Case Report
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2014; 20(33): 11904-11909
Published online Sep 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i33.11904
Figure 1
Figure 1 Diagnostic imaging before the first operation. A: Computed tomography showed a low density area (approximately 6 cm) in the pancreas tail (arrow); B: Positron emission tomography-computed tomography showed abnormal uptake of fluorodeoxy glucose (asterisk) in the low density area observed on computed tomography; C: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography showed irregular dilatation of the main pancreatic duct in the body and tail.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Diagnostic imaging before the second operation. A: Computed tomography showed a low density area at the uncus of the pancreas (arrow); B: Endoscopic ultrasound showed a 3 cm hypoechoic mass (asterisk) at the main pancreatic duct near the common bile duct (arrowhead); C: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography showed the presence of inferior common bile duct stenosis.
Figure 3
Figure 3 The resected specimen and pathological findings from the first operation. A: The resected specimen had a cystic lesion with a solid component; B: HE staining showed a mucus-type epithelium with an extension of intraductal papillary growth of the tumor cells. Scarce mucus-producing cells were also present (HE, × 40).
Figure 4
Figure 4 Immunohistochemical and pathological findings from the first operation. A: α1-antitrypsin (× 100): regions of both strongly positive and weakly positive cells were present; B: Mucin5AC (× 100): only part of the tumor was positive; C: Carcinoembryonic antigen (× 100): a portion of the tumor was positive; D: Alcian blue (× 100): staining was positive in the region with poor mucus production.
Figure 5
Figure 5 The resected specimen and pathological findings from the second operation. A: The resected specimen from the second operation showed a 3 cm solid mass in the head of the pancreas; B: There was a region with acinar-like structures (bottom right) that showed papillary growth (upper left) (HE, × 40); C: Dysplastic cells with poor mucus production exhibited papillary proliferation (HE, × 200); D: Acinar structures and cell division were observed (HE, × 400).
Figure 6
Figure 6 Immunohistochemical and pathological findings from the second operation. A: α1-antitrypsin (× 40): the acinar structure in the lower right area was strongly positive; B: Mucin5AC (× 40): only a small part of the tumor was positively stained; C: Carcinoembryonic antigen (× 40): only a portion of the area was positively stained; D: Mucin1 (× 40): some positive staining was observed.