Topic Highlight Open Access
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2011; 17(27): 3204-3212
Published online Jul 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i27.3204
Current treatment of ulcerative colitis
Johannes Meier, Andreas Sturm
Johannes Meier, Andreas Sturm, Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Clinic, 13353 Berlin, Germany
Author contributions: Meier J and Sturm A contributed equally to this review.
Correspondence to: Andreas Sturm, MD, Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Clinic, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany. andreas.sturm@charite.de
Telephone: +49-30-450565206 Fax: +49-30-450553929
Received: December 10, 2011
Revised: June 20, 2011
Accepted: June 27, 2010
Published online: July 21, 2011

Abstract

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disease featuring recurrent inflammation of the colonic mucosa. The goal of medical treatment is to rapidly induce a steroid-free remission while at the same time preventing complications of the disease itself and its treatment. The choice of treatment depends on severity, localization and the course of the disease. For proctitis, topical therapy with 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) compounds is used. More extensive or severe disease should be treated with oral and local 5-ASA compounds and corticosteroids to induce remission. Patients who do not respond to this treatment require hospitalization. Intravenous steroids or, when refractory, calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine, tacrolimus), tumor necrosis factor-α antibodies (infliximab) or immunomodulators (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine) are then called for. Indications for emergency surgery include refractory toxic megacolon, perforation, and continuous severe colorectal bleeding. Close collaboration between gastroenterologist and surgeon is mandatory in order not to delay surgical therapy when needed. This article is intended to give a general, practice-orientated overview of the key issues in ulcerative colitis treatment. Recommendations are based on published consensus guidelines derived from national and international guidelines on the treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Key Words: Ulcerative colitis, Inflammatory bowel disease, Medical management, Diagnosis, Azathioprine, TNF-α blocker



INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disease with recurrent uncontrolled inflammation of the colon. The rectum is always affected with inflammation spreading from the distal to the proximal colonic segments. The terminal ileum is typically not involved but some patients with extensive disease may show endoscopic signs of “backwash ileitis”. As the course of disease and extent vary considerably among patients, an individualized diagnostic and therapeutic approach is necessary.

The purpose of clinical practice guidelines is to indicate the best approaches to medical problems based on scientific findings. However, in the case of UC, if we consider just 3 different distribution patterns (proctitis, left-sided, pancolitis), 4 disease activities (remission, mild, moderate, severe), and 4 possible disease courses (asymptomatic after initial flare, increase in severity over time, chronic continuous symptoms, chronic relapsing symptoms), 48 different situations have to be evaluated before giving scientific advice. With the addition of further important factors such as the patient’s extra-intestinal manifestations, age, concomitant diseases, previous operations, medical intolerances, lifestyles and personal wishes this number exceeds a thousand possible regimes. So guidelines can only aim to indicate the preferable but not necessarily the only acceptable therapeutic approach and are meant to be used flexibly in a manner best suited to the individual patient. Therefore, the therapeutic approaches described in this article are meant to provide a general, practice-orientated overview of the important issues on UC treatment. Recommendations are based on published consensus guidelines of the national German [Deutsche Gesellschaft für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS)][1,2] and international societies [American College of Gastroenterology (ACG)[3], European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO)][4-6] as well as on the authors’ experience. Evidence levels (EL) and recommendation grades (RG) are given according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, EL 1 being the highest evidence level and RG A the strongest recommendation. ACG and DGVS guideline recommendations are graded from A (highest) to D (lowest).

The goal of medical treatment in UC is the rapid induction of a steroid-free remission and the prevention of complications of the disease itself and its treatment. In Crohn’s disease experts are currently debating the usefulness of a “top-down” strategy, giving highly potent drugs in the early stages of the disease in order to prevent complications. In contrast, guidelines on UC, a putatively curable disease (by means of colectomy), still favor a pyramidal step-up approach where 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is considered the baseline medication, steroids and immunomodulators function to intensify the treatment, while infliximab (IFX), calcineurin inhibitors [cyclosporine A (CsA), tacrolimus] or surgery are considered as rescue therapy.

MANAGEMENT OF ACTIVE UC

Symptoms of new onset UC or recurrent flare-ups usually consist of abdominal pain, bloody and/or mucous diarrhea. Severe cases present with weight loss, tachycardia, fever, anemia and bowel distension. Before starting medical treatment other etiologies of colitis/enteritis such as infections [Clostridium difficile, cytomegalovirus (CMV)], toxic reactions (e.g. antibiotics, NSAID colitis), mesenteric ischemia or intestinal malignancies should be ruled out. Opportunistic infections (e.g. CMV infection) need to be excluded prior to medical therapy escalation, especially in patients under immunosuppressive therapy with a corticosteroid-refractory course.

Although there is no gold standard, minimal diagnostic workup for UC includes medical history, clinical evaluation (focusing on extraintestinal manifestations), full blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), stool microbiology, ultrasound and endoscopy with mucosal biopsies[6]. If there is any doubt about the diagnosis in the acute setting, endoscopic and histological confirmation should be repeated after a period of time has passed (ECCO EL 5, RG D; DGVS C).

The choice of treatment depends on the degree of activity, distribution (proctitis, left-sided or extensive colitis), course of disease, frequency of relapses, extraintestinal manifestations, previous medications, side-effect profile and the patient´s individual wishes.

The degree of activity can be classified according to the Montreal classification as: Remission (S0): 3 or less stools per day without any presence of blood or increased urgency of defecation; Mild (S1): up to 4 stools per day, possibly bloody. Pulse, temperature, hemoglobin concentration and ESR are normal; Moderate (S2): 4 to 6 bloody stools daily, no signs of systemic involvement; Severe (S3): more than 6 bloody stools daily, signs of systemic involvement (temperature above 37.5°C, heart rate above 90/min, hemoglobin concentration below 10.5 g/dL, or ESR above 30 mm/h).

