Original Article Open Access
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2011; 17(15): 1961-1970
Published online Apr 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i15.1961
Unusual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: A retrospective analysis and literature review
Sami Akbulut, Zulfu Arikanoglu, Murat Basbug, Abdullah Ulku, Yusuf Yagmur, Department of Surgery, Diyarbakir Education and Research Hospital, 21400, Diyarbakir, Turkey
Mahmut Tas, Department of Emergency Medicine, Diyarbakir Education and Research Hospital, 21400, Diyarbakir, Turkey
Nilgun Sogutcu, Department of Pathology, Diyarbakir Education and Research Hospital, 21400, Diyarbakir, Turkey
Heybet Semur, Department of Surgery, Ergani State Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey
Author contributions: Akbulut S, Tas M, Arikanoglu Z, Basbug M, Ulku A, Semur H and Yagmur Y contributed to writing the article and reviewing the literature, as well as undertaking a comprehensive literature search; Sogutcu N provided the pathological information.
Correspondence to: Sami Akbulut, MD, Department of Surgery, Diyarbakir Education and Research Hospital, 21400, Diyarbakir, Turkey. akbulutsami@gmail.com
Telephone: +90-412-2580052  Fax: +90-412-2580050
Received: November 27, 2010
Revised: December 23, 2010
Accepted: December 30, 2010
Published online: April 21, 2011


AIM: To document unusual findings in appendectomy specimens.

METHODS: The clinicopathological data of 5262 patients who underwent appendectomies for presumed acute appendicitis from January 2006 to October 2010 were reviewed retrospectively. Appendectomies performed as incidental procedures during some other operation were excluded. We focused on 54 patients who had unusual findings in their appendectomy specimens. We conducted a literature review via the PubMed and Google Scholar databases of English language studies published between 2000 and 2010 on unusual findings in appendectomy specimens.

RESULTS: Unusual findings were determined in 54 (1%) cases by histopathology. Thirty were male and 24 were female with ages ranging from 15 to 84 years (median, 32.2 ± 15.1 years). Final pathology revealed 37 cases of enterobiasis, five cases of carcinoids, four mucinous cystadenomas, two eosinophilic infiltrations, two mucoceles, two tuberculosis, one goblet-cell carcinoid, and one neurogenic hyperplasia. While 52 patients underwent a standard appendectomy, two patients who were diagnosed with tuberculous appendicitis underwent a right hemicolectomy. All tumors were located at the distal part of the appendix with a mean diameter of 6.8 mm (range, 4-10 mm). All patients with tumors were alive and disease-free during a mean follow-up of 17.8 mo. A review of 1366 cases reported in the English literature is also discussed.

CONCLUSION: Although unusual pathological findings are seldom seen during an appendectomy, all appendectomy specimens should be sent for routine histopathological examination.

Key Words: Appendicitis, Carcinoid, Unusual findings, Goblet cell carcinoid, Enterobius vermicularis, Mucocele


Appendicitis is one of most common acute surgical conditions of the abdomen, and an appendectomy is one of the most frequently performed operations worldwide. The incidence of acute appendicitis roughly parallels that of lymphoid development, with peak incidence in the late teens and twenties. Obstruction of the lumen is the dominant factor in acute appendicitis, and although fecoliths and lymphoid hyperplasia are the usual cause of obstructions, some unusual factors could also be involved[1-128]. Obstruction may be due to enterobiasis[1,4,7,29], ascariasis[57,92-94], balantidiasis[2,92], taeniasis[14,18], actinomycosis[32-38], schistosomiasis[2,8,42-51,57], amebiasis[7,84-86,90], trichuriasis[52,57], Blastocystis hominis[20], tuberculosis (TB)[8,23,53-55,57], carcinoid tumor[1-3,5,9,12,26,28,31,95], goblet-cell carcinoid (GCC)[5,12,21,25], primary or secondary adenocarcinoma[16,31], cystadenocarcinoma[31], lymphoma[2], dysplastic changes[2], endometriosis[1,16,58-69], granulomatous diseases[31,32], gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)[71,72,103], mucocele[1-3,52], villous adenoma[24,39,56], tubulovillous adenoma[24], tubular adenoma[24,31], leiomyoma[2], eosinophilic granuloma[32,52], or neurogenic appendicopathy[30].


Between January 2006 and October 2010, 5262 patients with presumed acute appendicitis underwent surgical treatment at Diyarbakir Education and Research Hospital, Turkey. Appendectomies performed as an incidental procedure during some other operation were excluded. The data of 54 (1%) patients who were pathologically reported to have unusual appendix findings were retrospectively collected. The original pathology specimens with unusual findings were evaluated again by an experienced pathologist. The records analysis was composed of the patient’s age, gender, clinical presentation, operative reports, radiological tools, pathological report, and follow-up. The length of follow-up was calculated by months from the date of diagnosis until the last clinical information available on the patient up to November 2010.

English medical language PubMed and Google Scholar database searches were conducted for case reports, retrospective and prospective studies, and literature reviews relating to “unusual causes of appendicitis”. Keywords used were parasites, enterobiasis, schistosomiasis, amebiasis, yersiniosis, strongyloidiasis, actinomycosis, TB, idiopathic granulomatous appendicitis, Crohn’s disease, endometriosis, appendicular adenocarcinoma, carcinoid, GCC, mucocele, mucinous cystadenoma, lymphoma, polypoid lesion, appendectomy, and appendicitis. The search included all articles from 2000 until November 2010. Patients who had undergone an operation for presumed acute appendicitis and had “unusual findings” pathology were included in the study, whereas articles that provided inconclusive information about patients and those in which the patients could not be reached were excluded. Additionally, appendicitis cases that developed due to foreign bodies were also excluded[1-128].


