Basic Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2015; 21(34): 9936-9944
Published online Sep 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i34.9936
Neurochemical features of endomorphin-2-containing neurons in the submucosal plexus of the rat colon
Jun-Ping Li, Ting Zhang, Zhen-Zhen Kou, Zhen-Yu Wu, Yun-Qing Li, Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, K.K. Leung Brain Research Centre, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China
Jun-Ping Li, Xu-Wen Jiao, Lian-Xiang Zhang, Zhong-Yi He, Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, Ningxia Hui Nationality Autonomous Region, China
Chang-Jun Gao, Department of Anesthesiology, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an 710038, Shaanxi Province, China
Author contributions: Li JP, Zhang T and Gao CJ performed the majority of experiments and analyzed the data; Kou ZZ and Wu ZY participated in tissue preparation and whole-mount preparations; Jiao XW and Zhang LX performed immunofluorescence histochemical double-staining and cell quantification; He ZY and Li YQ designed and coordinated the research; Li JP wrote the paper.
Supported by Grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 30971123 and No. 81371239.
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved by the Fourth Military Medical University Institutional Review Board (Xi’an, China).
Institutional animal care and use committee statement: All procedures involving animals were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Fourth Military Medical University (Xi’an, China).
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Dr. Yun-Qing Li, Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, K.K. Leung Brain Research Centre, The Fourth Military Medical University, No. 169 Changle West Road, Xi’an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China. deptanat@fmmu.edu.cn
Telephone: +86-29-84774501 Fax: +86-29-83283229
Received: January 14, 2015
Peer-review started: January 15, 2015
First decision: March 26, 2015
Revised: April 10, 2015
Accepted: June 10, 2015
Article in press: June 10, 2015
Published online: September 14, 2015

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the distribution and neurochemical phenotype of endomorphin-2 (EM-2)-containing neurons in the submucosal plexus of the rat colon.

METHODS: The mid-colons between the right and left flexures were removed from rats, and transferred into Kreb’s solution. For whole-mount preparations, the mucosal, outer longitudinal muscle and inner circular muscle layers of the tissues were separated from the submucosal layer attached to the submucosal plexus. The whole-mount preparations from each rat mid-colon were mounted onto seven gelatin-coated glass slides, and processed for immunofluorescence histochemical double-staining of EM-2 with calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), nitric oxide synthetase (NOS), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), substance P (SP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP). After staining, all the fluorescence-labeled sections were observed with a confocal laser scanning microscope. To estimate the extent of the co-localization of EM-2 with CGRP, ChAT, NOS, NSE, SP and VIP, ganglia, which have a clear boundary and neuronal cell outline, were randomly selected from each specimen for this analysis.

RESULTS: In the submucosal plexus of the mid-colon, many EM-2-immunoreactive (IR) and NSE-IR neuronal cell bodies were found in the submucosal plexus of the rat mid-colon. Approximately 6 ± 4.2 EM-2-IR neurons aggregated within each ganglion and a few EM-2-IR neurons were also found outside the ganglia. The EM-2-IR neurons were also immunopositive for ChAT, SP, VIP or NOS. EM-2-IR nerve fibers coursed near ChAT-IR neurons, and some of these fibers were even distributed around ChAT-IR neuronal cell bodies. Some EM-2-IR neuronal cell bodies were surrounded by SP-IR nerve fibers, but many long processes connecting adjacent ganglia were negative for EM-2 immunostaining. Long VIP-IR processes with many branches coursed through the ganglia and surrounded the EM-2-IR neurons. The percentages of the EM-2-IR neurons that were also positive for ChAT, SP, VIP or NOS were approximately 91% ± 2.6%, 36% ± 2.4%, 44% ± 2.5% and 44% ± 4.7%, respectively, but EM-2 did not co-localize with CGRP.

CONCLUSION: EM-2-IR neurons are present in the submucosal plexus of the rat colon and express distinct neurochemical markers.

Key Words: Endomorphin-2, Submucosal plexus, Enteric neuron, Colon, μ-opioid receptor

Core tip: Previous studies have showed that morphine can cause gastrointestinal disorders viaμ-opioid receptor (MOR). However, the regulatory mechanisms of MOR relating to gastrointestinal activity remain unclear. Endomorphin-2 (EM-2) is the endogenous ligand for the MOR. The distribution of EM-immunoreactive (IR) structures is generally similar to that of the MOR in the nervous system, but not the submucosal plexus of the enteric nervous system. This study demonstrates for the first time that EM-2-IR neurons are present in the submucosal plexus of the rat colon, and EM-2 co-localized with several neurochemical makers in distinct populations of submucosal neurons.



