Basic Research Open Access
Copyright ©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2007; 13(28): 3841-3846
Published online Jul 28, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i28.3841
Interaction of L-Arginine-methyl ester and Sonic hedgehog in liver ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rats
Mehmet Cudi Tuncer, Dicle University, Medical School, Departments of Anatomy, Diyarbakir, Turkey
Hayrettin Ozturk, Abanty Izzet Baysal University, Medical School, Departments of Pediatric Surgery, Bolu, Turkey
Huseyin Buyukbayram, Dicle University, Medical School, Departments of Pathology, Diyarbakir, Turkey
Hulya Ozturk, Izzet Baysal Obstetric and Children Hospital, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Bolu, Turkey
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Hayrettin Ozturk, MD, Associated Professor in Pediatric Surgery, Abant Izzet Baysal University, Medical School, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Bolu 14280, Turkey. ozturkhayrettin@hotmail.com
Telephone: +90-374-2534656- 4112 Fax: +90-374-2534615
Received: December 4, 2006
Revised: December 15, 2006
Accepted: December 20, 2006
Published online: July 28, 2007

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the role of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) on the course of liver ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) in rats, and the interaction between treatment with nitric oxide donor L-Arginine-methyl ester (L-Arg) and up-regulation of Shh expression.

METHODS: A total of 30 male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 220-240 g were used in this study. Sham-control group (G1, n = 10): a sham operation was performed (except for liver I/R). I/R-untreated group (G2, n = 10): rats underwent liver ischemia for 1 h followed by reperfusion for 45 min. I/R-L-Arg group (G3, n = 10): after performing the same surgical procedure as in group 2, animals were treated with L-Arg. Liver tissues were taken for determination of malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, and biochemical and histological evaluations were made.

RESULTS: Plasma alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT) activities were higher in group 2 than in group 3. MDA values and the hepatic injury score decreased in the L-Arg treated group compared to the I/R-untreated group. In group 2, the hepatocytes were swollen with marked vacuolization. Group 3 rats showed well-preserved liver parenchyma, with hepatocytes extending from the central vein. The morphology of the hepatocytes and the sinusoidal structures was normal, without any signs of congestion. Mild Shh positive immunostaining was detected in group 2 animals. The expression of immunoreactive cells was increased markedly in liver tissue from I/R-L-Arg rats.

CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that Shh molecules are critical factors in the pathophysiology of inflammatory liver injury induced by I/R. In addition, NO plays an important role in the immunohistochemical expression of these molecules.

Key Words: Ischemia/reperfusion, Liver, Sonic hedgehog, L-Arginine-methyl ester



INTRODUCTION

Liver ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is a complication associated with hepatic resection, liver transplantation, and hemorrhagic shock with fluid resuscitation[1]. The consequences of I/R injury include liver and remote organ failure, both of which have high rates of morbidity and mortality. Despite improvements in organ protection and surgical techniques, I/R injury remains an important clinical problem, and there is significant interest in preventing this complication[2].

Hedgehog (Hh) proteins act as morphogens in several tissues during embryonic development[3-7]. In mammals, there are three such genes: Sonic hedgehog (Shh), Indian hedgehog (Ihh), and Desert hedgehog (Dhh)[8]. Sonic hedgehog (Shh) is the most extensively expressed gene during embryonic development[9,10], and lack of Shh in mice is lethal resulting in multiple defects, beginning in the early to mid gestational period[4-6]. Several new findings point to the involvement of Hh in inducing vascularization of several embryonic tissues. For example, hypervascularization of neuroectoderm is seen following transgenic over expression of Shh in the dorsal neural tube[11].

Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) from hepato-cytes and Kupffer cells is activated to produce nitric oxide (NO). Both cytotoxic and cytoprotective effects of NO have been demonstrated, related respectively, to its ability to restore microcirculation via its vasodilatory properties and to the inhibitory effect of large amounts of NO on energy metabolism, leading to cell death[12]. Recently, Pola et al[13] suggested that Shh is a potent angiogenic factor, and when administered to aged mice is able to induce robust neovascularization of ischemic hind-limbs. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of Shh on the course of liver I/R in rats and the interaction between treatment with nitric oxide donor L-Arginine-methyl ester (L-Arg) and up-regulation of Shh expression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 220 to 240 g were used in the study. All the study protocols were performed according to the guidelines for the ethical treatment of experimental animals.

Animals and experimental protocol

The rats were housed individually in cages, were allowed free access to standard rat chow and water before and after the experiments. The animal rooms were windowless with temperature (22 ± 2°C) and lighting controls. The animals were fasted overnight before the experiments but were given free access to water. They were anesthetized with 100-mg/kg ketamine and 20-mg/kg xylazine. Right femoral vein was cannulated for administration of drugs and saline.

The animals were randomly separated into 3 groups, each containing 10 rats. Sham-control group (G1, n = 10): to determine the baseline values of histological parameters, we performed a sham operation. A midline incision was made in the upper abdomen and the liver was freed from its ligaments (except for liver I/R). I/R-untreated group (G2, n = 10): rats were subjected to the surgical procedure described below and underwent liver ischemia for 1 h followed by reperfusion for 45 min. Group 3 (I/R-L-Arg): after performing the same surgical procedure as in group 2, L-arginine-methyl ester (200 μg/kg per minute IV; Sigma Chemical Co, St. Louis, USA), an NO donor, was infused for 45 min by an infusion pump.

Liver ischemia-reperfusion

The ligament attachments connecting the liver to the diaphragm, abdominal wall, and neighboring organs were divided. After the organ had been carefully isolated, the liver hilum was exposed and the common hepatic artery and portal vein were identified. A vascular microclamp was used to interrupt the blood supply to three-quarters of the liver for 60 min, followed by 45 min of reperfusion. Other rats were subjected to a sham operation (sham-operated), namely an identical surgical procedure as in the I/R group was performed, but without vascular clamping; the rats were maintained under anesthesia for the duration of the experiment. At the end of the study protocol, the rats were sacrificed by an overdose of sodium pentobarbital.

Measurement of serum liver enzymes

The abdominal aorta was punctured and 5 mL blood was collected in heparinized tubes. Plasma was separated by centrifugation (3000 RPM for 10 min at room temperature) for biochemical studies. The levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT, a specific marker for hepatic parenchymal injury) (units/L), aspartate aminotransferase (AST, a nonspecific marker for hepatic injury) (units/L), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, a marker of nonspecific cellular injury) and γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT, a sensitive but nonspecific indicator of liver disease with increased activity found in both cholestasis and hepatocellular damage) (units/L) in plasma were determined by standard auto-analyzer methods on an Abbot Aeroset (USA). The livers were obtained for histopathological evaluation just before the rats were sacrificed.

Malondialdehyde determination

Liver MDA levels were determined by Wasowiczs’s method (14) based on the reaction of MDA with thiobarbituric acid at 95-100°C. Fluorescence intensity was measured in the upper n-butanol phase by a fluorescence spectrophotometry, (Hitachi, Model F-4010) adjusted exitation at 525 nm and emission at 547 nm. Arbitrary values obtained were compared with a series of standard solutions (1, 1, 3, 3 tetramethoxypropane). Results were expressed as nanomole per gram wet tissue (nmol/g wet tissue).

Protein assays

The protein content of homogenates was determined according to the method of Lowry et al[15].

Histopathological study

The exteriorized livers were divided into two parts. One part was immediately placed in 10% formalin solution overnight and embedded in paraffin blocks. The blocks were sectioned 4-μm thick and stained with hematoxylin-eosin, according to standard protocols. Sections were evaluated by a point-counting method for severity of hepatic injury using an ordinal scale as follows: grade 0, minimal or no evidence of injury; grade 1, mild injury consisting of cytoplasmic vacuolation and focal nuclear pyknosis; grade 2, moderate to severe injury with extensive nuclear pyknosis, cytoplasmic hypereosinophilia, and loss of intercellular borders; and grade 3, severe necrosis with disintegration of hepatic cords, hemorrhage, and neutrophil infiltration.

Biochemical analyses

The second portion of the liver was washed in ice-cold 0.9% saline solution, weighed and stored at -70°C. Homogenates of the tissues were prepared as 1.0 g/10 mL in 250 mmol/L sucrose, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 1 mmol/L-dl-dithiothreitol and 15 mmol/L Tris HCl (pH 7.4), using an all-glass Potter Elvehjem homogenizer (Selecta, Barcelona, Spain). Each homogenate was centrifuged for 20 min at 800 ×g. The resulting supernatant fraction was used to determine enzyme activities. The protein concentrations of the supernatant were determined by the method described by Bradford[16].