In total, 5262 appendectomies were performed with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis at Diyarbakir Education and Research Hospital from January 2006 through October 2010. All patients were diagnosed clinically with acute appendicitis on the basis of physical and laboratory examinations. Of all appendectomies performed, 54 (1%) specimens revealed incidental abnormal histopathological diagnoses. The general characteristics of these 54 patients are summarized in Table 1. Thirty of the patients were male and 24 were female with ages ranging from 15 to 84 years (median, 32.2 ± 15.1 years). Thirty-seven of the 54 patients revealed Enterobius vermicularis, five a carcinoid tumor, six a mucinous cystadenoma (two were mucoceles), two TB, and two eosinophilic infiltration, and two each were diagnosed with GCCs and neurogenic hyperplasia (Figure 1). While 52 patients underwent a standard appendectomy, two patients, who were preoperatively diagnosed with tuberculous appendicitis, had a right hemicolectomy. All patients with malignant tumors were diagnosed clinically with acute appendicitis, and none of them had symptoms of carcinoid syndrome or were preoperatively diagnosed with an appendicular tumor. After pathological confirmation of the diagnosis, the patients were referred to our clinic for staging. Staging included abdominal ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and 24-h urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels. After staging, all patients were followed up at the outpatient clinic every 3 mo for the first year. All patients with tumors were alive and disease-free during a mean follow-up of 17.8 mo. The clinicopathological characteristics of six patients with tumors are summarized in Table 2.

Table 1 General characteristics of the 54 patients with abnormal pathological findings.
Patients’ characteristicsResultsRate (%)
Age (yr) (range)32.2 ± 15.1 (15-84)
WBC (K/UL) (range)11.7 ± 4.9 (4.5-26.7)
Histopathologic findings54
Goblet-cell carcinoid1
Mucinous cystadenoma47.40
Eosinophilic infiltration23.70
Neurogenic hyperplasia1
Follow-up (mo) (range)10.4 ± 12.4 (1-54)
Surgical Approach
Right hemicolectomy23.70
Figure 1
Figure 1 Unusual histopathologic findings. A: Adult of E.Vermicularis in appendices (HE, × 200); B: Eosinophilic appendicitis: diffuse eosinophilic infiltrate in lamina propria (HE, × 200); C: Carcinoid tumor of classic type is formed by solid nest of small monotonous cells with occasional acinar formation (HE, × 100); D: Microglandular goblet cell carcinoma. Acute appendicitis with a diffusely infiltrating goblet cell neoplasm. tumor cells infiltrated muscularis propria (HE, × 200); E: Mucosel. Dilatation of lumen by mucinous secretion, thin appendiceal wall. Mucin is protruding into surrounding fatty tissue (HE, × 40); F: Mucinous cystadenoma of appendix. Typical epithelium of a cystadenoma with pseudostratified, columnar cells containing elonged, crowded, hyperchromatic nuclei and scattered goblet cells with mucus in cavity (HE, × 100); G: Neurogenous hyperplasia of appendix. The proliferating spindle cells shown in this photography (HE, × 200); H: Tuberculous appendicitis. Granuloma which contain a caseating center surrounded by epithelioid cells, lymphocytes and histiocytes. A giant cell is present in the granuloma (HE, × 20).
Table 2 Clinicopathological characteristics of the six patients with primary appendicular tumors.
AgeSexTumor size (mm)LocationTreatmentPathologyParietal spreadFollow-up (mo)
36M10DistalAppendectomyGoblet cellM.Propria3

A histopathological examination of patients with E. vermicularis revealed 12 with acute inflammation and 25 with no evidence of any pathological change. After obtaining the pathology reports, the patients with oxyuris were prescribed a single oral dose of 100 mg mebendazole, which was repeated 7-10 d later. All patients with oxyuris were asymptomatic on follow-up (mean, 7.2 mo; range, 1-54 mo).

Two female patients (18 and 48 years old, respectively) with tuberculous appendicitis received antitubercular therapy during the preoperative period. A right hemicolectomy was performed in patients with an acute abdomen in the follow-up, considering the intraoperative findings. We have presented the details of these two cases in a previous article[53].

Results of the literature review

Using the PubMed and Google Scholar databases, 128 studies published between January 2000 and November 2010 were compatible with our criteria. Fifty-one of these were written as original articles (50 retrospective and 1 prospective), 67 as case reports, eight as letters to the editor, and two as case series. When we looked at the countries in which the articles were prepared, 59 were from Europe, 40 from Asia, 19 from the Americas, six from Africa, and four were from Australia. In total, 80 698 cases were discussed in these articles, and all patients who were operated on had presumed acute appendicitis. Unusual findings were detected in 1366 (1.7%) of the cases with or without histopathologically acute appendicitis in their appendectomy specimens. We have summarized the causes that we qualified as “unusual findings in appendectomy specimens” in Table 3. As shown in the table, causes such as enterobiasis, schistosomiasis, amebiasis, and carcinoid tumor comprised 75.7% of all cases. The etiological (tumoral and non-tumoral causes) distribution of the 1366 patients by continent is summarized in Figure 2 to demonstrate the effects of geographic and sociocultural differences.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Worldwide distribution of the 1366 cases defined as ''unusual findings''. Tumor: Carcinoid, goblet cell carcinoid, mucocele, appendix adenocarcinoma, lymphoma, mucinous cystadenoma and adenocarcinoma, polypoid lesions, leukemia, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, dysplastic change; Benign: Non-tumoral causes.
Table 3 Distribution of the 1366 cases defined as “unusual findings” according to etiological causes.
Total patients1366 (1366/80 698 = 1.7%)
Unusual findings13661.7%
Enterobius vermicularis38928.4%
Amoebic appendicitis1188.6%
Mucinous cystadenoma (+mucocele)725.2%
Ascaris lumbricoides392.8%
Tuberculous appendicitis342.5%
Goblet-cell carcinoid282.0%
Trichuris trichiura221.6%
Idiopathic granulomatous appendicitis352.5%
Crohn disease18
Primary adenocarcinoma11
Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma9
Secondary adenocarcinoma7
Dysplastic change7
Villous adenoma6
Hyperplastic polyp5
GIST (+leiomyoma)5
Balantidium coli3
Tubulovillous adenoma3
Eosinophilic granuloma3
Neurogenic hyperplasia2
Tubular adenoma2
Blastocystis hominis1
Strongyloides stercoralis1
Yersinia enterocolitica1

Acute appendicitis is the most common general surgical emergency, and obstruction of the appendiceal lumen seems to be essential for developing an appendiceal infection. Although fecaliths and lymphoid hyperplasia are the usual causes of the obstruction, some unusual factors could also be involved[2,8,16,57].

Appendiceal tumors, occurring in less than 3% of all appendectomies, are rarely associated with clinical manifestations; they are frequently recognized either during an operation or the pathological examination. Malignant tumors of the appendix include carcinoids, GCCs, lymphomas, mucoceles, primary adenocarcinomas, and mucinous cystadenocarcinomas. Benign tumors of the appendix consist of tubular adenomas, villous adenomas, leiomyomas, neuromas, and lipomas[2,5,31].

