Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of detailed structures of pancreatic cystic neoplasms

doi:10.3748/wjg.v23.i17.3184

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 23, Issue 17

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (7079)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

604

WORD

293

HTML

3453

Figures (1-2)

189

Tables (1-4)

146

Sum=4685

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

830

Download

1563

Sum=2393

May 7, 2017 (publication date) through Apr 26, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (29)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Prospective Study

World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2017; 23(17): 3184-3192
Published online May 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i17.3184

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms by pathology and imaging.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. A: EUS view. The mother cyst of 4.6 cm × 3.8 cm in the pancreatic tail consisted of two daughter cysts. B: CT image. No daughter cyst was revealed by CT in the same patient. C: MRI image. No daughter cyst was revealed by MRI in the same patient. EUS: Endoscopic ultrasound; CT: Computed tomography; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging.

Citation: Du C, Chai NL, Linghu EQ, Li HK, Sun LH, Jiang L, Wang XD, Tang P, Yang J. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of detailed structures of pancreatic cystic neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(17): 3184-3192
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i17/3184.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i17.3184