Expression of c-erbB-2 and glutathione S-transferase-pi in hepatocellular carcinoma and its adjacent tissue

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the possible role of c-erbB-2 and glutathione S-transferase (GST-Pi) in primary hepatocellular carcinogenesis and the relationship between liver hype-rplastic nodule (LHN), liver cirrhosis (LC), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS: The expression of c-erbB-2 and GST-Pi was detected immunohistochemically in 41 tissue specimens of HCC and 77 specimens of its adjacent tissue.

RESULTS: The positive expression of c-erbB-2 in LHN (28.6%) was significantly higher than that in LC (0%) (P = 0.032<0.05), but no significant difference was seen between HCC and LHN or LC (P>0.05, c² = 0.002, 3.447). The positive expression of GST-Pi in HCC (89.6%) or LHN (71.1%) was significantly higher than that in LC (22.9%, P<0.001, c² = 49.91, 16.96). There was a significant difference between HCC and LHN (P<0.05, c² = 6.353).

CONCLUSION: The c-erbB-2 expression is an early event in the pathogenesis of HCC. GST-Pi may be a marker enzyme for immunohistochemical detection of human HCC and its preneoplastic lesions. LHN seems to be a preneoplastic lesion related to hepatocarcinogenesis.

Key Words: Liver neoplasm, Hyperplastic nodule, C-erbB-2 gene, GST-pi gene, Immunohistochemistry

INTRODUCTION

Primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in Asia, and the incidence and mortality of HCC show a tendency to rise year by year. Therefore, the detection of preneoplastic lesions of HCC is crucial for the analysis of carcinogenic processes and developing strategies for prevention and treatment. For many years, liver hyperplastic nodule (LHN) has been considered as a preneoplastic lesion. Our previous studies have also confirmed that LHN is closely related to human HCC.

In the present study, the immunohistochemical LSAB method was used to detect the expression of c-erbB-2 oncogene and glutathione S-transferase-pi (GST-pi) in HCC and pericarcinomatous tissues, in order to investigate the possible roles of these genes in the HCC carcinogenesis, and to find out the relationship between LHN, liver cirrhosis (LC), and HCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

HCC specimens from 100 patients were selected during surgical resections or biopsies performed at the Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Qingdao University, China. Of these patients, 76 were males and 24 females with an average age of 50.4 years. None of the patients received chemo- or radiotherapy before resection. We randomly selected 41 and 77 cases of HCC to detect the expression of c-erbB-2 and GST-pi, respectively. The same specimens from 16 cases were detected for both c-erbB-2 and GST-pi, which were too few to be analyzed in terms of the correlation between them in the present study. Forty-one specimens for detecting c-erbB-2 oncogene contained 18 pericarcinomatous tissues, including 14 LHN, 17 LC. Seventy-seven specimens for detecting GST-pi contained 40 pericarcinomatous tissues, including 38 LHN, and 35 LC.

Methods

All specimens were routinely processed, alcohol-fixed and paraffin-embedded. Serial paraffin sections of 4 mm thickness were cut and used for hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical staining. Immunohistochemical LSAB method was used to detect c-erbB-2 and GST-pi. Anti-c-erbB-2 multiple clonal antibody, anti-GST-pi multiple clonal antibody and LSAB kits were purchased from Dako Co. Before staining, the sections were microwave heated in 0.05 mol citric acid solution for antigen retrieval. In each staining run, a known c-erbB-2 or GST-pi positive section was added as positive control, PBS was used as substitutes of the first antibodies for negative control.

