Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2011; 17(29): 3459-3464
Published online Aug 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i29.3459
Three cases of retroperitoneal schwannoma diagnosed by EUS-FNA
Taiki Kudo, Hiroshi Kawakami, Masaki Kuwatani, Nobuyuki Ehira, Hiroaki Yamato, Kazunori Eto, Masahiro Asaka, Department of Gastroenterology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
Kazunori Eto, Kanako Kubota, Department of Surgical pathology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14, Nishi 5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
Author contributions: Kudo T and Kawakami H contributed equally to this work; Kawakami H managed the patients, performed the endoscopic examination, designed the research and provided discussion of clinical features and pathology; Kuwatani M, Ehira N and Yamato H analyzed the data and provided clinical advice; Eto K and Kubota K diagnosed the case and provided discussion of pathology; Kudo T and Kawakami H collected the data and wrote the paper; Kawakami H revised the paper; Asaka M supervised the research; all authors approved the final manuscript for publication.
Correspondence to: Hiroshi Kawakami, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan. hiropon@med.hokudai.ac.jp
Telephone: +81-11-7161161-5918 Fax: +81-11-7067867
Received: December 16, 2010
Revised: March 4, 2011
Accepted: March 11, 2011
Published online: August 7, 2011

Abstract

Schwannomas are peripheral nerve tumors that are typically solitary and benign. Their diagnosis is largely based on surgically resected specimens. Recently, a number of case reports have indicated that retroperitoneal schwannomas could be diagnosed with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). We report the diagnosis of three cases of schwannoma using EUS-FNA. Subjects were two males and one female, ages 22, 40, and 46 years, respectively, all of whom were symptom-free. Imaging findings showed well-circumscribed round tumors. However, as the tumors could not be diagnosed using these findings alone, EUS-FNA was performed. Hematoxylin-eosin staining of the resulting tissue fragments revealed bland spindle cells with nuclear palisading. There was no disparity in nuclear sizes. Immunostaining revealed S-100 protein positivity and all cases were diagnosed as schwannomas. Ki-67 indexes were 3%-15%, 2%-3%, and 3%, respectively. No case showed any signs of malignancy. As most schwannomas are benign tumors and seldom become malignant, we observed these patients without therapy. All tumors demonstrated no enlargement and no change in characteristics. Schwannomas are almost always benign and can be observed following diagnosis by EUS-FNA.

Key Words: Schwannoma; Endoscopic ultrasonography; Fine-needle aspiration; Retroperitoneal tumor; S100 proteins; Ki-67 index



INTRODUCTION

Schwannomas are tumors that originate from peripheral nerve Schwann cells, and are typically solitary and benign. Schwannomas are difficult to diagnose using imaging only, and as such, diagnoses are commonly confirmed with conventional surgical resection. In the present study, we diagnosed three schwannomas using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) without the need for surgical resection, and provided follow-up of the patients.

CASE REPORT
Case 1

A 22-year-old male consulted our department for further examination of a 20 mm hypoechoic mass in the head of the pancreas that had been detected by abdominal ultrasonography (US). His abdomen was flat and soft without tenderness. US showed a well-encapsulated, smooth-surfaced, homogeneous and hypoechoic mass near the pancreas at the right side of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) (Figure 1). Contrast-enhanced US with Sonazoid (Daiichi-Sankyo, Tokyo, Japan), a lipid stabilized suspension of perfluorobutane gas microbubbles, revealed progressively increased enhancement in the mass (Figure 2). Computed tomography (CT) showed a 20 mm diameter low-density mass located just dorsal to the head of the pancreas. Contrast-enhanced CT of the tumor revealed minimal early contrast enhancement followed by delayed enhancement (Figure 3). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a round mass with high signal intensity on T2-weighted images and low signal intensity on T1-weighted images. The borders of the mass were clear (Figure 4). To obtain a pathological diagnosis, three passes of EUS-FNA of the mass were performed with a curvilinear echoendoscope (GF-UCT240-AL5; Olympus Medical Systems Co., Tokyo, Japan) under conscious sedation through the duodenal wall using a 22 gauge EchoTip® Ultra (Wilson-Cook Medical Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Pathological findings using a hematoxylin-eosin stain showed bland spindle cells with regular nuclear palisading. Immunochemical staining of the tumor demonstrated S-100 positivity. We diagnosed the tumor as a schwannoma, with a Ki-67 index of 3%-15% (Figure 5).