An appendiceal carcinoid tumor is considered the most common type of appendiceal primary malignant lesion and accounts for almost 60% of all appendiceal tumors[28]. An appendiceal carcinoid tumor is found in 0.3%-2.27% of patients undergoing an appendectomy. Characteristics of all appendiceal carcinoids predicting aggressive behavior include tumor size, histological subtype, and mesoappendiceal involvement. The tumors are smaller than 1 cm in 70%-95% of cases[26-28]. The calculated risk of metastasis from tumors 1 cm or smaller is nearly zero and therefore may be managed with a simple appendectomy. An increase in metastasis risk of up to 85% occurs with a tumor of 2 cm or larger. An appendiceal carcinoid tumor larger than 2 cm should be managed with a formal right hemicolectomy[1,3,5,6,9-13,16,26,28].

GCCs, also known as adenocarcinomas and first described by Gagne in 1969, are uncommon primary tumors of the vermiform appendix characterized by dual endocrine and glandular differentiation[129]. Whether GCCs represent a morphological variant of appendiceal classical carcinoid or a mucin-producing adenocarcinoma is a matter of conjecture[12]. GCCs account for 2% of primary appendiceal malignancies. Most tumors are less than 2 cm in diameter and 20% metastasize to the ovaries. Recent studies suggest that GCCs have biological and immunohistochemical profiles more similar to adenocarcinomas than to classical carcinoids, which may explain their aggressive behavior and therefore requirement for more extensive treatment[12]. A right hemicolectomy is generally advised if any of the following features are present: tumors greater than 2 cm, involvement of resected margins greater than 2 mitoses/10 high-power fields, extension of the tumor beyond the serosa, lymphovascular invasion, or lymph node metastases[5,12,21,25]. In our series, one patient had a GCC tumor located distally in the appendix that measured 1 cm in diameter. The patient was advised to undergo a right hemicolectomy, but he refused the procedure.

Mucinous cystadenoma is a rare tumor of the appendix associated with cystic dilatation, to which the more general term of mucocele has been applied. A mucocele of the appendix denotes an obstructive dilatation of the appendiceal lumen due to abnormal accumulation of mucus, which may be caused by a retention cyst, endometriosis, mucosal hyperplasia, cystadenoma, or a cystadenocarcinoma. The incidence of mucocele ranges from 0.2% to 0.3% of all appendectomy specimens. Mucoceles are often asymptomatic and discovered as incidental findings at appendicectomy, or during laparotomy for another indication or at histological examination of an operative specimen. However, mucoceles may be diagnosed clinically from features of acute appendicitis. Appendectomy is the standard of care for mucinous cystadenoma, whereas a cystadenocarcinoma requires a right hemicolectomy. Because of the high association of mucinous cystadenoma with colon and ovarian malignancy, follow-up CT, US, and colonoscopy examinations must be performed during the postoperative period[1-3,5,16,25,27,31,52,106,107].

Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the appendix, also known as a mucinous adenocarcinoma or malignant mucocele, constitutes a rare malignancy of the appendix and is often associated with a second malignancy of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The most common type of presentation is that of acute appendicitis. The diagnosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix is usually given after an appendectomy, or other explorative surgical procedure, and consequent pathological evaluation of the appendiceal specimen[5,25,31,108].

Primary adenocarcinoma of the appendix is an extraordinarily rare tumor, and its incidence was 0.01% (11 of 80 698 cases) in our literature review. Adenocarcinomas behave aggressively and in a fashion similar to that of colonic adenocarcinomas, so in the case of an appendicular adenocarcinoma, oncologic resection with right hemicolectomy is the treatment of choice[2,16,23,31,105].

The GI tract is the most common site for extranodal lymphomas and accounts for 30%-45% of all extranodal cases. The stomach is the most commonly involved organ followed by the small intestine, colon, and esophagus. The incidence of primary appendiceal lymphoma has been estimated at 0.015%-0.022% of all appendiceal specimens. An appendiceal lymphoma usually presents in the second and third decades of life, usually manifests as acute appendicitis, and is often diagnosed postoperatively by histopathology. Therapy guidelines for primary appendiceal lymphomas are unclear because of their rarity. Our literature review revealed 14 lymphoma cases with clinical evidence of acute appendicitis; 12 of these were of B-cell origin, whereas two were of T-cell origin[2,8,97-101,109-112].

Leukemia can involve the GI tract but rarely involves the appendix. Although appendicitis is a known complication in patients with leukemia, leukemic cell involvement in the appendix is extremely rare. When the leukemia involves soft tissue including the appendix, it is called granulocytic sarcoma. The incidence of leukemic appendicitis was 0.005% (4 of 80 698 cases) in our literature review. Surgical management of patients with leukemia and acute abdomen has not been advocated because of the high rate of operative mortality. However, some support exists for surgically managing appendicitis as the most effective method of therapy in acute leukemia cases. Systemic chemotherapy is necessary prior to additional surgery in patients with leukemia[113-115].

GISTs, which occur most commonly in the stomach (60%) and the small bowel (30%), are the most common primary mesenchymal neoplasms of the GI tract. GISTs, known as leiomyoma or leiomyosarcoma before 1983, primary to the vermiform appendix are exceptionally rare, with only eight cases reported so far[2,71,72,103]. Five out of eight patients were operated due to acute appendicitis symptoms. The size of the mass and degree of mitotic activity play a crucial role in tumor behavior and recurrence development. Therefore, when approaching the appendix for GIST tumors, tumor location should be evaluated along with tumor size and mitotic activity.

Enterobius vermicularis, also known as pinworm or oxyuris, is a widespread parasitic infection estimated to affect up to 200 million people worldwide. The association of oxyuris and appendicitis was first made in the late 19 century, when Still initially documented this organism in the appendix lumen. While the reported incidence of pinworm in appendectomy specimens of patients with presumed appendicitis ranged from 0.2% to 41.8%, the reported rates of inflammation in specimens from appendices infested with pinworm ranged from 13% to 37%[4,7,14,29]. Patients must receive antihelminthic treatment because the appendectomy treats only the consequence and not the cause of the disease. An E. vermicularis infestation is treated with an oral dose of mebendazole, which is repeated in 1-2 wk[1,2,4,7,11,14,16-20,22,29,52,57,92,93].

