Clinical Trials Study
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2014; 20(47): 17985-17992
Published online Dec 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17985
Figure 1
Figure 1 Ultrasonic liver image with hepatic/renal ratio and hepatic echo-intensity attenuation rate. A: Ultrasonic liver image with hepatic/renal ratio. ROI-1 and ROI-2 stands for the echo gray histograms of the liver and kidney cortex ROIs; B: Ultrasonic liver image with hepatic echo-intensity attenuation rate. ROI-1 and ROI-2 stands for the near-field and far-field echo gray histograms of the liver. ROI: Region of interest.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Linear correlation analysis between 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy liver fat content and ultrasound hepatic/renal ratio (A), and hepatic echo-intensity attenuation rate (B). The illustration shows that the 1H-MRS liver fat content that was determined significantly correlated with (A) the ultrasound hepatic/renal ratio (r = 0.952, P = 0.000) and (B) the hepatic echo-intensity attenuation rate (r = 0.850, P = 0.000). MRS: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy.