Colorectal Cancer
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2004. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 15, 2004; 10(20): 2954-2957
Published online Oct 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i20.2954
Targeting cyclooxygenase-2 with sodium butyrate and NSAIDs on colorectal adenoma/carcinoma cells
Zhi-Hong Zhang, Qin Ouyang, Hua-Tian Gan
Zhi-Hong Zhang, Qin Ouyang, Hua-Tian Gan, Department of Gastroenterology, First Hospital, Western China University of Medical Sciences, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by the Scientific Foundation of Sichuan Province, No. 174
Correspondence to: Zhi-Hong Zhang, Department of Gastroenterology, First Hospital, Western China University of Medical Sciences, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China. zhang-821@21cn.com
Telephone: +86-28-85081923
Received: July 17, 2002
Revised: August 8, 2002
Accepted: November 4, 2002
Published online: October 15, 2004

Abstract

AIM: The protective effects of sodium butyrate and NSAIDs (especially the highly selective COX-2 inhibitors) have attracted considerable interest recently. In this study, primary adenoma cells and HT-29 were used to investigate whether the above drugs would be effective for reducing proliferation and inducing apoptosis. Additionally, it was investigated whether NSAIDs would strengthen the effects of sodium butyrate and its possible mechanisms.

METHODS: In vitro primary cell culture of colorectal adenomas and HT-29 were used for this investigation. PGE2 isolated from HT-29 cell culture supernatants was investigated by ELISA. MTT was employed to detect the anti-proliferative effects on both adenoma and HT-29 culture cells. FCM was used for apoptosis rate and cell cycle analysis. The morphology of apoptotic cells was investigated by means of electromicroscopy.

RESULTS: Sodium butyrate could stimulate the secretion of PGE2, while NSAIDs inhibited it to below 30 pg/106 cells. Both butyrate and NSAIDs could inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis. The effects were time- and dose-dependent (P < 0.05). Aspirin and NS-398 could enhance the effects of sodium butyrate. The effects were stronger while sodium butyrate was used in combination with NS-398 than it was used in combination with Aspirin.

CONCLUSION: Butyrate and NSAIDs could inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis respectively. NSAIDs could enhance the effects of sodium butyrate by down-regulating COX-2 expression. Selective COX-2 inhibitor is better than traditional NSAIDs.




INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer remains the major cause of cancer-related mortality in the developed countries. With improvement in economic status, the incidence of colorectal cancer is increasing in China. Prevention of the disease is a more attractive approach to dealing with the problem than treatment of existing disease for both medical and fiscal reasons. Clinical evidences showed that removal of colorectal adenoma could attenuate 76%-90% risk of colorectal cancer, but the yearly relapse rate has reached 10%-15%. Therefore, the urgent task is to develop new strategies to prevent the disease. With regard to chemoprevention, butyrate sodium (sodium butyrate) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), especially selective COX-2 inhibitors have attracted more attention.

Evidences have shown that low fat and high dietary fiber diet could protect against colorectal cancer. Dietary fiber could be fermented by symbiotic bacteria in the large bowel and then a short chain fatty acid-butyrate, could be released. Clinical and laboratory studies showed that butyrate might be beneficial to the development of colorectal cancer and even in the early stage of its premalignant status[1].

NSAIDs have shown its promising role in colorectal cancer chemoprevention in recent years. Epidemic studies demonstrated that it might reduce 40%-50% risk of colorectal cancer in persons who took aspirin or other NSAIDs on a regular basis[2]. The most recognized target for NSAIDs was cyclooxygenase (COX), because COX-2 showed 86% and 43% expression in colorectal adenoma and carcinoma tissues respectively[17]. Furthermore, COX-2 selective inhibitors have attracted more attention because of their minimal risk of gastrointestinal side effects.

Although the precise mechanisms are unclear, sodium butyrate and NSAIDs are involved in chemoprevention of colorectal cancer. In this study, colorectal adenoma cells and HT-29 cells were used to investigate whether the above agents were effective in reducing proliferation and inducing apoptosis, and whether NSAIDs could strengthen the effects of sodium butyrate and its possible mechanisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials

NS-398 was a gift from Dr. W Sternson (Washington University). EGF was from Dr. Ouyang Xueshong (Hong Kong University). Sodium butyrate, aspirin, collagenaes type IV, hyaluronidase type IV were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. Prostaglandin E2 EIA kit was from Cayman Chemical. Arachidonic acid, insulin, FBS was from GIBIO Co.