TB may affect all tissues and organs in the body, but it most frequently involves the lungs. The GI system is ranked sixth among all extrapulmonary involvements. TB may affect all of the segments of the GI system, from the mouth to anus. However, the ileum and ileocecal region are the sites most commonly involved, followed by the colon and vermiform appendix. The appendix may be affected secondarily to ileocecal TB, but appendicular TB may occur in an even rarer primary form without any evidence of the disease elsewhere. The reported incidence of appendicular TB varies from 0.1% to 3.0% among all appendectomies performed. An accurate diagnosis is usually established after histopathological examination of a specimen. Classic histopathological analysis of an appendectomy specimen usually reveals the presence of caseating granulomas and Langhans giant cells, suggesting TB of the appendix. Although some studies have reported that treatment is not necessary for the primary disease and that appendectomy alone is sufficient, no consensus has been reached. When we reviewed the literature, 34 cases of patients undergoing an appendectomy with presumed appendicitis have been published in the last decade, including our own two cases[23,32,53-55,57].

Actinomycosis is an uncommon chronic infectious disease. Common sites of involvement include the cervicofacial, thoracic, and abdominopelvic regions. In abdominal actinomycosis, the ileocecal region including the appendix is the most commonly involved site. A correct diagnosis can be made by culture or histopathological examination, although a definitive diagnosis of actinomycosis requires microscopic proof of either the pathogen itself or the presence of specific sulfur granules. After the diagnosis has been confirmed, the general therapeutic recommendation is to initiate treatment with intravenous antibiotic therapy for 2-12 mo. Eight cases of patients undergoing an appendectomy with presumed appendicitis have been published in the last decade[32-38].

Taeniasis, a well-known worm infection, is characterized by the presence of the helminth in the intestine. Infection is generally recognized when a segment of the parasite appears in the stool. The occurrence of Taenia spp. in the appendix is so rare that the situation invites a case report. In our literature review, Taenia was found in only five of the cases operated on for presumed acute appendicitis. In cases of taeniasis, specific species identification is not required for treatment, as patients are treated with a single dose of praziquantel[14,18,93,127,128].

Amebiasis is an infection of the large intestine caused by Entamoeba histolytica, which affects 10% of the world population and has a worldwide distribution. This parasite is occasionally found in the appendix, usually in the lumen without accompanying inflammation, but is rarely associated with acute appendicitis. A preoperative diagnosis of amebic appendicitis is almost impossible because no clinical features or diagnostic laboratory tests distinguish amebic from bacterial appendicitis, other than a stool examination. The clinical picture presented in this report represents a typical case of amebic appendicitis with a good outcome after surgical resection and treatment with metronidazole[84,85,87-93].

Schistosomiasis, also known as bilharziasis and most commonly caused by Schistosoma haematobium, only rarely leads to appendicitis, even in nations in which schistosomiasis is endemic. The pathogenesis is most probably due to a periappendicular granulomatous reaction of the host against the schistosome. Inflammation and repair causes scarring and strictural deformation of the appendiceal wall, leading to luminal obstruction and acute appendicitis. Histologically, appendices may show transmural inflammation rich in eosinophils, with a granulomatous reaction to ova. Treatment for schistosomal appendicitis consists of an appendectomy and administration of praziquantel[2,8,13,16,32,40-52,57,93,125,126].

Ascaris lumbricoides, also known as roundworm, is one of the most common human helminthic diseases worldwide. The highest prevalence of ascariasis occurs in tropical and semitropical countries. The domain of the worm extends from the stomach to the ileocecal valve; 99% of worms inhabit the jejunum and proximal ileum, and it is rarely seen in the appendix. Appendicitis due to migration of roundworm into the appendix is still debatable because the symptoms of this migration may simulate appendicitis but rarely cause it[57,92,94].

Because parasites such as Balantidium coli[2,92], Blastocystis hominis[20], Trichuris trichiura[52,57,92], and Strongyloides stercoralis[121] have few causative roles, interpreting their pathogenesis is difficult. A final diagnosis should be established with a histopathological evaluation of all three parasites, and antihelminthic treatment should be administered after the appendectomy.

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of ectopic endometrial tissue outside the lining of the uterine cavity. Many women of reproductive age suffer from this disease, but its occurrence in the GI tract is rare. Intestinal endometriosis is classified as external endometriosis and occurs in only about 10% of women with endometriosis. Most intestinal endometriosis occurs in the rectum and sigmoid colon but rarely in the appendix. Appendiceal endometriosis is usually asymptomatic, but it occasionally causes appendicitis, perforation, and intussusception. The diagnosis of appendiceal endometriosis is based on the histological presence of endometrial tissue in the specimen. The treatment strategy consists mainly of surgery and hormone therapy[1,16,27,57-69,102].

The incidence of granulomatous appendicitis (GA), a rare condition that may be discovered incidentally in a patient with a clinical presentation of acute appendicitis, ranges from 0.31% to 0.95%. Various infectious and noninfectious factors cause GA. Systemic conditions, such as Crohn’s disease and sarcoidosis, may also be associated with granulomatous inflammation of the appendix. The initial belief that it represented a manifestation of Crohn’s disease is incorrect in the great majority of cases, as only 5%-10% of patients with GA develop Crohn’s disease elsewhere in their GI tract. Distinguishing idiopathic granulomatous appendicitis from early Crohn’s disease, which affects only the appendix, is difficult. A definitive diagnosis can only be made after long-term follow-up, and sometimes further investigations are required[31,52,116-120,122,123].

Crohn’s disease is a chronic transmural inflammation characterized by epithelioid granulation formation in the intestinal wall. The clinical presentation is always variable, and patients often present with findings consistent with acute appendicitis such as right-lower quadrant pain, fever, nausea, and anorexia. The diagnosis of appendiceal Crohn’s disease requires exclusion of multiple entities. Infectious causes of granulomatous appendicitis include Yersinia, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, blastomycosis, Schistosoma, Actinomyces, Campylobacter, Histoplasma capsulatum, and some parasites. An appendectomy is a routine surgical procedure when the Crohn’s disease is limited to the appendix with no postoperative or intraoperative mortality and a low rate of fistula formation[16,32,123].

In summary, although fecaliths and lymphoid hyperplasia are the usual causes of acute appendicitis, some unusual factors may also cause appendicitis. The most common unusual findings in appendectomy specimens are parasites and benign or malignant tumors. A simple appendectomy or right hemicolectomy can be performed depending on the localization, size, and histopathological structure of the tumor in the primary malignant appendiceal tumor, whereas an appendectomy alone is sufficient for benign tumors. Administering the appropriate antibacterial or antiparasitic treatment after the appendectomy is the proper approach for parasitic and bacterial infections that cause chronic inflammation. We emphasize and strongly recommend that all appendectomy specimens be examined histopathologically regardless of whether the specimens are macroscopically normal.