Immunohistochemistry

The expressions of Shh in the liver tissue were analyzed by using an immunohistochemistry technique. Tissues were fixed in Bouin’s solution and embedded in paraffin. Sections were cut 4 μm in thickness, dewaxed in xylene, and incubated for 20 min in 0.3% H2O2 to block endogenous peroxidase activity. Sections were placed in a microwave for four minutes in phosphate buffer saline (PBS), and incubated with primary antibodies [monoclonal Anti-Sonic Hedgehog, N-terminal antibody produced in rat] overnight at room temperature. The primary antibody was visualized with diaminobenzidine (DAB) as a chromogen. The sections were counterstained in hematoxylene and eosin, cleared with xylene and covered with a cover slip. The tissue sections were examined, using a light microscope interfaced with a Zeiss Color Camera. The sections were analyzed by 2-3 observers who were blinded to the grouping of the animals, and categorized using a ranking system (0 = no immunoreactivity, 1 = faint, 2 = moderate, and 3 = strong immunoreactivity). At least 3 slides per animal were examined and the results were presented as average (= median).

Statistical analysis

Data was analyzed on an IBM compatible personal computer using SPSS version 9.0. All values were expressed as mean ± SE. The significance of the data obtained was evaluated by using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Differences between means were analyzed by using the post-ANOVA (Tukey’s b) test. P values of < 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

The biochemical measurements in the different study groups are shown in Figure 1 A-D. ALT, AST, GGT and LDH levels were significantly higher in groups 2 and 3 compared to group 1 (P < 0.05 for both comparisons). However, ALT, AST, GGT and LDH values were higher in group 2 compared to group 3 (P < 0.05).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Effects of L-Arg on liver function after liver I/R. AST (A), LDH (B), ALT(C) and GGT (D) values in group 2 were significantly higher compared to groups 1 and 3 (aP < 0.05 vs group 1; cP < 0.05 vs group 3). Values are expressed as mean ± SE. GGT: γ-glutamyltranspeptidase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase. Group 1 (n = 10), Sham-control group; Group 2 (n = 10), I/R-untreated group; Group 3 (n = 10), I/R-L-Arg group.

The values of MDA measurements in the different groups are shown in Figure 2A. MDA values were significantly higher in group 2 compared to groups 1 and 3 (P < 0.05 for both). In addition, MDA values were significantly higher in group 2 compared to group 3 (P < 0.05).

Figure 2
Figure 2 Effects of ischemia/reperfusion and L-Arg on MDA levels (A) and IRS (B) of liver tissue. aP < 0.05 group 2 vs group 1; cP < 0.05 group 2 vs group 3. Values are expressed as mean ± SE, MDA; Malondialdehyde. IRS; Immunoreactivity scores, Group 1 (n = 10), Sham-control group; Group 2 (n = 10), I/R-untreated group; Group 3 (n = 10), I/R-L-Arg group.

The histopathological scores were 0.1 ± 0.2; 2.7 ± 0.6 and 1.3 ± 0.5 in groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively. The histopathological score was higher in groups 2 and 3 compared to group 1 (P < 0.05 for both). However, the histopathological score was significantly greater in group 2 compared to group 3 (P < 0.05).

No morphological damage was observed in any of the rats in group 1 (Figure 3A). In group 2, the hepatocytes were markedly swollen, with striking vacuolization. In addition, areas of necrosis and cell infiltration were noted (Figure 3B-D). Group 3 showed well-preserved liver parenchyma with hepatocytes extending from the central vein. The regular sinusoidal structures showed normal morphology, without any signs of congestion (Figure 3E).

Figure 3
Figure 3 A: Group 1 shows normal liver parenchyma with regular morphology of both the hepatocytes and the sinusoids around the central vein (HE; x 200); B: Group 2 shows increase in necrosis (↑) and cell infiltration (↑↑); C: Swollen hepatocytes with marked vacuolization; D: necrosis (↑) (HE, x 200); E: Group 3 rats showing normal morphology of hepatocytes and sinusoids, reflecting well-preserved liver parenchyma (HE, x 200).

Immunoreactivity scores (IRS) in the three groups were 0.1 ± 0.1, 3 ± 0.1 and 1 ± 0.1 respectively. The IRS was significantly higher in the I/R-L-Arg group compared to the sham treated and I/R groups (P < 0.05 for both) (Figure 2B). There were no positive immunoreactive cells in the sham-operated rats (Figure 4A). Mild Shh positive immunostaining was detected in group 2 animals (Figure 4B). By contrast, the liver tissue from I/R-L-Arg rats showed intense expression of immunoreactive cells (Figure 4C-F).

