Clinical Research
Copyright ©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2005; 11(8): 1167-1171
Published online Feb 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i8.1167
Clinical significance of serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor in biliary disease and carcinoma
Munechika Enjoji, Makoto Nakamuta, Koji Yamaguchi, Satoshi Ohta, Kazuhiro Kotoh, Marie Fukushima, Masami Kuniyoshi, Tomomi Yamada, Masao Tanaka, Hajime Nawata
Munechika Enjoji, Makoto Nakamuta, Satoshi Ohta, Kazuhiro Kotoh, Marie Fukushima, Masami Kuniyoshi, Hajime Nawata, Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
Koji Yamaguchi, Masao Tanaka, Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
Tomomi Yamada, Medical Information Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Munechika Enjoji, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan. enjoji@intmed3.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp
Telephone: +81-92-642-5282 Fax: +81-92-642-5287
Received: July 17, 2004
Revised: July 19, 2004
Accepted: August 30, 2004
Published online: February 28, 2005

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the clinical significance of serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and soluble VEGF receptor-1 (VEGFR1/Flt-1) (sVEGFR1) levels in biliary diseases.

METHODS: We analyzed the serum levels of these proteins in patients with acute cholangitis (group 1), biliary malignancies (group 2), and primary biliary cirrhosis or primary sclerosing cholangitis (group 3), and in healthy donors (group 4). The influence of inflammation was also analyzed. Serum VEGF levels were expressed as VEGF per platelet (VEGF/PLT, pg/106) in order to exclude the influence of platelet counts.

RESULTS: sVEGFR1 levels were significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 than in the control group, but did not correlate with inflammatory markers. VEGF/PLT levels were generally higher in patients with active inflammation than in those with carcinoma. C-reactive protein strongly correlated with the levels of serum VEGF independently of platelet and leukocyte counts, even in cancer patients. In cancer patients, VEGF/PLT and sVEGFR1 levels might be indicators for evaluating the effect of medical treatment or the disease progression.

CONCLUSION: Serum VEGF and VEGFR1 might be useful markers for gauging the clinical effect of various treatments on patients.

Key Words: VEGF, VEGFR1, Cholangiocarcinoma, Cholangitis



INTRODUCTION

Angiogenic response occurs through the release of various angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). VEGF is known to be synthesized by endothelial cells, leukocytes, and megakaryocytes[1]. Angiogenesis is essential for the growth and survival of solid tumors and VEGF plays a predominant role in inducing tumor-associated angiogenesis[2,3]. Generally, VEGF is detected in most malignant epithelial tumor cells and it has been reported that the level of VEGF expression in tumor tissue is of prognostic value[4,5]. Some groups reported that both serum and plasma VEGF concentrations correlate with tumor stage[6,7]. Megakaryocytes are an important source of VEGF, which is stored in the α granules of platelets[8]. A close correlation between platelet counts and serum VEGF has been reported in cancer patients and this phenomenon is presumably due to the release of VEGF following platelet activation during the clotting process[9,10].

A VEGF-specific tyrosine kinase receptor, VEGF receptor-1 (VEGFR1/Flt-1), is found in vascular endothelial cells of tumor vessels[2,3,11]. A naturally occurring soluble form of VEGFR1 (sVEGFR1) is an alternatively spliced variant of the VEGFR1 gene and can be secreted into the circulation[5,12]. VEGFR1 has a high affinity for VEGF, even in soluble form[12]. sVEGFR1 can be derived not only from vessels but also from tumor cells[13-15]. sVEGFR1 appears to be a crucial, intrinsic, negative regulator of VEGF and it may play a key role in tumor angiogenesis[16,17].

The expression of VEGF and VEGFR1 in tissues of cholangiocarcinoma has been examined histopathologically[18]. VEGF is strongly expressed in malignant cholangiocytes, whereas the surrounding mesenchymal and endothelial cells are consistently negative for VEGF. On the other hand, VEGFR1 is expressed exclusively by endothelial cells adjacent to tumor cells and rarely expressed in quiescent endothelial cells. Endothelial cells are demonstrated as the only cellular source of the receptor. However, little is known about the clinical significance of serum levels of VEGF and sVEGFR1 in biliary diseases, especially in benign disease. The current study was therefore, initiated to evaluate the serum values of VEGF and sVEGFR1 in patients with biliary diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sera were collected from patients with biliary disease at the Third Department of Internal Medicine and the First Department of Surgery, Kyushu University Hospital, between 2001 and 2003. Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1. Cholangitis with active inflammation (n = 42); Group 2. Biliary neoplasms including intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 44), gallbladder carcinoma (n = 7), and ampullary carcinoma (n = 8); Group 3. Vanishing bile duct disorder of autoimmune origin, primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC: n = 12) or primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC: n = 13). For the control group (Group 4), serum samples from 31 healthy blood donors were assayed. Informed consent was obtained from each patient prior to their entering the study.