INTRODUCTION

It is well known that morphine is a selective exogenous agonist of the μ-opioid receptor (MOR) and is a widely used analgesic drug in the clinic. Unfortunately, morphine can cause gastrointestinal disorders, such as constipation, nausea and emesis, when used for a long period of time[1-4]. To explore the mechanism of the gastrointestinal disorders caused by morphine and endogenous opioid peptides, pharmacological and morphological studies have been performed in the gastrointestinal tract; however, the regulatory mechanisms of morphine and endogenous opioid peptides relating to gastrointestinal activity remain unclear.

The results of many previous studies have shown that there are at least three types of opioid receptors, i.e., MORs, δ-opioid receptors (DORs) and κ-opioid receptors (KORs), and the endogenous ligands of these receptors, including endomorphin (EM), enkephalin and dynorphin, are widely distributed in the gastrointestinal tract[5-8]. In the gastrointestinal tract, MOR immunoreactivity is the most abundant compared to other opioid receptors, particularly in the colon[1,9,10]. After the MOR was knocked out in the mouse, the effects of both MOR agonists and DOR or KOR agonists on gastrointestinal disorders nearly disappeared[11]. Endomorphin-1 (EM-1) and endomorphin-2 (EM-2), two endogenous ligands for the MOR, selectively bind to the MOR with high affinity[12]. The distribution of EM-immunoreactive (IR) structures is generally similar to that of the MOR[13] in the nervous system, including the myenteric plexus[14], but not the submucosal plexus[14,15] of the enteric nervous system (ENS). Exploring the distribution and chemical nature of the EM-IR structures in the submucosal plexus is fundamental to clarifying the regulatory mechanisms of morphine and opioid peptides. In our previous study, we reported that only EM-2-containing neurons, but not EM-1-IR neurons, were present in the submucosal plexus of the rat colon. Therefore, we examined the distribution patterns and neurochemical phenotypes of submucosal EM-2-containing neurons in the rat colon with immunofluorescence histochemical staining of whole-mount preparations of the rat mid-colon.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Experimental procedures

Male Sprague-Dawley rats, weighing 220-250 g, were provided by the Experimental Animal Center of the Fourth Military Medical University (Xi’an, China). All the protocols described below were approved by the Committee of Animal Use for Research and Education of the Fourth Military Medical University. In accordance with the ethical guidelines for animal research, all efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used and the suffering of animals[16].

Tissue collection

After the rats (n = 7) were anesthetized with ether, their abdominal cavities were opened, and the mid-colons between the right and left flexures were removed and stored in iced Kreb’s solution containing the following (in mmol/L): 115.5 NaCl, 4.16 KCl, 1.16 NaH2PO4, 21.9 NaHCO3, 11.1 glucose, 1.16 MgSO4 and 2.5 CaCl2. Thereafter, colonic segments were immersed in Kreb’s solution at room temperature after rinsing. Finally, the mesentery was trimmed.

Organotypic culture

The dissected mid-colons were transferred into Kreb’s solution containing 50 mg/mL gentamicin, 2.5 mg/mL amphotericin B, 10% fetal bovine serum, and 4 mmol/L nicardipine and bubbled with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 at 37 °C for 2 h, followed by incubation for 5 to 6 h in the same medium with 1% colchicine added to the mixed medium to enhance EM-2 immunoreactivities in the neuronal somata. Thereafter, the intestinal lumen was distended with a fixative solution containing 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The tissues were immersed into the same fixative for 6 to 8 h at 4 °C and were then opened longitudinally.

Tissue preparation

For whole-mount preparations, the mucosal, outer longitudinal muscle and inner circular muscle layers of the tissues were separated from the submucosal layer attached to the submucosal plexus. The whole-mount preparations from each rat mid-colon were mounted onto seven gelatin-coated glass slides.