Distribution patterns depend on the part of the colon involved and are designated according to the Montreal classification as proctitis (E1), left-sided colitis (E2, limited to the sigmoid and descending colon) or extensive colitis (E3, also referred to as pancolitis). A graphical treatment algorithm is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Treatment algorithm for ulcerative colitis. 5-ASA: 5-Aminosalicylic acid; AZA: Azathioprine; CsA: Cyclosporine A; IFX: Infliximab; 6-MP: 6-Mercaptopurine.
Proctitis/distal colitis

Colitis limited to the rectum with mild or moderate activity should be initially treated topically[7]. A 5-ASA suppository (e.g. mesalazine 1 g/d) is the drug of first choice (ECCO EL 1b, RG B; DGVS EL A) and induces remission in 31-80% of patients compared to 7-11% in the placebo-treated group[8]. There is no dose response to topical therapy above 1 g mesalazine daily. 5-ASA foam enemas are an alternative, but suppositories deliver the drug more effectively to the rectum and are often better tolerated by patients due to their smaller volume[9].

Topical corticoids (budesonide 2-8 mg/d, hydrocortisone 100 mg/d) are less effective than topical mesalazine[10]. If no therapeutic effect is observed, treatment escalation using a combination of oral mesalazine (2-6 g/d for induction), together with topical mesalazine and/or a topical steroid is recommended as second-line therapy (ECCO EL 1b, RG B; DGVS A). If symptoms do not resolve within 2-4 wk, the patient’s adherence to medical treatment should be evaluated. Repeated exclusion of infectious colitis and endoscopic reconfirmation of persisting inflammatory proctitis might be helpful to guide the subsequent therapeutic approach, as an unrecognized co-existing irritable bowel syndrome or infectious colitis may be the reason for the refractory course. CMV infection is best diagnosed using immunohistochemical staining of viral proteins in mucosal biopsies, while conventional staining often gives false negative results. Quantitative CMV PCR presents the dilemma that positive results cannot distinguish between the presence of CMV as an innocent bystander in inflamed mucosa and its causative role in inflammation[11].

Confirmed persistent proctitis, in spite of combined local and topical therapy, is best treated as if it were more extensive or severe colitis.

Left-sided UC

Left-sided active UC of mild-to-moderate severity should be initially treated with topical aminosalicylates (ECCO EL1b, RG B; ACG EL A) combined with > 2 g/d oral mesalazine. Comparative trials revealed a dose-response of oral mesalazine (< 2.4 g vs 4.8 g/d) with more rapid clinical improvement and cessation of rectal bleeding in patients taking a higher dose (16 d vs 9 d, P < 0.05), but failed to show significant differences in remission rates 20.2% vs 17.7% (not significant)[12,13]. Again, treatment escalation by a combination of topical mesalazine with oral 5-ASA and/or topical steroids is possible (ECCO EL 1b, RG B). If rectal bleeding persists after 10-14 d despite combined treatment, systemic steroids should be introduced (ECCO EL 1b, RG C; DGVS EL B; ACG EL C). The steroid starting dose is 40-60 mg orally once daily. Marked differences between 40 and 60 mg starting doses have not been found (DGVS EL A)[14], and steroid regimes differ depending on country and hospital. Without proven superiority, common regimes start with

40 mg prednisolone daily for 1 wk, followed by 30 mg/d for another week and 20 mg/d for 1 mo, before decreasing the dose by 5 mg/d per week. Concerns about possible steroid side effects have led to a more restrictive introduction of steroids in the US compared with European countries and the development of promising new oral steroid formulas with mainly colonic release and low systemic bioavailability (e.g. beclomethasone diproprionate, budesonide)[15,16].

Severe left-sided colitis is usually an indication for hospital admission and systemic therapy (ECCO EL 1b, RG B).

Extensive UC

Extensive UC of mild-to-moderate severity should initially be treated with oral sulfasalazine at a dose titrated up to 4-6 g/d (ACG EL A) or a combination of oral and topical mesalazine (ECCO EL 1a, RG A; DGVS EL A). However, oral 5-ASA formulas induce remission in only approximately 20% of patients[17]. Patients who do not respond to this treatment within 10-14 d or who are already taking appropriate maintenance therapy should be treated additionally with a course of oral steroids (ECCO EL 1b, RG C; ACG EL B). In the case of steroid-dependency (ECCO EL 1a, RG A) or steroid refractory course (ECCO EL 1a, RG B, ACG A), azathioprine (2.5 mg/kg per day) or 6-mercaptopurine (1.5 mg/kg per day) should be introduced for induction of remission and remission maintenance.

Severe UC

Severe UC is defined as more than 6 bloody stools per day and signs of systemic involvement (fever, tachycardia, anemia). These patients should be hospitalized for intensive treatment and surveillance (ECCO EL 5, RG D) as the development of a toxic megacolon and perforation is a potentially life-threatening condition. Intravenous steroids (e.g. methylprednisolone 60 mg/d or hydrocortisone 400 mg/d) remain the mainstay of conventional therapy to induce remission (ECCO EL 1b, RG D; DGVS C). Patients refractory to maximal oral treatment with prednisolone and 5-ASA can be given the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α blocker IFX at 5 mg/kg (ACG EL A).

