Incidence of port-site metastasis after undergoing robotic surgery for biliary malignancies

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the incidence of clinically detected port-site metastasis (PSM) in patients who underwent robotic surgery for biliary malignancies.

METHODS: Using a prospective database, the patients undergoing fully robotic surgery for biliary malignancies between January 2009 and January 2011 were included. Records of patients with confirmed malignancy were reviewed for clinicopathological data and information about PSM.

RESULTS: Sixty-four patients with biliary tract cancers underwent robotic surgery, and sixty patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 67 year (range: 40-85 year). During a median 15-mo follow-up period, two female patients were detected solitary PSM after robotic surgery. The incidence of PSM was 3.3%. Patient 1 underwent robotic anatomatic left hemihepatectomy and extraction of biliary tumor thrombi for an Klatskin tumor. She had a subcutaneous mass located at the right lateral abdominal wall near a trocar scar. Patient 2 underwent robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal biliary cancer. She had two metachronous subcutaneous mass situated at the right lateral abdominal wall under a same trocar scar at 7 and 26 mo. The pathology of the excised PSM masses confirmed metastatic biliary adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSION: The incidence of PSMs after robotic surgery for biliary malignancies is relatively low, and biliary cancer can be an indication of robotic surgery.

Key Words: Robotic surgery, Trocar, Port-site metastasis, Recurrence, Biliary tract cancer

INTRODUCTION

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an epithelial malignant neoplasm arising from the bile ducts with features of cholangiocyte differentiation. CCA is the second most common primary hepatobiliary malignant cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma, and epidemiologic studies suggest its incidence is increasing worldwidely[1]. Advanced unresected CCA has an extremely dismal prognosis, with a median survival of < 24 mo; meanwhile, five-year survival rates after R0 resection for hilar CCA are 11% to 41% and for distal CCA are 27% to 37%[2]. The treatment of CCA is challenging, and surgical therapy is the only therapeutic option with a chance of cure. Owing to its unique patterns of invasion and metastasis, the disease recurrence rate was very high (> 50%) after R0 resection, either locoregional recurrence or distant metastases[3,4]. Recently, cutaneous or subcutaneous metastasis from CCA and gallbladder cancer was also noted[5-7], especially port-site metastasis (PSM) after laparoscopic surgery[8-14].

Since Mouret performed the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1987, this technique has rapidly become the gold standard for the management of cholelithiasis. In the past decade, laparoscopic and robotic techniques have quickly expanded to the indication of various malignancies[15-17]. The advantages of a minimally invasive surgery are well established, such as shorter convalescence and decreased analgesic requirements, along with better cosmetic results. Laparoscopic oncology continues to be confirmed with favorable outcomes[18,19], however, reports of PSMs, a phenomenon of tumor seeding or implantation at the port-site of entry of the laparoscopic trocars, remain an area of concern[8-14,20-26]. There are very limited reports on the risk of PSMs occurring from robotic surgery for malignancies[27,28].

The goal of our study was to determine the incidence of PSMs in patients undergoing robotic surgery for biliary malignancies, which can somewhat extrapolate whether robotic surgery is indicated for advanced biliary cancers or not.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted with the approval of the institutional review board of PLA Second Artillery General Hospital. We maintain a prospective database of all patients undergoing robotic procedures performed by the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, and we reviewed all cases performed between January 2009 and January 2011. All patients with a confirmed biliary malignancy who underwent robotic surgery were included. Patients with benign disease, those who had died postoperatively or lost postoperative following-up, and those whose procedure converted to open or laparotomy were excluded. Data abstracted included the patient’s age at diagnosis, site of biliary tumor, primary histological diagnosis, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, surgical procedures, intraoperative findings, presence of ascites, information regarding adjuvant radiochemotherapy after initial surgery, detection of PSM, time to the development of PSM, findings at the time of the diagnosis of PSM, and the overall survival for patients who developed PSMs. AJCC stage was assigned as delineated in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinial Practice Guidelines on Hepatobliary Cancers (Version 2, 2012)[29]. The medical records were reviewed for all robotic procedures, including operative notes, radiology reports, pathology reports, and all involved progress notes. All patients included in this analysis had a regular every 3-mo follow-up physical examinations.

