Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2009; 15(31): 3851-3854
Published online Aug 21, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3851
Surgical resection of rectal adenoma: A rapid review
Damian Casadesus
Damian Casadesus, Calixto Garcia Hospital, J and University, Vedado, Havana, 10600, Cuba
Author contributions: Casadesus D contributed all to this paper.
Correspondence to: Damian Casadesus, MD, PhD, Calixto Garcia Hospital, J and University, Vedado, Havana, 10600, Cuba. dcasadesus@hotmail.com
Telephone: +53-7-552197
Fax: +53-7-332197
Received: August 29, 2008
Revised: July 17, 2009
Accepted: July 24, 2009
Published online: August 21, 2009

Abstract

Transanal excision (TE), endoscopic transanal resection (ETAR) and transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) can be used to remove adenomatous polyps. However, their use is limited by the size or location of the tumor. TE is limited to the lower rectum, TEM offers better access to lesions in the middle and upper rectum, and ETAR is used less frequently than it deserves for resection of rectal lesions.

Key Words: Adenoma, Colorectal surgery, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Microsurgery, Rectal neoplasms


Citation: Casadesus D. Surgical resection of rectal adenoma: A rapid review. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(31): 3851-3854
INTRODUCTION

The risk of carcinoma developing in a colorectal polyp of 1 cm or larger is 2.5% and 8% at 5 and 10 years, respectively[1]. This potential for malignancy of adenomatous colorectal polyps is an indication for their excision and the first-line treatment is endoscopic removal during the diagnostic procedure, which is safe, relatively inexpensive, and associated with the lowest complication rate. When the size and/or location of the tumor limits standard endoscopic resection, a number of different transanal approaches are used to remove adenomatous polyps in the lower rectum, but adenomas in the middle or upper rectum are difficult to remove using standard transanal excision (TE) instruments. Different techniques have been developed for the removal of rectal adenomas that are not amenable to removal during colonoscopy.

TE

TE of lower rectal adenoma, first reported by Parks[2], is one the most frequently adopted approaches for excision of rectal polyps of any dimension, situated as far as 6 cm from the anal verge, and has very few complications, and low recurrence and mortality. In a review of the literature, bleeding after TE was present in up to 10% of the patients, perforation in up to 6%, and anal stenosis in up to 5%, with a mortality rate of 2%[36]. Recurrence is variable, at 3%-50% for adenoma from adenoma, and up to 3% for carcinoma from adenoma. In a long series of 117 procedures, Sakamoto et al[7] treated 27% of patients for residual disease and 30% for recurrence, with a 10% rate of serious complications. In a recent study, Pigot et al[8] obtained better results: they resected apparently benign rectal adenomas from 207 consecutive patients with a 3.6% recurrence rate, eight postoperative complications, and one death. Specific recurrence-free probability was 99.5% at 1 year, 96% at 5 years, and 95% at 10 years.

In the middle and upper third of the rectum, benign lesions are difficult to reach transanally, and standard radical surgical options, such as posterior trans-sphincteric resection, and low anterior resection can be offered to the patient; however, they have been associated with high morbidity, such as anastomotic leakage, sexual dysfunction, and fecal and urinary incontinence.

POSTERIOR APPROACH

The posterior approach (represented by a combination of coccyx removal and partial sphincter division) has been progressively abandoned. It was indicated for extensive lesions in the anterior rectal wall at a distance of 8-10 cm from the anal verge. Variable rates of complications and very high rates of recurrence have been reported. In a review of 360 cases treated for benign and malignant lesions, fecal fistula was the most frequent complication in 5%-70% of patients and fecal incontinence in 5%-25%[39]. Adenoma recurrence rate was up to 33% and a stoma was necessary in 20%-70% of patients, as a temporary stoma to avoid fecal fistula or as a therapeutic stoma after its appearance[39].

ENDOSCOPIC TRANSANAL RESECTION (ETAR)

ETAR was first described in 1977 by Lindenschmidt et al[10] and has been used in the resection of rectal adenoma. A review of 304 cases (464 procedures) from seven studies, most of them in the United Kingdom, with probable double recording of patients (Table 1), suggests that ETAR is valuable in the resection of rectal adenoma with low morbidity and mortality. This technique has shown low recurrence, however, it is impossible to know if the resection is complete and the margins are free of tumor after various procedures in the same patient from whom the adenoma is resected piecemeal. ETAR does not require surgical assistance, anesthesia, extreme positioning, new technology or special training. Nevertheless, this technique provides limited resection of mesorectal fat and lymph nodes, limited histopathological information regarding extent of resection, and poor local disease control.

Table 1 Resection of apparent adenoma polyps by ETAR.
Ref.PatientsETARRecurrenceNo. of complication patientsFailureFollow-up (mo)Related mortality
Tuech et al[11]283926-60 (2.5-10.5)0
Beattie et al[12]11300---0
Wetherall et al[13]23382-14.5 (2-42)0
Dickinson et al[14]3862110--1
Sutton et al[15]601024-2-0
Bujanda et al[16]131312-15 (3-24)-
Tsai et al[17]131180277-600
Total304464372531
TRANSANAL ENDOSCOPIC MICROSURGERY (TEM)

TEM has been used successfully in the management of rectal adenoma and in selected cases of rectal carcinoma, since it was introduced by Professor Buess in 1984[18]. It has been suggested that TEM enables local excision of adenomas up to 24 cm from the anal verge, and offers a minimally invasive alternative to TE, radical surgery and recurrence from previously used endoscopic resection, with superior endoscopic magnification and illumination, accuracy and complete resection, and secure suture closure.

TEM has produced satisfactory results, with better recurrence rates and low morbidity and mortality. In one of the largest studies of adenoma resection using TEM, the authors reported a 3.4% early postoperative complication rate and 1.2% and 7% recurrence rates after 1 and 5 years, respectively, in a series of 286 cases[19]. In a review of 1682 adenoma resection procedures from 18 studies (Table 2), an average of 11% of the patients were found to have residual adenoma in the surgical margin, 6.3% had recurrence, and the complication rate was up to 11% during a follow-up period of 12 mo in one series, and > 24 mo in the rest of the studies.

Table 2 Adenoma resected by TEM.
Ref.No. of lesionsResidual adenoma in surgical margin (%)Local recurrence (%)Follow-up (mo)
Steele et al[20]7795.17.4
Farmer et al[21]36255.633
Nakagoe et al[22]900d.n.o
Cocilovo et al[23]561.73.5d.n.o
Neary et al[24]2104.7d.n.o
Katti et al[25]5871034
Vorobiev et al[26]113-8.329.5
Bretagnol et al[27]14814.97.633
Endreseth et al[28]64201324
Zacharakis et al[29]484.26.337
Schäfer et al[30]33181236.4
Røkke et al[31]5610012
Guerrieri et al[32]530-4.344
McCloud et al[33]7537.31631
Whitehouse et al[34]1465.54.839
Platell et al[35]62-2.424
Lloyd et al[36]6895.928.7
Ganai et al[37]82101544

The histologically positive resection margin is highly significant in terms of local recurrence rates after adenoma resection. In a review of 18 studies with a minimum follow-up of 12 mo (Table 2), I have found that residual adenoma in the surgical margin varied from 0% to 37.3%. However, the recurrence rate was 0%-15%, predominantly in cases with positive or uncertain resection margins. In three large series, it has been found that adenoma recurrence rate is high in the incompletely resected group (37.7%, 46% and 25%) compared with that in patients with free histological margins after adenoma resection (4.3%, 3% and 3.7%, respectively)[283334]. In another two studies, adenoma extending to the surgical margin of locally excised polyps was found in 25%[21] and 30.7% of cases[38]. The latter was a large series of 238 patients (226 patients treated by TEM and 12 by TE). It is remarkable that, with such high positive-residual-margin rates, the recurrence rates in these studies were only 5.6% after 33 mo follow-up[21] and 3.6% after 67.5 mo follow-up[38], which are lower than the rates reported in studies with lower positive-residual-margin rates. Røkke et al[31] did not observe adenoma recurrence after 12 mo follow-up in a series of patients in whom the residual adenoma in surgical margin was 10%.

Even for recurrent adenoma, TEM has now become an important alternative treatment. Five series have reported the use of TEM in the treatment of recurrent adenoma or residual disease without further recurrence[2526323335].

In five studies that have compared adenoma resection with TEM and another procedure, the lower or similar recurrence, residual tumor and early complication rates favor TEM resection[223840]. Late complication rates were higher after TEM because of the increased incidence of transient incontinence in the postoperative period[3940]. Recently, Moore et al[41] have compared rectal adenoma excision with TEM and TE, and concluded that TEM is more effective than the other technique, because they found a significantly higher rate of clear margin with less fragmented specimens after TEM, with low complication and recurrence rates.

CONCLUSION

The transanal approach is a feasible, frequently used technique with few complications and low recurrence and mortality, but its use is limited to the lower rectum. The posterior approach with coccygeal resection, with or without sphincter section, can be mentioned only anecdotally in colorectal surgery. Probably very few surgeons are using it because of its high morbidity and recurrence and the use of colostomy. ETAR is a forgotten minimally invasive technique. It is a simple and safe method and technical expertise has already been acquired on urological conditions such as bladder and prostate tumors, however, it is used less frequently than it deserves for resection of rectal lesions. This is probably because few colorectal surgeons have much enthusiasm for the multiple sessions and piecemeal resection using a resectoscope. TEM offers better access to lesions in the middle and upper rectum, with superior endoscopic magnification and better illumination, superior visualization and pneumorectum, with accurate and complete resection allowing better histological analysis, and secure suture closure. The benefits of TEM are: few complications; low recurrence and mortality; less postoperative pain and use of analgesia; shorter time to the patient being able to walk, sit, eat and defecate; shorter hospital stay; and avoidance of colostomy. These benefits can compensate for the high price of the instruments.

Footnotes

Peer reviewer: Conor P Delaney, MD, MCh, PhD, FRCSI, FACS, Professor of Surgery, Case Western Reserve University, Chief, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Vice-Chairman, Department of Surgery, Director, Institute for Surgery and Innovation, University Hospitals, Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue Cleveland, OH 44106-5047, United States

References
1.  Gordon PH, Nivatvongs S.  Principles and practice of surgery for the colon, rectum, and anus. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1999;.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
2.  Parks AG, Rob C, Smith R, Morgan CN. Benign tumours of the rectum. Clinical Surgery. Vol 10. England, London: Butterworths; 1966;541.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
3.  Keighley MRB, Williams NS. Polypoid disease. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. London: WB Saunders; 1999;908-961.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
4.  Francillon J, Moulay A, Vignal J, Tissot E. Excisions of carcinomas of the rectal ampulla via the inferior route. The parachute technique. Nouv Presse Med. 1974;3:1365-1366.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
5.  Faivre J, Chaume JC. L’electroresection trans-anale des tumours benignes et malignes du rectum par lambeau tracteur: à propos de 267 cases. Ann Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1982;18:79-83.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
6.  Featherstone JM, Grabham JA, Fozard JB. Per-anal excision of large, rectal, villous adenomas. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:86-89.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
7.  Sakamoto GD, MacKeigan JM, Senagore AJ. Transanal excision of large, rectal villous adenomas. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34:880-885.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
8.  Pigot F, Bouchard D, Mortaji M, Castinel A, Juguet F, Chaume JC, Faivre J. Local excision of large rectal villous adenomas: long-term results. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:1345-1350.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
9.  Groebli Y, Tschantz P. [Should the posterior approach to the rectum be forgotten?]. Helv Chir Acta. 1994;60:599-604.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
10.  Lindenschmidt Th-O, Hempel D, Zimmermann HG. Elektroresektion des stenosierenden Rectum-Carcinoms. Chirurg. 1977;48:343-344.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
11.  Tuech JJ, Pessaux P, Regenet N, Ziani M, Ollier JC, Arnaud JP. Endoscopic transanal resection using the urological resectoscope in the management of patients with rectal villous adenomas. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004;19:569-573.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
12.  Beattie GC, Paul I, Calvert CH. Endoscopic transanal resection of rectal tumours using a urological resectoscope--still has a role in selected patients. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7:47-50.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
13.  Wetherall AP, Williams NM, Kelly MJ. Endoscopic transanal resection in the management of patients with sessile rectal adenomas, anastomotic stricture and rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1993;80:788-793.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
14.  Dickinson AJ, Savage AP, Mortensen NJ, Kettlewell MG. Long-term survival after endoscopic transanal resection of rectal tumours. Br J Surg. 1993;80:1401-1404.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
15.  Sutton CD, Marshall LJ, White SA, Flint N, Berry DP, Kelly MJ. Ten-year experience of endoscopic transanal resection. Ann Surg. 2002;235:355-362.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
16.  Bujanda L, Pereira T, Ramos F, Pérez-Ortega A, Sánchez A, Gil-Molet A, Muñoz C, Echenique-Elizondo M. Transanal resection of complicated rectal polyps using the urological resectoscope. Kirurgia. 2005;235:2.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
17.  Tsai JA, Hedlund M, Sjoqvist U, Lindforss U, Torkvist L, Furstenberg S. Experience of endoscopic transanal resections with a urologic resectoscope in 131 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:228-232.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
18.  Buess G, Hutterer F, Theiss J, Böbel M, Isselhard W, Pichlmaier H. [A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation]. Chirurg. 1984;55:677-680.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
19.  Said S, Stippel D. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in large, sessile adenomas of the rectum. A 10-year experience. Surg Endosc. 1995;9:1106-1112.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
20.  Steele RJ, Hershman MJ, Mortensen NJ, Armitage NC, Scholefield JH. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery--initial experience from three centres in the United Kingdom. Br J Surg. 1996;83:207-210.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
21.  Farmer KC, Wale R, Winnett J, Cunningham I, Grossberg P, Polglase A. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: the first 50 cases. ANZ J Surg. 2002;72:854-856.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
22.  Nakagoe T, Sawai T, Tsuji T, Shibazaki S, Jibiki M, Nanashima A, Yamaguchi H, Yasutake T, Ayabe H. Local rectal tumor resection results: gasless, video-endoscopic transanal excision versus the conventional posterior approach. World J Surg. 2003;27:197-202.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
23.  Cocilovo C, Smith LE, Stahl T, Douglas J. Transanal endoscopic excision of rectal adenomas. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1461-1463.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
24.  Neary P, Makin GB, White TJ, White E, Hartley J, MacDonald A, Lee PW, Monson JR. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a viable operative alternative in selected patients with rectal lesions. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:1106-1111.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
25.  Katti G. An evaluation of transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal adenoma and carcinoma. JSLS. 2004;8:123-126.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
26.  Vorobiev GI, Tsarkov PV, Sorokin EV. Gasless transanal endoscopic surgery for rectal adenomas and early carcinomas. Tech Coloproctol. 2006;10:277-281.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
27.  Bretagnol F, Merrie A, George B, Warren BF, Mortensen NJ. Local excision of rectal tumours by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg. 2007;94:627-633.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
28.  Endreseth BH, Wibe A, Svinsås M, Mårvik R, Myrvold HE. Postoperative morbidity and recurrence after local excision of rectal adenomas and rectal cancer by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7:133-137.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
29.  Zacharakis E, Freilich S, Rekhraj S, Athanasiou T, Paraskeva P, Ziprin P, Darzi A. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal tumors: the St. Mary's experience. Am J Surg. 2007;194:694-698.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
30.  Schäfer H, Baldus SE, Gasper F, Hölscher AH. [Submucosal infiltration and local recurrence in pT1 low-risk rectal cancer treated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery]. Chirurg. 2005;76:379-384.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
31.  Røkke O, Iversen KB, Ovrebø K, Maartmann-Moe H, Skarstein A, Halvorsen JF. Local resection of rectal tumors by transanal endoscopic microsurgery: experience with the first 70 cases. Dig Surg. 2005;22:182-189; discussion 189-190.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
32.  Guerrieri M, Baldarelli M, Morino M, Trompetto M, Da Rold A, Selmi I, Allaix ME, Lezoche G, Lezoche E. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in rectal adenomas: experience of six Italian centres. Dig Liver Dis. 2006;38:202-207.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
33.  McCloud JM, Waymont N, Pahwa N, Varghese P, Richards C, Jameson JS, Scott AN. Factors predicting early recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery excision for rectal adenoma. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8:581-585.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
34.  Whitehouse PA, Tilney HS, Armitage JN, Simson JN. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: risk factors for local recurrence of benign rectal adenomas. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8:795-799.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
35.  Platell C, Denholm E, Makin G. Efficacy of transanal endoscopic microsurgery in the management of rectal polyps. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;19:767-772.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
36.  Lloyd GM, Sutton CD, Marshall LJ, Baragwanath P, Jameson JS, Scott AD. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery--lessons from a single UK centre series. Colorectal Dis. 2002;4:467-472.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
37.  Ganai S, Kanumuri P, Rao RS, Alexander AI. Local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal polyps and early cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:547-556.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
38.  Mörschel M, Heintz A, Bussmann M, Junginger T. Follow-up after transanal endoscopic microsurgery or transanal excision of large benign rectal polyps. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998;383:320-324.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
39.  Madhala O, Lelcuk S, Rabau M. [Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms]. Harefuah. 1995;129:236-237, 295.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
40.  Nagy A, Kovács T, Berki C, Jánó Z. [Surgical management of villous and tubulovillous adenomas of the rectum]. Orv Hetil. 1999;140:2215-2219.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
41.  Moore JS, Cataldo PA, Osler T, Hyman NH. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1026-1030; discussion 1030-1031.  [PubMed]  [DOI]