Nevertheless, colectomy rates are as high as 29% in patients with severe UC and who need intravenous corticosteroids[18]. They should therefore be presented to the colorectal surgeon on the day of admission. It is crucial that gastroenterologists and surgeons provide joint daily care in order to avoid delaying the necessary surgical therapy. In the case of a worsening condition or a lack of amelioration after 3 d of steroid therapy, colectomy should be discussed, since extending steroid therapy beyond 7 d without clinical effect carries no benefit[18], but causes otherwise preventable postoperative wound-healing disorders[19]. The response to intravenous steroids is best assessed by stool frequency, CRP and abdominal radiography on day 3 (ECCO EL 2b, RG B). If drug therapy fails, either proctocolectomy (DGVS EL C, ACG EL B) or rescue therapy with CsA (ACG EL A) is recommended.

In order to prevent immediate surgical therapy in corticoid resistant cases calcineurin inhibitors (CsA, tacrolimus) and IFX are available as second-line therapies, as detailed below.

Continuous intravenous CsA monotherapy with 4 mg/kg per day is effective and can be an alternative for patients with contraindications for corticosteroid therapy (e.g. a history of steroid psychosis, DGVS EL A). After successful induction of remission, an immunosuppressant such as azathioprine (2.5 mg/kg per day) should soon be added, CsA switched to oral therapy with tacrolimus and tapered over a period of 3-6 mo (DGVS C). Note that it may take up to 3 mo for the therapeutic effects of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine to develop. Neither CsA nor tacrolimus are indicated for maintenance therapy. Intravenous CsA achieves marked short-term responses in 50%-80% of patients receiving CsA as rescue therapy[20,21]. However, studies on long-term outcomes indicated that 58%-88% of these patients underwent colectomy within the following 7 years[21,22]. One major advantage of CsA over IFX in rescue therapy is its short half-life. If it proves ineffective it is cleared within a few hours, whereas IFX will circulate for weeks.

Tacrolimus is another calcineurin inhibitor given in an oral dose of 0.1-0.2 mg/kg per day or 0.01-0.02 mg/kg per day intravenously to achieve trough concentrations of 10-15 ng/mL[23]. A retrospective uncontrolled study indicated that lower trough levels of 4-8 ng/mL are also effective and are associated with fewer side effects[24].

Due to the elevated risk of opportunistic infection with Pneumocystis jiroveci, chemoprophylaxis is recommended in patients under triple immunosuppressive therapy (DGVS EL B). Possible regimes are trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 160/800 mg twice a week or, in case of intolerance, inhalation of 300 mg pentamidine once per month.

According to the ECCO and the newer ACG guidelines, IFX may be effective in the prevention of colectomy. In clinical practice it is widely considered a second choice due to its long half-life compared to CsA. Infliximab is given intravenously at a single dose of 5 mg/kg followed by scheduled infusions on weeks 2 and 6, and every 8 wk thereafter. One controlled trial on 45 patients with severe corticoid-refractory colitis compared IFX versus continued intravenous betamethasone. A significantly lower number of patients, 7/24 vs 14/21 (P = 0.017; odds ratio 4.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-17), proceeded to colectomy within 3 mo with IFX[25]. In a recent trial of infliximab IFX as rescue therapy in tacrolimus-refractory patients with active UC, about a quarter of patients (6 of 24) responded to IFX[26]. Nevertheless, effectiveness is not yet proven, as the present number of case series of infliximab IFX rescue therapy in steroid-refractory severe extended colitis is small, with wide differences concerning colectomy rates (20% to 75%)[27,28]. Patients who required IFX to induce remission should receive regular maintenance therapy with IFX for at least 6 mo. Adalimumab, a fully humanized TNF-α blocker, is not yet available for the treatment of UC.

Selective physical apheresis of activated immune cells involved in the inflammatory process of UC (leukocytapheresis) is an alternative strategy proposed for the treatment of active UC, but its role remains controversial. Although trials in Japan showed leukocytapheresis to be equal to corticoid treatment for inducing remission while displaying fewer side effects[29,30], the most recent study of an international cohort did not show significant differences in clinical outcome between the apheresis- and sham-treatment groups[31].

Only a small amount of data is available on methotrexate (MTX) for induction of remission. The only randomized placebo-controlled study did not show any effect in UC. Neither did a comparative study of 6-mercaptopurine, oral MTX or 5-ASA additional to prednisolone in 34 steroid-dependent UC patients, with remission rates of 58.3% in the MTX group compared with 35% in the 5-ASA group (P > 0.5). This disappointing effect may result from the very low doses of MTX (15 mg/kg per week) administered orally in both studies. Although existing guidelines do not generally recommended MTX, in individual cases therapy with an initial dose of 25 mg/wk followed by dose reduction to 15 mg/wk after achieving remission can be tried. Significant side effects (hepatotoxicity, bone marrow depression, MTX-induced lung injury) should be monitored and strict contraception performed (risk of teratogenicity). In order to reduce side effects 5 mg oral folic acid given on the morning after MTX administration is effective and safe[32].

Adjuvant therapeutic considerations in severe UC

Antibiotic therapy is only recommended if infection is considered (DGVS EL A). Application of metronidazole or tobramycin has not shown consistent benefit in severe UC[33-35]. Patients should be given enteral nutrition if tolerated and subileus/ileus are absent (DGVS EL B/C) since bowel rest in acute colitis did not alter the outcome and enteral nutrition was shown to be associated with significantly fewer complications (9% vs 35%)[36].