Figure 4
Figure 4 A: No expression of Shh in the control group (Immunoperoxidase. X 200); B: Mild Shh-positive immunostaining in group 2 (arrows) (Immunoperoxidase, X 200), C, D, E, F: Intense Shh expression in liver tissue from I/R-L-Arg treated rats (arrows) (Immunoperoxidase, X 200).
DISCUSSION

The Hedgehog family has been examined extensively during embryogenesis. Most of the prenatal studies have focused on the function of Hh family members in the regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal interactions that are crucial to the formation of limbs, lungs, gut, hair follicles, and bone[3-7], including a possible role in vascularization of certain embryonic tissues[17-19]. By contrast, the role for the Hh family in the regulation of adult tissue regeneration and revascularization has received little attention[20-22]. The intracellular signalling events mediated by Shh remain poorly defined. After synthesis, Shh undergoes autoproteolysis by an enzymatic activity contained within its carboxylterminal sequence, which leads to an aminoterminal product responsible for the biological activity of the protein, anchored to the cell membrane by a lipidic molecule[23,24]. It has been suggested that transduction of the Shh signal involves a complex of two membrane proteins, Patched (Ptc) and Smoothened (Smo), which display homology with members of transporters and G-protein-coupled receptors, respectively[25-27]. Recently, it has also been proposed that a Hedgehog (Hh)-binding protein (Hip), a putative transmembrane protein with epidermal growth factor-like domains, is a receptor for Hh peptides and might be implicated in modulating Hh signalling[28]. Pola et al[13] demonstrated that exogenous administration of Shh induces neovascularization in both corneal and ischemic hind limb models of angiogenesis. Neovascularization induced by Shh appears to be mediated by stromal cells producing a combination of potent angiogenic factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and angiopoietin-1 and 2[13]. Shh seems to work as an indirect angiogenic agent and may activate neovascularization through Shh/patched-1 signaling, specifically in mesenchymal cells[13]. In another study, Pola et al[29] suggested that the Hh pathway may be postnatally recapitulated in response to skeletal muscle ischemia, and concluded that in adult mice, a strong up-regulation of Shh and Ptc1 occurs during regeneration of ischemic skeletal muscle. In our study, ALT, AST, GGT, LDH and MDA levels were significantly higher in the I/R-untreated group. In group 2, the hepatocytes were swollen and showed marked vacuolization. There were no positive immunoreactive cells in the sham-operated rats, while mild Shh positive immunostaining was detected in group 2 animals.

Therefore, supplementation of nitric oxide in the form of nitric oxide donors can be used to correct the nitric oxide deficiency encountered in many disease states. Nitric oxide, known as an endothelium-derived relaxing factor, is formed from the terminal guanidino nitrogen atom of L-arginine by NO synthase[30]. Nitric oxide binds to the haem moiety of guanylate cyclase and increases its activity by 400-fold, catalyzing the conversion of guanosine triphosphate to cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). Elevation of cGMP relaxes the smooth muscles in blood vessels including the genitourinary tract, inhibits platelet aggregation and adhesion, and blocks the adhesion of white cells to the blood vessel wall[31-33]. It has been suggested that cGMP can influence the inductive effects of Shh on neural tissue[34]. In the present study, the biochemical parameters were superior in the I/R-L-Arg group than in the I/R-untreated group. Histological examination of the liver revealed regular sinusoidal structures in group 3, as opposed to swollen cells with marked vacuolization seen in group 2. In addition, the expression of immunoreactive cells was increased markedly in liver tissue from I/R-L-Arg rats. These findings suggest that NO may play an important role in the immunohistochemical expression of Shh molecule.

Lipid peroxidation, mediated by free oxygen radicals, is believed to be an important cause of destruction and damage to cell membranes. Membrane peroxidation can lead to changes in membrane fluidity and permeability and also to enhanced rates of protein degradation, eventually resulting in cell lysis[35]. MDA levels have been extensively used as markers of lipid peroxidation and lipid peroxidation damage in tissues, including cells and body fluids in both clinical and experimental studies[36,37] . We also examined the effect of L-Arg on lipid peroxidation as measured by MDA levels. L-Arg reversed the increase in MDA levels to a considerable extent, thereby confirming its antioxidant role in I/R.

