Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2006; 12(9): 1408-1411
Published online Mar 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i9.1408
Detection of carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in peritoneal washes from gastric cancer patients and its clinical significance
Yan-Song Zhang, Jun Xu, Guang-Hua Luo, Rong-Chao Wang, Jiang Zhu, Xiao-Ying Zhang, Peter Nilsson-Ehle, Ning Xu
Yan-Song Zhang, Jun Xu, Rong-Chao Wang, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University, Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu Province, China
Guang-Hua Luo, Jiang Zhu, Laboratory of Molecular Biology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University, Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu Province, China
Xiao-Ying Zhang, Department of Thoracic Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University, Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu Province, China
Peter Nilsson-Ehle, Ning Xu, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Institute of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital of Lund, Lund University, Lund 221 85, Sweden
Correspondence to: Ning Xu, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Institute of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital of Lund, Lund S-221 85, Sweden. ning.xu@klinkem.lu.se
Telephone: +46-46-173462 Fax: +46-46-130064
Received: June 29, 2005
Revised: August 1, 2005
Accepted: October 9, 2005
Published online: March 7, 2006

Abstract

AIM: To establish a more sensitive method for detection of free cancer cells in peritoneal washes from gastric cancer patients during surgery and to evaluate its clinical significance.

METHODS: The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) mRNA levels in peritoneal washes from 65 cases of gastric cancer were detected by real-time RT-PCR. Peritoneal lavage cytology (PLC) was applied simultaneously to detection of free cancer cells. Negative controls included peritoneal washes from 5 cases of benign gastric disease and blood samples from 5 adult healthy volunteers.

RESULTS: There was no CEA mRNA in peritoneal washes from benign gastric disease patients and in blood of adult healthy volunteers. The positive percentage of free cancer cells detected by real-time RT-PCR was 47.7% and only 12.3% by PLC. The positive rate of CEA mRNA was significantly related with serosa invasion between peritoneal metastasis and stage of gastric cancer.

CONCLUSION: Real-time RT-PCR is a sensitive and rapid method for the detection of free cancer cells in peritoneal washes. The presence of free cancer cells in peritoneal washes is related to the pathologic stage of gastric cancer.

Key Words: Real-time RT-PCR, Peritoneal washes, Gastric cancer, Carcinoembryonic antigen



INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer death in China. The postoperative survival rate of patients with advanced gastric cancer remains very low[1-3]. About 50-60% of gastric cancer patients with serosal invasion after curative resection eventually de-velop peritoneal metastases[4,5]. Free cancer cells in the abdominal cavity can predict the prognosis of gastric cancer patients[6-8]. Peritoneal lavage cytology (PLC) has been used to examine cancer cells in peritoneal washes for more than a decade. But it lacks sensitivity and is time consuming[9,10]. Since CEA is a specific marker of gastric cancer cells, detecting CEA mRNA in peritoneal washings from gastric cancer patients may determine the treatment strategy[11]. To date, many methods to detect CEA mRNA of cancer cells are available, but their sensitivity remains to be improved[11-13]. Recently real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has been used to detect CEA mRNA of free cancer cells in peritoneal washes from gastric cancer patients and micro peritoneal metastasis in these patients[14-17]. In the present study, we used real-time RT-PCR to detect CEA mRNA in peritoneal washes during gastrectomy with its clinical significance evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients and collection of samples

Sixty-five patients with gastric cancer (aged 35 - 76 years, mean age 60.6 ± 11.5 years, 50 men and 15 women) undergone curative surgery in our hospital were enrolled in the present study. No patients received preoperative radiation therapy or pre-chemotherapy prior to their en-rollment. Five patients with benign gastric disease undergone gastrectomy and 5 blood samples from health volunteers were included as negative controls. During the operation, peritoneal metastasis was found in 6 patients. At the beginning of operation, 50 mL of saline was poured into the Douglas cavity and aspirated after gentle stirring. After centrifugation, a certain amount of washes was cytopathologically examined. The total RNA was extracted from the rest washes or from blood cells using phenol-chloroform kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions(Fermentas Company, Hanover, USA). All experiments were approved by the local ethic committee.