Prediction of outcome and surgical therapy

In a recent population-based European study, the global risk of colectomy in UC was 8.7% over 10 years. Efforts have been made to identify patients who are at high risk of not responding adequately to pharmacological therapy. In Crohn’s disease, factors such as young age at first diagnosis, early steroid use, ileal disease, mucosal healing, and smoking were identified as important for developing disabling disease or for major abdominal surgery[37]. Much less is known in UC. According to data from different population-based studies, including the recent 10-year data from the Norwegian IBSEN cohort, initial extensive colitis, elevated ESR (> or = 30 mm/h) and sclerosing cholangitis were associated with an increased risk of colectomy[38-40]. In contrast, older age at disease onset (> or = 50 years)[40] and smoking[41,42] reduced the risk of subsequent colectomy. In a prospective study evaluating 49 hospitalized patients with severe UC, patients treated with steroids and/or CsA, a stool frequency of > 8/d or 3-8 stools/d, and increased CRP (> 0.45 mg/L) on day 3 predicted the need for colectomy with 85% certainty[43]. Further work to identify predictive parameters of refractory courses should help to prevent a delay in inevitable surgical therapy.

Emergency indications for surgery includes refractory toxic megacolon, perforation and continuous severe colorectal bleeding (ACG EL C)[44,45]. In this situation the recommended operation is colectomy and ileostomy, leaving the rectum in situ, since reconstruction is not an option in the acute setting (ECCO EL 4, RG C).

Elective surgery is indicated in chronic continuous colitis refractory to immunosuppressive treatment, detection of dysplasia or malignancy, and stricturing disease causing partial or total intestinal obstruction. In elective surgery common surgical therapy is total proctocolectomy with ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). Although with IPAA a curative therapy for UC is available, high rates (up to 20%) of postoperative complications with abscesses, sepsis, fistulas[46], and postoperative impaired fertility and sexual function are unsolved problems[47,48]. Ileorectal anastomosis is a temporary alternative in selected cases (e.g. young women who have not had children), but harbors the risk of disease recurrence and/or cancer development in the remaining rectal segment[45].

MAINTENANCE OF REMISSION

Remission is clinically defined by 3 or less stools per day without any presence of blood or increased urgency of defecation. The major goal of maintenance therapy is a steroid-free remission to avoid severe and partially disabling long-term side effects of corticoid treatment. Continuing medical therapy that does not achieve this goal is therefore not recommended and should be changed (ECCO EL 5, RG D). More than half of patients with UC have a relapse in the year following a flare. In a recent population-based outcome survey conducted in Copenhagen with a cohort of 1575 patients with newly diagnosed UC, 13% had no relapse within the following 5 years, 74% had less than 5 relapses and 13% suffered an aggressive course with more than one relapse per year[49]. Maintenance treatment is therefore recommended for all patients (ECCO EL 1a, RG A), but intermittent therapy is also acceptable for a few patients with an indolent course of the disease.

First line therapy for maintenance of remission is 5-ASA administered orally or (in the case of left-sided colitis) rectally[13,50]. All the available different 5-ASA preparations are effective and no convincing data are available favoring any specific preparation. Sulfasalazine, an azo-bound combination of mesalazine and sulfapyridine, is equally or even slightly more effective. While the ACG guidelines recommend it for induction as well as remission therapy, the European guidelines reserve its use for induction and maintenance therapy in patients with additional joint manifestations due to its higher toxicity (ECCO EL 1a, RG A). First-line medical therapy for proctitis and left-sided colitis consists of topical 5-ASA with a minimum dose of 1 g 3 times a week (ECCO EL 1b, RG B; ACG EL A). Oral mesalazine can be added as second-line therapy and has been shown to be superior compared with monotherapy (ECCO EL 1b, RG B), or it can be given alone if long-term rectal treatment is not accepted by the patient. For extensive disease, oral mesalazine is the therapy of first choice. It is effective and well tolerated at doses > 800 mg/d for maintenance of remission[13], although a clear dose-response effect has yet to be established.

Compliance is a key factor in disease control and maintenance of remission. In an internet-based survey of 1595 UC patients receiving 5-ASA therapy, major reasons for poor compliance were identified as ‘too many pills’ and ‘dosing required too many times each day’[51]. In a prospective survey in Michigan only 71% of the originally prescribed medical therapy was finally taken by the patients included in the study[52]. A new generation of aminosalicylates with prolonged release formulations has been engineered over the last few decades (e.g. Eudragit-S-coated, pH-dependent mesalamine, ethylcellulose-coated mesalamine, and multimatrix-release mesalamine). All three currently available trials comparing a once versus a twice daily dose of prolonged release mesalamine for maintenance of remission in mild-to-moderate UC did show non-inferiority or even superiority of a once daily medication, in part due to increased compliance[53-55]. Once daily dosing of a prolonged release formulation could therefore be a promising approach to further reduce recurrent flares in maintenance therapy.

In case of side effects of the 5-ASA treatment with the probiotic strain Escherichia coli Nissle is an alternative for maintenance of remission with comparable efficacy (ECCO EL 1b, RG A)[56,57].

Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine are indicated as steroid-sparing agents for steroid-dependent patients or for patients not adequately sustained and with frequent relapses under aminosalicylate treatment (ECCO EL 5, RG D; ECCO EL A). The optimal dose (1.5-2.5 mg/kg per day) can be taken once daily. Therapy should be monitored by a leucocyte count of lower than 4.5 × 109/L but higher than 2.5 × 109/L. If remission is successfully induced it is recommended to continue maintenance therapy for at least 3-5 years[58,59], although there is no hard evidence on the optimal duration of treatment. Side effects such as bone marrow suppression, progressive elevation of lever enzymes, toxic pancreatitis may occur (usually within the first weeks) and require immediate termination of azathioprine treatment. A 3-fold increased risk of opportunistic infection is estimated under azathioprine therapy, especially when used in conjunction with IFX and steroids[60].

