 347]  [Article Influence: 43.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
67.  Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64:73-84.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5322]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6259]  [Article Influence: 782.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
68.  Caligiuri A, Gentilini A, Marra F. Molecular Pathogenesis of NASH. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 107]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 120]  [Article Influence: 15.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
69.  Yesilova Z, Yaman H, Oktenli C, Ozcan A, Uygun A, Cakir E, Sanisoglu SY, Erdil A, Ates Y, Aslan M, Musabak U, Erbil MK, Karaeren N, Dagalp K. Systemic markers of lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in patients with nonalcoholic Fatty liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:850-855.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 199]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 205]  [Article Influence: 10.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
70.  Anstee QM, Targher G, Day CP. Progression of NAFLD to diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease or cirrhosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10:330-344.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1066]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1163]  [Article Influence: 105.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
71.  Amarapurkar D, Kamani P, Patel N, Gupte P, Kumar P, Agal S, Baijal R, Lala S, Chaudhary D, Deshpande A. Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: population based study. Ann Hepatol. 2007;6:161-163.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
72.  Samuel VT, Liu ZX, Qu X, Elder BD, Bilz S, Befroy D, Romanelli AJ, Shulman GI. Mechanism of hepatic insulin resistance in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:32345-32353.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 945]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 942]  [Article Influence: 47.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
73.  Patel P, Abate N. Body fat distribution and insulin resistance. Nutrients. 2013;5:2019-2027.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 177]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 210]  [Article Influence: 19.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
74.  Prashanth M, Ganesh HK, Vima MV, John M, Bandgar T, Joshi SR, Shah SR, Rathi PM, Joshi AS, Thakkar H, Menon PS, Shah NS. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Assoc Physicians India. 2009;57:205-210.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
75.  Leite NC, Villela-Nogueira CA, Pannain VL, Bottino AC, Rezende GF, Cardoso CR, Salles GF. Histopathological stages of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in type 2 diabetes: prevalences and correlated factors. Liver Int. 2011;31:700-706.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 119]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 123]  [Article Influence: 9.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
76.  Shimobayashi M, Albert V, Woelnerhanssen B, Frei IC, Weissenberger D, Meyer-Gerspach AC, Clement N, Moes S, Colombi M, Meier JA, Swierczynska MM, Jenö P, Beglinger C, Peterli R, Hall MN. Insulin resistance causes inflammation in adipose tissue. J Clin Invest. 2018;128:1538-1550.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 210]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 254]  [Article Influence: 42.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
77.  Bodiga VL, Eda SR, Bodiga S. Advanced glycation end products: role in pathology of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Heart Fail Rev. 2014;19:49-63.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 119]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 129]  [Article Influence: 12.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
78.  Santos JC, Valentim IB, de Araújo OR, Ataide Tda R, Goulart MO. Development of nonalcoholic hepatopathy: contributions of oxidative stress and advanced glycation end products. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:19846-19866.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 43]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 45]  [Article Influence: 4.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
79.  Nagai R, Shirakawa J, Fujiwara Y, Ohno R, Moroishi N, Sakata N, Nagai M. Detection of AGEs as markers for carbohydrate metabolism and protein denaturation. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2014;55:1-6.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]