Brief Article
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2010; 16(16): 2055-2060
Published online Apr 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i16.2055
Table 3 Multiple stepwise regression analysis with the Cox proportional hazards model
ParametersβSEWaldPRR95% CI
rN excluded
Tumor size-0.0250.1170.0450.8320.9760.776-1.227
Pathology0.0000.1610.0000.9991.0000.730-1.370
Depth of invasion27.1440.000
pT2 vs pT10.9560.25913.590.0002.6011.565-4.325
pT3 vs pT11.2530.24725.6680.0003.5002.156-5.683
pN category20.5720.000
pN1 vs pN00.5560.1888.7540.0031.7341.206-2.519
pN2 vs pN00.8290.20316.6730.0002.2911.539-3.410
pN3 vs pN01.020.24816.9160.0002.7721.705-4.507
rN included
Tumor size-0.0330.1170.0780.7790.9680.769-1.218
Pathology0.0110.1610.0050.9451.0110.738-1.385
Depth of invasion24.3880.000
pT2 vs pT10.9080.26311.9740.0012.481.483-4.149
pT3 vs pT11.2060.25222.8270.0003.342.036-5.477
rN category17.9270.000
rN1 vs rN00.5020.1996.3490.0121.6511.118-2.440
rN2 vs rN00.8420.20516.9280.0002.3221.554-3.468
rN3 vs rN00.8670.23413.7580.0002.3801.505-3.763