IFX is effective in maintaining improvement and remission and is therefore recommended for those patients who initially respond to the IFX induction regime (ECCO EL 1b, RG A)[61]. The standard IFX dose is 5 mg/kg. Higher initial treatment doses have not been shown to be of any benefit. As shown for Crohn’s disease, 25%-40% of patients with initial response to IFX develop loss of response and benefit from dose escalation to 10 mg/kg or shortening dosing intervals during further therapy[62,63].

For maintenance therapy, scheduled intravenous administration every 8 wk has been proven to be more effective and safer than periodic application, probably due to a reduced formation of antibodies (ABs) against anti-TNF agents[64,65]. Most infusion reactions are mild-to-moderate and consist of flushing, headaches, dizziness, chest pain, dyspnea, fever or pruritus. Halting or lowering the infusion rate often provides relief. In order to prevent adverse reactions and AB formation, premedication with steroids prior to IFX administration is recommended (ECCO EL 2, RG C)[66]. Serious infection occurred in approximately 3% of patients treated with IFX in the ACT 1 and ACT 2 trials[61]. Although the information available from meta-analyses, from IFX safety registries in Crohn’s disease, and from IFX therapy in rheumatoid arthritis differ widely, a 3-fold higher rate of opportunistic infectious under IFX therapy is estimated[67-70]. In order to prevent reactivation of latent infection, exclusion of latent tuberculosis and hepatitis B should be performed by chest radiography, serologic testing, skin test and/or lymphocyte stimulation test (QuantiFERON-TB Gold®).

There is no existing recommendation on the duration of IFX treatment in stable remission. In stable long-term remission, interruption of IFX treatment while continuing 5-ASA or switching maintenance therapy to azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine are possible de-escalation approaches.

MTX for maintenance therapy can be considered in individual cases, especially when other immunosuppressants are not tolerated. Furthermore, patients with refractory arthropathy may benefit. Because the available data are restricted to one randomized prospective study[71] and several retrospective series with a total of only 91 patients[72-74], no consensus recommendation for MTX in UC is given[6].

ALTERNATIVE AND FUTURE TREATMENTS

Several alternative therapies have emerged for the treatment of UC. Ova of the non-pathogenic helminth trichiuris suis taken orally has shown initial success in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial, inducing remission in 43% of patients taking ova compared with 16.7% in the placebo group[75]. Transdermal administration of nicotine was proposed as being effective in active UC. A systematic review and analysis of 5 relevant studies demonstrated its effectiveness in achieving remission compared with placebo. However, direct comparative trials with 5-ASA are still missing. Omega-3 fatty acids, which are largely present in fish oil, have shown anti-inflammatory properties by reducing the production of leukotriene B4[76]. However, in a meta-analysis of the 3 available studies on 138 UC patients in remission, no evidence was found to support the use of omega-3 fatty acids for maintenance of remission as similar relapse rates were found in the study group and the placebo group (relative risk, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.51-2.03; P = 0.96)[77]. Taken together, due to a lack of data on efficacy, safety and adverse events, no recommendation is given for the therapies mentioned above.

Advances in the field of biological therapy focus on novel target molecules and alternative means of administration, some of which have already been approved for the treatment of Crohn’s disease. Further TNF-α AB preparations include certolizumab, etanercept and adalimumab - approval of the latter for the treatment of UC could be expected this year. Other biologicals such as natalizumab (anti-α4-integrin AB), visilizumab (anti-CD3 receptor AB), fontolizumab (anti-interferon gamma AB), alicaforsen (anti-sense oligonucleotide to human ICAM1), basiliximab (IL-2 receptor AB), anti-IL12 ABs and anti-IL-6 ABs have in part been tested in acute steroid-refractory UC but data on maintenance of remission are not available as yet.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CANCER SURVEILLANCE

Patient with UC have an elevated risk of developing colon cancer. After 8-10 years of colitis, annual or biannual surveillance colonoscopy with multiple biopsies at regular intervals should be performed (ACG EL B; ECCO EL5, RGD). Detection of high grade dysplasia in flat mucosa has to be confirmed by a second pathologist and is an indication for colectomy (ACG EL B; ECCO EL2, RG B).

The sensitivity of random biopsies is a matter of debate and uncertainty as dysplasia in flat mucosa can be easily overlooked. Implementation of advanced endoscopic imaging techniques such as high-resolution white-light endoscopy, autofluorescence and narrow-band imaging may help to better identify pathological lesions and optimize cancer surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease in the future[78-80].

Footnotes

Peer reviewer: Akira Andoh, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Seta Tukinowa, Otsu 520-2192, Japan