Figure 1
Figure 1 The borders of each of the tumors (arrows) are clearly defined. A: Case 1; B: Case 2; C: Case 3. Ultrasonography showed a round hypoechoic mass (arrows) with a slightly heterogeneous internal echo level.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultra sound showed no early enhancement and gradually increasing late phase enhancement. A: Vascular phase of Case 1; B: Post-vascular phase of Case 1; C: Vascular phase of Case 2; D: Post-vascular phase of Case 2; E: Vascular phase of Case 3; F: Post-vascular phase of Case 3. Tumors are indicated by arrows.
Figure 3
Figure 3 In Case 1, computed tomography indicated a round tumor (arrows) near the head of the pancreas. Gradually increasing enhancement of the tumor was shown by a dynamic computed tomography study. A: Plain; B: Early phase; C: Portal phase; D: Delayed phase.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Magnetic resonance imaging of Case 1 showed a round mass (arrows) with low signal intensity in T1-weighted images and high signal intensity in T2-weighted images. The tumor signal was uniform. A: T1-weighted image; B: T2-weighted image.
Figure 5
Figure 5 In all three cases the tissue fragments consisted of densely packed, bland spindle cells with nuclear palisading under hematoxylin-eosin staining (× 400). A: Case 1; B: Case 2; C: Case 3; D-F: S-100 reaction was also positive in all case. D: Case 1; E: Case 2; F: Case 3; G-I: Ki-67 indexes were 3%-15%, 2%-4%, and 3% for Cases 1, 2, and 3, respectively. G: Case 1; H: Case 2; I: Case 3.
Case 2

A 40-year-old female consulted an urologist and a retroperitoneal tumor was found incidentally on US. The abdomen was flat and soft without tenderness. When she consulted our hospital, she had no symptoms. US showed a well-encapsulated, smooth-surfaced, homogeneous and hypoechoic mass near the pancreas at the right side of the SMA (Figure 1). Contrast-enhanced US with Sonazoid revealed progressively increasing enhancement in the mass (Figure 2). CT showed a 27.4 mm diameter low-density mass located between the head of the pancreas and the SMA. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed deficient early contrast enhancement with slightly homogenous enhancement in the late phase. MRI showed a round mass with high signal intensity on T2-weighted images and low signal intensity on T1-weighted images. The borders of the mass were clear and the internal signal was heterogeneous. Two passes of EUS-FNA of the mass were performed through the duodenal bulb wall using a 22-gauge EchoTip Ultra. Pathologically the tumor consisted of bland spindle cells with nuclear palisading under hematoxylin-eosin staining. Immunochemical staining for S-100 was positive. The Ki-67 index of the tumor was 2%-3% (Figure 5).

Case 3

A 46-year-old male consulted a doctor in a nearby hospital for further examination of a 15 mm hypoechoic mass near the head of the pancreas that had been detected by US. The abdomen was flat and soft without tenderness and the patient was asymptomatic. US showed a well-encapsulated, smooth-surfaced, homogeneous and hypoechoic mass located dorsal to the uncinate process of the pancreas (Figure 1). US contrast-enhancement with Sonazoid revealed slow contrast enhancement in the mass (Figure 2). CT showed a 15 mm diameter, smooth surfaced, well-bordered and round mass with a slightly higher density than normal pancreatic parenchyma. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed that the tumor was slightly enhanced. MRI showed a round mass with high signal intensity on T2-weighted images and low signal intensity on T1-weighted images. The borders of the mass were clear and the internal signal was homogenous. Two passes of EUS-FNA of the tumor through the duodenal bulb wall were performed using a 22-gauge EchoTip Ultra. On pathological examination with hematoxylin-eosin staining, the tumor consisted of bland spindle cells with nuclear palisading. Immunochemical staining showed S-100 positivity, and the Ki-67 index was 3% (Figure 5). We diagnosed the tumor as a retroperitoneal schwannoma.