Colorectal adenoma specimens were from resection through colonoscopy in the Endoscopic Center, First Hospital of Western China University of Medical Sciences. HT-29 was a gift from Immuno-Transplation Laboratory, First Hospital of Western China University of Medical Sciences.

Methods

Cell cultures Adenoma specimens were washed at least 10 times in PBS containing penicillin (1 000 U/mL), streptomycin (1 000 U/mL), amphotericin B (3 μg/mL). The minced tissues were digested by DMEM containing collagenaes type IV (1.5 mg/mL), hyaluronidase type IV (0.25 mg/mL) for 2 h until the tissues were dispersed into individual crypts, then they were incubated at 37 °C, 50 mL/L CO2 in growth medium consisting of DMEM, 50 mL/L FBS, 0.5 μg/mL insulin, 1 μg/mL hydrocortisone, 5 μg/mL transferrin, 20 ng/mL EGF, 5 × 10-9 Na2SeO3, 0.1 μg/mL pentagastrin, 2 mmol/L glutamine, 200 U/mL penicillin, 200 U/mL streptomycin. The culture cells were identified as epithelial origin by immunohistochemical staining and electro microscopy (data not shown). HT-29 was cultured in standard growth condition containing DMEM, 100 g/L LBS, 200 U/mL penicillin and streptomycin.

Preparation of drugs

Sodium butyrate was dissolved in culture medium. Aspirin and NS-398 were in DMSO, and the final concentration was less than 3.3 mL/L. The drugs below were used to measure PGE2, MTT and FCM. Sodium butyrate: 2 mmol/L, 4 mmol/L, 6 mmol/L; Aspirin: 1 mmol/L, 5 mmol/L, 10 mmol/L, 20 mmol/L; NS-398: 0.1 µmol/L, 1 µmol/L, 10 µmol/L, 50 µmol/L; 2 mmol/L Sodium butyrate + 10 mmol/L Aspirin; 2 mmol/L Sodium butyrate + 10 µmol/L NS-398. For electro microscopy, 2 mmol/L Sodium butyrate, 10 mmol/L aspirin or 10 µmol/L NS-398 was used.

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) immunoassay

HT-29 cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 10 6 cells/T25 flask for 48 h, and then treated with medicine for 24 h or 72 h separately. Aliquots of culture medium (1 mL) were stored at -70 °C until assayed (In NSAIDs treatments and control groups, an exogenous supply of 10 µmol/L AA was added to pre-treat for 30 min individually). Immunoassay was carried out according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The sensitivity of the assay was 10 pg/mL.

Proliferation assays

Cell proliferation of both primary adenoma cells and HT-29 was assessed by MTT. After seeded at a density of 2 × 10 4 cells/well for 96 well plates with 100 µL media for 48 h, the cells were treated with medicine for 24 h or 72 h separately. At the end of incubation, the medium was removed and 20 µL MTT solution was added to each well. Then DMSO was added to each well, the optical density of each well was read on the plate reader at 570 nm.

The inhibition rate = (1- tested group optical density/the control optical density) × 100%.

Flow cytometric analysis

After HT-29 cells were harvested , they were fixed in 700 mL/L ethanol overnight at 4 °C, mixed with PI staining fluid for 20 min at 4 °C and then filtered. At last, the samples were examined by FCM.

Electro microscopy

The collected HT-29 cells were fixed in 30 g/L glutaraldehyde, then rinsed in 10 g/L osmium textroxide for 30 min at 4 °C, dehydrated through a series of acetone, embedded in EPON polymerized at 60 °C, stained with uranyl acetate and Raynold lead citrate. Finally, the sections were examined under an electron microscope.

Statistical analysis

PGE2 expression and growth inhibition were statistically analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Comparison among the groups was analyzed by L-S-D. The apoptotic rate was analyzed by χ2. All data were analyzed by SPSS.

