Minireviews Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2016; 22(39): 8750-8759
Published online Oct 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i39.8750
Preoperative therapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer
Pankaj Kumar Garg, Jyoti Sharma, Ashish Jakhetiya, Aakanksha Goel, Manish Kumar Gaur
Pankaj Kumar Garg, Aakanksha Goel, Manish Kumar Gaur, Department of Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, University of Delhi, Delhi 110095, India
Jyoti Sharma, Department of Surgical Oncology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur 302004, India
Ashish Jakhetiya, Department of Surgical Oncology, Dr BRA Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
Author contributions: Garg PK conceptualized the study; Garg PK and Sharma J searched the literature, analyzed the retrieved literature, and wrote the initial draft; Jakhetiya A, Goel A and Gaur MK provided critical inputs in literature search and analysis, and drafting the manuscript; all the authors read the final draft and approved it.
Conflict-of-interest statement: There is no conflict of interest associated with any of the author.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Dr. Pankaj Kumar Garg, Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, University of Delhi, Dilshad Garden, Delhi 110095, India. dr.pankajgarg@gmail.com
Telephone: +91-11-22592536 Fax: +91-11-22590495
Received: June 7, 2016
Peer-review started: June 11, 2016
First decision: July 29, 2016
Revised: August 23, 2016
Accepted: September 28, 2016
Article in press: September 28, 2016
Published online: October 21, 2016

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is an aggressive malignancy associated with dismal treatment outcomes. Presence of two distinct histopathological types distinguishes it from other gastrointestinal tract malignancies. Surgery is the cornerstone of treatment in locally advanced esophageal cancer (T2 or greater or node positive); however, a high rate of disease recurrence (systemic and loco-regional) and poor survival justifies a continued search for optimal therapy. Various combinations of multimodality treatment (preoperative/perioperative, or postoperative; radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy) are being explored to lower disease recurrence and improve survival. Preoperative therapy followed by surgery is presently considered the standard of care in resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer as postoperative treatment may not be feasible for all the patients due to the morbidity of esophagectomy and prolonged recovery time limiting the tolerance of patient. There are wide variations in the preoperative therapy practiced across the centres depending upon the institutional practices, availability of facilities and personal experiences. There is paucity of literature to standardize the preoperative therapy. Broadly, chemoradiotherapy is the preferred neo-adjuvant modality in western countries whereas chemotherapy alone is considered optimal in the far East. The present review highlights the significant studies to assist in opting for the best evidence based preoperative therapy (radiotherapy, chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Key Words: Esophageal cancer, Preoperative therapy, Multimodality treatment, Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy

Core tip: The literature suggests that preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery results in optimal outcome while managing locally advanced esophageal cancer; however, there is a need to compare preoperative chemoradiotherapy with chemotherapy alone to further refine the role of preoperative therapy. The standard of care continues to be debated due to difference of opinions and practices across the world and lack of any trial with head-to-head comparison between these two established treatment protocols.



INTRODUCTION

The eighth most common cancer in the world is esophageal cancer. Esophageal cancer, being the sixth most common cause of death from cancer, has an overall ratio of mortality to incidence of 0.88[1]. Esophageal cancer comprises of two distinct histological entities, i.e. squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma. These two histological types differ in their epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, tumor biology, management and outcomes. SCC is common in Asia and Eastern Europe while adenocarcinoma is prevalent in North America and Western Europe. Unfortunately, majority of the patients present with locally advanced disease in esophageal cancer and survival is dismal regardless of histology.

Traditionally, surgical resection has been the mainstay of treatment with a potential to ensure loco-regional control as well as long-term survival. However, surgery alone fails to contend against the natural history of disease owing to the presence of occult micrometastasis and fatal distant and loco-regional disease relapse is common. Median survival after esophagectomy is 15 to 18 mo with a 5-year survival rate of 20% to 25%[2]. Therefore, clinicians now are inclined towards use of some form of multidisciplinary treatment including surgery as standard of care for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Locally advanced esophageal cancer can be defined as those restricted to the esophagus or resectable periesophageal tissue (T2-T4) and/or lymphnode involvement (N1-N3) in the absence of distant metastasis[3]. The optimal multimodality treatment is still controversial. Potential contentious issues exist regarding the (1) ideal approach-preoperative, perioperative, or postoperative and (2) ideal combination-radiotherapy, chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiation. Though various randomized and non-randomized trials have been conducted to address these issues, no standard guidelines have been established till date. This review will highlight the significant studies to assist in opting for the best evidence based multimodality management of esophageal cancer. We limit this review to preoperative therapy followed by surgery as it is presently considered the standard of care. The objectives of preoperative treatment are to downstage the tumor to achieve R0 resection, reduce local and distant disease relapses and thus improve survival.

PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY

High rate of local failure after curative resection led to conception of many studies in the ’80s and ’90s to evaluate the role of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) in esophageal cancer. Preoperative RT was envisaged to increase the resectability rates with negative circumferential margins, to lower the loco-regional recurrences and to improve survival. Five randomized control trials (RCTs) addressed this issue and compared preoperative RT followed by surgery to surgery alone. Table 1 displays the salient features of these RCTs[4-8]. None of the studies reported significantly higher complete resections following preoperative RT. Only two studies reported loco-regional recurrences in the study arms: Wang et al[7] reported no difference whereas Gignoux et al[8] observed significantly lower loco-regional recurrences following preoperative RT and surgery compared to surgery alone (46% vs 67%). None of the RCTs reported significant improvement in survival. Nygaard et al[6] reported improvement in 3-year overall survival (OS) (21% vs 9%) among patients who underwent surgery following preoperative RT compared to patients who were operated upfront. Oesophageal Cancer Collaborative Group conducted a quantitative meta-analysis using updated data from these five RCTs comprising 1147 patients to assess whether preoperative radiotherapy improves OS and whether it is differentially effective in patients defined by age, sex and tumour location[9] (Figure 1). In a group of patients with mostly squamous cell carcinoma, who had a median follow up of 9 years, the hazard ratio (HR) was found to be 0.89 (95%CI: 0.78-1.01). This suggested an overall reduction in the risk of death by 11% and an absolute survival benefit of 3% at 2 years and 4% at 5 years. It, however, failed to achieve conventional statistical significance (P = 0.062). There was no apparent difference in the magnitude of the benefit by sex, age or tumor location. The authors concluded that there is not enough evidence to suggest that preoperative radiotherapy improves the survival of patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer. The effect of such preoperative radiotherapy regimens is likely to be modest, even if they do improve survival. The absolute improvement in survival is not expected to be more than 3% to 4%. To detect such an improvement (from 15% to 20%) reliably, trials or a meta-analysis of not less than 2000 patients (90% power, 5% significance level) would be needed[10].

Table 1 Salient features of randomized controlled trials addressing the role of preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone in the management of esophageal cancer.
Ref.Study periodTreatmentNo. of patientsHistologyComplete resectionLocal recurrence rateOperative mortality5-yr OSConclusion
Launois et al[5], 19811973-197640 Gy RT + Surgery67SCC74%NA22.6%9.5%No significant benefit of pre-op RT
Surgery57SCC78%NA23.4%11.5%
Gignoux et al[8], 19871976-198233 Gy RT + SurgeryNASCC43%46%NA11%No significant benefit of pre-op RT
SurgeryNASCC55%67%NA10%
Wang et al[7], 19891977-198540 Gy RT + Surgery104SCC74%41%5%5%Higher pre-op RT dose or post-op RT required
Surgery102SCC65%34%6%30%
Arnott et al[4], 19931979-198320 Gy RT + Surgery90SCC/AC76%NANA9%No benefit of low dose RT
Surgery86SCC/AC72%NANA17%
Nygaard et al[6], 19921983-198835 Gy RT + SurgeryNASCC34%NANA21%Beneficial effect of pre-op RT
SurgeryNASCC32%NANA9%
Figure 1
Figure 1 Forest plot comparing survival in esophageal cancer in patients who received preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery vs surgery alone (Reproduced with permission from Arnott et al[9]).

It can be inferred, based on available RCTs, that preoperative radiation therapy is unlikely to benefit esophageal cancer patients, both in terms of significantly lowering local failure rate and improving survival.

PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY

Distant recurrence following curative resection in localized esophageal cancer constitutes significant proportion of disease relapse and invariably limits survival. Recurrence pattern analysis of 439 patients who underwent R0 resection highlighted that almost one fifth of the patients developed distant recurrence[11]. Furthermore, autopsy study of 43 curatively resected cases of esophageal cancer revealed that 17 of the 27 patients who had disease recurrence were found to have haematogenous metastasis[12]. Two studies showed that almost 80% of the patients had disseminated tumour cells in the bone marrow samples of ribs resected during esophagectomy for localized esophageal cancer[13,14]. Presence of systemic micro-metastasis in a significant number of esophageal cancer patients and the pattern of higher rates of distant recurrence leading to failure in curatively treated patients led to exploration of role of induction preoperative chemotherapy in esophageal cancer.

