Randomized Clinical Trial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2016; 22(23): 5430-5435
Published online Jun 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i23.5430
Figure 1
Figure 1 Patient flow.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Frequency of heartburn evaluated using patient’ questionnaires. Data are shown as a boxplot. In both groups, the frequency of heartburn was reduced after initial treatment, bP < 0.01.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Change in heartburn frequency after initial treatment. Data are shown as a boxplot. There were no significant difference between the lafutidine group and the lansoprazole group (P = 0.26).
Figure 4
Figure 4 Severity of heartburn evaluated using visual analog scale scores. Data are expressed as means ± SE. VAS scores in the lafutidine group were significantly worse than in the lansoprazole group (P = 0.016, ANOVA for repeated measures). VAS: Visual analog scale.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Sum score of question 2 and question 3 in the GSRS score. Data are expressed as means ± SE. VAS scores in the lafutidine group were significantly worse than in the lansoprazole group (P = 0.0068, ANOVA for repeated measures). VAS: Visual analog scale.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Satisfaction score evaluated using visual analog scale scores. Data are expressed as means ± SE. VAS scores in the lafutidine group were significantly worse than the lansoprazole group (P = 0.0048, ANOVA for repeated measures). VAS: Visual analog scale.