RESULTS
PGE2 production in HT-29 cells

With the increase of optical density, PGE2 production was decreased in standard culture condition. Sodium butyrate 2 mmol/L was enough for stimulating the secretion of PGE2 1306 pg/106 cells compared with control values of 69 pg/106 cells in 24 h (P < 0.05), but it was not time-and dose-dependent. 2 mmol/L\ 4 mmol/L\6 mmol/L sodium butyrate separately stimulated the secretion of PGE2 1306 \1230\1385 (pg/106 cells). And the same concentration of sodium butyrate had no statistical differential effects in 24 h and 72 h. In contrast, NSAIDs (aspirin and NS-398) could completely inhibit PGE2 secretion in a time-and dose-independent manner (P < 0.001). After incubated for 30 min with 10 umol/L AA, PGE2 production reached 1470 pg/106 cells in control, while 1-20 mmol/L aspirin reduced the PGE2 levels to below 30 pg/106 cells and 0.1-50 umol/L NS-398 reached 477 pg/106 cells-25 pg/106 cells. NS-398 was different in time- and concentration-dependence from aspirin. Sodium butyrate in combination with NSAIDs showed PGE2 production inhibition ( < 30 pg/106 cells) (Table 1).

Table 1 PGE2 (pg/106 cells) production in HT-29 treated with Sodium butyrate and/or NSAIDs.
Production of PGE22 mmol/L sodium butyrate10 mmol/L aspirin10 μmol/L NS - 398Sodium butyrate + aspirinSodium butyrate + NS - 398
24 h1306 ± 5.613.2 ± 4.135.2 ± 3.514.9 ± 1.945.9 ± 2.9
72 h1427 ± 7.15.61 ± 2.75.95 ± 2.26.5 ± 1.08.49 ± 1.3
Sodium butyrate and NSAIDs had dose- or time-dependent anti-proliferative effects on HT-29 and adenoma cells

The anti-proliferative effects on HT-29 and adenoma cells were obvious concentration- and time- dependent (P < 0.05). 2-6 mmol/L sodium butyrate after 24 h showed 4.3%-12.6% on HT-29 and 5.7%-11.9% on adenoma cells. They reached 23.7%-62.9% and 19%-30.5% after 72 h. In agreement with NS-398 and aspirin, the effect was stronger on NS-398 than on aspirin with the same concentration. 1-20 mmol/L aspirin could inhibit the cell proliferation 18.5%-57.1% after 24 h and 48.5%-76.6% after 72 h, while 0.1-50 µmol/L NS-398 reached 4.5%-24% after 24 h and 52.2%-68.5% after 72 h. The effects were more obvious on the adenoma cells. Treatment with both Sodium butyrate and NSAIDs resulted in an increase in anti-proliferative effects compared with Sodium butyrate treatment alone for HT-29, and the effects were time-dependent (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of growth inhibition effects on HT-29 with Sodium butyrate alone or in combination with NSAIDs (%).
Time2 mmol/L sodium butyrate10 mmol/L aspirin10 umol/L NS - 398Sodium butyrate + aspirinSodium butyrate + NS - 398
24 h4.285510.258.326
72 h23.772.263.981.970.5

But for adenoma cells, the results were different in repeated experiments. Only treatment with Sodium butyrate and NS-398 for 72 h showed the synergistic effects on 28.6% adenoma specimens (P < 0.05).

Moreover, HT-29 cell cycle distribution was analyzed by FCM. Both Sodium butyrate and NSAIDs could arrest the cell cycle in S phase compared with the control (P < 0.05), but the response to G1/G1 or G2 phase was different.

Induction of apoptosis effects was dose-dependent in HT-29

Normal primary culture cells and HT-29 showed irregular polygon-appearances. The cells treated with the drugs shrank and became round, then shad from the wall and floated in the fluid. The floating cells showed blue coloration by trypan blue staining, while the attached cells were achromatical.

As expected, the dose-dependent apoptotic effects on HT-29 cells treated with Sodium butyrate or NSAIDs could be seen (P < 0.05) (Table 3). Sodium butyrate with NS-398 had more preferential apoptotic effects (14.7%) compared with Sodium butyrate alone (10.7%) or Sodium butyrate in combination with aspirin (13.3%).