Appendicitis is one of most common acute surgical conditions of the abdomen, and an appendectomy is one of the most frequently performed operations worldwide. Obstruction of the lumen is the dominant factor in acute appendicitis, and although fecoliths and lymphoid hyperplasia are the usual causes of obstructions, some unusual factors could also be involved.

Research frontiers

The authors conducted a literature review via the PubMed and Google Scholar databases of English language studies published between 2000 and 2010 on unusual findings in appendectomy specimens. Also, we presented 54 patients who had unusual findings in their appendectomy specimens.

Innovations and breakthroughs

The authors emphasize and strongly recommend that all appendectomy specimens be examined histopathologically regardless of whether the specimens are macroscopically normal.

Peer review

This is a very interesting paper. It will be cited many times in the future and this is good for our journal.


Peer reviewer: Jean-Luc Faucheron, MD, Professor, Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Michallon Hospital, BP 217, Grenoble cedex 9, 38043, France

S- Editor Sun H L- Editor Logan S E- Editor Ma WH

1.  Agarwala N, Liu CY. Laparoscopic appendectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003;10:166-168.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Duzgun AP, Moran M, Uzun S, Ozmen MM, Ozer VM, Seckin S, Coskun F. Unusual findings in appendicectomy specimens: Evaluation of 2458 cases and review of the literature. Indian J Surg. 2004;66:221-226.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Machado NO, Chopra P, Pande G. Appendiceal tumour--retrospective clinicopathological analysis. Trop Gastroenterol. 2004;25:36-39.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Arca MJ, Gates RL, Groner JI, Hammond S, Caniano DA. Clinical manifestations of appendiceal pinworms in children: an institutional experience and a review of the literature. Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;20:372-375.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Bucher P, Mathe Z, Demirag A, Morel P. Appendix tumors in the era of laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1063-1066.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Guraya SY, Khairy GA, Ghallab A, Al-Saigh A. Carcinoid tumors of the appendix. Our experience in a university hospital. Saudi Med J. 2005;26:434-437.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Yildirim S, Nursal TZ, Tarim A, Kayaselcuk F, Noyan T. A rare cause of acute appendicitis: parasitic infection. Scand J Infect Dis. 2005;37:757-759.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Al-Jaradi M, Sallam A, Saqran N, Petrucci MD, Burger N. Is appendiceal pathology important? Morphological study of 745 appendectomies: Sana Yemen. Pak J Pathol. 2006;17:105-108.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Tchana-Sato V, Detry O, Polus M, Thiry A, Detroz B, Maweja S, Hamoir E, Defechereux T, Coimbra C, De Roover A. Carcinoid tumor of the appendix: a consecutive series from 1237 appendectomies. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:6699-6701.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Bucher P, Gervaz P, Ris F, Oulhaci W, Inan I, Morel P. Laparoscopic versus open resection for appendix carcinoid. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:967-970.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Sah SP, Bhadani PP. Enterobius vermicularis causing symptoms of appendicitis in Nepal. Trop Doct. 2006;36:160-162.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Coşkun H, Bostanci O, Dilege ME, Mihmanli M, Yilmaz B, Akgün I, Yildirim S. Carcinoid tumors of appendix: treatment and outcome. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2006;12:150-154.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Gali BM, Nggada HA, Eni EU. Schistosomiasis of the appendix in Maiduguri. Trop Doct. 2006;36:162-163.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Aydin O. Incidental parasitic infestations in surgically removed appendices: a retrospective analysis. Diagn Pathol. 2007;2:16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Van Gompel JJ, Stoddard E, Chen H. Incidental carcinoid tumors of the appendix: do they affect presentation or prognosis? Int Surg. 2007;92:331-334.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Jones AE, Phillips AW, Jarvis JR, Sargen K. The value of routine histopathological examination of appendicectomy specimens. BMC Surg. 2007;7:17.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Ramezani MA, Dehghani MR. Relationship between Enterobius vermicularis and the incidence of acute appendicitis. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2007;38:20-23.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  da Silva DF, da Silva RJ, da Silva MG, Sartorelli AC, Rodrigues MA. Parasitic infection of the appendix as a cause of acute appendicitis. Parasitol Res. 2007;102:99-102.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Isik B, Yilmaz M, Karadag N, Kahraman L, Sogutlu G, Yilmaz S, Kirimlioglu V. Appendiceal Enterobius vermicularis infestation in adults. Int Surg. 2007;92:221-225.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Deniz K, Sökmensüer LK, Sökmensüer C, Patiroğlu TE. Significance of intraepithelial lymphocytes in appendix. Pathol Res Pract. 2007;203:731-735.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  In't Hof KH, van der Wal HC, Kazemier G, Lange JF. Carcinoid tumour of the appendix: an analysis of 1,485 consecutive emergency appendectomies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1436-1438.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Sodergren MH, Jethwa P, Wilkinson S, Kerwat R. Presenting features of Enterobius vermicularis in the vermiform appendix. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:457-461.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Zulfıkar I, Khanzada TW, Sushel C, Samad A. Review of the Pathologic Diagnoses of Appendectomy Specimens Annals. Ann King Edward Med Univ. 2009;15:168-178.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Terada T. Schistosomal appendicitis: incidence in Japan and a case report. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:1648-1649.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Graham RP, Williams NP, West KA. Primary epithelial tumours of the appendix in a black population: a review of cases. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:1472-1474.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
26.  Hatzipantelis E, Panagopoulou P, Sidi-Fragandrea V, Fragandrea I, Koliouskas DE. Carcinoid tumors of the appendix in children: experience from a tertiary center in northern Greece. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;51:622-625.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.  Sieren LM, Collins JN, Weireter LJ, Britt RC, Reed SF, Novosel TJ, Britt LD. The incidence of benign and malignant neoplasia presenting as acute appendicitis. Am Surg. 2010;76:808-811.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Shapiro R, Eldar S, Sadot E, Venturero M, Papa MZ, Zippel DB. The significance of occult carcinoids in the era of laparoscopic appendectomies. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2197-2199.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Ariyarathenam AV, Nachimuthu S, Tang TY, Courtney ED, Harris SA, Harris AM. Enterobius vermicularis infestation of the appendix and management at the time of laparoscopic appendectomy: case series and literature review. Int J Surg. 2010;8:466-469.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Petnehazy T, Saxena AK, Ainoedhofer H, Hoellwarth ME, Schalamon J. Single-port appendectomy in obese children: an optimal alternative? Acta Paediatr. 2010;99:1370-1373.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Ma KW, Chia NH, Yeung HW, Cheung MT. If not appendicitis, then what else can it be? A retrospective review of 1492 appendectomies. Hong Kong Med J. 2010;16:12-17.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
