Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2013; 19(1): 137-140
Published online Jan 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i1.137
Endoscopic resection of co-existing severe dysplasia and a small esophageal leiomyoma
Sun Young Ahn, Seong Woo Jeon, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu 700-721, South Korea
Author contributions: Ahn SY and Jeon SW contributed equally to this work; Ahn SY and Jeon SW designed this article and discussed the clinical features; Ahn SY wrote the paper; Jeon SW contributed to revising this article critically for important intellectual content.
Correspondence to: Seong Woo Jeon, MD, PhD, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Samduk 2-50, Junggu, Daegu 700-721, South Korea. swjeon@knu.ac.kr
Telephone: +82-53-2003517 Fax: +82-53-4268773
Received: October 8, 2012
Revised: October 30, 2012
Accepted: November 6, 2012
Published online: January 7, 2013

Abstract

Leiomyoma is the most common benign mesenchymal tumor of the esophagus. A small leiomyoma covered with endoscopically normal mucosa has a characteristic endoscopic ultrasonographic appearance, slow growth rate, and negligible risk of malignant transformation; therefore the histology does not need to be proven. Synchronous tumors such as an epithelial tumor and small subepithelial tumor in the upper gastrointestinal tract are uncommon. We describe a case with a co-existing small leiomyoma and severe dysplasia in the esophagus which were completely resected by endoscopic mucosal resection.

Key Words: Synchronous tumor, Leiomyoma, Dysplasia



INTRODUCTION

Leiomyoma is the most common benign mesenchymal tumor in the esophagus[1,2]. A small and asymptomatic leiomyoma covered with endoscopically normal mucosa does not require surgical treatment such as resection because it has a characteristic endoscopic ultrasonographic appearance, slow growth rate, and negligible risk of malignant transformation[3]. A few cases involving co-existing tumors such as epithelial tumor and subepithelial tumor in the esophagus have been reported. However, in all of these reports the tumors were larger than 1 cm, were squamous cell carcinoma[4-8], and most were treated with surgery. A subepithelial lesion smaller than 1 cm combined with epithelial dysplasia is extremely unusual. We present a patient with an epithelial lesion of severe dysplasia overlying a small leiomyoma in the muscularis mucosa of the esophagus. Both lesions were completely removed simultaneously by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).

CASE REPORT

A 67-year-old male patient visited our hospital following the incidental finding of a subepithelial lesion at the mid-esophagus. He was a non-smoker, with no previous medical history and had good performance. Esophagogastroscopic examination showed a protruding mass, measuring 1 cm × 1 cm in dimension, without any ulcer or erosion, covered with normal mucosa (Figure 1A). We examined the lesion using narrow-band imaging (NBI) which showed scattered brown dots, and dilated and tortuous vessels on the top of the lesion (Figure 1B). We judged that the lesion might have dysplasia. Endoscopic ultrasonography was performed in order to determine the depth and nature of the tumor. Findings indicated that the lesion, which measured 5.0 mm × 4.0 mm in size, was a homogenous hypoechoic mass, confined to the second layer, the muscularis mucosa (Figure 2A). We performed a mucosal biopsy. Histological examination of the specimen indicated severe dysplasia. We diagnosed severe dysplasia overlying a small leiomyoma from the muscularis mucosa. Therefore, we planned en bloc resection by endoscopy for removal of the synchronous lesions. Endoscopic resection was performed using the EMR method. Following injection of hyaluronic acid into the submucosa, resection was performed using a snare (Figure 2B and C). No complications related to the procedure were observed (Figure 2D). Histopathological examination of the tumor revealed high-grade dysplasia with a clear resection margin and the results of immunohistochemical analyses revealed that the leiomyoma was negative for C-Kit and CD 34, and positive for smooth muscle actin (Figure 3).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Endoscopic findings. A: Endoscopic findings demonstrate a subepithelial tumor with intact overlying mucosa; B: Chromoendoscopy with narrow band imaging showed scattered brown dots, and dilated and tortuous vessels on the top of the lesion.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Endoscopic ultrasound findings and procedures for endoscopic mucosal resection. A: High frequency ultrasonic endoscopic findings showed a clear homogenous hypoechoic mass derived from the second layer of the esophagus; B: After making a submucosal bleb; C: The subepithelial lesion was captured using a snare; D: No immediate complications occurred after endoscopic mucosal resection.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Histopathologic findings. A: Esophageal leiomyoma arising from the muscularis mucosa (HE, 20 ×); B: Atypical cells in all three areas of the epithelium, but not full thickness, showed severe dysplasia (HE, 200 ×); C: The esophageal leiomyoma was negative for CD117 (C-Kit); D: The esophageal leiomyoma showed strong and diffuse positive staining for smooth muscle actin (200 ×).
DISCUSSION

The present case of severe epithelial dysplasia overlying a small subepithelial tumor was treated with EMR.

Due to improvements in diagnostic tools and prolonged lifespan rates, the diagnosis of esophageal subepithelial lesions is increasing. Leiomyoma is the most common subepithelial tumor of the esophagus. Esophageal leiomyomas account for approximately 12% of all gastrointestinal leiomyomas[9]. Esophageal leiomyomas may occur in the muscularis propria layer or the muscularis mucosa of the esophagus. With the development of the high frequency ultrasonic endoprobe, detection of the origin of leiomyomas, even in small lesions, appears to be easier[10]. On occasion, those arising from the muscularis mucosa can present as polypoid intraluminal tumors. In a review of 838 cases, only 1% were the polypoid intraluminal type[11]. The question of whether a leiomyoma can show malignant degeneration is controversial. If it were possible, the risk would be negligible. Thus, when a small leiomyoma covered with normal mucosa is encountered on endoscopy, a biopsy is not recommended[1].