Table 3 Percentage of HT-29 apoptotic cell rate (%).
ControlAspirin (mmol/L)NS-398 (μmol/L)Sodium butyrate (mmol/L)
Concentration1510200.111050246
Apoptotic rate4.2 ± 1.38.3 ± 1.610.9 ± 2.011.9 ± 2.729.7 ± 3.16 ± 1.47.8 ± 1.712.5 ± 3.119.5 ± 3.410.7 ± 2.515.9 ± 0.923.2 ± 4.1

To confirm the induction of apoptosis, the morphological appearances of HT-29 cells were examined by elecotromicroscopy. Typical apoptotic appearances are shown in Figure 1, which included cell shrinkage, nuclear condensation, and formation of apoptotic bodies, etc.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Morphological appearances of HT -29 cells. A: Typical appearances of apoptotic cells; B: Illustration of apoptotic bodies.
DISCUSSION

In recent years, the incidence of colorectal cancer is increasing in China. Prevention of the disease is a more attractive approach in the early stage of adenoma-cancer progression. Butyrate and NSAIDs (especially highly selective COX-2 inhibitors) have attracted considerable attention recently.

As a byproduct of carbohydrates fermented by symbiotic bacteria, butyrate has been demonstrated its important role in inhibiting cell growth and in inducing apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells in vitro[3]. Clinical case-control and cohort studies have shown a 40%-50% reduction in colorectal cancer-related mortality in individuals taking aspirin and other NSAIDs on a regular basis compared with those not taking these agents[2]. Aspirin serves as a typical representative of classical NSAID agents. As a highly selective COX-2 inhibitor, NS-398 showed higher selective effects than others. Its IC50 (COX-2/COX-1) was 0.0005, while L-745, 337 was 0.003, flosulide was 0.001[4], rofecoxib was 0.0012[5]. Although the precise mechanism underlying the protective effects of NSAIDs is unclear, COX-2 could play a key role in intestinal tumorigenesis[6] and has been a widely recognized target because of its high expression in colorectal adenoma and cancer tissues[7-10]. The COX-2-dependent mechanism involving in increased angiogenesis[11-13], could reduce apoptotic susceptibility by inhibiting the cytochrome c-dependent apoptotic pathway[14]. Down-regulation of bcl2 and CD44v6 expression and up-regulation of nm23 expression[15] could inhibit death receptor 5 expression and confer resistance to tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-induced apoptosis[16]. However, some COX-independent ways, such as lipoxgenase (LOX) another AA metabolic enzyme, could modulate sodium butyrate-induced apoptosis and cell differentiation[17]. Leukotriene (LT) D (4)/CysLT (1) R signaling could facilitate survival of colon cancer cells and LTs were accessible targets for pharmacologic treatment like COX-2[18], NF-KB/I-KB system[19]. Activated Ras and TGF-β could collaborate to increase the invasive response[20], etc, which have been shown to be involved in the protective mechanism. In this study, adenoma cells and HT-29 were investigated whether Sodium butyrate and aspirin/NS-398 were the effective adjuvants for the protective effects.

The relationship between PGE2 (an AA metabolize product) and colorectal carcinogenesis is still disputed. Generally, PGE2 could combine with the transcription factor PPARr, which activates the target gene transcription and promotes carcinogenesis[21]. PGE2 could also increase bcl-2 expression and inhibit cell apoptosis[22] and was involved in the angiogenesis of cancers. So it has been implicated that PGE2 inhibition is the main mechanism of anticarcinogenesis of NSAIDs. But a positive result showed that exogenous PGE2 could not reverse the antineoplastic effects of sulindac sulfone[23]. In this study, PGE2 production was investigated to reflect the COX-2 enzyme activity indirectly. For HT-29, Sodium butyrate could stimulate its PGE2 secretion in a time- and dose-independent manner, suggesting that it could increase its COX-2 enzyme activity. In contrast, NSAIDs inhibited PGE2 production. Although previous evidence displayed that the expression of COX-2 was increased by some NSAIDs and TGF-β [24], we proposed that the inhibited enzyme activity would still down-regulate the effects of NSAIDs.

Sodium butyrate could reduce cell proliferation and induce cell apoptosis in a time- and dose-dependent manner. The possible mechanism has been known to involve in a large number of parameters, including inhibition of histone deacetylase and induction of caspase-3 protease activity with a mitochondrial/cytochrome c-dependent pathway[25] , enhancement of Fas-mediated apoptosis[26], inhibition of P53 expression[25]. Down-regulation of GATA-6 and up-regulation of 15-LO-1 were observed after treatment with sodium butyrate (sodium butyrate), which was also involved in stimulating cell apoptosis and cell differentiation[27]. NSAIDs had the same effects on both cell lines. This was not in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Therefore, it implied that anti-neoplastic mechanisms of NSAIDs were COX-2-dependent and COX-2-independent.