Analysis of immunohistochemical staining

When brown granules were found on cell membrane of liver cells and cancer cells, c-erbB-2 was identified positive. When only cytoplasm was stained brown, c-erbB-2 was identified negative. The c-erbB-2 expression was graded semi-quantitatively according to the intensity and the percentage of positivity into negative (-): no positive cells or a weak staining of c-erbB-2 with positive cells<5%; positive (+): c-erbB-2 expression was relatively stronger with the positive cells>5%. For GST-pi, cells with brown granules in cytoplasm were regarded as positive. The criteria of the evaluation of GST-pi expression in this study were as follows. The positive number was semiquantitatively evaluated by counting that in 5-10 randomly chosen medium power (×100 magnification), and the three grades for GST-pi were considered as negative (-): no positive cells; positive (+): the positive reaction being brown and the positive cells <30%; strong positive (++): the positive reaction being brown and the positive cells>30% according to the intensity and extent of GST-pi staining.

Statistical analysis

Results were analyzed by c²-test and direct probability calculation. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Expression of c-erbB-2 oncogene in HCC and its adjacent tissue

The positive staining for c-erbB-2 in cancer cells was exclusively located in cell membrane stained brown, the expression of c-erbB-2 was observed in both cell membrane and cytoplasm in one of four cases of LHN expressing c-erbB-2 (Figure 1A). The c-erbB-2 positive rate was significantly higher in LHN (28.6%) than that in LC (0%, P value 0.032, direct probability calculation, P<0.05), but no significant difference was seen between HCC (Figure 1B) and LHN or LC (c² values 0.002, 3.447, P>0.05, Table 1).

Table 1 Expression of c-erbB-2 oncogene in HCC and its adjacent tissue.

Histological	Case	Expression of c-erbB-2 oncogene		Positive rate(%)
type		-	+
HCC	41	31	10	24.4a
LHN	14	10	4	28.6a
LC	17	17	0	0

^aP<0.05 vs LC.

Figure 1 Positive expression of c-erbB-2 and GST-pi in LHN ( A, C) and HCC ( B, D), LSAB ×200.

Expression of GST-pi in HCC and its adjacent tissue

The positive staining for GST-pi appeared as brown granules, which was predominantly located in the cytoplasm, and the staining of the nuclei was seen in part of the cancer cells. There was strong staining of GST-pi in bile duct epithelial cells. A weak staining of GST-pi was observed in LC with a positive rate of 22.9% (8/35). GST-pi expression was markedly stronger in HCC or LHN (Figure 1C). The rates of positivity were 89.6% (69/77) and 71.1% (27/38), respectively, and significantly higher than that in LC (c² values 49.91, 16.96, P<0.001). There was also a significant difference between HCC (Figure 1D) and LHN (c² value 6.353, P<0.05, Table 2).

Table 2 Expression of GST-pi in HCC and its adjacent tissue.

Histological	Case	Expression of GST-pi			Positive rate(%)
type		- (%)	+ (%)	++ (%)
HCC	77	8 (10.4)	55 (71.4)	14 (18.2)	89.6
LHN	38	11 (28.9)	25 (65.8)	2 (5.3)	71.1a
LC	35	27 (77.1)	8 (22.9)	0	22.9b

^aP<0.05, c² = 6.353 vs HCC;

^bP<0.001, c² = 16.96, 49.91 vs LHN and HCC.

DISCUSSION

The c-erbB-2/neu is a transforming proto-oncogene encoding a transmembrane glycoprotein of 185 ku (P185) with tyrosine kinase activity and extensive sequence homology to epidermal growth factor receptor. The c-erbB-2 is in a state of inactivation under normal condition, and is involved in regulating cell growth and proliferation[1]. Having been affected by some endogenous or extraneous carcinogens, its structure or expression is dysregulated, thus being activated, and c-erbB-2 becomes oncogene with tumor transformation activity. In human malignancies, the activation of c-erbB-2 is most frequently caused by gene amplification, there is extremely high concordance between copy number of gene amplification and protein overexpression[2,3]. The c-erbB-2 is frequently overexpressed in different tumors in humans, and the activation of c-erbB-2 appears to be an early event in tumorigenesis for some cancers[4-7]. However, there seems to be conflicting reports concerning the role of c-erbB-2 oncogene in carcinogenesis of HCC. Some studies reported that c-erbB-2 does not play a role in tumorigenesis of HCC[7], whereas others reported that the overexpression of c-erbB-2 is found in the middle stage of hepatocarcinogenesis, and might only have promoting effects during the development of this lesion[8]. In the present study, c-erbB-2 overexpression was observed in 24.4% (n = 41) of HCC tissue specimens and 22.2% (n = 18) of its adjacent tissue specimens, suggesting that the overexpression of c-erbB-2 oncogene plays an initial role in hepatocarcinogeneis, and is an early molecule change in the carcinogenesis of HCC. In addition, the expression of c-erbB-2 did not decrease in the transition from pericarcinomatous tissues into HCC in the present study, indicating that c-erbB-2 expression also occurs later in the process of hepatocarcinogeneis and maintains the transformed hepatocyte phenotype. Apparently, c-erbB-2 expression can contribute to the initiation and progression of HCC.