Immunofluorescence histochemical double-staining

The whole-mount sections (n = 7) obtained from 7 male rats were processed for immunofluorescence histochemical double-staining of EM-2 with calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), nitric oxide synthetase (NOS), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), substance P (SP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP). The immunofluorescence histochemical double-staining was performed by incubating the slides with the following solutions: (1) The respective mixture of rabbit antiserum against EM-2 (AB5104, 1:200; Chemicon, Billerica, MA, United States) with mouse antiserum against NSE (MAB314, 1:200; Chemicon), goat antiserum against ChAT (IHCR1008-6, 1:500; Chemicon), rat antiserum against SP (MAB356, 1:500; Chemicon), mouse antiserum against VIP (SC-25347, 1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, United States), mouse antiserum against NOS (N2280, 1:2000; Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, United States) or goat antiserum against CGRP (ab36001, 1:200; Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) containing 5% (v/v) normal goat serum (NGS), 0.3% (v/v) Triton X-100, 0.05% (w/v) NaN3 and 0.25% (w/v) carrageenan (PBS-NGS, pH 7.4) for 72 hr at 4 °C; (2) The respective mixture of biotinylated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (BA-1000, 1:200; Vector, Burlingame, CA, United States) to stain EM-2 and Alexa 594-labeled donkey anti-mouse IgG (A21203, 1:500; Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, United States) for NSE, VIP and NOS staining, Alexa 594-labeled donkey anti-goat IgG (A-11058, 1:500; Invitrogen) for ChAT and CGRP staining, or Cy3-labeled donkey anti-rat IgG (AP189C, 1:200; Chemicon) for SP staining in PBS-NGS for 4 hr at 4 °C; and (3) Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled avidin D (A-2001, 1:1000; Vector) in PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100 (PBS-X, pH 7.4) for 4 h at room temperature.

The sections were cover-slipped with 0.01 M PBS containing 50% (v/v) glycerin and 2.5% (w/v) triethylene diamine (an anti-fading reagent).

Control test

The rabbit antiserum against EM-2 was prepared against a full-length synthetic peptide (Tyr-Pro-Phe-Phe-NH2) from EM-2 conjugated to bovine serum albumin (BSA). We tested the specificity of the antibody by incubating it with either 2 μmol/L EM-2 or 2 μmol/L EM-1 peptide, as previously described[17,18]. Normal mouse serum was used to confirm the specificities of the mouse antibodies against NSE, VIP and NOS. Using replacement tests, normal goat serum was used to confirm the specificities of the goat antibodies against ChAT and CGRP, and normal rat serum were used to confirm the specificity of the rat antibody against SP. In the present study, when the anti-EM-2 antibody was pre-absorbed with either synthetic homologous or heterologous peptides and normal mouse, goat and rat sera were used to replace the mouse, goat and rat antibodies against NSE, VIP and NOS, ChAT and CGRP, and SP, respectively, there was no immunopositive staining observed in the sample preparations. The antibodies were thus considered to be specific and reliable (data not shown).

Cell quantification

After staining, all the fluorescence-labeled sections were observed with a confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus FV1000; Tokyo, Japan) equipped with the appropriate filters for FITC (excitation 490 nm; emission 520 nm), Alexa 594 (excitation 590 nm; emission 617 nm) and Cy5 (excitation 650 nm; emission 667 nm). To estimate the extent of the co-localization of EM-2 with CGRP, ChAT, NOS, NSE, SP and VIP, 6 sets of representative whole-mount sections from the mid-colons were selected (n = 6). Ganglia, which have a clear boundary and neuronal cell outline, were randomly selected from each specimen for this analysis. In each specimen, approximately 6-7 ganglia were selected to quantify the neuronal cells, and the total number of ganglia was approximately 35 in each set. Within each ganglion in the submucosal plexus, we counted the number of EM-2-IR neuronal cell bodies, the number of neuronal cell bodies labeled with the other markers, and the number and percentage of neuronal cell bodies that expressed both markers.

Statistical analysis

The results are expressed as the mean ± SD.

RESULTS
Distribution of EM-2-IR neurons in the submucosal plexus of the rat colon

In the present study, many EM-2-IR and NSE-IR neuronal cell bodies were found in the submucosal plexus of the rat mid-colon (Figure 1). The EM-2-IR proteins were localized predominantly in the cytoplasm of the neuronal cell bodies. The EM-2-IR neuronal cell bodies commonly had an oval-shaped cell body with several thick processes protruding from the soma and a long process, which could extend up to 95 μm or considerably longer (Figure 1A). The average length and width of the EM-2-IR neuronal cell bodies were 34.6 ± 9.8 μm and 16.5 ± 5.2 μm, respectively. The antiserum against NSE labeled all the neuronal components, including neuronal cell bodies and varicose and non-varicose nerve fibers (Figure 1B). In the submucosal layer, the ganglia were quite dispersed. The relative quantification of the number of perikarya expressing EM-2 was estimated by counting the number of positive cells per ganglion in the colonic submucosal layer. Approximately 6 ± 4.2 EM-2-IR neurons aggregated within each ganglion, and a few EM-2-IR neurons were also found outside the ganglia (Figure 1C). The results of the immunofluorescence histochemical double-staining revealed that nearly all of the EM-2-IR neurons also contained NSE-immunopositive products in their neuronal cell bodies (Figure 1C). However, only approximately 68% ± 1.5% of the NSE-IR neuronal cell bodies had EM-2-immunopositive staining in the submucosal ganglia (Table 1). Some of the long EM-2-IR processes with or without varicosities connecting adjacent ganglia formed a nerve fiber network between each ganglion. These results indicated that all the EM-2-IR cells were neurons and that approximately 2/3 of the total number of neuronal cell bodies in the ganglia contained EM-2.