S- Editor Tian L L- Editor Cant MR E- Editor Ma WH

References
1.  Hoffmann JC, Zeitz M, Bischoff SC, Brambs HJ, Bruch HP, Buhr HJ, Dignass A, Fischer I, Fleig W, Fölsch UR. [Diagnosis and therapy of ulcerative colitis: results of an evidence based consensus conference by the German society of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases and the competence network on inflammatory bowel disease]. Z Gastroenterol. 2004;42:979-983.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Hoffmann JC, Zeitz M. [S3 guideline by the German Society of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases and the Competence Network of Chronic Inflammatory Bowel diseases on diagnosis and therapy of ulcerative colitis. An update]. Med Klin (Munich). 2005;100:43-50.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Kornbluth A, Sachar DB. Ulcerative colitis practice guidelines in adults: American College Of Gastroenterology, Practice Parameters Committee. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:501-523; quiz 524.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Caprilli R, Gassull MA, Escher JC, Moser G, Munkholm P, Forbes A, Hommes DW, Lochs H, Angelucci E, Cocco A. European evidence based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn‘s disease: special situations. Gut. 2006;55 Suppl 1:i36-i58.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Travis SP, Stange EF, Lémann M, Oresland T, Chowers Y, Forbes A, D‘Haens G, Kitis G, Cortot A, Prantera C. European evidence based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn‘s disease: current management. Gut. 2006;55 Suppl 1:i16-i35.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Stange EF, Travis SP, Vermeire S, Beglinger C, Kupcinkas L, Geboes K, Barakauskiene A, Villanacci V, Von Herbay A, Warren BF. European evidence based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn‘s disease: definitions and diagnosis. Gut. 2006;55 Suppl 1:i1-i15.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Gionchetti P, Amadini C, Rizzello F, Venturi A, Campieri M. Review article: treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis and pouchitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16 Suppl 4:13-19.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Marshall JK, Irvine EJ. Rectal corticosteroids versus alternative treatments in ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Gut. 1997;40:775-781.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Campieri M, Gionchetti P, Belluzzi A, Brignola C, Tabanelli GM, Miglioli M, Barbara L. 5-Aminosalicylic acid as enemas or suppositories in distal ulcerative colitis? J Clin Gastroenterol. 1988;10:406-409.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Gionchetti P, Rizzello F, Venturi A, Brignola C, Ferretti M, Peruzzo S, Campieri M. Comparison of mesalazine suppositories in proctitis and distal proctosigmoiditis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997;11:1053-1057.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Kandiel A, Lashner B. Cytomegalovirus colitis complicating inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2857-2865.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Hanauer SB, Sandborn WJ, Kornbluth A, Katz S, Safdi M, Woogen S, Regalli G, Yeh C, Smith-Hall N, Ajayi F. Delayed-release oral mesalamine at 4.8 g/day (800 mg tablet) for the treatment of moderately active ulcerative colitis: the ASCEND II trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:2478-2485.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Sutherland L, Macdonald JK. Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;CD000543.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Baron JH, Connell AM, Kanaghinis TG, Lennard-Jones JE, Jones AF. Out-patient treatment of ulcerative colitis. Comparison between three doses of oral prednisone. Br Med J. 1962;2:441-443.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Löfberg R, Danielsson A, Suhr O, Nilsson A, Schiöler R, Nyberg A, Hultcrantz R, Kollberg B, Gillberg R, Willén R. Oral budesonide versus prednisolone in patients with active extensive and left-sided ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 1996;110:1713-1718.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Cameron EA, Binnie JA, Balan K, Skerratt SA, Swift A, Solanki C, Middleton SJ. Oral prednisolone metasulphobenzoate in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003;38:535-537.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Bebb JR, Scott BB. How effective are the usual treatments for ulcerative colitis? Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20:143-149.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Turner D, Walsh CM, Steinhart AH, Griffiths AM. Response to corticosteroids in severe ulcerative colitis: a systematic review of the literature and a meta-regression. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:103-110.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Aberra FN, Lewis JD, Hass D, Rombeau JL, Osborne B, Lichtenstein GR. Corticosteroids and immunomodulators: postoperative infectious complication risk in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:320-327.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Cohen RD, Stein R, Hanauer SB. Intravenous cyclosporin in ulcerative colitis: a five-year experience. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:1587-1592.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Moskovitz DN, Van Assche G, Maenhout B, Arts J, Ferrante M, Vermeire S, Rutgeerts P. Incidence of colectomy during long-term follow-up after cyclosporine-induced remission of severe ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:760-765.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Campbell S, Travis S, Jewell D. Ciclosporin use in acute ulcerative colitis: a long-term experience. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;17:79-84.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Ogata H, Matsui T, Nakamura M, Iida M, Takazoe M, Suzuki Y, Hibi T. A randomised dose finding study of oral tacrolimus (FK506) therapy in refractory ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2006;55:1255-1262.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Baumgart DC, Pintoffl JP, Sturm A, Wiedenmann B, Dignass AU. Tacrolimus is safe and effective in patients with severe steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent inflammatory bowel disease--a long-term follow-up. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1048-1056.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Järnerot G, Hertervig E, Friis-Liby I, Blomquist L, Karlén P, Grännö C, Vilien M, Ström M, Danielsson A, Verbaan H. Infliximab as rescue therapy in severe to moderately severe ulcerative colitis: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1805-1811.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