Real-time RT PCR

CEA specific primers and probes were synthesized by the Shengyou Company (Shanghai, China). The donor probe was labeled with fluorescence at the 3’ end, while the acceptor probe was labeled with LC Red 640 at 5’ end (Table I). The standard CEA mRNA sample was taken from a liver metastasis in a colon cancer patient. All procedures were carried out according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, real-time RT-PCR of CEA mRNA was performed in two steps. For reverse transcription, it was carried out in a 40-µL reaction mixture containing 1 µg oligo(dT)18, 2 µg total RNA, 4 µL 10 mmol/L dNTP and 400 units RevertAid M-MuLV reverse transcriptase. For real-time PCR amplification, it was carried out in a 20 µL reaction mixture containing 2 µL cDNA, 22.5 pmol of both forward and reverse primers, 5 pmol probes, 2 µL 10 mmol/L dNTP and 1 unit Tag DNA polymerase. Thermal cycling conditions included at 95 °C for 1 min to activate Taq polymerase. After that, 45 cycles of PCR amplification were performed at 95 °C for 5 s, at 60 °C for 10 s and at 72 °C for 10 s. Samples were amplified in duplicate. All PCRs were performed on LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics).

Statistical analysis

The statistical significance of differences in clinical path-ological factors and positive rates of CEA mRNA was analyzed with the chi-square test. Comparisons of CEA mRNA values between groups with or without peritoneal metastasis were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Positive CEA mRNA was found in 31 (47.7 %) out of the 65 patients by real-time RT-PCR, whereas free cancer cells were found only in 8 patients (12.3 %) by cytological method. CEA mRNA in peritoneal washes was significantly correlated to the depth of tumor invasion, peritoneal metastasis and different pathologic classifications (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2 Comparison of clinical pathological factors and CEA mRNA expression.
Positive CEA mRNA1(%)P-value
Gender:
Male48 (24/50)
Female47 (7/15)1.000
Depth of invasion:
pT361 (22/36)0.024
pT1+pT231 (9/29)
Cancer location
Cardia53 (10/19)0.618
Gastric body40 (10/25)
Gastric antrum52 (11/21)
Lymph node metastasis
yes47(21/45)1.000
no50(10/20)
TNM stages
I+ II33(10/30)
III+ IV60(21/35)0.046
Table 3 Comparison of CEA mRNA in gastric cancer patients with or without peritoneal metastasis (mean ± SD).
Peritoneal metastasisCEA mRNAP-value
Yes16006.2 ± 18242.P < 0.001
No40.5 ± 158.9
DISCUSSION

TNM classification[18,19] or modified TNM classification[20,21] has been used to evaluate the prognosis of patients with gastric carcinomas for many years. However, it cannot cover all clinical situations in these patients[21]. The prognosis of gastric cancer is poor mainly due to intraperitoneal relapse. Free cancer cells (FCC) may exfoliate from cancer-invaded serosa contributing to peritoneal dissemination, which is the most frequent pattern of recurrence in patients with gastric cancers[5]. The presence of FCC in the peritoneal cavity is significantly correlated with classical prognostic factors (TNM classification)[22]. Since 1998, Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) has suggested that the presence of free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity should be considered as an independent prognostic marker in patients with gastric cancers[23]. Detecting micro peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer patients during gastrectomy may determine the prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Many methods can detect free cancer cells in peritoneal washes. Peritoneal lavage cytology (PLC) is an established routine method for detecting free cancer cells in the peritoneal washes, but the positive rate of PLC for FCC is only 11%[24]. In our study, the positive rate of PLC for FCC was 12.3% (Table 2). More sensitive and specific methods are necessary for the improvement of detecting FCC in peritoneal washes. With the development of PCR technology[25], real-time RT-PCR can detect specific markers of free cancer cells in peritoneal washes. CEA mRNA is one of the most common specific markers of FCC, although Goeminne et al[26]reported that mesothelial cells and infiltrating leukocytes also express CEA. This cross-reaction could be avoided by combining different markers.