PSM was defined as subcutaneous tumor recurrence in the abdominal wall, near or within the scar tissue of the previous robotic-trocar site, which was detected either by clinical examination or by radiologic findings.

In all cases, the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) under a carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum with the maximum intraabdominal pressure of 14 mmHg was used. On average, 5 or 6 trocars were placed during the procedure, and incision size ranged from 8 mm to 12 mm. One 12-mm trocar, usually infraumbilical, served as the camera port, and 3 robotic 8-mm trocars were placed 8-cm relative to each other. One or two additional 12-mm troars were used as assistant and choledochoscopic access. The entry into the abdominal cavity was achieved under direct visualization. The non-robotic trocar used in all cases was the Versaport trocar system (United States Surgical, North Heaven, Connecticut). The trocars were removed after the abdomen was deflated with the trocars in place. The 12-mm trocar incisions were closed in 2 layers at the fascia and the skin level, and the 8-mm trocar incisions were usually closed at the skin only with an attempt to close all layers. A lavage of the port sites with povidone-iodine solution was performed at the discretion of the surgeon.

Standard statistical analyses were used and performed using SPSS software, Version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Descriptive statistics and proportions were used to report relevant demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-four patients underwent robotic surgery procedures during the study period, including 64 cases with biliary cancers: intrahepatic biliary cystadenocarcinoma in 3, hilar CCA in 39, middle and distal biliary tract cancer in 11, and gallbladder cancer in 11. After exclusion of 2 patients with conversion to open procedures and 2 patients with postoperative death, we finally identified 60 patients who met inclusion criteria. Meanwhile, the 4 patients with open conversion or death were evaluated together when needed. The clinical characteristics of the patients are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of the patients undergoing robotic surgery for biliary tract cancers.

Characteristics	No. of patients (n = 64)
Age (yr)
Median	67
Range	40-85
Gender
Male	37
Female	27
Tumor locations
Intra-hepatic biliary cancer	3
Hiliar biliary cancer	39 (1 conversion, 1 death)
Middle biliary cancer	1
Distal biliary cancer	10 (1 conversion, 1 death)
Gallbladder cancer	11
Conversion to open procedures	2
Presence of ascites
Yes	8
No	56
Use of retrieval bags
Yes	55
No	9
Postoperative adjuvant radiochemotherapy
Yes	29
No	35
Port-site metastasis	2

All patients had no pre- and intra-operative evidence of distant intra-abdominal tumor metastasis. Eight severely jaundiced patients had an intraoperative finding of minor ascites. For retrieval of specimens, we usually applied surgical glove or ladle-like forcep to retrieve the freezing specimen or tumor thrombi intraoperatively, and use of retrieval bags for large specimens at the end of procedure. The postoperative primary histological diagnosis was biliary adenocarcinoma in 59 cases, biliary cystadenocarcinoma in 3, and miscellaneous in 2.

The tumor, node, metastasis stages of primary tumor type are outlined in Table 2. The robotic procedures performed are listed in Table 3. Among 64 patients with biliary tract cancers, 2 patients converted to open procedures, with a rate of conversion of 3.1%. The postoperative morbidity and mortality are listed in Table 4.

Table 2 The American Joint Committee on Cancer stage of the 64 patients with biliary tract cancers.

Stage	Hilar biliary cancer (n = 39)	Mid- and distal biliary cancer (n = 11)	Gallbladder cancer (n = 11)	Intrahepatic biliary cystadenocarcinoma (n = 3)
T1	1	1	0	0
T2	8	9	0	2
T3	14	1	4	0
T4	16	0	7	1

Table 3 The diagnosis and robotic surgical procedures of the 64 patients with biliary tract cancer.