The enthusiasm to use preoperative chemotherapy arose due to its potential to exterminate micro-metastasis, to down-stage the tumor, thus enhancing resectability, to improve loco-regional control and to provide relief of dysphagia. The downside of giving preoperative chemotherapy is development of chemo-resistance and progression of disease in patients who do not respond to it. It is known that almost half of the patients are unresponsive to the presently employed chemotherapy[2]. Moreover, delay in local treatment can further compromise the already marginal nutritional status of the patient when surgery is not the initial treatment.

The role of preoperative/perioperative chemotherapy followed by surgery compared to surgery alone has been addressed by 13 RCTs (Table 2)[6,15-26]. A pooled random-effects meta-analysis of 10 RCTs comprising 2122 participants highlighted the lower risk of mortality among patients who were given preoperative chemotherapy compared to those treated with surgery alone (HR = 0.88, 95%CI: 0.80-0.96, P = 0.003)[27] (Figure 2). Another updated meta-analysis of 10 RCTs revealed that the risk of all-cause mortality was significantly less for preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery compared to surgery alone (pooled HR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.79-0.96, P = 0.005). The absolute survival difference at 2 years was calculated as 5.1% (number needed to treat = 19). A subgroup analysis by histological type for these studies showed that the preoperative chemotherapy proved beneficial in adenocarcinoma (HR = 0.83, 95%CI: 0.71-0.95, P = 0.01) and not in squamous-cell carcinoma (HR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.81-1.04, P = 0.18)[28].

Table 2 Salient features of randomized controlled trials addressing the role of preoperative/perioperative chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone in the management of esophageal cancer.
TrialsStudy periodTreatmentNo. of patientsHistologyR0 resectionpCRpN+Median follow upLRROS (%)Conclusions
Roth et al[21], 19881982-1986Periop Cisplatin vindesine, bleomycin + S19SCC35%6%NS30 moNS25 (3 yr)Prolonged OS in responders in perioperative chemotherapy arm with acceptable toxicity and post-op complications
Surgery20SCC21%-NS30 moNS05 (3 yr)No improvement in survival in chemotherapy arm
Nygaard et al[6], 19921983-1988Preop Cisplatin, Bleomycin + S44SCC44%NSNSNANS03 (3 yr)
Surgery41SCC36%-09 (3 yr)
Schlag et al[22], 19921980'sPreop FC + S22SCC44%6%NANANSNSNo influence on resectability or OS in chemotherapy arm. Rather, it results in Increase in side effects and postop mortality rate
Surgery24SCC45%-NANANSNS
Maipang et al[19], 19941988-1990Preop Cisplatin Vindesine, Bleomycin + S24SCCNS0%NSNANS31 (3 yr)Better OS in control group. Poorly nourished patients may tolerate smaller dosages of chemotherapy
Surgery22SCC-NA36 (3 yr)
Law et al[18], 19971989-1995Preop FC + S74SCC67%6.7%70NA1244 (2 yr)Significant downstaging and an increased likelihood of R0 resection in chemotherapy arm. No survival difference but responders fared better
Surgery73SCC35%-883031 (2 yr)
Ancona et al[15], 20011992-1997Preop FC + S47SCC90%13%NS30 mo3234 (5 yr)Significantly improved long term survival in patients with pathologic complete response following preoperative chemotherapy
Surgery47SCC87%-30 mo3422 (5 yr)
Cunnigham et al[26], 2006 (Magic trial)1994-2002Peri-op ECF + S37/250AC69.3%NANS4914.436.3 (5 yr)Peroperative chemotherapy decreased tumor size and stage, and significantly improved PFS, OS
Surgery36/253AC66.4%-4720.623 (5 yr)
Kelsen et al[17], (RTOG 8911, US Intergroup 113) 20071990-1995Preop FC + S213SCC - 98, AC - 11563%2.5%NS8.8 yr2523 (3 yr)No improvement in OS in chemotheray arm.Only R0 resection results in long-term survival, regardless of pre-op chemotherapy
Surgery227SCC - 106, AC - 12159%-1926 (3 yr)
MRC OEO2 trial, 2009 Allum et al[25]1992-1998Preop FC + S400SCC - 123, AC - 265, Others - 1260%4%585.9 yr11.523 (5 yr)Preop chemotherapy improves survival and should be considered as a standard of care
Surgery402SCC - 124, AC - 268, Others - 1054%-686.1 yr12.217 (5 yr)
Ychou et al[23], 20111995-2003Peri-op FC + S113AC84%3%678.8 yr1238 (5 yr)Peri-op chemotherapy significantly increased R0 resection rate, DFS, and OS
Surgery111AC73%-80824 (5 yr)
Boonstra et al[16], 20111989-1996Preop Cisplatin, Etoposide + S85SCC71%7%4315 mo1926 (5 yr)Significant improvement in OS in chemotherapy arm
Surgery84SCC57%-4614 mo2517 (5 yr)
Ando et al[24], 2012- JCOG 99072000-2006Preop FC + S164SCC96%2%6562 mo2555 (5 yr)Pre-op chemotherapy can be regarded as standard treatment
Surgery166SCC91%-76NA3143 (5 yr)
Figure 2
Figure 2 Forest plot comparing survival in esophageal cancer in patients who received preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery vs surgery alone (Reproduced with permission from Kidane et al[27]).

