Healing time of incision infection after hepatobiliary surgery treated by needle-free incision suture closure

doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15815

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 20, Issue 42

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (5345)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

349

WORD

229

HTML

2693

Figures (1-3)

226

Sum=3497

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

991

Download

857

Sum=1848

Nov 14, 2014 (publication date) through Apr 26, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (1)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Observational Study

World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2014; 20(42): 15815-15819
Published online Nov 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15815

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Wound site before closure.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Closure of the infection wound using needle-free incision suture closure.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Healing time in patients with incision infection. The wound healing time in the needle-free incision suture closure (NFISC) group was significantly shorter than that in the traditional butterfly bandage group (BB group) and secondary suture group (SS group). Healing time in the butterfly bandage group appeared to be slightly shorter than that in the secondary suture group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). ^aP < 0.05 vs BB group and SS group.

Citation: Ma WJ, Zhou Y, Mao H, Xu RH, Shrestha A, Li FY, Lorance A, Yang Q, Zhang YQ, Jiang T, Feng H, Zhang W, Cheng NS. Healing time of incision infection after hepatobiliary surgery treated by needle-free incision suture closure. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(42): 15815-15819
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i42/15815.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15815