Serum concentrations of VEGF and sVEGFR1 were quantified using the high-sensitivity ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. The sensitivity of VEGF and sVEGFR1 assays was 9 pg/mL. C-reactive protein (CRP) was used as a laboratory marker of inflammation. The number of platelets and leukocytes in peripheral blood was routinely tested. Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman’s correlation analysis, Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correlation for multiple comparisons, or Wilcoxon’s signed rank test and the results were considered statistically significant if P was less than 0.05.

RESULTS
Correlation of VEGF levels with platelet counts

In this study, blood donors formed one of these four groups: Group 1. patients with acute cholangitis/cholecystitis; Group 2. patients with biliary carcinoma; Group 3. PBC or PSC; Group 4. healthy volunteers (see Materials and Methods). Correlations between pairs of parameters were tested by Spearman’s correlation analysis. Overall, VEGF levels showed a close relationship with platelet counts: Group 1. r = 0.449, P = 0.0029; Group 2, r = 0.439, P = 0.0005; Group 3. r = 0.393, P = 0.0520; Group 4. r = 0.537, P = 0.0018 (Figure 1). On the other hand, VEGF levels were not significantly correlated with WBC counts in healthy donors and patients with benign biliary disease: Group 1 r = 0.166; Group 3 r = 0.325; Group 4, r = 0.312. However, the correlation was significant in patients with malignancy: Group 2, r = 0.487, P<0.0001. These results indicated that platelet counts could considerably control serum VEGF levels in patients. Therefore, the concentration of VEGF per platelet (VEGF/PLT, pg/106) was calculated by dividing the serum VEGF values (pg/mL) by the platelet counts (×106/mL) in order to standardize and accurately compare the VEGF levels between patients. When VEGF levels were expressed relative to platelet counts, WBC counts did not show a significant correlation: Group 1, r = -0.049; Group 2, r = 0.288; Group 3, r = -0.076; Group 4, r = 0.205. There was no significant correlation between platelet and leukocyte counts (data not shown). The correlation was not significant between serum levels of sVEGFR1 and platelet or leukocyte counts.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Correlation between serum VEGF levels and platelet counts. A: group 1; B: group 2; C: group 3; D: group 4.
Serum levels of VEGF, sVEGFR1, and VEGF/PLT

Serum levels of VEGF, sVEGFR1, and VEGF/PLT were compared among groups by Kruskal-Wallis test (Bonferroni correlation for multiple comparisons). Data for each group were presented as (median [25th. percentile, 75th. percentile]; mean value). VEGF values were significantly higher in Group 1 (648.5 [390, 1066]; 805.6 pg/mL) and Group 2 (504 [347, 775]; 633.7 pg/mL) than in Group 3 (191 [113, 333]; 246.7 pg/mL) and Group 4 (261 [185, 338]; 278.2 pg/mL) (Figure 2A). VEGF/PLT levels showed the same pattern as VEGF, and were significantly higher in Group 1 (3.22 [2.33, 4.59]; 3.78 pg/106) and Group 2 (2.51 [1.84, 3.26]; 2.86 pg/106) than in Group 3 (1.78 [1.02, 2.35]; 1.74 pg/106) and Group 4 (1.26 [0.89, 1.52]; 1.28 pg/106) (Figure 2B). sVEGFR1 levels were significantly higher in Group 1 (72 [62, 88]; 81.2 pg/mL) and Group 2 (72 [59, 90]; 77.0 pg/mL) than in Group 4 (56 [47, 74]; 60.4 pg/mL) (Figure 2C).