Though the objective of the present review is to analyze the role of preoperative therapy, it is worthwhile to discuss perioperative chemotherapy here as well. The role of perioperative chemotherapy (before and after the surgery) has been evaluated in lower esophageal adenocarcinoma in two RCTs. The British Medical Research Council conducted a phase III trial (MAGIC trial) to evaluate perioperative chemotherapy in the management of resectable gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma. Though the proportion of patients with esophageal cancers was less (lower esophagus 14% and esophagogastric junction 11%), results of this trial definitely indicated benefit of perioperative chemotherapy. OS significantly improved from 23% to 36%. Only 104 of 250 patients (41.6%) randomized to perioperative chemotherapy arm in this study could complete all six cycles of chemotherapy, due to disease progression or early death, patient choice, postoperative complications, prior toxicity, lack of response to preoperative treatment, and worsening coexisting disease, thus acting as a limitation[26]. Another recent FNCLCC/FFCD trial reported that perioperative chemotherapy improved 5-year OS from 24% to 38%. It must be noted that 75% of tumors in this trial were lower esophageal or junctional and among the 109 patients who received at least one cycle of preoperative chemotherapy, 54 patients (50%) received postoperative chemotherapy[23]. These two trials suggest that the approach of perioperative chemotherapy may be beneficial for patients with lower esophagus or junctional adenocarcinoma but only half of the patients are able to complete the planned treatment after surgery.

PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIATION

High risk of both loco-regional and systemic failures following curative treatment, led to integration of all three treatment modalities namely surgery, chemotherapy and radiation in the management of esophageal cancer. As preoperative RT failed to meet the high expectations of providing additional loco-regional control compared to surgery alone in esophageal cancer, attempts were made to use chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) as a double-edged sword. While RT was expected to improve loco-regional control, simultaneously, chemotherapy was thought to eradicate the micrometastasis. Chemotherapy adds several benefits with its use along with preoperative RT by (1) containing micrometastasis and lowering systemic failure; (2) providing additive effect to radiation by acting against the different tumor cell populations; and (3) providing assistance to radiotherapy for control of loco-regional disease (spatial cooperation)[29]. Spatial cooperation may exist at different levels: (1) with altered DNA repair or modification of the lesions induced by chemotherapy or radiation at the molecular level; (2) through cytokinetic cooperation arising from differential sensitivity of the various compartments of the cell cycle to the drug or radiation at the cellular level, notably; and (3) including re-oxygenation, increased drug uptake or inhibition of repopulation or angiogenesis at the tissue level[30].

Table 3 displays the RCTs which compared preoperative CRT followed by surgery to surgery alone[31-39]. The most promising trials which have almost established the role of preoperative CRT are the Dutch chemoradiotherapy in Oesophageal Cancer and the Surgery Study (CROSS) trials[29,38]. The investigators randomly assigned 368 patients with resectable esophageal cancers to either preoperative CRT followed by surgery or to surgery alone. The patients in preoperative CRT arm received weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel for 5 wk and concurrent radiotherapy (41.4 Gy in 23 fractions of 1.8 Gy each, with 5 fractions administered per week, starting on the first day of the first chemotherapy cycle) followed by surgery. The histopathological types were adenocarcinoma (75%), SCC (23%), and large-cell undifferentiated carcinoma (2%). R0 resection rates were significantly better in preoperative CRT arm compared to surgery alone (92% vs 69%, P < 0.001). More than one fourth of patients (29%) achieved pathological complete response following preoperative CRT. Though postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality were similar in the two groups, median OS was significantly better in preoperative CRT group (49.4 mo vs 24.0 mo, HR for survival, 0.657, 95%CI: 0.495-0.871, P = 0.003). However, the HR for esophageal adenocarcinoma was only marginally statistically significant (adjusted HR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.54-1.02, P = 0.07). Long- term results of the study were recently published. These revealed that the survival advantage for preoperative CRT persisted after a median follow up of 84.1 mo for surviving patients (range 61.1-116.8, IQR: 70.7-96.6). Median OS was 48.6 mo (95%CI 32.1-65.1) in the preoperative chemoradiotherapy plus surgery group and 24.0 mo (14.2-33.7) in the surgery alone group (HR = 0.68, 95%CI: 0.53-0.88, log-rank P = 0.003). The improvement in survival was evident for both histological subtypes - median OS for patients with squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinoma were 81.6 mo (95%CI: 47.2-116.0) and 43.2 mo (95%CI: 24.9-61.4) respectively in the preoperative CRT group compared to 21.1 mo (95%CI: 15.4-26.7) and 27.1 mo (95%CI: 13.0-41.2) in the surgery alone group[40]. Preoperative CRT led to significantly lower loco-regional recurrences (14% vs 34%, P < 0.001) and peritoneal carcinomatosis (4% vs 14%, P < 0.001)[41].