32.  AbdullGaffar B. Granulomatous diseases and granulomas of the appendix. Int J Surg Pathol. 2010;18:14-20.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Karagulle E, Turan H, Turk E, Kiyici H, Yildirim E, Moray G. Abdominal actinomycosis mimicking acute appendicitis. Can J Surg. 2008;51:E109-E110.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
34.  Liu V, Val S, Kang K, Velcek F. Case report: actinomycosis of the appendix--an unusual cause of acute appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:2050-2052.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
35.  Peitsidis P, Papadimitriou C, Rodolakis A, Peitsidou A. Actinomycosis of the appendix and pelvis: a case report. J Reprod Med. 2008;53:711-713.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
36.  Maternini M, Saucy F, Sandmeier D, Vuilleumier H. Simple appendicitis? Can J Surg. 2008;51:E54-E55.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
37.  Nissotakis C, Sakorafas GH, Koureta T, Revelos K, Kassaras G, Peros G. Actinomycosis of the appendix: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations. Int J Infect Dis. 2008;12:562-564.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
38.  Yiğiter M, Kiyici H, Arda IS, Hiçsönmez A. Actinomycosis: a differential diagnosis for appendicitis. A case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:E23-E26.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
39.  Karmarkar P, Joshi A, Wilkinson A, Mahore S, Bothale K. Villous adenoma of the appendix with dysplasia. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:38-39.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
40.  Gabbi C, Bertolotti M, Iori R, Rivasi F, Stanzani C, Maurantonio M, Carulli N. Acute abdomen associated with schistosomiasis of the appendix. Dig Dis Sci. 2006;51:215-217.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
41.  Halkic N, Abdelmoumene A, Gintzburger D, Mosimann F. Schistosomal appendicitis in pregnancy. Swiss Surg. 2002;8:121-122.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
42.  Kanoksil W, Larbcharoensub N, Soontrapa P, Phongkitkarun S, Sriphojanart S, Nitiyanant P. Eosinophilic appendicitis caused by Schistosoma japonicum: a case report and review of the literature. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2010;41:1065-1070.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
43.  Adisa AO, Omonisi AE, Osasan SA, Alatise OI. Clinicopathological review of schistosomal appendicitis in south western Nigeria. Trop Gastroenterol. 2009;30:230-232.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
44.  Webb JK, Thompson G. Schistosomal appendicitis in a Sudanese immigrant. Med J Aust. 2009;190:716-717.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
45.  Al-Waheeb S, Al-Murshed M, Dashti F, Hira PR, Al-Sarraf L. Disseminated peritoneal Schistosoma japonicum: a case report and review of the pathological manifestations of the helminth. Ann Saudi Med. 2009;29:149-152.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
46.  Konstantinidou E, Alexiou C, Demonakou M, Sakellaridis T, Fotopoulos A, Antsaklis G. Schistosomal peritonitis: a rare cause of acute abdomen. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009;103:1068-1070.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
47.  Nandipati K, Parithivel V, Niazi M. Schistosomiasis: a rare cause of acute appendicitis in the African American population in the United States. Am Surg. 2008;74:221-223.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
48.  Garg J, Bakhtar OR, Ramamoorthy S. Image of the month. Perforated schistosomal appendicitis. Arch Surg. 2007;142:487-488.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
49.  Badmos KB, Komolafe AO, Rotimi O. Schistosomiasis presenting as acute appendicitis. East Afr Med J. 2006;83:528-532.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
50.  Elazary R, Maly A, Khalaileh A, Rubinstein C, Olstain-Pops K, Almogy G, Rivkind AI, Mintz Y. Schistosomiasis and acute appendicitis. Isr Med Assoc J. 2005;7:533-534.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
51.  Adehossi E, Parola P. Schistosomal appendicitis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004;4:498.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
52.  Khan GM, Grillo IA, Abu-Eshy SA, Khan AR, Mubarak J, Jastaniah S. Pathology of the appendix. J Natl Med Assoc. 2000;92:533-535.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
53.  Akbulut S, Yagmur Y, Bakir S, Sogutcu N, Yilmaz D, Senol A, Bahadir MV. Appendicular tuberculosis: review of 155 published cases and a report of two cases. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2010;36:579-585.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
54.  Ito N, Kawamoto S, Inada K, Nagao S, Kanemaru T, Noda N, Ochiai R. Primary tuberculosis of the appendix in a young male patient: report of a case. Surg Today. 2010;40:668-671.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
55.  Chowdhury FR, Amin MR, Khan KH, Alam MB, Ahasan HA. Isolated appendicular tuberculosis (TB) presented as peritonitis. Nepal Med Coll J. 2010;12:51-52.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
56.  Salemis NS, Nisotakis K, Nazos K, Stavrinou P, Tsohataridis E. Perforated appendix and periappendicular abscess within an inguinal hernia. Hernia. 2006;10:528-530.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
57.  Chamisa I. A clinicopathological review of 324 appendices removed for acute appendicitis in Durban, South Africa: a retrospective analysis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009;91:688-692.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
58.  Akbulut S, Dursun P, Kocbiyik A, Harman A, Sevmis S. Appendiceal endometriosis presenting as perforated appendicitis: report of a case and review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280:495-497.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
59.  Astroza G, Faundes V, Nanjarí R, Fleiderman M, Rodríguez C. Appendiceal endometriosis differentially diagnosed from acute appendicitis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2010;123:1610-1611.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
60.  Faucheron JL, Pasquier D, Voirin D. Endometriosis of the vermiform appendix as an exceptional cause of acute perforated appendicitis during pregnancy. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10:518-519.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
61.  Hasegawaa T, Yoshidab K, Matsuic K. Endometriosis of the Appendix Resulting in Perforated Appendicitis. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2007;1:27-31.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
62.  Idetsu A, Ojima H, Saito K, Yamauchi H, Yamaki E, Hosouchi Y, Nishida Y, Kuwano H. Laparoscopic appendectomy for appendiceal endometriosis presenting as acute appendicitis: report of a case. Surg Today. 2007;37:510-513.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