26.  Herrlinger KR, Barthel DN, Schmidt KJ, Büning J, Barthel CS, Wehkamp J, Stange EF, Fellermann K. Infliximab as rescue medication for patients with severe ulcerative/indeterminate colitis refractory to tacrolimus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31:1036-1041.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.  Regueiro M, Curtis J, Plevy S. Infliximab for hospitalized patients with severe ulcerative colitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40:476-481.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Lees CW, Heys D, Ho GT, Noble CL, Shand AG, Mowat C, Boulton-Jones R, Williams A, Church N, Satsangi J. A retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of infliximab as rescue therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:411-419.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Sawada K, Muto T, Shimoyama T, Satomi M, Sawada T, Nagawa H, Hiwatashi N, Asakura H, Hibi T. Multicenter randomized controlled trial for the treatment of ulcerative colitis with a leukocytapheresis column. Curr Pharm Des. 2003;9:307-321.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Sawada K, Kusugami K, Suzuki Y, Bamba T, Munakata A, Hibi T, Shimoyama T. Leukocytapheresis in ulcerative colitis: results of a multicenter double-blind prospective case-control study with sham apheresis as placebo treatment. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1362-1369.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Sands BE, Sandborn WJ, Feagan B, Löfberg R, Hibi T, Wang T, Gustofson LM, Wong CJ, Vandervoort MK, Hanauer S. A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study of granulocyte/monocyte apheresis for active ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:400-409.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
32.  Whittle SL, Hughes RA. Folate supplementation and methotrexate treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a review. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43:267-271.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Dickinson RJ, O‘Connor HJ, Pinder I, Hamilton I, Johnston D, Axon AT. Double blind controlled trial of oral vancomycin as adjunctive treatment in acute exacerbations of idiopathic colitis. Gut. 1985;26:1380-1384.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
34.  Chapman RW, Selby WS, Jewell DP. Controlled trial of intravenous metronidazole as an adjunct to corticosteroids in severe ulcerative colitis. Gut. 1986;27:1210-1212.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
35.  Mantzaris GJ, Hatzis A, Kontogiannis P, Triadaphyllou G. Intravenous tobramycin and metronidazole as an adjunct to corticosteroids in acute, severe ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89:43-46.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
36.  González-Huix F, Fernández-Bañares F, Esteve-Comas M, Abad-Lacruz A, Cabré E, Acero D, Figa M, Guilera M, Humbert P, de León R. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition as adjunct therapy in acute ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:227-232.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
37.  Lakatos PL. Prediction of disease course in inflammatory bowel diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:2589-2590.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
38.  Gower-Rousseau C, Dauchet L, Vernier-Massouille G, Tilloy E, Brazier F, Merle V, Dupas JL, Savoye G, Baldé M, Marti R. The natural history of pediatric ulcerative colitis: a population-based cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2080-2088.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
39.  Etchevers MJ, Aceituno M, García-Bosch O, Ordás I, Sans M, Ricart E, Panés J. Risk factors and characteristics of extent progression in ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15:1320-1325.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
40.  Solberg IC, Lygren I, Jahnsen J, Aadland E, Høie O, Cvancarova M, Bernklev T, Henriksen M, Sauar J, Vatn MH. Clinical course during the first 10 years of ulcerative colitis: results from a population-based inception cohort (IBSEN Study). Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:431-440.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
41.  Szamosi T, Banai J, Lakatos L, Czegledi Z, David G, Zsigmond F, Pandur T, Erdelyi Z, Gemela O, Papp M. Early azathioprine/biological therapy is associated with decreased risk for first surgery and delays time to surgery but not reoperation in both smokers and nonsmokers with Crohn's disease, while smoking decreases the risk of colectomy in ulcerative colitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;22:872-879.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
42.  Boyko EJ, Perera DR, Koepsell TD, Keane EM, Inui TS. Effects of cigarette smoking on the clinical course of ulcerative colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1988;23:1147-1152.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
43.  Travis SP, Farrant JM, Ricketts C, Nolan DJ, Mortensen NM, Kettlewell MG, Jewell DP. Predicting outcome in severe ulcerative colitis. Gut. 1996;38:905-910.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
44.  Berg DF, Bahadursingh AM, Kaminski DL, Longo WE. Acute surgical emergencies in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Surg. 2002;184:45-51.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
45.  Andersson P, Söderholm JD. Surgery in ulcerative colitis: indication and timing. Dig Dis. 2009;27:335-340.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
46.  Loftus EV, Delgado DJ, Friedman HS, Sandborn WJ. Colectomy and the incidence of postsurgical complications among ulcerative colitis patients with private health insurance in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1737-1745.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
47.  Waljee A, Waljee J, Morris AM, Higgins PD. Threefold increased risk of infertility: a meta-analysis of infertility after ileal pouch anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2006;55:1575-1580.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
48.  Hueting WE, Buskens E, van der Tweel I, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ. Results and complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of 43 observational studies comprising 9,317 patients. Dig Surg. 2005;22:69-79.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
49.  Jess T, Riis L, Vind I, Winther KV, Borg S, Binder V, Langholz E, Thomsen OØ, Munkholm P. Changes in clinical characteristics, course, and prognosis of inflammatory bowel disease during the last 5 decades: a population-based study from Copenhagen, Denmark. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13:481-489.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
50.  Orchard T, Probert CS, Keshav S. Review article: maintenance therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24 Suppl 1:17-22.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
51.  Loftus EV. A practical perspective on ulcerative colitis: patients‘ needs from aminosalicylate therapies. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12:1107-1113.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
52.  Kane SV, Cohen RD, Aikens JE, Hanauer SB. Prevalence of nonadherence with maintenance mesalamine in quiescent ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2929-2933.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
53.  Dignass AU, Bokemeyer B, Adamek H, Mross M, Vinter-Jensen L, Börner N, Silvennoinen J, Tan G, Pool MO, Stijnen T. Mesalamine once daily is more effective than twice daily in patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:762-769.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
54.  Kane S, Huo D, Magnanti K. A pilot feasibility study of once daily versus conventional dosing mesalamine for maintenance of ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;1:170-173.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
55.  Kamm MA, Lichtenstein GR, Sandborn WJ, Schreiber S, Lees K, Barrett K, Joseph R. Randomised trial of once- or twice-daily MMX mesalazine for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2008;57:893-902.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