Figure 2
Figure 2 VEGF (A), VEGF/PLT (B), and VEGFR1 (C) levels in patients with biliary disease and healthy volunteers. The mean value of each group is presented as a bold line. VEGF/PLT: the calculated parameter by dividing the serum VEGF values (pg/mL) by the platelet counts (×106/mL); Cholangitis: patients with acute cholangitis or cholecystitis; Cancer: patients with biliary neoplasms; PBC/PSC: patients with primary biliary cirrhosis or primary sclerosing cholangitis; normal: healthy volunteers.
Influence of inflammation

The correlation between CRP, a commonly used marker of inflammation, and VEGF/PLT or sVEGFR1 was analyzed in patients (groups 1-3) by Spearman’s correlation analysis. CRP levels were normally distributed within each group. In acute inflammatory disease (group 1), CRP and VEGF/PLT were closely correlated (r = 0.575, P<0.0001) (Figure 3A), but there was no correlation between CRP and sVEGFR1 (r = -0.067). In patients with chronic autoimmune disease, the PBC and PSC group, no significant correlation was found between CRP and VEGF/PLT (r = -0.084) or sVEGFR1 (r = 0.398). In cancer patients, significant correlations were observed between CRP and VEGF/PLT (r = 0.717, P<0.0001) (Figure 3B), and also between CRP and sVEGFR1 (r = 0.318, P = 0.018).

Figure 3
Figure 3 Correlation between C-reactive protein (CRP) and VEGF/PLT levels in group 1 (A) and group 2 (B). VEGF/PLT: the calculated parameter by dividing the serum VEGF values (pg/mL) by the platelet counts (×106/mL).
Movement of serum VEGF/PLT and sVEGFR1 in cancer patients

In almost all our patients, biliary carcinoma was clinically detected and diagnosed at advanced stages (stage IV or III). Therefore, patients with cancer were divided into two groups for the convenience of clinical severity: Group A, patients treated by curative surgical resection (n = 13); Group B, patients with no effective treatment (n = 14). Significant difference was tested by Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test. The levels of VEGF/PLT and sVEGFR1 were measured before and 4 wk after surgical operation in group A. In group B, the parameters were measured at intervals of 3 mo. At the time of admission to our hospital, there was no significant difference in the levels of VEGF/PLT and sVEGFR1 between Groups A and B. However, in Group A, the levels of VEGF/PLT (P = 0.0001) and sVEGFR1 (P = 0.0024) decreased significantly after surgical treatment (Figures 4A, B). By contrast, the levels of both significantly increased in Group B: VEGF/PLT, P = 0.0134; sVEGFR, P = 0.0017 (Figures 4C, D).

Figure 4
Figure 4 Time course of VEGF/PLT (A and C) and VEGFR1 (B and D) levels in patients with biliary cancer. The levels were measured in each patient before and after the curative operation (A and B) or before and after the progression of cancer in size without any effective treatments (C and D). VEGF/PLT: the calculated parameter by dividing the serum VEGF values (pg/mL) by the platelet counts (×106/mL).
DISCUSSION

Recent studies have shown that serum VEGF levels are closely related to platelet counts in cancer patients[1,7,19,20]. It has been suggested that serum VEGF levels reflect platelet counts rather than VEGF secretion from tumor cells, or that platelets act as a scavenger through endocytosis and storage of VEGF secreted from the tumor[1,7,10,19-21]. We demonstrated, in this study, the relationship between serum VEGF and platelet counts is also true in biliary cancer (r = 0.439, P = 0.0005). On the other hand, some groups have not found such a correlation between VEGF and platelet counts in benign disease and healthy controls[13,14]. However, in our study, a correlative trend was obvious in acute cholangitis (r = 0.449, P = 0.0029), autoimmune biliary disease (r = 0.393, P = 0.052), and normal controls (r = 0.537, P = 0.0018). Therefore, we reasoned that expressing VEGF levels relative to platelet counts is a more meaningful way to compare the clinical significance of VEGF among diseases. Leukocytes are another known producer of VEGF. However, when WBC counts were compared with VEGF/PLT, no correlation was found in any of the groups. This finding indicates that WBC counts in peripheral blood do not significantly influence the levels of VEGF.