Real-time RT-PCR allows rapid amplification and accurate quantification of CEA mRNA and online data analysis without a post-PCR procedure, making it an applicable method for routine diagnosis[27]. In the present study, no CEA mRNA expression was detected in the control samples collected from patients with benign gastric diseases or from volunteer’s blood. Moreover, the positive rate of CEA mRNA was related with membrane invasion, peritoneal metastasis, and stage of gastric cancer, su-ggesting that free cancer cells in peritoneal washes are closely related to tumor stages. The mean value of CEA mRNA was much higher in patients with peritoneal metastasis than in those without peritoneal metastasis (Table 3), suggesting that CEA mRNA can be used in the evaluation of peritoneal metastasis. Marutsuka et al[28] reported that RT-PCR can be used in routine assays. With improvement of skill the sample handling could be shortened and becomes more practicable.

In conclusion, real-time PCR is a sensitive and rapid method for the detection of free cancer cells in peritoneal washes.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Qing-Feng Mu for providing excellent technical assistance.

Footnotes

S- Editor Wang J L- Editor Wang XL E- Editor Wu M

References
1.  Chen Z, Zheng T, Chen J. [Evaluation of ten-year results of cancer prevention and treatment in Changle City with high incidence of gastric cancer]. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2000;22:311-313.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
2.  Roder DM. The epidemiology of gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2002;5 Suppl 1:5-11.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
3.  Pisani P, Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide mortality from 25 cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer. 1999;83:18-29.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
4.  Broll R, Weschta M, Windhoevel U, Berndt S, Schwandner O, Roblick U, Schiedeck TH, Schimmelpenning H, Bruch HP, Duchrow M. Prognostic significance of free gastrointestinal tumor cells in peritoneal lavage detected by immunocytochemistry and polymerase chain reaction. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001;386:285-292.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
5.  Nakanishi H, Kodera Y, Yamamura Y, Kuzuya K, Nakanishi T, Ezaki T, Tatematsu M. Molecular diagnostic detection of free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity of patients with gastrointestinal and gynecologic malignancies. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1999;43 Suppl:S32-S36.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
6.  Kodera Y, Nakanishi H, Yamamura Y, Shimizu Y, Torii A, Hirai T, Yasui K, Morimoto T, Kato T, Kito T. Prognostic value and clinical implications of disseminated cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and cytology. Int J Cancer. 1998;79:429-433.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
7.  Fujii S, Kitayama J, Kaisaki S, Sasaki S, Seto Y, Tominaga O, Tsuno N, Umetani N, Yokota H, Kitamura K. Carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in abdominal cavity as a useful predictor of peritoneal recurrence of gastric cancer with serosal exposure. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2002;21:547-553.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
8.  Tokuda K, Natsugoe S, Nakajo A, Miyazono F, Ishigami S, Hokita S, Takao S, Eizuru Y, Aikou T. Clinical significance of CEA-mRNA expression in peritoneal lavage fluid from patients with gastric cancer. Int J Mol Med. 2003;11:79-84.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
9.  Vogel I, Kalthoff H. Disseminated tumour cells. Their detection and significance for prognosis of gastrointestinal and pancreatic carcinomas. Virchows Arch. 2001;439:109-117.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
10.  Hermanek P. pTNM and residual tumor classifications: problems of assessment and prognostic significance. World J Surg. 1995;19:184-190.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
11.  Putzki H, Reichert B, Jablonski M, Heymann H. The tumor markers CEA, TPA and CA 19-9 in gastric cancer. Dtsch Z Verdau Stoffwechselkr. 1988;48:145-148.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
12.  Gerhard M, Juhl H, Kalthoff H, Schreiber HW, Wagener C, Neumaier M. Specific detection of carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing tumor cells in bone marrow aspirates by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:725-729.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
13.  van Dalen A, Kessler AC. A multicentre evaluation of tumour marker determinations using the automatic Enzymun-Test Systems ES 300 and ES 600/700. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1996;34:377-384.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