Table 1 Percentages of submucosal neurons with the co-localization of endomorphin-2 and various markers.
Marker pairSubmucosal ganglion neurons (n1 and n2, mean ± SD)Double-labeled neurons (n, mean ± SD)Percentage (%) (mean ± SE)
CGRP/EM-21.58 ± 1.4 and 5.0 ± 1.10CGRP of EM-2 (n/n2) 0
ChAT/EM-26.0 ± 2.4 and 3.5 ± 1.63.2 ± 1.2ChAT of EM-2 (n/n2) 91 ± 2.6
EM-2 of ChAT (n/n1) 53 ± 2.8
NOS/EM-22.3 ± 1.1 and 5.2 ± 1.42.3 ± 1.1NOS of EM-2 (n/n2) 44 ± 4.7
EM-2 of NOS (n/n1) 100.0
NSE/EM-26.2 ± 3.7 and 4.2 ± 2.94.2 ± 2.9NSE of EM-2 (n/n2) 100.0
EM-2 of NSE (n/n1) 68 ± 1.5
SP/EM-22.4 ± 1.0 and 5.0 ± 1.21.8 ± 0.6SP of EM-2 (n/n2) 36 ± 2.4
EM-2 of SP (n/n1) 75 ± 3.4
VIP/EM-21.5 ± 0.5 and 5.0 ± 1.31.5 ± 0.5VIP of EM-2 (n/n2) 30 ± 2.5
EM-2 of VIP (n/n1) 100.0
Figure 1
Figure 1 Immunofluorescence histochemical double-staining of the whole-mount sections of the rat mid-colon. The distributions of endomorphin-2-immunoreactive (IR) neurons (A), neuron-specific enolase (NSE)-IR neurons (B) and EM-2/NSE co-localized neurons (C) in the submucosal layer. Arrows point to the representative neurons containing both EM-2- and NSE-IR products. Scale bar = 45 μm.
Co-localization of EM-2 with cytochemical markers within submucosal neurons

The co-localization of EM-2 with ChAT, SP, VIP, NOS and CGRP in submucosal neurons was investigated. ChAT immunoreactivities were localized predominantly in the neuronal soma. EM-2-IR nerve fibers coursed near ChAT-IR neurons, and some of these fibers were even distributed around ChAT-IR neuronal cell bodies (Figure 2B and E). A few EM-2-IR neuronal cell bodies were surrounded by ChAT-IR nerve fibers and terminals. SP-IR neurons exhibited a slightly round or oval-shaped neuronal cell body with one long process and several short and lamellar processes around the somata. Some EM-2-IR neuronal cell bodies were surrounded by SP-IR nerve fibers, but many long processes connecting adjacent ganglia were negative for EM-2 immunostaining (Figure 2A and D). In the submucosal layer, a few VIP-IR neuronal cell bodies were labeled. VIP-containing neurons had a slightly oval-shaped neuronal cell body with several short and lamellar processes as well as one long process around their somata. Long VIP-IR processes with many branches coursed through the ganglia and surrounded the EM-2-IR neurons (Figure 3A and D). The anti-NOS antibody staining revealed homogeneous immunoreactivity of the neuronal cell bodies without nuclear labeling. The NOS-IR neurons were peripherally located in the submucosal ganglia. NOS-IR processes were only labeled at their origin and could not be followed over a long distance (Figure 3B and E). In the submucosal plexus, the percentages of the EM-2-IR neurons that were also positive for ChAT, SP, VIP or NOS were approximately 91% ± 2.6%, 36% ± 2.4%, 44% ± 2.5% and 44% ± 4.7%, respectively (Table 1). In contrast, EM-2 was detected in ChAT-, SP- and VIP-IR neurons in 53% ± 2.8%, 75% ± 3.4% and 73.3% ± 2.6% of the cells, respectively, and all the NOS-IR neurons co-localized with EM-2-immunoreactivities (Table 1).