Many studies have demonstrated that c-erbB-2 gene product not only contributes to the development and maintenance of malignant phenotype, but also plays a pivotal role in transformation and tumorigenesis[4,5,9], because 3T3 cells or immortalized cells transfected with c-erbB-2 oncogene show a highly transformed and tumorigenic phenotype[10,11]. It can be inferred from these studies that those cells overexpressing c-erbB-2 oncogene are either cancerous or have malignant phenotype. In the present study, all four cases overexpressing c-erbB-2 oncogene in pericarcinomatous tissues were LHN, thus, the positive expression rate of c-erbB-2 in LHN was 28.6% (n = 14), and similar to that of HCC, suggesting that those cells overexpressing c-erbB-2 oncogene in LHN have at least acquired the malignant phenotype, which may reflect the alterations in different biologic state of LHN. Some studies reported that the increased oncogene expression brings cells into a state of active proliferation that results in an increased frequency of mutation[12]. Therefore, it is reasonable to postulate that the overexpression of c-erbB-2 oncogene may make LHN transform malignantly, and parts of LHN are actually in the preneoplastic state or might be cancerous. In contrast to LHN, the expression of c-erbB-2 oncogene is negative in LC, implying that there is no activation of c-erbB-2 in LC, i.e., it is impossible in this situation for malignant transformation. There is also no mutation of p53 in LC, consequently, LC does not necessarily link with hepatocarcinogenesis. Our findings further confirm the notion that it is not LC but LHN, is a preneoplastic lesion for the occurrence of HCC in humans.

GSTs play an important role in protecting cells against cytotoxic and carcinogenic agents. GST-pi is an acid GST, isolated and purified from human term placenta, which possesses catalytic and ligand-binding properties, and is regarded as a new marker enzyme for tumors. Some studies reported that GST-pi or GST-pi mRNA is hardly detectable in normal liver, but markedly increases in preneoplastic hepatic lesions such as hyperplastic nodules and in HCC by immunohistochemical staining or in situ hybridization[13-16], suggesting that GST-pi is a sensitive marker enzyme for preneoplastic lesions and neoplastic cells, not only at the protein level but also at the mRNA level, throughout the hepatocarcinogenesis in rat liver. In addition, other studies reported that single cells immunohistochemically positive for GST-pi induced in the rat liver carcinogenesis by chemical carcinogens are precursor-initiated cells of preneoplastic foci, GST-pi content in the single cells is higher than that in preneoplastic foci, and GST-pi is a more sensitive marker for detection of HCC than g-GT or AFP[17-20]. Therefore, it has been generally considered that GST-pi is the most accurate marker enzyme for detection of the very early “initiated cells” in chemically induced hepatocarcinogenesis in rats. It is known that human GST-pi has highly immunological cross-reaction with rat GST-pi, and the alteration of GST-pi precedes that of cell morphology. Studies in human HCC are not as advanced as in rats but have revealed close similarities. To investigate the relationship between GST-pi and HCC and its preneoplastic lesions, accordingly, may offer an important enzyme for the early diagnosis of HCC.

