Letters To The Editor Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2015; 21(35): 10251-10252
Published online Sep 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i35.10251
Use of entecavir in hepatitis B virus reactivation of a patient with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Hasan Tahsin Gozdas, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Dr. Münif İslamoğlu Kastamonu State Hospital, 37100 Kastamonu, Turkey
Erkan Arpaci, Department of Medical Oncology, Bülent Ecevit University Faculty of Medicine, 67980 Zonguldak, Turkey
Author contributions: Both authors contributed to this work.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this manuscript.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Dr. Hasan Tahsin Gozdas, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Dr. Münif İslamoğlu Kastamonu State Hospital, 37100 Kastamonu, Turkey. dr.htgozdas@yahoo.com.tr
Telephone: +90-3662141053 Fax: +90-3662142427
Received: March 2, 2015
Peer-review started: March 4, 2015
First decision: April 13, 2015
Revised: April 21, 2015
Accepted: June 9, 2015
Article in press: June 9, 2015
Published online: September 21, 2015
Processing time: 200 Days and 4 Hours

Abstract

We read with interest the case report by Liu et al and the correspondence by Tuna et al regarding this case. Liu et al described hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in a patient with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after withdrawal of lamivudine prophylaxis. When HBV reactivation was observed three months after lamivudine withdrawal, entecavir 0.5 mg daily was started. HBV DNA level was moderately elevated (104 copies/mL) at that time. So, we could not understand why a potent antiviral like entecavir was required for this case. In addition to this, entecavir must be used at a dose of 1 mg in patients with prior prophylactic treatment with lamivudine. As stated by Tuna et al duration of lamivudine prophylaxis in this case might be insufficient and HBV reactivation might have occured for this reason. So, we suppose that resolution of HBV reactivation might also be achieved with lamivudine instead of entecavir in this case.

Key Words: Immunochemotherapy; Hepatitis B reactivation; Antiviral prophylaxis; Lamivudine; Entecavir

Core tip: Lamivudine is used for the prevention of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients receiving immunochemotherapy. Following cessation of lamivudine prophylaxis, HBV reactivation can be observed because of insufficient duration of prophylaxis. If HBV DNA is moderately elevated at that moment, prophylaxis may be continued with lamivudine instead of entecavir.



TO THE EDİTOR

We read with interest the case report by Liu et al[1] and the correspondence by Tuna et al[2] regarding this case. Liu et al[1] described HBV reactivation in a patient with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after withdrawal of lamivudine prophylaxis. We agree with the opinions of Tuna et al[2] regarding the timing and duration of antiviral prophylaxis against hepatitis B. However, we also have some additional comments on this case.

Lamivudine was used in this case for a total of eight months (during immunochemotherapy that lasted four months and an additional four months following the end of immunochemotherapy). When HBV reactivation was observed three months after lamivudine withdrawal, entecavir 0.5 mg daily was started. HBV DNA level was moderately elevated (104 copies/mL) at that moment. So, we could not understand why a potent antiviral like entecavir was required for this case.

In addition to this, entecavir must be used at a dose of 1 mg in patients with prior prophylactic treatment with lamivudine[3]. Although entecavir was used at a dose of 0.5 mg in this case, resolution of HBV reactivation was observed. Since the case received prior lamivudine prophylaxis for only eight months and resolution of HBV reactivation was achieved with entecavir 0.5 mg, lamivudine resistance seems to be very unlikely. As stated by Tuna et al[2] duration of lamivudine prophylaxis in this case might be insufficient and HBV reactivation might have occured for this reason. So, we suppose that resolution of HBV reactivation might also be achieved with lamivudine instead of entecavir in this case.

Footnotes

P- Reviewer: Su ZJ S- Editor: Yu J L- Editor: A E- Editor: Liu XM

References
1.  Liu WP, Zheng W, Song YQ, Ping LY, Wang GQ, Zhu J. Hepatitis B surface antigen seroconversion after HBV reactivation in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:5165-5170.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Tuna N, Karabay O. Hepatitis B reactivation and timing for prophylaxis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:2263-2264.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Brost S, Schnitzler P, Stremmel W, Eisenbach C. Entecavir as treatment for reactivation of hepatitis B in immunosuppressed patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:5447-5451.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]