In our study, the levels of VEGF/PLT were higher (P = 0.0152) in acute cholangitis patients (mean value: 3.78 pg/106) than in cancer patients (mean value: 2.86 pg/106) and closely correlated with serum CRP levels (r = 0.575, P<0.0001). Angiogenesis is a necessary process for inflammation and tissue regeneration. It has been reported that inflammation and hypoxic change with expression of various tissue factors, cytokines, and chemokines stimulate VEGF synthesizing cells such as platelets, immune cells, and inflammatory cells[22-24]. Acute cholangitis is a typical intensive infectious disease. Therefore, in the patients with the disease, the correlation between inflammation activity marker, CRP, and serum VEGF levels is expressed more significantly.

Surprisingly, in biliary cancer patients, VEGF/PLT is also closely correlated with CRP (r = 0.717, P<0.0001). The phenomenon raises the question whether cholangiocarcinoma cells really produce and secrete significant amounts of VEGF, since VEGF/PLT levels may be increased by the same mechanism as in cholangitis. In patients with hypervascular massive tumors like hepatocellular carcinoma, immunohistochemical VEGF expression in cancer cells and serum VEGF are quantitatively correlated[25]. These findings support the concept that VEGF production and neovascularization are absolutely needed for these tumors to survive. On the other hand, cholangiocarcinoma is a relatively hypovascular and invasive tumor, namely, inflammation may be a more significant clinical characteristic in cholangiocarcinoma than in HCC. Therefore, platelets and inflammatory cells may play an important role in VEGF production/secretion in cholangitis as well. If this hypothesis is true, then it is not surprising that, in view of the degree of inflammation, VEGF/PLT levels were higher in the cholangitis group than in the neoplasm group.

Among the patients with autoimmune biliary disease (PBC and PSC), those at advanced stages (i.e., liver cirrhosis) showed lower platelet counts (under 1×105/μL), and therefore, the mean serum VEGF level in this group was only 234.6 pg/mL. However, no correlation was found between VEGF/PLT and CRP. These autoimmune diseases are characterized by chronic inflammatory conditions. VEGF expression is thoroughly characterized in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a well-known systemic autoimmune disease. Serum levels of VEGF have been reported to be elevated in patients with RA and to correlate with disease activity and inflammatory markers. However, over time, the correlation with VEGF levels is only seen in RA of early to median disease duration, but not of long duration[26-28]. Generally, in patients with PBC/PSC, the clinical state is relatively stable even at advanced stages and the inflammatory events are not pronounced. Therefore, serum VEGF and VEGF/PLT levels may be in a relatively low grade and independent of CRP levels.

In our study, serum sVEGFR1 levels did not correlate with platelet and WBC counts. sVEGFR1 levels were statistically higher in groups 1 and 2 than in the normal control group. This finding can be explained by previous evidence showing that endothelial sVEGFR1 is up-regulated by its ligand, VEGF[13]. Indeed sVEGFR1 levels tend to change with VEGF/PLT level.

We have investigated whether the levels of VEGF/PLT and sVEGFR1 reflect the effect of surgical treatment in patients with biliary carcinoma. If not treated, both levels were elevated with the lapse of time. However, the levels clearly declined as a consequence of curative surgical resection. The results indicate that these serum proteins might be useful markers for gauging the clinical effect of various treatments on patients.