The co-existence of an epithelial lesion and a subepithelial lesion is rare. Twelve patients in ten case reports with carcinoma located in the mucosa overlying a benign tumor have been reported[4-6,12]. All cases were squamous cell carcinoma and the subepithelial lesions were larger than 1 cm. Eight patients were treated surgically. However, this is the first case of epithelial dysplasia overlying a leiomyoma measuring less than 1 cm in the esophagus.

It is not clear whether both lesions occurred at the same time and whether there were any causative relationships. However, we suggest that there was synchronous development of the subepithelial and epithelial lesions. After development of a leiomyoma, external stimuli may change the mucosa. Epithelial dysplasia is the principal precursor lesion of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Studies have shown that esophageal squamous cell carcinoma develops through a progressive sequence from mild to severe dysplasia[13]. Predisposition to esophageal dysplasia may be related to certain carcinogenic stimuli, dietary factors, and individual genetic susceptibility[13]. The patient was a non-smoker and did not have any relevant medical history. He did not have any risk factors for esophageal cancer. We assume that focal mechanical stimuli might induce mucosa dysplasia. However, determination of a dysplastic lesion on conventional endoscopy is difficult, even when using an iodine stain. The prevalence of severe dysplasia derived from iodine-stained tissue is quite low (< 1%)[14]. The specificity of NBI for severe dysplasia performed by experienced endoscopists has been reported to be up to 100%[15]. Therefore, a subepithelial lesion presenting with an intraluminal polypoid mass should be examined closely using electronic chromoendoscopy with NBI and tissue biopsy. However, there is a risk of bleeding and scattering malignant cells with tissue biopsy. Furthermore, scarring after tissue biopsy can create problems in the complete removal of lesions. The examination of simultaneous lesions is important. If NBI findings suggest dysplastic change, it is better to resect the lesion without tissue biopsy. Severe dysplasia overlying a leiomyoma originating from the muscularis mucosa can be removed safely using an endoscopic technique[10].

In conclusion, a polypoid subepithelial tumor of the esophagus is usually very small; however, it can occur with simultaneous epithelial dysplastic change. If the lesions are detected early using novel endoscopic imaging, they can be removed endoscopically.

Footnotes

P- Reviewer Stanojevic GZ S- Editor Song XX L- Editor Webster JR E- Editor Xiong L

References
1.  Fountain SW. Leiomyoma of the esophagus. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986;34:194-195.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Punpale A, Rangole A, Bhambhani N, Karimundackal G, Desai N, de Souza A, Pramesh CS, Jambhekar N, Mistry RC. Leiomyoma of esophagus. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;13:78-81.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Mutrie CJ, Donahue DM, Wain JC, Wright CD, Gaissert HA, Grillo HC, Mathisen DJ, Allan JS. Esophageal leiomyoma: a 40-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1122-1125.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 111]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 99]  [Article Influence: 5.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Kuwano H, Sadanaga N, Watanabe M, Yasuda M, Nozoe T, Sugimachi K. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma occurring in the surface epithelium over a benign tumor. J Surg Oncol. 1995;59:268-272.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Watanabe M, Baba T, Hotchi M. A case of leiomyoma of the lamina muscularis mucosae of the esophagus with a complication of carcinoma in situ of the overlying mucosa. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1987;37:1845-1851.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Iizuka T, Kato H, Watanabe H, Itabashi M, Hirota T. Superficial carcinoma of the esophagus coexisting with esophageal leiomyoma: a case report and review of the Japanese literature. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1984;14:115-122.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Iwaya T, Maesawa C, Uesugi N, Kimura T, Ikeda K, Kimura Y, Mitomo S, Ishida K, Sato N, Wakabayashi G. Coexistence of esophageal superficial carcinoma and multiple leiomyomas: A case report. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:4588-4592.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Mizobuchi S, Kuge K, Matsumoto Y, Yokoyama Y, Ookawauchi K, Tamura S, Kurabayashi A, Sasaguri S. Co-existence of early esophageal carcinoma and leiomyoma: a case report. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004;34:751-754.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Choong CK, Meyers BF. Benign esophageal tumors: introduction, incidence, classification, and clinical features. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;15:3-8.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Lee SJ, Paik YH, Lee DK, Lee KS, Lee SI. The diagnostic value of endoprobe for small esophageal leiomyomas derived from the muscularis mucosae. Yonsei Med J. 2005;46:61-65.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Seremetis MG, Lyons WS, deGuzman VC, Peabody JW. Leiomyomata of the esophagus. An analysis of 838 cases. Cancer. 1976;38:2166-2177.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Ishihara R, Yamamoto S, Yamamoto S, Iishi H, Takeuchi Y, Kato M, Masuda E, Tatsumi K, Higashino K, Uedo N. Endoscopic resection of the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma overlying leiomyoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:745-747.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Mao WM, Zheng WH, Ling ZQ. Epidemiologic risk factors for esophageal cancer development. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12:2461-2466.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Fagundes RB, de Barros SG, Pütten AC, Mello ES, Wagner M, Bassi LA, Bombassaro MA, Gobbi D, Souto EB. Occult dysplasia is disclosed by Lugol chromoendoscopy in alcoholics at high risk for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Endoscopy. 1999;31:281-285.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 73]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 72]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Ishihara R, Takeuchi Y, Chatani R, Kidu T, Inoue T, Hanaoka N, Yamamoto S, Higashino K, Uedo N, Iishi H. Prospective evaluation of narrow-band imaging endoscopy for screening of esophageal squamous mucosal high-grade neoplasia in experienced and less experienced endoscopists. Dis Esophagus. 2010;23:480-486.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 80]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 87]  [Article Influence: 6.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]