Compared with the effects on adenoma and carcinoma cells, NSAIDs had stronger inhibitory effects on carcinoma cells than on adenoma cells with MTT. Maybe the cause laid in the primarily cultured adenoma cells from different specimens, which resulted in the individual characterization of COX-2 expression and cell proliferation. Other studies gave the same conclusion that NSAIDs had stronger effects on HT-29 carcinoma cells (high COX-2 expression) than on S/KS cells (lack of COX-2 expression).

Previous studies revealed that COX-2 expression up-regulation would induce resistance to apoptosis induced by sodium butyrate. Because NSAIDs could down-regulate COX-2 expression, whether NSAIDs could sensitize the cells to the action of sodium butyrate and reduce the potential side-effects and increase the efficacy by using both drugs was investigated in this study. The data showed that NSAIDs inhibited the growth of HT-29 by sodium butyrate by down-regulating COX-2 expression. It was in agreement with the previous studies. In contrast, other studies reported that cooperation with the two agents was greatly dependent on the category of cell lines and NSAIDs, especially highly selective COX-2 inhibitors showed more preferential effects. Only HT-29 cell line was investigated in this study, so it was necessary to investigate other cell lines for more precise results. Cooperation with the two drugs could affect the two cell lines differently. The effects on HT-29 were completely shown, but only 28.6% was positive for primary adenoma specimens. The main cause depended on the adenoma samples. Additionally, treatment with NS-398 and sodium butyrate had more preferential effects than that with aspirin and sodium butyrate, suggesting that specific selective COX-2 inhibitor NS-398 had a more promising future in clinical application.

In summary, sodium butyrate and NSAIDs could inhibit the cell proliferation and induce cell apoptosis through a number of mechanisms. Combination of two kinds of agents would enhance the above effects by down-regulating COX-2 expression, which could serve as a promising chemoprevention for colorectal neoplasm.