References
1.  Salven P, Orpana A, Joensuu H. Leukocytes and platelets of patients with cancer contain high levels of vascular endothelial growth factor. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5:487-491.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
2.  Veikkola T, Alitalo K. VEGFs, receptors and angiogenesis. Semin Cancer Biol. 1999;9:211-220.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
3.  Neufeld G, Cohen T, Gengrinovitch S, Poltorak Z. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors. FASEB J. 1999;13:9-22.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
4.  Linderholm B, Lindh B, Tavelin B, Grankvist K, Henriksson R. p53 and vascular-endothelial-growth-factor (VEGF) expression predicts outcome in 833 patients with primary breast carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2000;89:51-62.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
5.  Toi M, Bando H, Ogawa T, Muta M, Hornig C, Weich HA. Significance of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/soluble VEGF receptor-1 relationship in breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2002;98:14-18.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
6.  Kumar H, Heer K, Lee PW, Duthie GS, MacDonald AW, Greenman J, Kerin MJ, Monson JR. Preoperative serum vascular endothelial growth factor can predict stage in colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4:1279-1285.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
7.  George ML, Eccles SA, Tutton MG, Abulafi AM, Swift RI. Correlation of plasma and serum vascular endothelial growth factor levels with platelet count in colorectal cancer: clinical evidence of platelet scavenging? Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:3147-3152.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
8.  Wartiovaara U, Salven P, Mikkola H, Lassila R, Kaukonen J, Joukov V, Orpana A, Ristimäki A, Heikinheimo M, Joensuu H. Peripheral blood platelets express VEGF-C and VEGF which are released during platelet activation. Thromb Haemost. 1998;80:171-175.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
9.  Maloney JP, Silliman CC, Ambruso DR, Wang J, Tuder RM, Voelkel NF. In vitro release of vascular endothelial growth factor during platelet aggregation. Am J Physiol. 1998;275:H1054-H1061.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
10.  Webb NJ, Bottomley MJ, Watson CJ, Brenchley PE. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is released from platelets during blood clotting: implications for measurement of circulating VEGF levels in clinical disease. Clin Sci (Lond). 1998;94:395-404.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
11.  Petrova TV, Makinen T, Alitalo K. Signaling via vascular endothelial growth factor receptors. Exp Cell Res. 1999;253:117-130.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
12.  Kendall RL, Thomas KA. Inhibition of vascular endothelial cell growth factor activity by an endogenously encoded soluble receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:10705-10709.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
13.  Hornig C, Barleon B, Ahmad S, Vuorela P, Ahmed A, Weich HA. Release and complex formation of soluble VEGFR-1 from endothelial cells and biological fluids. Lab Invest. 2000;80:443-454.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
14.  Inoue T, Kibata K, Suzuki M, Nakamura S, Motoda R, Orita K. Identification of a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antagonist, sFlt-1, from a human hematopoietic cell line NALM-16. FEBS Lett. 2000;469:14-18.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
15.  Lamszus K, Ulbricht U, Matschke J, Brockmann MA, Fillbrandt R, Westphal M. Levels of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor 1 in astrocytic tumors and its relation to malignancy, vascularity, and VEGF-A. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:1399-1405.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
16.  Hornig C, Weich HA. Soluble VEGF receptors. Angiogenesis. 1999;3:33-39.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
17.  Shibuya M. Structure and dual function of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (Flt-1). Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2001;33:409-420.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
18.  Benckert C, Jonas S, Cramer T, Von Marschall Z, Schäfer G, Peters M, Wagner K, Radke C, Wiedenmann B, Neuhaus P. Transforming growth factor beta 1 stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor gene transcription in human cholangiocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2003;63:1083-1092.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
19.  Salgado R, Vermeulen PB, Benoy I, Weytjens R, Huget P, Van Marck E, Dirix LY. Platelet number and interleukin-6 correlate with VEGF but not with bFGF serum levels of advanced cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 1999;80:892-897.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
20.  Benoy I, Salgado R, Colpaert C, Weytjens R, Vermeulen PB, Dirix LY. Serum interleukin 6, plasma VEGF, serum VEGF, and VEGF platelet load in breast cancer patients. Clin Breast Cancer. 2002;2:311-315.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
21.  Vermeulen PB, Salven P, Benoy I, Gasparini G, Dirix LY. Blood platelets and serum VEGF in cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 1999;79:370-373.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
22.  Tonnesen MG, Feng X, Clark RA. Angiogenesis in wound healing. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2000;5:40-46.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
23.  Lingen MW. Role of leukocytes and endothelial cells in the development of angiogenesis in inflammation and wound healing. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001;125:67-71.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
24.  Verheul HM, Jorna AS, Hoekman K, Broxterman HJ, Gebbink MF, Pinedo HM. Vascular endothelial growth factor-stimulated endothelial cells promote adhesion and activation of platelets. Blood. 2000;96:4216-4221.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
25.  Poon RT, Lau CP, Cheung ST, Yu WC, Fan ST. Quantitative correlation of serum levels and tumor expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3121-3126.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
26.  Kikuchi K, Kubo M, Kadono T, Yazawa N, IHN H, Tamaki K. Serum concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor in collagen diseases. Br J Dermatol. 1998;139:1049-1051.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
27.  Harada M, Mitsuyama K, Yoshida H, Sakisaka S, Taniguchi E, Kawaguchi T, Ariyoshi M, Saiki T, Sakamoto M, Nagata K. Vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 1998;27:377-380.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
28.  Pinheiro GR, Andrade CA, Gayer CR, Coelho MS, Freire SM, Scheinberg MA. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor in late rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2001;19:721-723.  [PubMed]  [DOI]