63.  Khoo JJ, Ismail MS, Tiu CC. Endometriosis of the appendix presenting as acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J. 2004;45:435-436.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
64.  Ruiz Marín M, Parra Baños PA, González Valverde FM, Rodenas Moncada J, Candel Arenas MF, Méndez Martínez M, Terol Garaulet E, Tamayo Rodríguez ME, Benavides Buleje JA, Escamilla Segade C. Appendiceal intussusception resulting from endometriosis presenting as acute appendicitis. Am Surg. 2010;76:906-908.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
65.  Naghshvar F, Torabizadeh Zh, Haghgoo A, Ghahremani M. Ovarian pregnancy: a case report. Pak J Biol Sci. 2008;11:151-152.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
66.  Alexiou VG, Ierodiakonou V, Peppas G, Falagas ME. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery: an international survey. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2010;11:343-348.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
67.  Tazaki T, Oue N, Ichikawa T, Tsumura H, Hino H, Yamaoka H, Kanehiro T, Yasui W. A case of endometriosis of the appendix. Hiroshima J Med Sci. 2010;59:39-42.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
68.  Tumay V, Ozturk E, Ozturk H, Yilmazlar T. Appendiceal endometriosis mimicking acute appendicitis. Acta Chir Belg. 2006;106:712-713.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
69.  Uncu H, Taner D. Appendiceal endometriosis: two case reports. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278:273-275.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
70.  D'Aleo C, Lazzareschi I, Ruggiero A, Riccardi R. Carcinoid tumors of the appendix in children: two case reports and review of the literature. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2001;18:347-351.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
71.  Yap WM, Tan HW, Goh SG, Chuah KL. Appendiceal gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1545-1547.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
72.  Agaimy A, Pelz AF, Wieacker P, Roessner A, Wünsch PH, Schneider-Stock R. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the vermiform appendix: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular study of 2 cases with literature review. Hum Pathol. 2008;39:1252-1257.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
73.  Prommegger R, Obrist P, Ensinger C, Profanter C, Mittermair R, Hager J. Retrospective evaluation of carcinoid tumors of the appendix in children. World J Surg. 2002;26:1489-1492.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
74.  Li CC, Hirowaka M, Qian ZR, Xu B, Sano T. Expression of E-cadherin, b-catenin, and Ki-67 in goblet cell carcinoids of the appendix: an immunohistochemical study with clinical correlation. Endocr Pathol. 2002;13:47-58.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
75.  Aizawa M, Watanabe O, Naritaka Y, Katsube T, Imamura H, Kinoshita J, Shimakawa T, Kobayashi S, Asaka S, Haga S. Adenocarcinoid of the appendix: report of two cases. Surg Today. 2003;33:375-378.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
76.  Pelizzo G, La Riccia A, Bouvier R, Chappuis JP, Franchella A. Carcinoid tumors of the appendix in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2001;17:399-402.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
77.  Barakat AJ, Reese D, Menezes G. Carcinoid tumors of the appendix in children: a reminder. Case Rep Clin Pract Rev. 2003;4:69-72.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
78.  Dall'Igna P, Ferrari A, Luzzatto C, Bisogno G, Casanova M, Alaggio R, Terenziani M, Cecchetto G. Carcinoid tumor of the appendix in childhood: the experience of two Italian institutions. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;40:216-219.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
79.  Bucher P, Gervaz P, Ris F, Oulhaci W, Egger JF, Morel P. Surgical treatment of appendiceal adenocarcinoid (goblet cell carcinoid). World J Surg. 2005;29:1436-1439.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
80.  Suzuki O, Ono K, Sekishita Y, Fujimori M, Shiono T, Kondo S. Laparoscopic two-stage surgery for goblet cell carcinoid of the appendix: report of a case and review of the Japanese literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006;16:106-108.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
81.  O'Donnell ME, Carson J, Garstin WI. Surgical treatment of malignant carcinoid tumours of the appendix. Int J Clin Pract. 2007;61:431-437.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
82.  Christianakis E, Paschalidis N, Chorti M, Filippou G, Rizos S, Filippou D. Carcinoid tumour of the appendix in children: a case report. Cases J. 2008;1:136.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
83.  Pitiakoudis M, Kirmanidis M, Tsaroucha A, Christianakis E, Filippou D, Sivridis E, Simopoulos C. Carcinoid tumor of the appendix during pregnancy. A rare case and a review of the literature. J BUON. 2008;13:271-275.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
84.  Singh NG, Mannan AA, Kahvic M. Acute amebic appendicitis: report of a rare case. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2010;53:767-768.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
85.  Andrade JE, Mederos R, Rivero H, Sendzischew MA, Soaita M, Robinson MJ, Sendzischew H, Danielpour P. Amebiasis presenting as acute appendicitis. South Med J. 2007;100:1140-1142.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
86.  Gilboa Y, Fridman E, Ofir K, Achiron R. Carcinoid tumor of the appendix: ultrasound findings in early pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:576-578.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
87.  Pervez S, Raza AN. A child with acute appendicitis. Eur J Pediatr. 2008;167:127-128.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
88.  Guzmán-Valdivia G. Acute amebic appendicitis. World J Surg. 2006;30:1038-1042.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
89.  Zardawi IM, Kattampallil JS, Rode JW. Amoebic appendicitis. Med J Aust. 2003;178:523-524.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
90.  Ramdial PK, Madiba TE, Kharwa S, Clarke B, Zulu B. Isolated amoebic appendicitis. Virchows Arch. 2002;441:63-68.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
91.  Gotohda N, Itano S, Okada Y, Horiki S, Endo A, Terada N, Isozaki H, Takakura N, Tanaka N. Acute appendicitis caused by amebiasis. J Gastroenterol. 2000;35:861-863.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
92.  Dorfman S, Cardozo J, Dorfman D, Del Villar A. The role of parasites in acute appendicitis of pediatric patients. Invest Clin. 2003;44:337-340.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
93.  Karatepe O, Adas G, Tukenmez M, Battal M, Altiok M, Karahan S. Parasitic infestation as cause of acute appendicitis. G Chir. 2009;30:426-428.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
94.  Wani I, Maqbool M, Amin A, Shah F, Keema A, Singh J, Kitagawa M, Nazir M. Appendiceal ascariasis in children. Ann Saudi Med. 2010;30:63-66.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
95.  Saylam B, Küçük ÖK, Düzgün AP, Özer MV, Coşkun F. Carcinoid tumor of the appendix: report on ten cases. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2010;19:Epub ahead of print.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