14.  To EM, Chan WY, Chow C, Ng EK, Chung SC. Gastric cancer cell detection in peritoneal washing: cytology versus RT-PCR for CEA transcripts. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2003;12:88-95.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
15.  Kojima N, Kunieda K, Matsui K, Kato H, Saji S. Evaluation of carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in living, necrotic, and apoptotic gastric cancer cells by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Surg Today. 2003;33:839-846.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
16.  Yonemura Y, Endou Y, Fujimura T, Fushida S, Bandou E, Kinoshita K, Sugiyama K, Sawa T, Kim BS, Sasaki T. Diagnostic value of preoperative RT-PCR-based screening method to detect carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity from patients with gastric cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2001;71:521-528.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
17.  Nakanishi H, Kodera Y, Torii A, Hirai T, Yamamura Y, Kato T, Kito T, Tatematsu M. Detection of carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing free tumor cells in peritoneal washes from patients with gastric carcinoma by polymerase chain reaction. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1997;88:687-692.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
18.  Hermanek P, Scheibe O, Spiessl B, Wagner G. [TNM classification of malignant tumors: the new 1987 edition]. Rontgenblatter. 1987;40:200.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
19.  Hermanek P. [The new TNM classification and staging of stomach cancer]. Leber Magen Darm. 1989;19:169-72, 175-9.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
20.  Kim JP, Yang HK, Oh ST. Is the new UICC staging system of gastric cancer reasonable (Comparison of 5-year survival rate of gastric cancer by old and new UICC stage classification). Surg Oncol. 1992;1:209-213.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
21.  Maruyama K, Sasako M, Sano T, Katai H, Kinoshita T, Fukagawa T. [TNM classification: cancer of the stomach]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1998;25:1793-1799.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
22.  Juhl H, Stritzel M, Wroblewski A, Henne-Bruns D, Kremer B, Schmiegel W, Neumaier M, Wagener C, Schreiber HW, Kalthoff H. Immunocytological detection of micrometastatic cells: comparative evaluation of findings in the peritoneal cavity and the bone marrow of gastric, colorectal and pancreatic cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 1994;57:330-335.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
23.  Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma - 2nd English Edition –. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:10-24.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
24.  Kodera Y, Nakanishi H, Ito S, Yamamura Y, Kanemitsu Y, Shimizu Y, Hirai T, Yasui K, Kato T, Tatematsu M. Quantitative detection of disseminated free cancer cells in peritoneal washes with real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction: a sensitive predictor of outcome for patients with gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2002;235:499-506.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
25.  Ito S, Nakanishi H, Hirai T, Kato T, Kodera Y, Feng Z, Kasai Y, Ito K, Akiyama S, Nakao A. Quantitative detection of CEA expressing free tumor cells in the peripheral blood of colorectal cancer patients during surgery with real-time RT-PCR on a LightCycler. Cancer Lett. 2002;183:195-203.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
26.  Goeminne JC, Guillaume T, Salmon M, Machiels JP, D'Hondt V, Symann M. Unreliability of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in detecting contaminating breast cancer cells in peripheral blood stem cells due to induction of CEA by growth factors. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999;24:769-775.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
27.  Nakanishi H, Kodera Y, Yamamura Y, Ito S, Kato T, Ezaki T, Tatematsu M. Rapid quantitative detection of carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing free tumor cells in the peritoneal cavity of gastric-cancer patients with real-time RT-PCR on the lightcycler. Int J Cancer. 2000;89:411-417.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
28.  Marutsuka T, Shimada S, Shiomori K, Hayashi N, Yagi Y, Yamane T, Ogawa M. Mechanisms of peritoneal metastasis after operation for non-serosa-invasive gastric carcinoma: an ultrarapid detection system for intraperitoneal free cancer cells and a prophylactic strategy for peritoneal metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:678-685.  [PubMed]  [DOI]