56.  Böhm SK, Kruis W. Probiotics: do they help to control intestinal inflammation? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1072:339-350.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
57.  Kruis W, Fric P, Pokrotnieks J, Lukás M, Fixa B, Kascák M, Kamm MA, Weismueller J, Beglinger C, Stolte M. Maintaining remission of ulcerative colitis with the probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 is as effective as with standard mesalazine. Gut. 2004;53:1617-1623.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
58.  Mantzaris GJ, Sfakianakis M, Archavlis E, Petraki K, Christidou A, Karagiannidis A, Triadaphyllou G. A prospective randomized observer-blind 2-year trial of azathioprine monotherapy versus azathioprine and olsalazine for the maintenance of remission of steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1122-1128.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
59.  Lopez-Sanroman A, Bermejo F, Carrera E, Garcia-Plaza A. Efficacy and safety of thiopurinic immunomodulators (azathioprine and mercaptopurine) in steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20:161-166.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
60.  Toruner M, Loftus EV, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR, Orenstein R, Sandborn WJ, Colombel JF, Egan LJ. Risk factors for opportunistic infections in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:929-936.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
61.  Rutgeerts P, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Reinisch W, Olson A, Johanns J, Travers S, Rachmilewitz D, Hanauer SB, Lichtenstein GR. Infliximab for induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2462-2476.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
62.  Hanauer SB, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR, Mayer LF, Schreiber S, Colombel JF, Rachmilewitz D, Wolf DC, Olson A, Bao W. Maintenance infliximab for Crohn's disease: the ACCENT I randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1541-1549.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
63.  Schnitzler F, Fidder H, Ferrante M, Noman M, Arijs I, Van Assche G, Hoffman I, Van Steen K, Vermeire S, Rutgeerts P. Long-term outcome of treatment with infliximab in 614 patients with Crohn‘s disease: results from a single-centre cohort. Gut. 2009;58:492-500.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
64.  Maser EA, Villela R, Silverberg MS, Greenberg GR. Association of trough serum infliximab to clinical outcome after scheduled maintenance treatment for Crohn‘s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1248-1254.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
65.  Cheifetz A, Smedley M, Martin S, Reiter M, Leone G, Mayer L, Plevy S. The incidence and management of infusion reactions to infliximab: a large center experience. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1315-1324.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
66.  Farrell RJ, Alsahli M, Jeen YT, Falchuk KR, Peppercorn MA, Michetti P. Intravenous hydrocortisone premedication reduces antibodies to infliximab in Crohn‘s disease: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:917-924.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
67.  Domm S, Cinatl J, Mrowietz U. The impact of treatment with tumour necrosis factor-alpha antagonists on the course of chronic viral infections: a review of the literature. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159:1217-1228.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
68.  Lichtenstein GR, Feagan BG, Cohen RD, Salzberg BA, Diamond RH, Chen DM, Pritchard ML, Sandborn WJ. Serious infections and mortality in association with therapies for Crohn‘s disease: TREAT registry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:621-630.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
69.  Bongartz T, Sutton AJ, Sweeting MJ, Buchan I, Matteson EL, Montori V. Anti-TNF antibody therapy in rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of serious infections and malignancies: systematic review and meta-analysis of rare harmful effects in randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2006;295:2275-2285.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
70.  Hansen RA, Gartlehner G, Powell GE, Sandler RS. Serious adverse events with infliximab: analysis of spontaneously reported adverse events. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:729-735.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
71.  Oren R, Arber N, Odes S, Moshkowitz M, Keter D, Pomeranz I, Ron Y, Reisfeld I, Broide E, Lavy A. Methotrexate in chronic active ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, randomized, Israeli multicenter trial. Gastroenterology. 1996;110:1416-1421.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
72.  Cummings JR, Herrlinger KR, Travis SP, Gorard DA, McIntyre AS, Jewell DP. Oral methotrexate in ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21:385-389.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
73.  Paoluzi OA, Pica R, Marcheggiano A, Crispino P, Iacopini F, Iannoni C, Rivera M, Paoluzi P. Azathioprine or methotrexate in the treatment of patients with steroid-dependent or steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis: results of an open-label study on efficacy and tolerability in inducing and maintaining remission. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16:1751-1759.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
74.  Kozarek RA, Patterson DJ, Gelfand MD, Botoman VA, Ball TJ, Wilske KR. Methotrexate induces clinical and histologic remission in patients with refractory inflammatory bowel disease. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:353-356.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
75.  Summers RW, Elliott DE, Urban JF, Thompson RA, Weinstock JV. Trichuris suis therapy for active ulcerative colitis: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:825-832.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
76.  MacLean CH, Mojica WA, Newberry SJ, Pencharz J, Garland RH, Tu W, Hilton LG, Gralnek IM, Rhodes S, Khanna P. Systematic review of the effects of n-3 fatty acids in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:611-619.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
77.  Turner D, Steinhart AH, Griffiths AM. Omega 3 fatty acids (fish oil) for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;CD006443.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
78.  van den Broek FJ, Fockens P, van Eeden S, Reitsma JB, Hardwick JC, Stokkers PC, Dekker E. Endoscopic tri-modal imaging for surveillance in ulcerative colitis: randomised comparison of high-resolution endoscopy and autofluorescence imaging for neoplasia detection; and evaluation of narrow-band imaging for classification of lesions. Gut. 2008;57:1083-1089.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
79.  Danese S, Fiorino G, Angelucci E, Vetrano S, Pagano N, Rando G, Spinelli A, Malesci A, Repici A. Narrow-band imaging endoscopy to assess mucosal angiogenesis in inflammatory bowel disease: a pilot study. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:2396-2400.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
80.  Matsumoto T, Moriyama T, Yao T, Mibu R, Iida M. Autofluorescence imaging colonoscopy for the diagnosis of dysplasia in ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13:640-641.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]