In conclusion, our findings suggest that the Shh molecules may be critical factors in the pathophysiology of inflammatory liver injury induced by I/R. NO may play an important role in the immunohistochemical expression of these molecules.

Footnotes

S- Editor Liu Y L- Editor Anand BS E- Editor Ma WH

References
1.  Uhlmann D, Glasser S, Gaebel G, Armann B, Ludwig S, Tannapfel A, Hauss J, Witzigmann H. Improvement of postischemic hepatic microcirculation after endothelinA receptor blockade--endothelin antagonism influences platelet-endothelium interactions. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:187-197.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Olthoff KM. Can reperfusion injury of the liver be prevented? Trying to improve on a good thing. Pediatr Transplant. 2001;5:390-393.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Johnson RL, Tabin CJ. Molecular models for vertebrate limb development. Cell. 1997;90:979-990.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 443]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 454]  [Article Influence: 16.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Pepicelli CV, Lewis PM, McMahon AP. Sonic hedgehog regulates branching morphogenesis in the mammalian lung. Curr Biol. 1998;8:1083-1086.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 502]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 479]  [Article Influence: 18.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Ramalho-Santos M, Melton DA, McMahon AP. Hedgehog signals regulate multiple aspects of gastrointestinal development. Development. 2000;127:2763-2772.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  St-Jacques B, Dassule HR, Karavanova I, Botchkarev VA, Li J, Danielian PS, McMahon JA, Lewis PM, Paus R, McMahon AP. Sonic hedgehog signaling is essential for hair development. Curr Biol. 1998;8:1058-1068.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 582]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 583]  [Article Influence: 22.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  St-Jacques B, Hammerschmidt M, McMahon AP. Indian hedgehog signaling regulates proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes and is essential for bone formation. Genes Dev. 1999;13:2072-2086.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1290]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1246]  [Article Influence: 49.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Olsen CL, Hsu PP, Glienke J, Rubanyi GM, Brooks AR. Hedgehog-interacting protein is highly expressed in endothelial cells but down-regulated during angiogenesis and in several human tumors. BMC Cancer. 2004;4:43.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 113]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 115]  [Article Influence: 5.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Zardoya R, Abouheif E, Meyer A. Evolution and orthology of hedgehog genes. Trends Genet. 1996;12:496-497.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 58]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Bitgood MJ, McMahon AP. Hedgehog and Bmp genes are coexpressed at many diverse sites of cell-cell interaction in the mouse embryo. Dev Biol. 1995;172:126-138.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1101]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1029]  [Article Influence: 35.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Rowitch DH, S-Jacques B, Lee SM, Flax JD, Snyder EY, McMahon AP. Sonic hedgehog regulates proliferation and inhibits differentiation of CNS precursor cells. J Neurosci. 1999;19:8954-8965.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Alexander B. The role of nitric oxide in hepatic metabolism. Nutrition. 1998;14:376-390.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 74]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 80]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Pola R, Ling LE, Silver M, Corbley MJ, Kearney M, Blake Pepinsky R, Shapiro R, Taylor FR, Baker DP, Asahara T. The morphogen Sonic hedgehog is an indirect angiogenic agent upregulating two families of angiogenic growth factors. Nat Med. 2001;7:706-711.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 481]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 503]  [Article Influence: 21.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Wasowicz W, Nève J, Peretz A. Optimized steps in fluorometric determination of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances in serum: importance of extraction pH and influence of sample preservation and storage. Clin Chem. 1993;39:2522-2526.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265-275.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248-254.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 173357]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 153368]  [Article Influence: 3195.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Dyer MA, Farrington SM, Mohn D, Munday JR, Baron MH. Indian hedgehog activates hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis and can respecify prospective neurectodermal cell fate in the mouse embryo. Development. 2001;128:1717-1730.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Vu TH, Shipley JM, Bergers G, Berger JE, Helms JA, Hanahan D, Shapiro SD, Senior RM, Werb Z. MMP-9/gelatinase B is a key regulator of growth plate angiogenesis and apoptosis of hypertrophic chondrocytes. Cell. 1998;93:411-422.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1368]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1307]  [Article Influence: 50.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Wang LC, Liu ZY, Gambardella L, Delacour A, Shapiro R, Yang J, Sizing I, Rayhorn P, Garber EA, Benjamin CD. Regular articles: conditional disruption of hedgehog signaling pathway defines its critical role in hair development and regeneration. J Invest Dermatol. 