Figure 2
Figure 2 Immunofluorescence histochemical double-staining of the whole-mount sections of the rat mid-colon. A and D: Distributions of endomorphin-2 (EM-2)-immunoreactive (IR) neurons; B and E: Choline acetyltransferase (ChAT)-IR neurons (B) and substance P (SP)-IR neurons (E) in the submucosal layer; C and F: Merged images of (A, B) and (D, E). Arrows point to neurons bearing EM-2 and containing ChAT or SP. Scale bar = 45 μm.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Immunofluorescence histochemical double-staining of the whole-mount sections of the rat mid-colon. A and D: The endomorphin-2 (EM-2)-immunoreactive (IR) neurons; B and E: Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-IR neurons (B) and nitric oxide synthetase (NOS)-IR neurons (E) in the submucosal layer; C and F: Merged images of (A, B) and (D, E). Arrows point to neurons containing both EM-2 and VIP or NOS. Scale bar = 45 μm.

The co-localization of EM-2 and CGRP was not found in submucosal neurons, but CGRP-IR nerve fibers were observed to make close contacts with the EM-2-IR neuronal cell bodies and the large processes of these cells (Figure 4).

Figure 4
Figure 4 Immunofluorescence histochemical double-staining of the whole-mount sections of the rat mid-colon. A and B: Distributions of endomorphin-2 -immunoreactive (IR) neurons (A) and calcitonin gene-related peptide-IR neurons (B) in the submucosal layer; C: Merged images of (A) and (B). Scale bar = 45 μm.

After the antiserum against EM-2 was pre-absorbed with synthetic homologous or heterologous peptides, there was no positive EM-2-IR immunostaining observed in the submucosal layer (Figure 5B).

Figure 5
Figure 5 Fluorescent micrographs exhibiting the results of endomorphin-2-immunohistochemical staining before (A) and after antiserum against endomorphin-2 was pre-absorbed with synthetic homologous or heterologous peptides (B) in the submucosal layer of the whole-mount sections of the rat mid-colon. Scale bar = 45 μm.
DISCUSSION

In the gastrointestinal tract, submucosal neurons principally control the mucosal absorption and secretion of water and electrolytes[19-21]. To meet the needs of digestion, submucosal neurons provide a precise and complex regulation of epithelial function and blood flow, such that the absorption and secretion of water and electrolytes maintain a balance[22]. Previously, the general explanation for the constipating effect of opioids was that opioids suppress propulsive motility and gastrointestinal transit, thereby extending the time of water and electrolyte absorption. However, this explanation is currently not fully accepted because opioids can modulate both gastrointestinal motility and mucosal secretion as well as water/electrolyte metabolism[8,23-25].

In the colon, MOR-IR products are found in neurochemically distinct classes of enteric neurons, and the proportion of MOR-labeled perikarya in the submucosal plexus is more abundant than that in the myenteric plexus[15,26,27]. MOR agonists can inhibit colon water and electrolyte secretion, which can contribute to opioid-induced constipation. Submucosal secretomotor neurons release acetylcholine and VIP[28], which can activate epithelial cell chloride channels via muscarinic and VIP receptors on the basolateral surface of enterocytes. Chloride moves from the enterocyte cytoplasm into the gut lumen, and H2O follows the chloride via an osmotic mechanism. The MOR on secretomotor neurons is activated by opioid drugs and suppresses acetylcholine and VIP release, resulting in a decrease in chloride secretion and osmotic water movement[29,30]. However, to date, the source of the endogenous ligand of the MOR in the gastrointestinal tract has remained unclear.

In the present study, EM-2-IR cells were found in the submucosal layer of the rat mid-colon, and all the EM-2-IR cells co-localized with the general neuronal marker NSE, which labeled all the neuronal components[31]. This result confirmed that the EM-2-IR cells were enteric neurons, which account for a large proportion of submucosal neurons. EM-2-IR neurons, similar to cells found in the myenteric plexus of the colon, usually exhibit a round or oval cell body with short and thick dendrites protruding from the stomata and a long axonal process[14].