96.  Higgins MJ, Walsh M, Kennedy SM, Hyland JM, McDermott E, O'Higgins NJ. Granulomatous appendicitis revisited: report of a case. Dig Surg. 2001;18:245-248.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
97.  Fu TY, Wang JS, Tseng HH. Primary appendiceal lymphoma presenting as perforated acute appendicitis. J Chin Med Assoc. 2004;67:629-632.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
98.  Kitamura Y, Ohta T, Terada T. Primary T-cell non-Hodgkin's malignant lymphoma of the appendix. Pathol Int. 2000;50:313-317.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
99.  Shiwani MH. Primary malignant lymphoma of the appendix associated with acute appendicitis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2006;16:79-80.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
100.  Pickhardt PJ, Levy AD, Rohrmann CA Jr, Abbondanzo SL, Kende AI. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the appendix: clinical and CT findings with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:1123-1127.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
101.  Tsujimura H, Takagi T, Tamaru J, Sakai C. Involvement of the appendix in a relapsed case of primary nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2000;37:633-634.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
102.  Moradi P, Barakate M, Gill A, Farrow G. Intussusception of the veriform appendix due to endometriosis presenting as acute appendicitis. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77:758-760.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
103.  Miettinen M, Sobin LH. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the appendix: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of four cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:1433-1437.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
104.  Maes M, Segers K, Cheyns P. Goblet cell carcinoid of the appendix: laparoscopic appendectomy or right hemicolectomy? Acta Chir Belg. 2008;108:447-450.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
105.  Marudanayagam R, Williams GT, Rees BI. Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens. J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:745-749.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
106.  Calişkan K, Yildirim S, Bal N, Nursal TZ, Akdur AC, Moray G. Mucinous cystadenoma of the appendix: a rare cause of acute abdomen. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2008;14:303-307.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
107.  Kiyak G, Celik A, Sarikaya SM. Mucocele of the appendix due to mucinous cystadenoma. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009;59:336.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
108.  Leanza S, Bekheit M, Coco D, Bellia A, Ferrara F, Sarvà S, Pappalardo A, Piazza L. Carcinoma of the appendix and its natural history in relation to surgical management. A case report. Chir Ital. 2009;61:597-600.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
109.  Bhardwaj N, Bains SK, Ortonowski G, Murphy P. A case of Burkitt's lymphoma presenting as suspected acute appendicitis. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2010;7:214-215.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
110.  Ghasmei M, Kenari SA. A Primary Diffuse Large B-Cell lymphoma of appendix. IRCMJ. 2010;12:576-578.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
111.  Tadele M, Yancovitz S. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma presenting as acute appendicitis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Infect Dis Clin Pract. 2007;15:411-414.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
112.  Khanna M, Buddhavarapu SR. Primary Burkitt’s Lymphoma Of The Appendix Presenting as Acute Abdomen: A Case Report. Radiology Case. 2008;2:9-14.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
113.  Toubai T, Kondo Y, Ogawa T, Imai A, Kobayashi N, Ogasawara M, Kiyama Y, Higa T, Sato K, Miyokawa N. A case of leukemia of the appendix presenting as acute appendicitis. Acta Haematol. 2003;109:199-201.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
114.  Hsiao PJ, Kuo SM, Chen JH, Lin HF, Chu PL, Lin SH, Ho CL. Acute myelogenous leukemia and acute leukemic appendicitis: a case report. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:5624-5625.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
115.  Palomino-Portilla EA, Valbuena JR, Quinones-Avila Mdel P, Medeiros LJ. Myeloid sarcoma of appendix mimicking acute appendicitis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:1027-1031.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
116.  Shivakumar P, Shanmugam RP, Mani CS. Idiopathic granulomatous appendicitis: a rare appendicular pseudo tumor. Trop Gastroenterol. 2010;31:130-131.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
117.  Yayla D, Alpman BN, Dolek Y. Granulomatous appendicitis in a 12-year-old boy. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:e27-e29.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
118.  Gu J, Allan C. Idiopathic granulomatous appendicitis: a report of three consecutive cases. ANZ J Surg. 2010;80:201.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
119.  Zissin R, Gayer G, Bernheim J, Kots E, Shapiro-Feinberg M, Hertz M. Granulomatous appendicitis presenting as right lower quadrant pain: CT findings. Abdom Imaging. 2003;28:280-283.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
120.  Ho P, Law WL, Choy C, Chan GS, Chu KW. Granulomatous appendicitis progressing to Crohn's disease with bleeding complication. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:554-556.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
121.  Felekouras E, Kontos M, Kyriakou V, Hatzianagnostou D, Dimaroggona K, Papalampros E, Kordossis T, Bastounis E. Strongyloides stercoralis infection as a cause of acute granulomatous appendicitis in an HIV-positive patient in Athens, Greece. Scand J Infect Dis. 2002;34:856-857.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
122.  Tucker ON, Healy V, Jeffers M, Keane FB. Granulomatous appendicitis. Surgeon. 2003;1:286-289.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
123.  Prieto-Nieto I, Perez-Robledo JP, Hardisson D, Rodriguez-Montes JA, Larrauri-Martinez J, Garcia-Sancho-Martin L. Crohn's disease limited to the appendix. Am J Surg. 2001;182:531-533.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
124.  Mackie SL, Keat A. An unusual complication of appendicitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:1526.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
125.  Madavo C, Hurriez H. Schistosomiasis of the appendix. J R Soc Med. 2006;99:473-474.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
126.  Doudier B, Parola P, Dales JP, Linzberger N, Brouqui P, Delmont J. Schistosomiasis as an unusual cause of appendicitis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10:89-91.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
127.  Sartorelli AC, da Silva MG, Rodrigues MA, da Silva RJ. Appendiceal taeniasis presenting like acute appendicitis. Parasitol Res. 2005;97:171-172.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
128.  Lejbkowicz F, Abel AB, Tsilman B, Cohen HI. Taenia infestation in the appendix: a report of two cases. J Med Microbiol. 2002;51:90-91.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
129.  Gagné F, Fortin P, Dufour V, Delage C. [Tumors of the appendix associating histologic features of carcinoid and adenocarcinoma]. Ann Anat Pathol (Paris). 1969;14:393-406.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]