2000;114:901-908.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 166]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 172]  [Article Influence: 7.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Torok MA, Gardiner DM, Izpisúa-Belmonte JC, Bryant SV. Sonic hedgehog (shh) expression in developing and regenerating axolotl limbs. J Exp Zool. 1999;284:197-206.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Poss KD, Shen J, Nechiporuk A, McMahon G, Thisse B, Thisse C, Keating MT. Roles for Fgf signaling during zebrafish fin regeneration. Dev Biol. 2000;222:347-358.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 258]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 262]  [Article Influence: 10.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Murakami S, Noda M. Expression of Indian hedgehog during fracture healing in adult rat femora. Calcif Tissue Int. 2000;66:272-276.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 46]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Beachy PA, Cooper MK, Young KE, von Kessler DP, Park WJ, Hall TM, Leahy DJ, Porter JA. Multiple roles of cholesterol in hedgehog protein biogenesis and signaling. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1997;62:191-204.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 93]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 92]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Pepinsky RB, Zeng C, Wen D, Rayhorn P, Baker DP, Williams KP, Bixler SA, Ambrose CM, Garber EA, Miatkowski K. Identification of a palmitic acid-modified form of human Sonic hedgehog. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:14037-14045.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 559]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 536]  [Article Influence: 20.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Alcedo J, Ayzenzon M, Von Ohlen T, Noll M, Hooper JE. The Drosophila smoothened gene encodes a seven-pass membrane protein, a putative receptor for the hedgehog signal. Cell. 1996;86:221-232.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 469]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 485]  [Article Influence: 17.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Stone DM, Hynes M, Armanini M, Swanson TA, Gu Q, Johnson RL, Scott MP, Pennica D, Goddard A, Phillips H. The tumour-suppressor gene patched encodes a candidate receptor for Sonic hedgehog. Nature. 1996;384:129-134.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 876]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 839]  [Article Influence: 30.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  van den Heuvel M, Ingham PW. smoothened encodes a receptor-like serpentine protein required for hedgehog signalling. Nature. 1996;382:547-551.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 389]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 397]  [Article Influence: 14.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Chuang PT, McMahon AP. Vertebrate Hedgehog signalling modulated by induction of a Hedgehog-binding protein. Nature. 1999;397:617-621.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 596]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 571]  [Article Influence: 22.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Pola R, Ling LE, Aprahamian TR, Barban E, Bosch-Marce M, Curry C, Corbley M, Kearney M, Isner JM, Losordo DW. Postnatal recapitulation of embryonic hedgehog pathway in response to skeletal muscle ischemia. Circulation. 2003;108:479-485.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 155]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 161]  [Article Influence: 7.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Moncada S, Palmer RM, Higgs EA. Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev. 1991;43:109-142.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Russwurm M, Koesling D. Isoforms of NO-sensitive guanylyl cyclase. Mol Cell Biochem. 2002;230:159-164.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Vallance P. Nitric oxide: therapeutic opportunities. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2003;17:1-10.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 64]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 61]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Oztürk H, Dokucu AI, Otçu S, Gezici A, Ketani A, Yildiz FR, Ozdemir E, Yücesan S. The protective effects of captopril and nitric oxide on solitary kidney after chronic partial ureteric obstruction. BJU Int. 2001;88:93-99.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Robertson CP, Gibbs SM, Roelink H. cGMP enhances the sonic hedgehog response in neural plate cells. Dev Biol. 2001;238:157-167.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  García JJ, Reiter RJ, Guerrero JM, Escames G, Yu BP, Oh CS, Muñoz-Hoyos A. Melatonin prevents changes in microsomal membrane fluidity during induced lipid peroxidation. FEBS Lett. 1997;408:297-300.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 223]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 235]  [Article Influence: 8.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Trimarchi H, Mongitore MR, Baglioni P, Forrester M, Freixas EA, Schropp M, Pereyra H, Alonso M. N-acetylcysteine reduces malondialdehyde levels in chronic hemodialysis patients--a pilot study. Clin Nephrol. 2003;59:441-446.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 38]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Freudenthaler SM, Schreeb KH, Wiese A, Pilz J, Gleiter CH. Influence of controlled hypoxia and radical scavenging agents on erythropoietin and malondialdehyde concentrations in humans. Acta Physiol Scand. 2002;174:231-235.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]