The present double-staining results indicated that EM-2 co-localized with ChAT, SP or VIP in the perikarya of submucosal neurons. The EM-2-IR nerve fibers coursed near ChAT-IR neurons, and some of these fibers even surrounded ChAT-IR neuronal cell bodies. In the submucosal plexus, approximately half of the neurons expressing ChAT are secretomotor neurons to epithelial cells[32-35]. Similarly, VIP and SP are also predominantly located in secretomotor neurons[20,28,35-38]. Acetylcholine and VIP are released by secretomotor neurons at neuroepithelial junctions[25]. An autoradiographic localization of the MOR binding sites has revealed that the MOR is also expressed by nerve terminals in the mucosal layers, as well as in the submucosal plexus, of the gastrointestinal tract[10,26], and MOR activation inhibits acetylcholine and VIP release in submucosal neurons of the rat colon and cat intestine[32,36,39]. Based on the results of these studies, we speculated that the EM-2 released by submucosal neurons may modulate the mucosal absorption and secretion of water and electrolytes via secretomotor neurons[29,30]. Functional and electrophysiological studies provide evidence to support our hypothesis. Functional data obtained from rat intestines suggest that the MOR participates in the regulation of fluid and electrolyte transport[40]. In addition, ChAT and SP also transmit sensory information of the intestinal lumen[20,38,41]. The present results have demonstrated that some EM-2-IR neurons are surrounded by SP- and ChAT-IR nerve fibers. These nerve fibers may be primary afferent fibers originating from neurons in the submucosal ganglia.

EM-2 is also co-localized with NO in the perikarya of submucosal neurons. NO has been found in interneurons or inhibitory neurons in the submucosal plexus, and has been shown to participate in modulating the circular muscle[38]. The MOR is expressed by enteric neurons, but not on smooth muscle membranes of the rat intestine[42,43]. EM-2-IR neurons may also modulate the contraction of circular muscle similar to interneurons. However, the EM-2-IR neurons did not co-localize with CGRP, a marker for primary afferent neurons in the rat colon[44,45], but the CGRP-IR nerve fibers surrounded these EM-2-IR neurons, indicating that the EM-2-IR neurons may be regulated by CGRP. In addition, MOR proteins have also been observed on nerve fibers surrounding blood vessels[10,26]. This result leads to the hypothesis that EM-2 is involved in the regulation of blood flow via nerve ending mechanisms, particularly in the submucosal and mucosal layers.

In conclusion, EM-2-IR neurons are present in the submucosal plexus of the rat colon, and EM-2 co-localized with several neurochemical makers in distinct populations of submucosal neurons. Therefore, EM-2 may mediate the secretory response of the rat colon via secretomotor neurons, which endogenously express the specific opioid receptor, MOR.

COMMENTS
Background

Morphine is a selective exogenous agonist of the μ-opioid receptor (MOR) and is a widely used analgesic drug in the clinic. Unfortunately, morphine can cause gastrointestinal disorders when used for a long period of time. However, the regulatory mechanisms of morphine and MOR relating to gastrointestinal activity remain unclear. Previous studies have showed that MORs are widely distributed in the gastrointestinal tract, particularly in the colon, and modulate the gastrointestinal activity, but the neural pathway is unclear. Endomorphins (EMs) are the endogenous ligands for the MOR. The distribution of EM-immunoreactive (IR) structures is generally similar to that of the MOR in the nervous system, but not the submucosal plexus of the enteric nervous system (ENS).

Research frontiers

The authors aimed to explore the distribution and chemical nature of the EM-IR structures in the submucosal plexus to clarify the regulatory mechanisms of MOR.

Innovations and breakthroughs

This study demonstrates for the first time that EM-2-IR neurons are present in the submucosal plexus of the rat colon, and EM-2 co-localized with several neurochemical makers in distinct populations of submucosal neurons.

Applications

The authors hypothesize that EM-2 may mediate the secretory response of the rat colon via secretomotor neurons, which endogenously express the specific opioid receptor, MOR.

Terminology

The ENS is an intrinsic neuronal network within the gut wall, extending over the entire length of the gastrointestinal tract. The ENS is responsible for the intrinsic control and coordination of motility, blood flow and secretion to support normal digestion. It consists of two ganglionated plexuses: the submucosal plexus is located near the luminal side between the mucosa and circular muscle layer, and the myenteric plexus is embedded between the outer longitudinal and inner circular muscle layer of the intestine.

Peer-review

This is a good descriptive study in which the authors explored the distribution and chemical nature of the EM-IR structures in the submucosal plexus. To clarify the regulatory mechanisms of MOR, it provides the morphological foundation.

Footnotes

Animal care and use statement: The animal protocol was designed to minimize pain or discomfort to the animals. The animals were acclimatized to laboratory conditions (23 °C, 12 h/12 h light/dark, 50% humidity, ad libitum access to food and water) for two weeks prior to experimentation. All animals were euthanized by barbiturate overdose (intravenous injection, 150 mg/kg pentobarbital sodium) for tissue collection.