All three patients were asymptomatic and none of the tumors exhibited malignant signs (Tables 1 and 2). Therefore, after obtaining informed consent from the patients, we observed all three without therapy for 26, 12, and 18 mo of follow-up, respectively. No changes in tumor size or features were noted.

Table 1 Patient characteristics.
Case 1Case 2Case 3
Age (yr), sex22, M40, F46, M
Detection methodScreeningScreeningScreening
First assessment modalityUS,CTCTUS
CEA (ng/mL)2.51.77.1
CA19-9 (U/mL)0.014.010.0
Tumor diameter (mm)20.027.415.0
Table 2 Lesion characteristics.
Case 1Case 2Case 3
BorderClearClearClear
USHypoechoicHypoechoicHypoechoic
CTLow densityLow densityLow density
MRIT1 low, T2 highT1 low, T2 highT1 low, T2 high
Ki-67(%)3-152-43
Follow-up duration (mo)23915
DISCUSSION

Schwannomas are tumors that originate from Schwann cells[1]. They are ordinarily seen in the head, neck, and extremities, and are only rarely found in the retroperitoneum; a retroperitoneal location accounted for 0.3%-3.2% of all primary schwannomas[2-6] and 0.3%-6.0% of all retroperitoneal tumors[7-12]. Schwannomas seldom cause symptoms and are often discovered incidentally. Most commonly, imaging studies show a well-defined round mass, sometimes with cystic changes[13]. Histologically, schwannomas consist of spindle cells in a hypercellular palisade arrangement area (Antoni type A) and myxomatous cells in a hypocellular organized area (Antoni type B). Schwannomas are characterized immunohistochemically by S-100 positivity[14,15]. As previously described, US findings of schwannomas generally show a well-defined hypoechoic mass with a slightly heterogeneous internal echo level. The majority of schwannomas have poor vascularity. Contrast-enhanced CT findings of these tumors often show a low-density and gradually enhanced mass. Our three cases demonstrated imaging findings similar to those described above, which are not specific to schwannomas. The MRI T2-weighted image signals of Antoni A areas were reported to exhibit a slightly high intensity, while those of Antoni B areas exhibited very high intensity[16]. According to a review of 199 schwannomas, 162 lesions (81%) showed biphasic macroscopic and microscopic patterns of central Antoni A and peripheral Antoni B cells, while 118 lesions (59%) also showed a biphasic pattern on MRI[17]. Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images showed central high intensity and peripheral low intensity, whereas T2-weighted images showed peripheral high intensity and central low intensity. The specificity of these signs in schwannomas was 100% and the sensitivity was 59%[17]. However, when large in size, schwannomas are more likely to show secondary degenerative changes such as cystic degeneration, hemorrhage, necrosis, and calcification, and to reveal mixed patterns[13,18]. As such, it is difficult to confirm the diagnosis of a schwannoma using only the MRI findings discussed above. As a result, almost all retroperitoneal schwannomas are surgically resected and diagnosed from the resected specimen. CT- or US-guided FNAs for schwannoma diagnosis prior to surgery have been reported. However, the accuracy of both biopsy targeting and diagnosis were poor[18,19]. Li et al[20] reported that of 73 cases with total tumor resection and nine cases with exploratory laparotomy, 13 cases (15.9%) could be diagnosed as schwannomas preoperatively, and histological diagnosis by US-guided FNA was performed in only one case. In our three cases, we performed EUS-FNA to obtain a pathological diagnosis as we could not provide diagnosis by imaging alone. For the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors, the sensitivity of EUS-FNA was reported to be over 90%, with a specificity of approximately 100%[21,22]. A randomized comparison between EUS-FNA and CT- or US-guided FNA for malignant pancreatic tumors also revealed sensitivities of 84% and 62%, respectively. Thus, EUS-FNA was superior to CT- or US-guided FNA, especially for small masses difficult to detect with CT or US[23].