Table 3 Salient features of randomized controlled trials addressing the role of preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery vs surgery alone in the management of esophageal cancer.
TrialStudy periodTreatmentNo. of patientsHistologyCompleted treatmentR0pCRpN+LRRMedian survival (mo)OSTreatment related mortalityDFS median/proportionsConclusion
Apinop et al[31], 19941986-1992FC + 40 Gy RT + Surgery35SCC26NA26.9%NANANANSNSNANo statistically significant difference in OS, complication rate, mortality
Surgery34SCC-NA-NANANANSNSNA
Le Prise et al[32], 19941988-1991Sequential FC-20 Gy RT-FC + Surgery41SCC3951.0%NA17.9%1019.2 (3 yr)8.5%7.6 moNo change in operative mortality or survival time
Surgery45SCC4236.0%-NA21.4%1013.8 (3 yr)7%5 mo
Walsh et al[33], 19961990-1995FC + 40 Gy RT + Surgery58AC53NA25%42NA3237 (3 yr)3%NAMultimodal treatment superior to surgery alone
Surgery55AC54NA-82NA1107 (3 yr)2%NA
Lee et al[34], 20041999-2002FC + 45.6 Gy RT + Surgery51SCC35100%43%3722.8%28.255 (2 yr)8.5%49% (2 yr)CRT induced high clinical and pathological response, but no statistically significant benefit in OS and DFS
Surgery50SCC4887.5%-7810.8%27.357 (2 yr)51%(2 yr)
Burmeister et al[35], 20051994-2000FC + 35 Gy RT + Surgery12845 SCC + 80 AC + 3 others10580.0%16%4311%22.2NS4.7%16 moNo significant improvement in PFS or OS
Surgery12850 SCC+ 78 AC11059.0%-6714%19.3NS5.4%12 mo
Tepper et al[36], 2008 (CALGB 9781)1997-2000FC+ 50.4 Gy RT + Surgery307 SCC + 23 AC2984.6%40%1213.7%53.739 (5 yr)5 yr28% (5 yr)Long-term survival advantage supports trimodality therapy as a standard of care
Surgery267 SCC+ 19 AC2688.4%-NA15.3%21.416 (5 yr)3.8%15% (5 yr)
Lv et al[37], 20101997-20042 Cis, Pacli+ 40 gy + Surgery80SCC8097.4%NANA11.3%5324.5 (10 yr)3.4%61.3% (3 yr)Rational application of pre-op or post-op CRT can improve PFS, OS
Surgery80SCC8080.0%-NA35%3612.5 (10 yr)0%49.3% (3 yr)
Van Hagen et al[38], 2012 (CROSS trials)2004-20085 Pacli, Carbo + 41.4 Gy + Surgery17841 SCC + 134 AC + 3 other16892.0%29%133.3%49.447 (5 yr)5.9%not reachedImproved survival with acceptable adverse-event rates
Surgery18843 SCC + 141 AC + 4 other18669.0%-759.3%24346.9%24.2 mo
Mariette et al[39], 20142000-20092 Cis, 5FU + Surgery9867 SCC + 30 AC+ 1 other8493.8%33.3%30.822.1%31.841 (5 yr)11.1%35.6% (5 yr)No effect on R0 resection rate or survival but enhanced postoperative mortality
Surgery9770 SCC + 27 AC9192.1%-52.828.9%41.233.83.4%27.7% (5 yr)

In sharp contrast to the findings of the CROSS trial, the French trial (FFCD 9901) could not find any significant benefit of preoperative CRT. FFCD 9901 was a multicentre RCT which was conducted to assess improvement in outcomes for patients with stage I or II esophageal cancer with use of preoperative CRT. The investigators randomized 195 patients (in 30 centres) to either preoperative CRT followed by surgery (n = 98) or surgery alone (n = 97). CRT protocol was 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 wk with two courses of concomitant chemotherapy composed of fluorouracil 800 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2. Preoperative CRT did not improve R0 resection rates (93.8% vs 92.1%, P = 0.749); there was no difference in 3-year OS either (47.5% vs 53.0%, HR = 0.99, 95%CI: 0.69-1.40, P = 0.94). Moreover, significantly higher postoperative mortality was seen in patients who received preoperative CRT (11.1% vs 3.4%, P = 0.049). The authors concluded that preoperative CRT does not improve R0 resection rate or survival but enhances postoperative mortality in patients with stage I or II esophageal cancer[39]. A number of factors can be attributed to these differences in survival outcomes between the French and Dutch studies: (1) small sample size in the FFCD 9901 trial reducing the statistical power of detecting a survival benefit; (2) different histological profiles in two studies (70% of patients in the French study were SCC compared with 23% in the Dutch study); and (3) larger number of patients with early-stage disease (fewer node-positive and T3 patients) in the French study compared to Dutch study[42]. The CROSS trial investigators cautioned against coming to the conclusion that preoperative CRT is not beneficial in early-stage esophageal cancer, as one might, from the results of the FFCD 9901 trial. They highlighted that CROSS trial findings should still be considered for stage II cancers in view of its larger study population, more consistent inclusion rate, less toxic CRT regimen, more sophisticated radiation techniques and lower postoperative mortality rate[43].

A meta-analysis which was designed to compare the role of preoperative CRT for esophageal carcinoma including 14 RCTs (n = 1737) concluded that it has the potential to improve the long-term survival and reduce locoregional cancer recurrence compared to surgery alone. Five-year survival was significantly better in preoperative CRT group compared to the surgery alone group (OR = 1.64, 95%CI: 1.28-2.12). The authors further reported that a complete pathological response to CRT was observed in 10%-45.5% of patients[44].

In a meta-analysis of 12 trials which compared preoperative CRT followed by surgery versus surgery alone (n = 1854), the Australasian gastro-intestinal trials group reported that preoperative CRT led to significant reduction in all-cause mortality (HR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.70-0.88, P < 0.0001). The beneficial effect was evident in both histological subtypes - the HR for squamous-cell carcinoma was 0.80 (95%CI: 0.68-0.93, P = 0.004) and for adenocarcinoma was 0.75 (95%CI: 0.59-0.95, P = 0.02). They further undertook the pooled analysis of two RCTs and highlighted that the preoperative CRT seemed to lower all-cause mortality compared to preoperative chemotherapy (HR for the overall indirect comparison 0.88, 95%CI: 0.76-1.01, P = 0.07). They concluded that there seemed to be strong evidence for survival benefit with the use of preoperative CRT or chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone in resectable esophageal cancer[28].

Another meta-analysis which included 13 RCTs (n = 1930, resectable esophageal cancers) addressed the issue of postoperative complications following preoperative CRT compared to surgery alone[45]. The authors reported that preoperative CRT did not lead to significantly higher postoperative complications compared to surgery alone (RR = 1.09, 95%CI: 0.96-1.24, P = 0.18) (Figure 3); indeed, preoperative CRT led to reduction in postoperative mortality (RR = 0.64, 95%CI: 0.49-0.84, P = 0.001). Moreover, there was a significant reduction in local recurrence (RR = 0.53, 95%CI: 0.39-0.73, P < 0.000) and distant recurrence (RR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.68-0.98, P = 0.03). These results clear the apprehension that preoperative CRT may result in higher postoperative complications.

Figure 3
Figure 3 The forest plots of postoperative mortality and complications of chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery vs surgery alone using a fixed effects model (Reproduced from Deng et al[45]).
CONCLUSION

The literature suggests that preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery results in optimal outcome while managing locally advanced esophageal cancer; however, there is a need to compare preoperative chemoradiotherapy with chemotherapy alone to further refine the role of preoperative therapy. The standard of care continues to be debated due to difference of opinions and practices across the world and lack of any trial with head-to-head comparison between these two established treatment protocols.

Footnotes

Manuscript source: Invited manuscript

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: India

Peer-review report classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): B, B, B

Grade C (Good): 0

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P- Reviewer: Garcia-Olmo D, Osawa S, Schmidt T S- Editor: Gong ZM L- Editor: A E- Editor: Wang CH