The expression of GST-pi might increase abnormally in the course of the carcinogenesis of many tumors, and it has been associated with preneoplastic and neoplastic changes[21,22]. Recently, many researches demonstrated that loss of transcription activity of GST-pi gene promoter in human malignancies appears to be the result of CpG island DNA methylation, and this phenomenon is most frequent in breast and renal carcinomas, and might contribute to the carcino-genetic process in these two carcinomas, while other tumor types show GST-pi promoter methylation only rarely or not at all[21-23]. However, some studies reported that GST-pi promoter hypermethylation changes occur frequently in human HCC, suggesting that somatic GST-pi inactivation via CpG island hypermethylation might contribute to the pathogenesis of HCC[24-27]. When cells display complete GST-pi hypermethylation in the CpG island, and they fail to express GST-pi mRNA and the corresponding protein product, which is different from our findings. GST-pi expression was present in 89.6% of HCC and in 71.1% of LHN in the present study. There are several possibilities for this (1) There is rare or no GST-pi promoter hypermeth-ylation in pathogenesis of HCC. (2) There is GST-pi promoter hypermethylation, but loss of GST-pi promoter hypermethylation in HCC may be due to the emergence of tumor subclones unmethylated at the GST-pi promoter during HCC transformation. Such subclones may gain additional genetic lesions that rendered GST-pi inactivation no longer necessary for neoplastic cell survival. (3) There is GST-pi promoter hypermethylation, but it is not responsible for GST-pi expression, it is the p53 gene mutation existing in LHN and HCC that activates GST-pi. p53 mutation is frequently observed in Asian HCC, but it is not a common event in Western HCC, thus, it is not difficult to interpret the reason why GST-pi is overexpressed in some studies whereas GST-pi is absent in other studies though GST-pi promoter hypermethylation may exist in pathogenesis of HCC. (4) GST-pi promoter hypermethylation is not a frequent event in pathogenesis of HCC, it may relate to the different etiologies of HCC in different geographical areas.

Markedly increased GST-pi content has been found in HCC investigated, indicating that HCC cells have characteristics of some fetal cells, as GST-pi content in fetal cells is noticeably higher than that in adult cells. It can be preliminarily inferred that GST-pi has relevance to detoxification of liver in pathogenesis of HCC. Meanwhile, the high expression of GST-pi in HCC might be associated with the resistance to anticancer drugs and might protect the tumor cells themselves against the cytotoxic effects of free radicals, as described in other tumors[28-31]. It is well-known that GST-pi can detoxify not only electrophiles derived from xenobiotics, but also endogenous electrophiles usually with the consequence of free radical damage. These data indicate that the overexpression of GST-pi may impart a proliferative advantage in HCC cells due to induction of resistance to several different cytotoxic mechanisms. In the present study, the positive rate of GST-pi in HCC was higher than that in pericarcinomatous tissues, and was significantly higher in LHN than in LC, showing that GST-pi is activated during initiation stage or much earlier stage of cell transformation induced by chemical carcinogens, and may be acquired in increased amounts during malignant progression. Therefore, the data obtained in the present study suggest that GST-pi may be an effective marker enzyme for HCC and its preneoplastic lesions.

As an important enzyme of detoxification, GST-pi protects cells against the influence of carcinogenic materials. However, GST-pi is taken as a double-edged sword in tumorigenesis, namely, GST-pi protects all cells expressing it, including normal cells, cells with malignant phenotype, and tumor cells as well. Many cells in LHN are in a state of active proliferation, and have acquired the malignant phenotype, thus GST-pi evolves specifically to protect these proliferating cells, and these cells inevitably proliferate rapidly, presenting a clonal expansion. Our findings suggest that cells overexpressing GST-pi in LHN may relate to the carcinogenesis of LHN, and some cells in LHN are altered hepatocytes, which should be treated as preneoplastic cells of HCC. In contrast to LHN, the cells in LC appear to represent quiescent phenotypes unlikely to progress into HCC.