Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2022; 28(22): 2437-2456
Published online Jun 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i22.2437
Figure 1
Figure 1 Structure of 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid. The molecular formula for 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid is C30H46O4, and the molecular weight is 470.68.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Effect of 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid on survival rate of GES-1 cells and proliferation of MGC80-3 and BGC-823 cells detected by CCK-8 method. A: GES-1 cells; B: BGC-823 cells; C: MGC80-3 cells; D: IC50 values of 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid (18β-GRA) for BGC-823 cells and MGC80-3 cells after 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h; E and F: Inhibition rate of 18β-GRA acid at different concentrations on BGC-823 and MGC80-3 cell proliferation. All analyses were repeated three times. The data is represented as the mean ± SD. aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01; cP < 0.001. 18β-GRA: 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Effects of different concentrations of 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid on gastric carcinoma cell cycle. A and B: Cell cycle and statistical graph of BGC-823 cells; C and D: Cell cycle and statistical graph of MGC80-3 cells. All analyses were repeated three times. The data is represented as the mean ± SD. aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01; cP < 0.001. 18β-GRA: 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Effects of different concentrations of 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid on gastric carcinoma cell apoptosis. A and B: Cell apoptosis and statistics graph of BGC-823 cells; C and D: Cell apoptosis and statistics graph of MGC80-3 cells. All analyses were repeated three times. The data is represented as the mean ± SD. aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01; cP < 0.001. 18β-GRA: 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Effects of different concentrations of 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid on invasion of human gastric carcinoma cells. A and B: Invasion ability of BGC-823 cells measured by Transwell of Matrigel matrix gel and the statistical graph; C and D: Invasion ability of MGC80-3 cells and statistical graph. All analyses were repeated three times. The data is represented as the mean ± SD. aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01; cP < 0.001. 18β-GRA: 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Effects of different concentrations of 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid on migration of human gastric carcinoma cells. A and B: Migration ability of BGC-823 cells determined by Transwell assay without Matrigel matrix gel and statistical graph; C and D: Migration ability of MGC80-3 cells and statistical graph. All analyses were repeated three times. The data is represented as the mean ± SD. aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01; cP < 0.001. 18β-GRA: 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Effects of different concentrations of 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid on migration of human gastric carcinoma cells. A and B: Effect of 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid (18β-GRA) on migration of BGC-823 cells evaluated by Wound-scratch assay and statistical graph; C and D: Effect of 18β-GRA on the migration of MGC80-3 cells and statistical graph. All analyses were repeated three times. The data is represented as the mean ± SD. aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01; cP < 0.001. 18β-GRA: 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid.
Figure 8
Figure 8 Effect of 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid on tumor size in nude mice. A: Nude mouse gastric carcinoma xenograft model; B: Subcutaneously transplanted tumor in nude mice. n = 6; C: Tumor growth curve of transplanted tumor model; D: Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the expression level of MRPL35 in the transplanted tumor tissues of mice. aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01; cP < 0.001. 18β-GRA: 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid.
Figure 9
Figure 9 Volcano plot of differentially expressed proteins and Gene Ontology annotation analysis. A: Volcano plot of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). The horizontal axis is the relative quantitative value of protein after log2 conversion, and the vertical axis is the P value of difference significance test after -log10 conversion; B: Gene Ontology (GO) annotation analysis of DEPs. The number of DEPs categorized as biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components; C: GO enrichment analysis of DEPs. The Y axis denotes the GO functional classification enriched by the DEPs, and the X axis denotes the −log10 of the P value of Fisher’s exact test of the significance of the enrichment; D: KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. The Y axis denotes the categories of KEGG pathways. The X axis is the −log10 of the P value of Fisher’s exact test of the significance of enrichment.
Figure 10
Figure 10  Differentially expressed proteins. A: Subcellular localization chart of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs); B: Protein domain enrichment analysis. The Y axis denotes the categories of the protein domain. The X axis denotes the enrichment score [−log(P value)]; C: Heatmap of the MRPL35, TP53, BCL2L1, and so on. The X-coordinate stands for the DEPs, while Y-coordinate stands for different groups; D: Network analysis of MRPL35, TP53, and BCL2L1. The connection was illustrated using the web-based tool STRING.
Figure 11
Figure 11  Validation of proteomics results using Western blot analysis of MRPL35, TP53, BCL2L1, COPS5, BAX, and BAD in cells treated with different concentrations of 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid for 48 h. β-tubulin was used as the loading control. A: MRPL35; B: TP53; C: BCL2L1; D: COPS5; E: BAX; F: BAD n = 4, aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01; cP < 0.001. 18β-GRA: 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid; MRPL35: Mitochondrial Ribosomal Protein L35.