References
1.  Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F.  GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013; cited 2015-06-25 Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Posner MC, Minsky BD, Ilson DH. Cancer of the Esophagus. DeVita, Hellman, and Rosenberg’s Cancer: Principles & Practice of Oncology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer 2015; 574-612.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Keditsu KK, Jiwnani S, Karimundackal G, Pramesh CS. Multimodality management of esophageal cancer. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2013;4:96-104.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Arnott SJ, Duncan W, Kerr GR, Walbaum PR, Cameron E, Jack WJ, Mackillop WJ. Low dose preoperative radiotherapy for carcinoma of the oesophagus: results of a randomized clinical trial. Radiother Oncol. 1992;24:108-113.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 154]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 119]  [Article Influence: 5.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Launois B, Delarue D, Campion JP, Kerbaol M. Preoperative radiotherapy for carcinoma of the esophagus. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981;153:690-692.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Nygaard K, Hagen S, Hansen HS, Hatlevoll R, Hultborn R, Jakobsen A, Mäntyla M, Modig H, Munck-Wikland E, Rosengren B. Pre-operative radiotherapy prolongs survival in operable esophageal carcinoma: a randomized, multicenter study of pre-operative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The second Scandinavian trial in esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 1992;16:1104-1109; discussion 1110.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 440]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 85]  [Article Influence: 15.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Wang M, Gu XZ, Yin WB, Huang GJ, Wang LJ, Zhang DW. Randomized clinical trial on the combination of preoperative irradiation and surgery in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma: report on 206 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989;16:325-327.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 149]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 87]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Gignoux M, Roussel A, Paillot B, Gillet M, Schlag P, Favre JP, Dalesio O, Buyse M, Duez N. The value of preoperative radiotherapy in esophageal cancer: results of a study of the E.O.R.T.C. World J Surg. 1987;11:426-432.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Arnott SJ, Duncan W, Gignoux M, Hansen HS, Launois B, Nygaard K, Parmar MK, Rousell A, Spilopoulos G, Stewart G. Preoperative radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;CD001799.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 43]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Arnott SJ, Duncan W, Gignoux M, Girling DJ, Hansen HS, Launois B, Nygaard K, Parmar MK, Rousell A, Spiliopoulos G. Preoperative radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma. Oeosphageal Cancer Collaborative Group. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;CD001799.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Mariette C, Balon JM, Piessen G, Fabre S, Van Seuningen I, Triboulet JP. Pattern of recurrence following complete resection of esophageal carcinoma and factors predictive of recurrent disease. Cancer. 2003;97:1616-1623.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 258]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 207]  [Article Influence: 14.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Katayama A, Mafune K, Tanaka Y, Takubo K, Makuuchi M, Kaminishi M. Autopsy findings in patients after curative esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:866-873.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Bonavina L, Soligo D, Quirici N, Bossolasco P, Cesana B, Lembertenghi Deliliers G, Peracchia A. Bone marrow-disseminated tumor cells in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus or cardia. Surgery. 2001;129:15-22.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 48]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  O’sullivan GC, Sheehan D, Clarke A, Stuart R, Kelly J, Kiely MD, Walsh T, Collins JK, Shanahan F. Micrometastases in esophagogastric cancer: high detection rate in resected rib segments. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:543-548.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Ancona E, Ruol A, Santi S, Merigliano S, Sileni VC, Koussis H, Zaninotto G, Bonavina L, Peracchia A. Only pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves significantly the long term survival of patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: final report of a randomized, controlled trial of preoperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone. Cancer. 2001;91:2165-2174.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Boonstra JJ, Kok TC, Wijnhoven BP, van Heijl M, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Ten Kate FJ, Siersema PD, Dinjens WN, van Lanschot JJ, Tilanus HW. Chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone in patients with resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:181.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 96]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 72]  [Article Influence: 9.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Kelsen DP, Winter KA, Gunderson LL, Mortimer J, Estes NC, Haller DG, Ajani JA, Kocha W, Minsky BD, Roth JA. Long-term results of RTOG trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113): a random assignment trial comparison of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3719-3725.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 359]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 123]  [Article Influence: 25.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Law S, Fok M, Chow S, Chu KM, Wong J. Preoperative chemotherapy versus surgical therapy alone for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;114:210-217.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 272]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 57]  [Article Influence: 11.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Maipang T, Vasinanukorn P, Petpichetchian C, Chamroonkul S, Geater A, Chansawwaang S, Kuapanich R, Panjapiyakul C, Watanaarepornchai S, Punperk S. Induction chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with carcinoma of the esophagus. J Surg Oncol. 1994;56:191-197.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 106]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 87]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Medical Research Council Oesophageal Cancer Working Group. Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1727-1733.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1027]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 257]  [Article Influence: 54.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Roth JA, Pass HI, Flanagan MM, Graeber GM, Rosenberg JC, Steinberg S. Randomized clinical trial of preoperative and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, vindesine, and bleomycin for carcinoma of the esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;96:242-248.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Schlag PM. Randomized trial of preoperative chemotherapy for squamous cell cancer of the esophagus. The Chirurgische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Fuer Onkologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft Fuer Chirurgie Study Group. Arch Surg. 1992;127:1446-1450.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Ychou M, Boige V, Pignon JP, Conroy T, Bouché O, Lebreton G, Ducourtieux M, Bedenne L, Fabre JM, Saint-Aubert B. Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1715-1721.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1046]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 445]  [Article Influence: 104.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, Shinoda M, Ozawa S, Shimizu H, Nakamura T, Yabusaki H, Aoyama N, Kurita A. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:68-74.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 647]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 489]  [Article Influence: 64.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Allum WH, Stenning SP, Bancewicz J, Clark PI, Langley RE. Long-term results of a randomized trial of surgery with or without preoperative chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5062-5067.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 593]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 242]  [Article Influence: 49.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, Scarffe JH, Lofts FJ, Falk SJ, Iveson TJ. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11-20.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3506]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1420]  [Article Influence: 233.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Kidane B, Coughlin S, Vogt K, Malthaner R.  Preoperative chemotherapy for resectable thoracic esophageal cancer. In: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015; .  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, Zalcberg JR, Simes RJ, Barbour A, Gebski V. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:681-692.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1046]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 366]  [Article Influence: 104.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  van Heijl M, van Lanschot JJ, Koppert LB, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Muller K, Steyerberg EW, van Dekken H, Wijnhoven BP, Tilanus HW, Richel DJ. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery versus surgery alone for patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (CROSS). BMC Surg. 2008;8:21.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 76]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67]  [Article Influence: 5.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Hennequin C, Favaudon V. Biological basis for chemo-radiotherapy interactions. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38:223-230.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Apinop C, Puttisak P, Preecha N. A prospective study of combined therapy in esophageal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 1994;41:391-393.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
32.  Le Prise E, Etienne PL, Meunier B, Maddern G, Ben Hassel M, Gedouin D, Boutin D, Campion JP, Launois B. A randomized study of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery versus surgery for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Cancer. 1994;73:1779-1784.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Walsh TN, Noonan N, Hollywood D, Kelly A, Keeling N, Hennessy TP. A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:462-467.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1445]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 307]  [Article Influence: 57.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Lee JL, Park SI, Kim SB, Jung HY, Lee GH, Kim JH, Song HY, Cho KJ, Kim WK, Lee JS. A single institutional phase III trial of preoperative chemotherapy with hyperfractionation radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:947-954.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 235]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 182]  [Article Influence: 13.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, Gebski V, Fitzgerald L, Simes RJ, Devitt P, Ackland S, Gotley DC, Joseph D, Millar J. Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:659-668.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 660]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 200]  [Article Influence: 41.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Tepper J, Krasna MJ, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Reed CE, Goldberg R, Kiel K, Willett C, Sugarbaker D, Mayer R. Phase III trial of trimodality therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1086-1092.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 860]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 294]  [Article Influence: 66.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Lv J, Cao XF, Zhu B, Ji L, Tao L, Wang DD. Long-term efficacy of perioperative chemoradiotherapy on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:1649-1654.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 90]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 76]  [Article Influence: 8.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, Richel DJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Hospers GA, Bonenkamp JJ. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074-2084.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2602]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1031]  [Article Influence: 289.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Mariette C, Dahan L, Mornex F, Maillard E, Thomas PA, Meunier B, Boige V, Pezet D, Robb WB, Le Brun-Ly V. Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for stage I and II esophageal cancer: final analysis of randomized controlled phase III trial FFCD 9901. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2416-2422.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 301]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 102]  [Article Influence: 43.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJ, Hulshof MC, van Hagen P, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, van Laarhoven HW, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Hospers GA, Bonenkamp JJ. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1090-1098.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 990]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 367]  [Article Influence: 165.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Oppedijk V, van der Gaast A, van Lanschot JJ, van Hagen P, van Os R, van Rij CM, van der Sangen MJ, Beukema JC, Rütten H, Spruit PH. Patterns of recurrence after surgery alone versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery in the CROSS trials. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:385-391.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 240]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 91]  [Article Influence: 34.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Czito BG, Palta M, Willett CG. Results of the FFCD 9901 trial in early-stage esophageal carcinoma: is it really about neoadjuvant therapy? J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2398-2400.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJ, Hulshof MC, van der Gaast A. Effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for early-stage esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:288-289.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Lv J, Cao XF, Zhu B, Ji L, Tao L, Wang DD. Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on prognosis and surgery for esophageal carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:4962-4968.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Deng J, Wang C, Xiang M, Liu F, Liu Y, Zhao K. Meta-analysis of postoperative efficacy in patients receiving chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable esophageal carcinoma. Diagn Pathol. 2014;9:151.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]