P- Reviewer: Kuwahara A S- Editor: Yu J L- Editor: Wang TQ E- Editor: Ma S

References
1.  Arhan P, Devroede G, Jehannin B, Lanza M, Faverdin C, Dornic C, Persoz B, Tétreault L, Perey B, Pellerin D. Segmental colonic transit time. Dis Colon Rectum. 1981;24:625-629.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 372]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 367]  [Article Influence: 8.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Coyne KS, LoCasale RJ, Datto CJ, Sexton CC, Yeomans K, Tack J. Opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain in the USA, Canada, Germany, and the UK: descriptive analysis of baseline patient-reported outcomes and retrospective chart review. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;6:269-281.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 71]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 86]  [Article Influence: 8.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Loh HH, Smith AP. Molecular characterization of opioid receptors. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1990;30:123-147.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 187]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 205]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Wein S. Opioid-induced constipation. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2012;26:382-384.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Sosa RP, McKnight AT, Hughes J, Kosterlitz HW. Incorporation of labelled amino acids into the enkephalins. FEBS Lett. 1977;84:195-198.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 56]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Orwoll ES, Kendall JW. Beta-endorphin and adrenocorticotropin in extrapituitary sites: gastrointestinal tract. Endocrinology. 1980;107:438-442.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 102]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 110]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Kromer W, Höllt V, Schmidt H, Herz A. Release of immunoreactive-dynorphin from the isolated guinea-pig small intestine is reduced during peristaltic activity. Neurosci Lett. 1981;25:53-56.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 46]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Holzer P. Opioid receptors in the gastrointestinal tract. Regul Pept. 2009;155:11-17.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 249]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 254]  [Article Influence: 16.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Banta CA, Clemens ET, Krinsky MM, Sheffy BE. Sites of organic acid production and patterns of digesta movement in the gastrointestinal tract of dogs. J Nutr. 1979;109:1592-1600.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Nishimura E, Buchan AM, McIntosh CH. Autoradiographic localization of mu- and delta-type opioid receptors in the gastrointestinal tract of the rat and guinea pig. Gastroenterology. 1986;91:1084-1094.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Roy S, Liu HC, Loh HH. mu-Opioid receptor-knockout mice: the role of mu-opioid receptor in gastrointestinal transit. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1998;56:281-283.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Zadina JE, Hackler L, Ge LJ, Kastin AJ. A potent and selective endogenous agonist for the mu-opiate receptor. Nature. 1997;386:499-502.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1059]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 992]  [Article Influence: 36.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Martin-Schild S, Gerall AA, Kastin AJ, Zadina JE. Differential distribution of endomorphin 1- and endomorphin 2-like immunoreactivities in the CNS of the rodent. J Comp Neurol. 1999;405:450-471.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Li JP, Wang XY, Gao CJ, Liao YH, Qu J, He ZY, Zhang T, Wang GD, Li YQ. Neurochemical phenotype and function of endomorphin 2-immunopositive neurons in the myenteric plexus of the rat colon. Front Neuroanat. 2014;8:149.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Sternini C, Patierno S, Selmer IS, Kirchgessner A. The opioid system in the gastrointestinal tract. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004;16 Suppl 2:3-16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Zimmermann M. Ethical guidelines for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animals. Pain. 1983;16:109-110.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5938]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6139]  [Article Influence: 149.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Niu L, Chen T, Wang YY, Li YQ. Neurochemical phenotypes of endomorphin-2-containing neurons in vagal nodose neurons of the adult rat. Neurochem Int. 2009;55:542-551.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Hui R, Chen T, Li YQ. The reciprocal connections of endomorphin 1- and endomorphin 2-containing neurons between the hypothalamus and nucleus tractus solitarii in the rat. Neuroscience. 2006;138:171-181.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Wood JD. Intracellular study of effects of morphine on electrical activity of myenteric neurons in cat small intestine. Gastroenterology. 1980;79:1222-1230.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Cooke HJ. “Enteric Tears”: Chloride Secretion and Its Neural Regulation. News Physiol Sci. 1998;13:269-274.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Foong JP, Tough IR, Cox HM, Bornstein JC. Properties of cholinergic and non-cholinergic submucosal neurons along the mouse colon. J Physiol. 2014;592:777-793.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 42]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Vanner S, Macnaughton WK. Submucosal secretomotor and vasodilator reflexes. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004;16 Suppl 1:39-43.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Warhurst G, Smith GS, Higgs N, Tonge A, Turnberg LA. Influence of morphine tolerance and withdrawal on intestinal salt and water transport in the rat in vivo and in vitro. Gastroenterology. 1984;87:1035-1041.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  De Luca A, Coupar IM. Insights into opioid action in the intestinal tract. Pharmacol Ther. 1996;69:103-115.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 218]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 203]  [Article Influence: 7.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Wood JD, Galligan JJ. Function of opioids in the enteric nervous system. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004;16 Suppl 2:17-28.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 261]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 236]  [Article Influence: 11.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Bagnol D, Mansour A, Akil H, Watson SJ. Cellular localization and distribution of the cloned mu and kappa opioid receptors in rat gastrointestinal tract. Neuroscience. 1997;81:579-591.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 133]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 133]  [Article Influence: 4.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Ho A, Lievore A, Patierno S, Kohlmeier SE, Tonini M, Sternini C. Neurochemically distinct classes of myenteric neurons express the mu-opioid receptor in the guinea pig ileum. J Comp Neurol. 2003;458:404-411.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Brookes SJ. Classes of enteric nerve cells in the guinea-pig small intestine. Anat Rec. 2001;262:58-70.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Fei G, Raehal K, Liu S, Qu MH, Sun X, Wang GD, Wang XY, Xia Y, Schmid CL, Bohn LM. Lubiprostone reverses the inhibitory action of morphine on intestinal secretion in guinea pig and mouse. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010;334:333-340.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 38]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Galligan JJ, Akbarali HI. Molecular Physiology of Enteric Opioid Receptors. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;2:17-21.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 82]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 90]  [Article Influence: 11.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Mulderry PK, Ghatei MA, Spokes RA, Jones PM, Pierson AM, Hamid QA, Kanse S, Amara SG, Burrin JM, Legon S. Differential expression of alpha-CGRP and beta-CGRP by primary sensory neurons and enteric autonomic neurons of the rat. Neuroscience. 1988;25:195-205.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 254]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 258]  [Article Influence: 7.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Wu ZC, Kisslinger SD, Gaginella TS. Functional evidence for the presence of cholinergic nerve endings in the colonic mucosa of the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1982;221:664-669.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Yau WM, Dorsett JA, Youther ML. Modulation of submucosal cholinergic neurons by 5-hydroxytryptamine and neuropeptides. Am J Physiol. 1990;259:G1019-G1024.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
34.  Lesko S, Wessler I, Gäbel G, Petto C, Pfannkuche H. Cholinergic modulation of epithelial integrity in the proximal colon of pigs. Cells Tissues Organs. 2013;197:411-420.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Beyer J, Jabari S, Rau TT, Neuhuber W, Brehmer A. Substance P- and choline acetyltransferase immunoreactivities in somatostatin-containing, human submucosal neurons. Histochem Cell Biol. 2013;140:157-167.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Eklund S, Sjöqvist A, Fahrenkrug J, Jodal M, Lundgren O. Somatostatin and methionine-enkephalin inhibit cholera toxin-induced jejunal net fluid secretion and release of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide in the cat in vivo. Acta Physiol Scand. 1988;133:551-557.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Mourad FH, Nassar CF. Effect of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) antagonism on rat jejunal fluid and electrolyte secretion induced by cholera and Escherichia coli enterotoxins. Gut. 2000;47:382-386.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 61]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 66]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Timmermans JP, Hens J, Adriaensen D. Outer submucous plexus: an intrinsic nerve network involved in both secretory and motility processes in the intestine of large mammals and humans. Anat Rec. 2001;262:71-78.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Coupar IM. Opioid action of the intestine: the importance of the intestinal mucosa. Life Sci. 1987;41:917-925.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 45]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Kromer W. Endogenous and exogenous opioids in the control of gastrointestinal motility and secretion. Pharmacol Rev. 1988;40:121-162.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
41.  Mann PT, Furness JB, Southwell BR. Choline acetyltransferase immunoreactivity of putative intrinsic primary afferent neurons in the rat ileum. Cell Tissue Res. 1999;297:241-248.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 51]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 52]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Fickel J, Bagnol D, Watson SJ, Akil H. Opioid receptor expression in the rat gastrointestinal tract: a quantitative study with comparison to the brain. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1997;46:1-8.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Porcher C, Bagnol D, Watson SJ. Opioid peptide mRNA expression in the colon of the rat. Neurosci Lett. 1999;272:111-114.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Furness JB, Robbins HL, Xiao J, Stebbing MJ, Nurgali K. Projections and chemistry of Dogiel type II neurons in the mouse colon. Cell Tissue Res. 2004;317:1-12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 89]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 94]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Chiocchetti R, Grandis A, Bombardi C, Lucchi ML, Dal Lago DT, Bortolami R, Furness JB. Extrinsic and intrinsic sources of calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactivity in the lamb ileum: a morphometric and neurochemical investigation. Cell Tissue Res. 2006;323:183-196.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 46]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]