Tumor location	Surgical procedure	Number	Average time of procedures (min)
Intrahepatic biliary cystadenocarcinoma (n = 3)	Hepatic segmentectomy	3	220 (170-260)
Hilar biliary cancer (n = 39)	Anatomical left hemihepatectomy	3 (1 open conversion)	530 (410-650)
	Excision of tumor and GD-bridged biliary reconstruction	3	415 (390-460)
	Excision of tumor and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy	15	400 (350-510)
	Excision of tumor and biliary reconstruction	1	350
	Excision of tumor and external biliary drainage	7	210 (190-290)
	Excision of tumor and T-tube biliary drainage	10 (1 death)	230 (210-280)
Middle biliary cancer (n = 1)	Excision of tumor and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy	1	330
Distal biliary cancer (n = 10)	Whipple procedures	10 (1 conversion, 1 death)	720 (570-870)
Gallbladder cancer (n = 11)	Excision of GD tumor and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy	2	450 (410-490)
	Cholecystectomy	3	200 (170-300)
	Cholecystectomy and internal biliary drainage	1	220
	Cholecystectomy and T-tube biliary drainage	5	230 (210-280)

GD: Gallbladder.

Table 4 The postoperative morbidites and mortalities of the patients undergoing robotic surgery for biliary tract cancer (%).

Complications	No. of patients (n = 64)
Open conversion	2 (3.1)
Morbidity	9 (14.1)
Minor biliary leakage	3
Intra-abdominal hemorrhage	1
Pancreatic leakage	2
Pulmonary infection	2
Acute renal failure	1
Mortality	2 (3.1)
Pulmonary infection	1
Acute renal failure	1

The median follow-up period for all of the patients was 15 mo (range: 11-34 mo). PSMs were detected in 2 (3.3%) of the 60 patients, both of them were absent of intraoperative ascites. The interval between robotic surgery and detection of PSM was 27 mo in patient 1 and 7 mo in patient 2.

Patient 1 was a 51-year-old woman, who admitted with complaints of abdominal pain, jaundice and generalized pruritus in February 2009. A diagnosis of Klatskin tumor (Bismuth classification IIIb) was suspected. Robotic anatomatic left hemihepatectomy and extraction of biliary tumor thrombi were performed. During the procedures, the glove-fingers were used for retrieval of tumor thrombi specimens (Figure 1). The pathology revealed well-differentiated papillary adenocarcinoma and biliary tumor thrombi arising from the left biliary duct. In order to prevent local tumor recurrence, a prophylactic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with total dose of 42 Gy (12 times) was given to the hepatic margin at 6th postoperative month.

Figure 1 During robotic procedure, the glove-fingers were used for retrieval of tumor thrombi specimens. 1, 2 and 3: The robotic arms, arm 1, 2 and 3.

In May, 2011, she was readmitted to our hospital for noting a subcutaneous mass at right lateral abdominal wall. Upon physical examination, a painless well-circumscribed, hard, subcutaneous mass near a trocar scar was palpated at the right lateral abdominal wall. Computed tomography (CT) scans confirmed a 2 cm × 1.5 cm subcutaneous mass (Figure 2A); no other obvious radiologic abnormalities were discovered. A subcutaneous tumor seeding was considered, and the mass was locally excised from the abdominal wall muscle (Figure 3A). Postoperative pathology confirmed metastatic biliary adenocarcinoma.

Figure 2 Computerized tomography scans of subcutaneous mass. A: A 2 cm × 1.5 cm subcutaneous mass at right lateral abdominal wall, which near a trocar scar on physical examination; B: A 4 cm × 3 cm × 3 cm subcutaneous mass at right lateral abdominal wall.

Figure 3 The subcutaneous mass was locally excised (A) and repeated excised locally (B) from abdominal wall muscle.