Footnotes

Edited by Wang XL and Wu XN Proofread by Chen WW and Xu FM

References
1.  Young GP, McIntyre A, Albert V, Folino M, Muir JG, Gibson PR. Wheat bran suppresses potato starch--potentiated colorectal tumorigenesis at the aberrant crypt stage in a rat model. Gastroenterology. 1996;110:508-514.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
2.  Smalley WE, DuBois RN. Colorectal cancer and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Adv Pharmacol. 1997;39:1-20.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
3.  Hernandez A, Thomas R, Smith F, Sandberg J, Kim S, Chung DH, Evers BM. Butyrate sensitizes human colon cancer cells to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis. Surgery. 2001;130:265-272.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
4.  Cromlish WA, Kennedy BP. Selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 using intact insect cell assays. Biochem Pharmacol. 1996;52:1777-1785.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
5.  Ehrich EW, Dallob A, De Lepeleire I, Van Hecken A, Riendeau D, Yuan W, Porras A, Wittreich J, Seibold JR, De Schepper P. Characterization of rofecoxib as a cyclooxygenase-2 isoform inhibitor and demonstration of analgesia in the dental pain model. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999;65:336-347.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
6.  Sonoshita M, Takaku K, Oshima M, Sugihara K, Taketo MM. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in fibroblasts and endothelial cells of intestinal polyps. Cancer Res. 2002;62:6846-6849.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
7.  Eberhart CE, Coffey RJ, Radhika A, Giardiello FM, Ferrenbach S, DuBois RN. Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase 2 gene expression in human colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas. Gastroenterology. 1994;107:1183-1188.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
8.  Takeuchi M, Kobayashi M, Ajioka Y, Honma T, Suzuki Y, Azumaya M, Narisawa R, Hayashi S, Asakura H. Comparison of cyclo-oxygenase 2 expression in colorectal serrated adenomas to expression in tubular adenomas and hyperplastic polyps. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2002;17:144-149.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
9.  McEntee MF, Cates JM, Neilsen N. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in spontaneous intestinal neoplasia of domestic dogs. Vet Pathol. 2002;39:428-436.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
10.  Zhang H, Sun XF. Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 correlates with advanced stages of colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1037-1041.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
11.  Chapple KS, Scott N, Guillou PJ, Coletta PL, Hull MA. Interstitial cell cyclooxygenase-2 expression is associated with increased angiogenesis in human sporadic colorectal adenomas. J Pathol. 2002;198:435-441.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
12.  Deng WG, Saunders M, Gilroy D, He XZ, Yeh H, Zhu Y, Shtivelband MI, Ruan KH, Wu KK. Purification and characterization of a cyclooxygenase-2 and angiogenesis suppressing factor produced by human fibroblasts. FASEB J. 2002;16:1286-1288.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
13.  Cianchi F, Cortesini C, Bechi P, Fantappiè O, Messerini L, Vannacci A, Sardi I, Baroni G, Boddi V, Mazzanti R. Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase 2 gene expression correlates with tumor angiogenesis in human colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:1339-1347.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
14.  Sun Y, Tang XM, Half E, Kuo MT, Sinicrope FA. Cyclooxygenase-2 overexpression reduces apoptotic susceptibility by inhibiting the cytochrome c-dependent apoptotic pathway in human colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2002;62:6323-6328.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
15.  Yu HG, Huang JA, Yang YN, Huang H, Luo HS, Yu JP, Meier JJ, Schrader H, Bastian A, Schmidt WE. The effects of acetylsalicylic acid on proliferation, apoptosis, and invasion of cyclooxygenase-2 negative colon cancer cells. Eur J Clin Invest. 2002;32:838-846.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
16.  Tang X, Sun YJ, Half E, Kuo MT, Sinicrope F. Cyclooxygenase-2 overexpression inhibits death receptor 5 expression and confers resistance to tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-induced apoptosis in human colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2002;62:4903-4908.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
17.  Ikawa H, Kamitani H, Calvo BF, Foley JF, Eling TE. Expression of 15-lipoxygenase-1 in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1999;59:360-366.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
18.  Ohd JF, Nielsen CK, Campbell J, Landberg G, Löfberg H, Sjölander A. Expression of the leukotriene D4 receptor CysLT1, COX-2, and other cell survival factors in colorectal adenocarcinomas. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:57-70.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
19.  Yin MJ, Yamamoto Y, Gaynor RB. The anti-inflammatory agents aspirin and salicylate inhibit the activity of I(kappa)B kinase-beta. Nature. 1998;396:77-80.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
20.  Roman CD, Morrow J, Whitehead R, Beauchamp RD. Induction of cyclooxygenase-2 and invasiveness by transforming growth factor-beta(1) in immortalized mouse colonocytes expressing oncogenic Ras. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6:304-309.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
21.  Lefebvre AM, Chen I, Desreumaux P, Najib J, Fruchart JC, Geboes K, Briggs M, Heyman R, Auwerx J. Activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma promotes the development of colon tumors in C57BL/6J-APCMin/+ mice. Nat Med. 1998;4:1053-1057.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
22.  Sheng H, Shao J, Morrow JD, Beauchamp RD, DuBois RN. Modulation of apoptosis and Bcl-2 expression by prostaglandin E2 in human colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 1998;58:362-366.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
23.  Piazza GA, Rahm AL, Krutzsch M, Sperl G, Paranka NS, Gross PH, Brendel K, Burt RW, Alberts DS, Pamukcu R. Antineoplastic drugs sulindac sulfide and sulfone inhibit cell growth by inducing apoptosis. Cancer Res. 1995;55:3110-3116.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
24.  Sheng H, Shao J, O'Mahony CA, Lamps L, Albo D, Isakson PC, Berger DH, DuBois RN, Beauchamp RD. Transformation of intestinal epithelial cells by chronic TGF-beta1 treatment results in downregulation of the type II TGF-beta receptor and induction of cyclooxygenase-2. Oncogene. 1999;18:855-867.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
25.  Medina V, Edmonds B, Young GP, James R, Appleton S, Zalewski PD. Induction of caspase-3 protease activity and apoptosis by butyrate and trichostatin A (inhibitors of histone deacetylase): dependence on protein synthesis and synergy with a mitochondrial/cytochrome c-dependent pathway. Cancer Res. 1997;57:3697-3707.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
26.  Bonnotte B, Favre N, Reveneau S, Micheau O, Droin N, Garrido C, Fontana A, Chauffert B, Solary E, Martin F. Cancer cell sensitization to fas-mediated apoptosis by sodium butyrate. Cell Death Differ. 1998;5:480-487.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
27.  Kamitani H, Kameda H, Kelavkar UP, Eling TE. A GATA binding site is involved in the regulation of 15-lipoxygenase-1 expression in human colorectal carcinoma cell line, caco-2. FEBS Lett. 2000;467:341-347.  [PubMed]  [DOI]