Using FNA of schwannomas, it is difficult to find a safe route from the skin to the lesion, especially in mediastinal, perirectal or retroperitoneal masses[21], as there are vessels or other organs between the skin and the lesion. A recent report on the diagnosis of retroperitoneal tumors indicated a sensitivity of 50%, specificity of 100%, and a positive predictive value is 100%[24]. Previous case reports have described eight cases with schwannomas or neurilemmomas diagnosed preoperatively by EUS-FNA (retroperitoneum, seven cases; mediastinum, one case)[10,25-28]. In the present study the three cases with retroperitoneal schwannomas received surgery after diagnosis with EUS-FNA[10,26,27] (Table 3). Tumor recurrence or malignant transformation after complete resection is very rare for retroperitoneal schwannomas[15,29-31], and the features of malignant schwannomas include tumor diameter over 5 cm, ambiguous borders separating the tumor from the surrounding tissue, intratumor bleeding or necrosis, and a Ki-67 index of 5%-65%[32]. Therefore, asymptomatic retroperitoneal schwannomas with no indications of malignancy diagnosed by EUS-FNA[28] can be observed without the need for surgery.

Table 3 Reported cases of schwannoma diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration.
Case No.Age (yr)SexSymptomTumor diameter (mm)PositionUSSurgery
1[14]79FDry cough30SMPHypo-
2[15]59MNone40RetroHypoDone
3[16]29MEpigastralgia35RetroHypoDone
4[17]37MNone16IntraHypoDone
5, 6, 7, 8[28]54.51M:F = 3:1None23.71RetroNA-
Our case 122MNone20RetroHypo-
Our case 240FNone27.4RetroHypo-
Our case 346MNone15RetroHypo-
Footnotes

Peer reviewers: Dr. Jeff Butterworth, MB, FRCP, Department of Gastroenterology, Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Mytton Oak Road, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY3 8XQ, United Kingdom; Andrada Seicean, MD, PhD, Third Medical Clinic Cluj Napoca, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj Napoca, Romania, 15, Closca Street, Cluj-Napoca 400039, Romania