In November 2011, about 33-mo after the robotic surgery, she was discovered multiple intraabdominal masses on CT scans, and was managed by SBRT.

Patient 2 was a 75-year-old woman with painless jaun dice who was diagnosed as distal biliary tumor, and underwent robotic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in July 2009. Postoperative pathology revealed poor-differentiated adenocarcinoma arising from the distal biliary duct. The preoperative serum CA199 level was 160 U/mL (normal range: 0-37 U/mL), then it dropped to normal range. An incisional hernia was occurred at infra-umbilical port site 2-mo after operation.

In February 2010, she had complained of a palpable painless subcutaneous mass of 3 cm × 2 cm size at right lateral abdominal wall under a robotic trocar scar, and which was removed by local excision. The pathology revealed seeding nodule of CCA. In September 2011, another 4 cm × 3 cm × 3 cm subcutaneous mass at the same site (Figure 2B) with obvious pain was noted, no other distal metastases were determined on CT scans. Meanwhile, the incisional hernia enlarged rapidly to a size of 13 cm × 13 cm; the serum CA199 level increased to 91.26 U/mL. Repeated local excision of subcutaneous mass (Figure 3B) and simultaneous incisional hernia repair with mesh implantation were performed. She recovered uneventfully. Postoperative pathology confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma, and the serum CA199 level had returned to normal at that time.

DISCUSSION

Oncology-related laparoscopic PSMs were first reported in 1978, Döbrönte et al[20] described a PSM occurring 2 wk after laparoscopy in a patient with malignant ascites. Since then, a number of PSMs cases after diagnostic or therapeutic laparoscopy have been reported, involving nearly all abdominopelvic malignancies[8-14,20-26]. However, given the sparse published data, and the few events of PSM, the precise incidence of PSM has still not been well defined. Ramirez et al[23] estimated that the overall incidence of PSMs after laparoscopic surgery was 1%-2%; and in general laparoscopic surgery the incidence of tumor seeding ranges from 0.8% to 21%[5,30]. Noticeably, the incidence of PSMs after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for incidental gallbladder cancer was as high as 14%-29% within the first 2 years after the initial operation[11-14].

Our study showed that the incidence of PSM in patients undergoing robotic surgery for the management of biliary malignancies is 3.3% (2/60). The 3.3% PSMs incidence in this study seems much lower than the reported incidence after laparoscopic surgery for incidental gallbladder cancer, and a little higher than that in general laparoscopic surgery[23]. The relatively low incidence of PSMs reveals that advanced biliary malignancies can be selected as an indication of robotic or laparoscopic techniques. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the incidence of PSMs after robotic procedures for biliary malignancies. Although there are rare reported cases of PSM after robotic procedures in malignancies[27,28], the risk of PSM between robotic and laparoscopic surgery would be not significantly different, because of procedures and requirements such as CO₂ pneumoperitoneum pressure (12-14 mmHg), the trocars placement are all much similar[28].

There are several postulated mechanisms for deve loping PSMs[23,30-34]. The most commonly discussed hypotheses include direct wound contamination and implantation, the biological aggressiveness of the primary tumor, haematogenous spread, effects of pneumoperitoneum that including the type of insufflating gas, chimney effect, aerosolization, surgical technique and the local immune response. Likewise the occurrence of PSMs is secondary to the above-mentioned multiple factors. Accordingly, several precautions were adopted with attempt to minimize the risk of PSMs[23,32-38].

The incidence of PSMs is much higher after laparoscopic surgery for incidental gallbladder carcinoma, which is mostly caused by tumor cells contamination due to gallbladder perforation during procedure and retrieval[8-14,39]. In this study, most of our patients had advanced biliary tract cancers. Their bile potentially contains tumor cells exfoliated from the primary tumor; bile ducts mobilization and dissection will probably detach more tumor cells into the bile; the robotic or laparoscopic instruments are inevitably contaminated by the spilled bile and exfoliated tumor cells. These possible scenarios resulted in consequent peritoneal carcinomatosis and PSM, especially in those with tumor thrombus, or undergoing R1 and R2 resection[5-7,40]. For patient 1, the procedures of tumor thrombi exposure and retrieval probably increase the risk of direct wound contamination of tumor cells, during specimen retrieval and instrument transfers.