S- Editor Tian L L- Editor Cant MR E- Editor Zheng XM

References
1.  White W, Shiu MH, Rosenblum MK, Erlandson RA, Woodruff JM. Cellular schwannoma. A clinicopathologic study of 57 patients and 58 tumors. Cancer. 1990;66:1266-1275.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Das Gupta TK, Brasfield RD, Strong EW, Hajdu SI. Benign solitary Schwannomas (neurilemomas). Cancer. 1969;24:355-366.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Narasimha A, Kumar MH, Kalyani R, Madan M. Retroperitoneal cystic schwannoma: A case report with review of literature. J Cytol. 2010;27:136-139.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Gu L, Liu W, Xu Q, Wu ZY. Retroperitoneal schwannoma mimicking hepatic tumor. Chin Med J (Engl). 2008;121:1751-1752.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Liu YW, Chiu HH, Huang CC, Tu CA. Retroperitoneal schwannoma mimicking a psoas abscess. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:A32.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Theodosopoulos T, Stafyla VK, Tsiantoula P, Yiallourou A, Marinis A, Kondi-Pafitis A, Chatziioannou A, Boviatsis E, Voros D. Special problems encountering surgical management of large retroperitoneal schwannomas. World J Surg Oncol. 2008;6:107.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Misra MC, Bhattacharjee HK, Hemal AK, Bansal VK. Laparoscopic management of rare retroperitoneal tumors. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20:e117-e122.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Pinto D, Kaidar-Person O, Cho M, Zundel N, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. Laparoscopic resection of a retroperitoneal degenerative schwannoma: a case report and review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008;18:121-123.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Funamizu N, Sasaki A, Matsumoto T, Inomata M, Shiraishi N, Kitano S. Laparoscopic resection of a retroperitoneal schwannoma behind the lesser omental sac. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004;14:175-177.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Facciorusso D, Federici T, Giacobbe A, Niro Grazia A, Piermanni V, Andriulli A. Retroperitoneal neurilemoma diagnosed by endosonographically guided fine needle aspiration. J Clin Ultrasound. 2006;34:241-243.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Fass G, Hossey D, Nyst M, Smets D, Saligheh EN, Duttmann R, Claes K, da Costa PM. Benign retroperitoneal schwannoma presenting as colitis: a case report. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:5521-5524.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Singh V, Kapoor R. Atypical presentations of benign retroperitoneal schwannoma: report of three cases with review of literature. Int Urol Nephrol. 2005;37:547-549.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Takatera H, Takiuchi H, Namiki M, Takaha M, Ohnishi S, Sonoda T. Retroperitoneal schwannoma. Urology. 1986;28:529-531.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 68]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 72]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Nakashima J, Ueno M, Nakamura K, Tachibana M, Baba S, Deguchi N, Tazaki H, Murai M. Differential diagnosis of primary benign and malignant retroperitoneal tumors. Int J Urol. 1997;4:441-446.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Weiss SW, Goldblum JR.  Enzinger and Weiss's Soft Tissue Tumors. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier 2008; .  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Hayasaka K, Tanaka Y, Soeda S, Huppert P, Claussen CD. MR findings in primary retroperitoneal schwannoma. Acta Radiol. 1999;40:78-82.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 63]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 73]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Koga H, Matsumoto S, Manabe J, Tanizawa T, Kawaguchi N. Definition of the target sign and its use for the diagnosis of schwannomas. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:224-229.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 57]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 61]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Daneshmand S, Youssefzadeh D, Chamie K, Boswell W, Wu N, Stein JP, Boyd S, Skinner DG. Benign retroperitoneal schwannoma: a case series and review of the literature. Urology. 2003;62:993-997.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 87]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 91]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Goh BK, Tan YM, Chung YF, Chow PK, Ooi LL, Wong WK. Retroperitoneal schwannoma. Am J Surg. 2006;192:14-18.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 71]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 79]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Li Q, Gao C, Juzi JT, Hao X. Analysis of 82 cases of retroperitoneal schwannoma. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77:237-240.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 101]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 109]  [Article Influence: 6.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Erickson RA. EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:267-279.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 123]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 133]  [Article Influence: 6.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Fisher L, Segarajasingam DS, Stewart C, Deboer WB, Yusoff IF. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: Performance and outcomes. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:90-96.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 68]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 58]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Horwhat JD, Paulson EK, McGrath K, Branch MS, Baillie J, Tyler D, Pappas T, Enns R, Robuck G, Stiffler H. A randomized comparison of EUS-guided FNA versus CT or US-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:966-975.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Anand D, Barroeta JE, Gupta PK, Kochman M, Baloch ZW. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of non-pancreatic lesions: an institutional experience. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60:1254-1262.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  McGrath KM, Ballo MS, Jowell PS. Schwannoma of the mediastinum diagnosed by EUS-guided fine needle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:362-365.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
26.  Okada N, Hirooka Y, Itoh A, Hashimoto S, Niwa K, Ishikawa H, Itoh T, Kawashima H, Goto H. Retroperitoneal neurilemoma diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:790-792.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Li S, Ai SZ, Owens C, Kulesza P. Intrapancreatic schwannoma diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol. 2009;37:132-135.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 38]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Hijioka S, Sawaki A, Mizuno N, Hara K, Mekky MA, Bhatia V, Hosoda W, Yatabe Y, Shimizu Y, Tamada K. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of retroperitoneal schwannoma. Endoscopy. 2010;42 Suppl 2:E296.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Chu YC, Yoon YH, Han HS, Han JY, Kim JM, Park IS. Malignant transformation of intrathoracic ancient neurilemmoma in a patient without Von Recklinghausen’s disease. J Korean Med Sci. 2003;18:295-298.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  McLean CA, Laidlaw JD, Brownbill DS, Gonzales MF. Recurrence of acoustic neurilemoma as a malignant spindle-cell neoplasm. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1990;73:946-950.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Woodruff JM, Selig AM, Crowley K, Allen PW. Schwannoma (neurilemoma) with malignant transformation. A rare, distinctive peripheral nerve tumor. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994;18:882-895.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 234]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 198]  [Article Influence: 6.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Woodruff JM, Kourea HP, Louis DN, Scheithauer BW.  Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor(MPNST). In : Kleihues P, Cavenee WK, editors. World Health Organization of Tumors. Pathology and Genetics of Tumors of the Nervous System. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000; 172-174.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 234]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 198]  [Article Influence: 6.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]