This study raises a question regarding the indication of robotic or laparoscopic surgery for advanced biliary tract cancers. The initial result of this study justifies robotic surgery for biliary cancer on low incidence of PSMs. However, while either based on the surgical approaches, being robotic, laparoscopic or open, it is less important than the adherence to the principles of oncological surgery. All the procedures of violation of the primary tumor boundaries or damage of tumor-bearing lymph nodes, may promote tumor cell dissemination[41]. The conditions such as a presence of tumor thrombus and extensive intraabdominal metastases, may be a contraindication of robotic surgery for biliary tract cancer, because direct tumor manipulation infringes the oncological principles[41]. To prevent the trocar-site seeding in the case of biliary malignancy, we now routinely extract the specimen intact with the use of an impermeable laparoscopic retrieval bag[39]. Furthermore, we began to perform hyperthermal intraperitoneal chemotherapy at the end of robotic surgery to annihilate potential intraabdominal disseminated tumor cells[42].

In conclusion, the incidence of PSMs after robotic surgery for biliary cancer is relatively low, and biliary malignancies can be selected as an indication of robotic surgery. Although robotic surgery seemed more elaborate than laparoscopic surgery in managing biliary cancer, we should be aware of the risk of PSMs when dealing with malignancies. Emphasis on adhering to strict oncological surgical principles is the best method of prevention. Further studies are mandatory to better determine the role of robotic biliary surgery on the long-term oncological outcomes.

COMMENTS

Background

In the past decade, laparoscopic and robotic techniques have rapidly expanded to the indication of various malignancies. However, reports of port-site metastases (PSMs), a phenomenon of tumor seeding or implantation at the port-site of entry of the laparoscopic trocars, remain an area of concern. It has presumed that gallbladder cancer is a contraindication of laparoscopic technique owing to extremely high incidence of PSMs. This study estimates the incidence of clinically detected PSM in patients undergoing robotic surgery for biliary malignancies, in order to investigate the indication of biliary malignancies for robotic surgery.

Research frontiers

The laparoscopic technique has been little used for biliary malignancies, because the incidence of PSMs after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for incidental gallbladder cancer was as high as 14%-29% within the first 2 years after the initial operation. However, there are very limited reports on the risk of PSMs occurring from robotic surgery for malignancies, especially with no data of PSM incidence after robotic biliary surgery.

Innovations and breakthroughs

This is the largest number of case reports from a single-institution worldwidely. Total to sixty-four patients with biliary tract cancers underwent robotic surgery, and sixty patients met the inclusion criteria. During a median 15-mo follow-up period, two female patients were detected solitary PSM after robotic surgery. The incidence of PSM was 3.3%. The relatively low incidence of PSMs after robotic surgery for biliary malignancies would arouse the interest of reappraisal the indication of laparoscopic or robotic procedures for biliary cancers.

Applications

Robotic surgery for biliary malignancies can be selected as an indication in selected patients with early or advanced biliary cancers, such as gallbladder cancer, Klatskin tumor and distal biliary cancer. Meanwhile, an emphasis on adhering to strict oncological surgical principles is the best method of prevention of PSMs, and further studies are mandatory to better determine the role of robotic biliary surgery on the long-term oncological outcomes.

Terminology

PSM is a phenomenon of tumor seeding or implantation at the port-site of entry of the laparoscopic trocars after laparoscopic or robotic surgery for malignancies. The high incidence would raise a question on the oncologic safety of laparoscopic or robotic procedures for malignancies.

Peer review

This is an interesting report of the author´s experience in the management of patients with biliary malignancies by using robot.